Skip to main content

Dietary supplementation with branched-chain amino acids enhances milk production by lactating sows and the growth of suckling piglets

Abstract

Background

Under current dietary regimens, milk production by lactating sows is insufficient to sustain the maximal growth of their piglets. As precursors of glutamate and glutamine as well as substrates and activators of protein synthesis, branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) have great potential for enhancing milk production by sows.

Methods

Thirty multiparous sows were assigned randomly into one of three groups: control (a corn- and soybean meal-based diet), the basal diet + 1.535% BCAAs; and the basal diet + 3.07% BCAAs. The ratio (g/g) among the supplemental L-isoleucine, L-leucine and L-valine was 1.00:2.56:1.23. Diets were made isonitrogenous by the addition of appropriate amounts of L-alanine. Lactating sows had free access to drinking water and their respective diets. The number of live-born piglets was standardized to 9 per sow at d 0 of lactation (the day of parturition). On d 3, 15 and 29 of lactation, body weights and milk consumption of piglets were measured, and blood samples were obtained from sows and piglets 2 h and 1 h after feeding and nursing, respectively.

Results

Feed intake did not differ among the three groups of sows. Concentrations of asparagine, glutamate, glutamine, citrulline, arginine, proline,  BCAAs, and many other amino acids  were greater (P < 0.05) in the plasma of BCAA-supplemented sows and their piglets than those in the control group. Compared with the control, dietary supplementation with 1.535% and 3.07% BCAAs increased (P < 0.05) concentrations of free and protein-bound BCAAs, glutamate plus glutamine, aspartate plus asparagine, and many other amino acids in milk; milk production by 14% and 21%, respectively; daily weight gains of piglets by 19% and 28%, respectively, while reducing preweaning mortality rates by 50% and 70%, respectively.

Conclusion

Dietary supplementation with up to 3.07% BCAAs enhanced milk production by lactating sows, and the growth and survival of their piglets.

Introduction

The major goal of the swine industry is to minimize neonatal mortality and improve weaning weights of neonatal pigs because their adaptability to weaning and their rates of growth to market weight are positively affected by weaning weight [1]. The total net profit of a swine production unit is primarily determined by both the number and size of piglets produced per year per sow [2]. Recent attempts to increase litter size have led to increased prevalence of low-birth-weight piglets [3, 4], which results in a higher rate of mortality and a longer period of time to reach an optimum market weight, when compared with normal-birth-weight piglets [5, 6]. Pork quality is also affected by birth weight to a large extent because of alterations in muscle metabolism [3]. The greatest proportion of mortality in commercial swine production occurs prior to weaning and ranges between 10% and 20% of live-born pigs [4, 7]. For example, the rates of pre-weaning mortality of piglets in U.S. commercial swine herds were 15.0% for the mean live-born litter size of 9.4 in 1992 [8] and 15.4% for the mean live-born litter size of 13.5 in 2020 [9] due to multiple factors including low birth weight, the inadequate provision of milk, intestinal dysfunction, physical (particularly muscular) weakness, and crushing by the sow [1, 10].

Insufficient intake of dietary amino acids (AAs) limits milk production by lactating sows [11, 12]. For example, increasing the content of crude protein (CP; 23% vs. 16.2%) and all proteinogenic AAs, including branched-chain AAs (BCAAs; e.g., 4.61% vs. 2.28%) in the diet of lactating sows enhances milk yield and piglet growth [13]. It is unknown whether this effect is due to specific AAs or simply total AA nitrogen. Results from several studies indicate that dietary supplementation with valine [14,15,16,17] or isoleucine [18], but not leucine [16], increase the litter weight of suckling piglets. BCAAs are major AA components of milk protein [19, 20], and also provide the amino group for the synthesis of glutamate, glutamine, aspartate and asparagine [21], all of which are abundant AAs in milk [22]. To date, dietary supplementation with a single BCAA to sows has yielded inconsistent results on milk production [14,15,16] possibly due to an imbalance of the three BCAAs in diets [23]. For example, dietary supplementation of lactating sows with 0.4% isoleucine enhanced the growth of suckling piglets when the ratio of isoleucine to leucine in the complete diet was 0.88 [14], but isoleucine failed to exert a beneficial effect when the ratio of isoleucine to leucine in the complete diet was 0.55 [16]. By contrast, increasing the ratio of total valine to total lysine in the diet (containing 0.71% standardized ileal digestible lysine) of the lactating sow nursing 14 piglets from 0.84 to 0.91 did not affect the preweaning mortality and average daily weight gain of the litter, litter weight at weaning, average milk yield, and the concentrations of fat, protein and lactose in milk [24]. Currently there is no information about the effects of dietary supplementation with leucine plus isoleucine plus valine versus an isonitrogenous control on lactation performance in any mammals (including sows).

L-Leucine activates the mechanistic target of rapamycin (MTOR) cell signaling pathway to stimulate protein synthesis in skeletal muscle [24,25,26] and mammary epithelial cells [27]. We recently reported that physiological concentrations of L-valine also stimulated the MTOR signaling and protein synthesis but inhibited proteolysis in porcine mammary epithelial cells [28]. We hypothesized that a proper mixture of BCAAs would increase milk synthesis in the mammary tissue of lactating sows, thereby improving neonatal growth, development and survival. The present study tested this hypothesis by determining effects of BCAA supplementation to lactating sows on: the preweaning growth and survival of the litter, the yield and nutrient composition of milk, and the concentrations of biochemical metabolites in the plasma of sows and piglets.

Materials and methods

Animals housing and management for feeding trials

The experimental protocol for this study was approved by the Texas A&M University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Thirty multiparous sows (Yorkshire × Landrace; 12 sows at parity 2 (approximately 16 months of age and an average BW of 152 kg) and 18 sows at parity 3 (approximately 22 months of age and an average BW of 173 kg)) were housed individually in 1.8 m × 2.5 m pens with plastic coated perforated flooring. During the entire gestation, they were fed 2 kg/d of a corn- and soybean meal-based diet containing 12.0% CP and 3083 kcal/kg metabolizable energy [29]. Immediately after farrowing (d 0), the sows were assigned randomly to one of three groups, and fed a corn- and soybean meal-based diet (Table 1) supplemented with 0 (control), 1.535% (0.32% L-isoleucine plus 0.82% L-leucine plus 0.395% L-valine), or 3.07% BCAAs (0.64% L-isoleucine plus 1.64% L-leucine plus 0.79% L-valine). The basal diet contained 3.20% total BCAAs, and its nutrient composition was analyzed as we described [20]. The content of AAs in all the three formulated experimental diets was determined and verified as we described [20] before feeding to sows. There were 10 sows per treatment group (4 sows at parity 2 and 6 sows at parity 3). Diets were provided to sows twice a day (3 kg/meal; 6 kg/d) and they had free access to drinking water. No sow consumed all the 6-kg diet on each day of lactation. The supplemental doses of BCAAs were based on the following rationale to prevent an imbalance among BCAAs. First, the ratios of isoleucine:leucine:valine in the lumen of the jejunum of lactating sows fed a typical corn- and soybean meal-based diet were determined to be 1.00:2.56:1.23 [30]. The concentrations of BCAAs in the lumen of the jejunum (the main site of AA absorption) result from the balance among dietary AA intake, intestinal AA secretion, and intestinal microbial metabolism. We considered that these ratios of BCAAs would not affect their absorption by the enterocytes of the small intestine. Second, the content of leucine in the basal diet was 1.64%. Thus, the supplemental doses of 0.82% and 1.64% leucine amounted to 50% and 100% of the leucine content in the basal diet. Diets were made isonitrogenous and isoenergetic by the addition of appropriate amounts of L-alanine at the expense of corn starch (Table 2). Supplemental AAs were obtained from Ajinomoto Co., Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). Before feeding sows, complete diets were mixed thoroughly using a Hobart feed mixer.

Table 1 Composition of the basal diet for lactating sows on an as-fed basis
Table 2 Supplemental branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) and L-alanine (the isonitrogenous control) to the basal corn-soybean diet1

On the day of farrowing (d = 0), cross fostering of newborn pigs was performed to minimize within-litter variation, and the number of piglets per sow was standardized to nine, yielding a total of 270 piglets for this experiment. The number of male and female piglets per treatment group was the same. The ambient temperature in the farrowing facility was maintained at 26 °C throughout the trial. Heat lamps were used to provide heat to neonatal pigs in each pen. Feed intake of the sows was recorded daily. Teeth of piglets were clipped and their tails docked at d 3 of age. At this age, each piglet was also ear notched for identification and given an intramuscular iron dextran injection (200 mg/piglet). On d 0, 3, 15 and 29 of lactation, all sows and piglets were weighed. We did not obtain the baseline information on metabolites in milk as well as maternal and neonatal plasma on d 0 of lactation to avoid possible negative effects of milk- and blood- sampling procedures on sows and newborn pigs. During the entire experiment, piglets had no access to the feed provided to sows and were not provided with any creep feed or milk replacer. The growth performance and survival rates of piglets were determined.

Collection of blood samples from sows and piglets

Heparinized tubes were used to draw blood from sows and piglets on d 3, 15, and 29 of lactation. Specifically, blood samples (10 mL) were obtained from all sows via the caudal auricular vein in the ear 2 h post-feeding, and blood samples (2 mL) were obtained from two randomly selected piglets in each litter via the jugular vein 1 h after nursing. Blood samples were immediately centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 1 min, and the supernatant fluid (plasma) stored at − 80 °C for subsequent analyses.

Collection of milk from sows

To obtain milk samples, 20 IU oxytocin was administered via the ear vein of sows to induce milk letdown into the teat canal and milk was expressed manually [20]. Milk samples (50 mL/gland) were collected from three different mammary glands (front, middle, and rear). Equal volumes of milk (10 mL) from each gland of a sow were mixed, and the samples stored at − 80 °C for subsequent analyses.

Milk consumption of piglets

Milk consumption of piglets was determined between 10:00 (the initial isolation of piglets from sows) and 20:00 (the last measurement) using the weigh-suckle-weigh method as previously described [31]. Briefly, on d 3, 15, and 29 of lactation, after blood sampling, piglets were separated from their mothers every 2 h and then returned to the sows for 1-h nursing. Piglets in the same litter were weighed as a group before and after nursing to calculate milk intake. This same procedure was performed five times and applied to all litters.

Proximate analysis of milk composition

The frozen whole-milk samples were thawed at 4 °C, and then used for determination of total milk fat, CP, dry matter (DM), and ash according to AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC) procedures [32]. Additionally, protein was determined by the modified Lowry procedure using purified porcine immunoglobulin G (IgG) as the standard [20]. Milk lactose was determined using the colorimetric method of Marier and Boulet [33] that involved the reaction with phenol and sulfuric acid and then reading against the blank at 490 nm. Total milk lipids were extracted using a mixture of isopropylalcohol:heptane:0.5 mol/L H2SO4 [34].

Analysis of free AAs in plasma

Plasma samples (0.5 mL) were deproteinized with an equal volume of 1.5 mol/L HClO4 and neutralized with 0.25 mL of 2 mol/L K2CO3. The neutralized samples were analyzed for free AAs by HPLC methods involving precolumn derivatization with o-phthaldialdehyde [35].

Analysis of free and protein-bound AAs in milk

For analysis of free AAs, milk samples (0.5 mL) were deproteinized with an equal volume of 1.5 mol/L HClO4 and neutralized with 0.25 mL of 2 mol/L K2CO3. The neutralized samples were analyzed for free AAs, as described above. Composition of protein-bound AAs in milk was determined as described by Dai et al. [36].

Analysis of glucose, ammonia, urea, lactate, pyruvate and ketone bodies in plasma and milk

Deproteinized and neutralized plasma or milk samples were analyzed for glucose, ammonia, urea, lactate, pyruvate, and ketone bodies by enzymatic methods [37, 38]. The enzymes were hexokinase, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, glutamate dehydrogenase, urease, lactate dehydrogenase, and β-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase for the assays of glucose, ammonia plus urea, lactate plus pyruvate, acetoacetate plus β-hydroxybutyrate, respectively.

Determination of plasma thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS)

To evaluate the oxidative status of sows and piglets, their plasma was analyzed for TBARS. Thiobarbituric acid forms a reaction with malondialdehyde (a naturally occurring product of lipid peroxidation) under high temperature and acidic conditions and can be measured colorimetrically [39]. The technical procedure was performed as recommended by the manufacturer (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Briefly, 100 μL of thawed plasma was placed into a labeled glass tube and mixed with the reagents of the commercial kit (Cayman Chemical, Cat # 10009055). Each tube was capped and incubated at 95 °C for 60 min. The tubes were then cooled in an ice bath for 10 min. Thereafter, the tubes were centrifuged at 1100 × g for 15 min and the supernatant fluid was obtained for the measurement absorbance at 530–540 nm.

Statistical analysis

Results are expressed as means ± pooled SEM. Data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and the Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparison, as we described [40]. The two factors were treatment (BCAA supplementation) and lactation day. Our web-based statistical program is freely available online at https://houssein-assaad.shinyapps.io/TwoWayANOVA/. Data on the rates of piglet mortality were analyzed by X2-analysis [41]. Values of P ≤ 0.05 are taken to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Feed intake and body weights of lactating sows

There were no differences (P > 0.05) in feed intake by sows among groups, which was approximately 32 g/kg BW per day throughout the 29-d period of lactation (Table 3). With advanced lactation, sows mobilized body reserves to provide nutrients for milk production. On the day of farrowing, body weights of sows did not differ (P > 0.05) among the three treatment groups (Table 4). However, on d 29 of lactation, sows in the 3.07% BCAA group were heavier (P < 0.05) than those in the control and 1.535% BCAA groups (Table 4). Overall, sows in the control and 1.535% BCAA groups lost (P < 0.05) 26 and 16 kg body weight between d 0 and 29 of lactation, respectively, whereas there was no difference (P > 0.05) in the body weights of sows in the 3.07% BCAA group during the same period (Table 4). Most (approximately 60%) of the weight losses in sows occurred during the fourth week of lactation.

Table 3 Effects of supplementing branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) to the diets of sows on their feed intake and the milk consumption of piglets during lactation
Table 4 Effects of supplementing branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) to the diets of sows on body weights of sows and piglets as well as their weight changes during lactation

Milk intake, growth and mortality of sow-reared piglets

Milk intake of piglets was 16.5% and 20.5% greater (P < 0.05) in the 1.535% and 3.07% BCAA groups, respectively, compared with control piglets (Table 3). Piglet BW at d 0 of lactation did not differ (P > 0.05) among treatment groups (Table 4). However, the BW of piglets nursed by sows fed the BCAA-supplemented diets during lactation were greater (P < 0.01) at d 15 and 29 of lactation, compared with piglets from control-fed sows. Average daily weight gains of piglets from sows fed the BCAA-supplemented diets during lactation were consistently greater (P < 0.01) throughout the 29-d lactation period, compared with piglets from control-fed sows (Table 4). Piglets in the 3.07% BCAA group had a greater weight gain (P < 0.01) than piglets in the 1.535% BCAA group. Of note, the rates of preweaning mortality of piglets in the 1.535% and 3.07% BCAA groups were 50% and 33% (P < 0.05) of the value for the control group, respectively (Table 5).

Table 5 Effects of supplementing branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) to the diets of sows on the rates of mortality of sow-reared piglets during lactation

Milk composition (proximate analysis)

Concentrations of DM, CP, fat, carbohydrates (including lactose), and minerals were higher (P < 0.01) in milk from BCAA-supplemented sows as compared to control sows (Table 6). Lactose accounted for 89.3% to 89.8% of total carbohydrate in each group. Composition of milk did not differ (P > 0.05) between the 1.535% and 3.07% BCAA groups. Concentrations of DM, fat and CP in milk were greater (P < 0.05) on d 3 than on d 15 or d 29 of lactation, but did not differ (P > 0.05) between d 15 and 29 of lactation. There was no treatment × day interaction effect (P > 0.05) on milk composition based on proximate analysis (Table 6).

Table 6 Effects of supplementing branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) to the diets of sows on the proximate composition of their milk during lactation

Concentrations of AAs in the plasma of sows and piglets

Concentrations of AAs in plasma of sows and piglets at d 3, 15 and 29 of lactation are summarized in Tables 7 and 8, respectively. BCAA supplementation to sows resulted in greater (P < 0.001) concentrations of Pro, BCAAs, citrulline, Arg, Asp, Glu and Gln in plasma, compared with values for sows in the control group. Except for Asn, β-Ala and Lys, concentrations of all other AAs in the plasma from sows were greater (P < 0.05) for the 3.07% BCAA group than the 1.535% BCAA group (Table 7). The effect of day of lactation was significant (P < 0.05) for all AAs in plasma from sows except for Cys, Glu, Gln, Gly, Lys, Met, Pro and Tau. However, no treatment × day effect was detected for any AAs except Asn in the plasma of sows. Similar results were obtained for concentrations of AAs in plasma from piglets (Table 8).

Table 7 Effects of supplementing branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) to the diets of sows on the concentrations of free amino acids and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) in their plasma during lactation
Table 8 Effects of supplementing branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) to the diets of sows on the concentrations of free amino acids and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) in the plasma of sow-reared piglets during lactation

Concentrations of free and protein-bound AAs in milk

Concentrations of most free AAs, including Ala, Arg, Asp, Asn, Cit, Glu, Gln, BCAAs and Pro, were greater (P < 0.05) in milk from BCAA-supplemented, as compared with the control sows (Table 9). Except for Ala and Trp, the abundance of all free AAs was greatest in milk from sows in the 3.07% BCAA group (Table 9). There was a significant effect (P < 0.05) of day on concentrations of all free AAs in milk, but a treatment × day interaction effect was detected only for Gln and Ser (Table 9). Concentrations of all protein-bound AAs were greater (P < 0.01) in milk of BCAA-supplemented sows, compared with control sows (Table 10). Concentrations of all protein-bound AAs were affected by day of lactation (P < 0.05). There was no treatment × day effect (P > 0.05) for any AA in milk protein (Table 10).

Table 9 Effects of supplementing branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) to the diets of sows on the composition of free amino acids in their milk during lactation
Table 10 Effects of supplementing branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) to the diets of sows on the composition of protein-bound amino acids in their milk during lactation

Metabolites in the plasma of sows and piglets and in milk

Effects of BCAA supplementation on concentrations of ammonia, urea, glucose, lactate and pyruvate in the plasma of sows and piglets and in sow’s milk are summarized in Table 11. Concentrations of glucose were greater (P < 0.05) in the plasma from BCAA-supplemented sows (P = 0.018) and from piglets nursed by those sows (P < 0.001) than sows and piglets in the control group. No differences in concentrations of glucose in milk were detected among the three groups of sows (P > 0.05). BCAA supplementation did not affect (P > 0.05) concentrations of ammonia, urea, lactate or pyruvate either in the plasma of sows and piglets or in sow’s milk. Concentrations of lactate in plasma and milk from sows increased (P < 0.05) as lactation advanced, but there were no changes (P > 0.05) in other measured metabolites. No treatment × day of lactation interaction had an effect on concentrations of ammonia, urea, lactate or pyruvate in plasma from sows and piglets or in milk from d 3, 15 or 29 of lactation (P > 0.05). Acetoacetate and β-hydroxybutyrate were not detected in the ×2.5-diluted plasma of sows and piglets or in milk on the same days of lactation (detection limit = 25 μmol/L).

Table 11 Effects of supplementing branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) to the diets of sows on the concentrations of metabolites in the plasma of sows and piglets and in milk during lactation

Concentrations of TBARS in the plasma of sows and piglets

Concentrations of TBARS in the plasma of sows increased (P < 0.001) as lactation progressed (Table 7), but the opposite changes were detected in plasma from piglets (Table 8). BCAA supplementation reduced (P = 0.004) the concentrations of TBARS in plasma from sows compared with control sows (Table 7). Concentrations of TBARS in plasma from piglets did not differ (P > 0.05) among the three treatment groups (Table 8).

Discussion

The mammary gland undergoes metabolic and histological changes during lactation [42, 43]. During lactation, sows are capable of utilizing nutrients from the arterial circulation for milk production [44, 45]. However, due to an increased metabolic rate and a reduced feed intake of lactating sows, they cannot meet the nutritional requirements for milk production, thereby leading to a catabolic state in which their body reserves are mobilized to provide precursors and energy for milk production [1]. This results in a substantial weight loss for lactating sows, which can negatively affect their subsequent reproductive performance [46]. In the present study, we supplemented the diet of lactating sows (fed a conventional diet) with a mixture of L-leucine, L-isoleucine and L-valine in proportion to their physiological ratios in the lumen of their small intestine so as to prevent an imbalance among BCAAs. Results of the present study demonstrated that supplementing 1.535% and 3.07% BCAAs to the typical corn- and soybean meal-based diet of multiparous sows during the entire 29-d lactation period reduced their weight loss, while increasing milk yield as well as concentrations of total AAs, lipids and lactose in milk, and also improved piglet growth performance and survival. Therefore, findings of the present study provide a new and effective strategy for nutritional management of lactating sows. To our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating effects of dietary supplementation with a mixture of BCAAs (without increasing dietary protein levels) on the lactational performance of lactating sows and associated effects on the enhanced growth and reduced mortality of preweaning piglets, as compared to an isonitrogenous control.

Lactating mammals extensively degrade BCAAs [47, 48]; therefore, there are increased requirements for dietary BCAAs by lactating sows to support their milk production [49]. There are reports that supplementing L-valine to the corn- and soybean-based diets of lactating sows enhanced milk yield and piglet growth. For example, Richert et al. [15] found that litter weaning weight and litter weight gain in high-producing lactating sows increased as the total content of valine and isoleucine in the diet increased from 0.72% to 1.42% and from 0.50% to 1.2%, respectively. Also, increasing total valine content from 0.61% to 1.15% in the diet for lactating sows nursing 10 or more piglets increased litter preweaning weights [18]. This beneficial effect of dietary valine (an augmentation from 0.75% to 1.15% valine) on lactation was confirmed by Moser et al. [16]. Furthermore, Paulicks et al. [17] observed that supplementing up to 1% valine to a corn- and soybean meal-based diet containing 0.45% valine for lactating sows increased milk production and total milk protein content, in comparison with the control group.

Research with lactating sows and cows has shown that effects of dietary supplementation with leucine or valine on milk yield and composition depend on the doses of the supplemental AA and the balance of dietary BCAAs. For example, supplementing either 0.4% leucine to a corn- and soybean-based diet containing 1.57% leucine or 0.4% isoleucine to a basal diet containing 0.68% isoleucine for lactating sows did not affect their milk production or piglet growth [16]. Results of other studies also indicated that the lactation performance of sows was not affected by supplementing (a) 0.26–0.37% valine to a corn- and soybean meal-based diet containing 0.61% valine, 0.58% isoleucine, and 0.95% leucine [15]; (b) 0.4% isoleucine to the basal diet containing 0.68% isoleucine, 0.8% valine, and 1.57% leucine [18]; (c) 0.4% leucine to the basal diet containing 1.57% leucine, 0.8% valine, and 0.68% isoleucine [18]; or (d) by increasing the total dietary valine:lysine ratio from 0.84 to 0.91 [24]. Interestingly, the duodenal infusion of 40 g/d leucine to lactating cows increased concentrations of casein, whey proteins, and total proteins in milk, compared with 0 g/d leucine [50]. However, the duodenal infusion of 40, 80 and 120 g/d leucine to lactating cows dose-dependently reduced milk fat and lactose yields in comparison with 0 g/d leucine, whereas the duodenal infusion of 80 g/d leucine decreased the total protein yield and the true-protein content of milk compared with 40 g/d leucine [50]. Because BCAAs share the same transmembrane transporters and the initial enzymes for catabolism [51], ratios of leucine, isoleucine and valine, as well as the content of other AAs and nutrients in the complete diet may affect lactational performance. To prevent a BCAA imbalance resulting from the addition of one single BCAA to the ration, dietary supplementation with all the three BCAAs in proper ratios provides a more effective strategy to improve milk production in sows and perhaps other mammals.

Voluntary feed intake of sows was not affected by dietary supplementation with up to 3.07% BCAAs (Table 3). As reported previously [52], the body weight of sows was markedly reduced with advanced lactation (Table 4). Interestingly, dietary supplementation with 1.535% BCAAs and 3.07% BCAAs reduced the weight loss of sows in a dose-dependent manner (Table 4), which may be attributed to effects of BCAAs (mainly leucine and valine) to stimulate muscle protein synthesis and inhibit muscle proteolysis during catabolic conditions [28, 51, 53], and those effects may enhance the subsequent reproductive performance of sows. In the present study, we did not measure the component of weight loss (e.g., protein, fats, and/or minerals) in lactating sows, but the loss likely occurred primarily in white adipose tissue and secondarily in skeletal muscle [52]. It is likely that by activating the MTOR cell signaling pathway, dietary BCAA supplementation improves the efficiency of the utilization of dietary nutrients for milk production.

Approximately 40% to 45% of dietary BCAAs are utilized by the small intestine of sows in the first pass [23]. Because the degradation of BCAAs in the liver is limited due to its low BCAA transaminase activity [22], most of the BCAAs that enter the portal circulation bypasses this organ to become available for utilization by other tissues, including skeletal muscle and mammary glands [11, 54]. Skeletal muscle of lactating mammals actively transports extracellular BCAAs and converts them into BCKAs and glutamate [22]. Glutamate is subsequently amidated with NH4+ to form glutamine and undergoes transamination with pyruvate and oxaloacetate to yield alanine and aspartate, respectively [22, 51]. Aspartate is then amidated by asparagine synthetase (an ATP- and glutamine-dependent cytosolic enzyme) to form asparagine [51]. This explains why dietary BCAA supplementation increased concentrations of glutamate, glutamine, alanine, and asparagine in the plasma of lactating sows. Utilization of arterial glutamine by the small intestine of lactating sows is expected to promote the intestinal synthesis of citrulline (the precursor of arginine), thereby contributing to an increase in the concentrations of both citrulline and arginine in maternal blood (Table 7).

Besides skeletal muscle and small intestine, the mammary gland of sows takes up and catabolizes large amounts of extracellular BCAAs [22, 55]. For example, during lactation, 76–80 g/d BCAAs are utilized by the mammary gland, with 46–53 g/d BCAAs being secreted in milk [56, 57]. Thus, approximately 30 g/d BCAAs are metabolized in the mammary gland. We reported that BCAAs are nitrogenous precursors for the synthesis of glutamate, glutamine, aspartate, asparagine, and alanine in the lactating mammary gland, which contains BCAA transaminase, branched-chain α-ketoacids (BCKA) dehydrogenase, glutamine synthetase, glutamate-oxaloacetate aminotransferase, glutamate-pyruvate aminotransferase, and asparagine synthetase [22, 58]. Similarly, Matsumoto et al. [59] found that dietary supplementation with leucine increased concentrations of glutamate and glutamine in the milk of rats. The BCKAs produced can be converted into acetyl-CoA, which can be either oxidized to provide ATP or utilized for fat synthesis. Of note, dietary supplementation with 2 g/d β-hydroxy-β-methyl butyrate (a leucine metabolite) to sows enhances fat content in colostrum by 41% and the body weight of suckling pigs by 7% on d 21 of lactation [60]. Taken together, these results help to explain our observation that dietary supplementation with BCAAs increased fat concentration in milk even when lactating sows were mobilizing less from body reserves. Furthermore, BCAAs stimulate protein synthesis in mammary epithelial cells through the MTOR pathway [27]. The results of the present study advance our understanding of lactation biology. These new and important findings also reveal that dietary BCAA supplementation increases concentrations of free and peptide-bound glutamate, glutamine, aspartate, asparagine, and alanine, as well as concentrations of protein and fat in sow’s milk.

As noted previously, an inadequate provision of dietary protein and some AAs (e.g., arginine, glutamine, glutamate, glycine, leucine, and proline) limits the maximal growth of young pigs [11, 23, 61, 62]. An increase in the provision of these AAs from sow’s milk enhances their concentrations in the plasma of suckling piglets, thereby improving the growth, muscular strength, intestinal health, immunity, and survival of suckling piglets. The underlying molecular mechanisms may involve the supply of substrates for protein synthesis as well as activation of the MTOR cell signaling pathway to increase protein synthesis and inhibit protein degradation [25, 63,64,65]. In support of this view, arginine and glycine are known to be severely deficient in sow’s milk relative to their requirements for piglet growth [19, 20, 66]. Additionally, approximately 70% and 95% of glutamine and glutamate in sow’s milk are utilized via catabolic and synthetic pathways in the small intestine of piglets during the first-pass metabolism and, therefore, do not enter the portal circulation [67, 68]. Thus, the endogenous synthesis of these two AAs, which are highly abundant in tissue protein, is necessary for piglet growth [23, 69]. Furthermore, arginine, glutamine, glycine, and leucine stimulate the phosphorylation of MTOR, S6K1, and 4EBP1 proteins in porcine tissues, including mammary tissue [64], skeletal muscle [26, 54, 70], and the small intestine [62, 71]. In addition, valine has recently been reported to activate the MTOR cell signaling to promote milk protein synthesis in porcine mammary epithelial cells [28]. These AAs can also enhance the expression of antioxidative genes and reduce the expression of proinflammatory genes in tissues [51, 72], thereby attenuating oxidative stress in swine (as indicated by the reduced concentration of TBARS in the plasma; Table 7) and improving their health and lactation performance. Similarly, dietary supplementation with BCAAs reduced oxidative stress in both rats with liver cirrhosis [73] and exercising humans [74]. Taken together, these functional AAs are expected to play an important role in improving the growth of neonatal pigs and the efficiency of milk utilization [75,76,77,78].

Conclusions

Supplementing a proper mixture of BCAAs to the diet for lactating sows increases concentrations of BCAAs, glutamate, glutamine, citrulline, arginine, proline, asparagine, and many other AAs in the plasma and milk of sows, and the plasma of piglets, while reducing oxidative stress in sows and increasing plasma glucose concentrations in both sows and piglets. BCAA supplementation does not affect either feed intake by sows or milk consumption by piglets (per kg BW), but enhances the growth of suckling piglets likely through stimulating tissue protein synthesis. Dietary supplementation with appropriate proportions of leucine, isoleucine and valine can prevent an imbalance among BCAAs in the diet and provide an effective means to improve milk synthesis by lactating sows and, in turn, the growth and survival of piglets.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AAs:

Amino acids

β-Ala:

Beta-alanine

BCAAs:

Branched-chain amino acids

BCKAs:

Branched-chain α-ketoacids

Cit:

Citrulline

CP:

Crude protein

DM:

Dry matter

MTOR:

Mechanistic target of rapamycin

Orn:

Ornithine

TAU:

Taurine

TBARS:

Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances

References

  1. Boyd DR, Kensinger RS, Harrell RJ, Bauman DE. Nutrient uptake and endocrine regulation of milk synthesis by mammary tissue of lactating sows. J Anim Sci. 1995;73(suppl_2):36–56. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.73suppl_236x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Quiniou N, Dagorn J, Gaudre D. Variation of piglets’ birth weight and consequences on subsequent performance. Livest Prod Sci. 2002;78(1):63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00181-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fix JS, Cassady JP, Holl JW, Herring WO, Culbertson MS, See MT. Effect of piglet birth weight on survival and quality of commercial market swine. Livest Sci. 2010;123(1-3):98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ward SA, Kirkwood RN, Plush KJ. Are larger litters a concern for piglet survival or an effectively manageable trait? Animals. 2020;10(2):309. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10020309.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rezaei R, Knabe DA, Li XL, Feng S, Wu G. Enhanced efficiency of milk utilization for growth in surviving low-birth-weight piglets. J Anim Sci Biotech. 2011;2:73–83.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ji Y, Wu ZL, Dai ZL, Wang XL, Li J, Wang BG, et al. Fetal and neonatal programming of postnatal growth and feed efficiency in swine. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2016;8(1):42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-017-0173-5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu G, Bazer FW, Wallace JM, Spencer TE. Intrauterine growth retardation: implications for the animal sciences. J Anim Sci. 2006;84(9):2316–37. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-156.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Preweaning morbidity and mortality. National Swine Survey. U.S. Fort Collins, Colorado: Department of Agriculture; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. USA 2020 Summary, PigCHAMP Benchmarking. https://www.pigchamp.com/Portals/0/Documents/Benchmarking%20Summaries/2020-benchmark-summaries-usa.pdf. .

  10. Wolter BF, Ellis M, Corrigan BP, Dedecker JM. The effect of birth weight and feeding supplemental milk replacer to piglets during lactation on preweaning and postweaning growth performance and carcass characteristics. J Anim Sci. 2002;80(2):301–8. https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.802301x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Manjarin R, Bequette BJ, Wu G, Trottier NL. Linking our understanding of mammary gland metabolism to amino acid nutrition. Amino Acids. 2014;46(11):2447–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-014-1818-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rezaei R, Wu ZL, Hou YQ, Bazer FW, Wu G. Amino acids and mammary gland development: nutritional implications for neonatal growth. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2016;7(1):20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-016-0078-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Dunshea FR, Bauman DE, Nugent EA, Kerton DJ, King RH, McCauley I. Hyperinsulinaemia, supplemental protein and branched-chain amino acids when combined can increase milk protein yield in lactating sows. Br J Nutr. 2005;93(3):325–32. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN20041366.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Richert BT, Tokach MD, Goodband RD, Nelssen JL, Pettigrew JE, Walker RD, et al. Valine requirement of the high-producing lactating sow. J Anim Sci. 1996;74(6):1307–13. https://doi.org/10.2527/1996.7461307x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Richert BT, Goodband RD, Tokach MD, Nelssen JL. Increasing valine, isoluecine, and total brancded-chain amino acids for lactating sows. J Anim Sci. 1997;75(8):2117–28. https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.7582117x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Moser SA, Tokach MD, Dritz SS, Goodband RD, Nelssen JL, Loughmiller JA. The effects of branched-chain amino acids on sow and litter performance. J Anim Sci. 2000;78(3):658–67. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.783658x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Paulicks BR, Ott H, Roth-Maier DA. Performance of lactating sows in response to the dietary valine supply. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2003;87(11-12):389–96. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0396.2003.00449.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Richert BT, Tokach MD, Goodband RD, Nelssen JL, Campbell RG, Kershaw S. The effect of dietary lysine and valine fed during lactation on sow and litter performance. J Anim Sci. 1997;75(7):1853–60. https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.7571853x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Davis TA, Nguyen H, Garcia-Bravo R, Fiorotto M, Jackson E, Lewis D, et al. Amino acid composition in human milk. J Nutr. 1994;124(7):1126–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/124.7.1126.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu G, Knabe DA. Free and protein-bound amino acids in sow's colostrum and milk. J Nutr. 1994;124(3):415–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/124.3.415.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu G. Principles of Animal nutrition. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li P, Knabe DA, Kim SW, Lynch C, Hutson S, Wu G. Lactating porcine mammary tissue catabolized branched-chain amino acids for glutamine and asparate synthesis. J Nutr. 2009;139(8):1502–9. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.109.105957.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu G, Bazer FW, Dai ZL, Li DF, Wang JJ, Wu ZL. Amino acid nutrition in animals: protein synthesis and beyond. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2014;2(1):387–417. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-022513-114113.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Strathe AV, Bruun TS, Zerrahn JE, Tauson AH, Hansen CF. The effect of increasing the dietary valine-to-lysine ratio on sow metabolism, milk production, and litter growth. J Anim Sci. 2016;94:155–64. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9267.

  25. Dennis MD, Baum JI, Kimball SR, Jefferson LS. Mechanisms involved in the coordinate regulation of mTORC1 by insulin and amino acids. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(10):8287–96. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.209171.

  26. Suryawan A, Nguyen HV, Almonaci RD, Davis TA. Differential regulation of protein synthesis in skeletal muscle and liver of neonatal pigs by leucine through an mTORC1-dependent pathway. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2012;3(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-1891-3-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lei J, Feng D, Zhang Y, Zhao FQ, Wu Z, San Gabriel A, et al. Nutritional and regulatory role of branched-chain amino acids in lactation. Front Biosci (Landmark edition). 2012;17:2725–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang JM, He WL, Yi D, Zhao D, Song Z, Hou YQ, et al. Regulation of protein synthesis in porcine mammary epithelial cells by L-valine. Amino Acids. 2019;51(4):717–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-019-02709-2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Li XL, Bazer FW, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Erikson DW, Frank JW, et al. Dietary supplementation with 0.8% L-arginine between days 0 and 25 of gestation reduces litter size in gilts. J Nutr. 2010;140(6):1111–6. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.110.121350.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rezaei R. Nutritional and regulatory roles for branched-chain amino acids in milk production by lactating sows. College Station: PhD Dissertation. Texas A&M University; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kim SW, Wu G. Regulatory role for amino acids in mammary gland growth and milk synthesis. Amino Acids. 2009;37(1):89–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-008-0151-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. AOAC. Official method of analysis, 15th ed. Washington DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Marier JR, Boulet M. Direct analysis of lactose in milk and serum. J Dairy Sci. 1959;42(8):1390–1. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(59)90747-7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dole VP. A relation between non-esterified fatty acids in plasma and the metabolism of glucose. J Clin Invest. 1956;35(2):150–4. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI103259.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Wu G, Davis PK, Flynn NE, Knabe DA, Davidson JT. Endogenous synthesis of arginine plays an important role in maintaining arginine homeostasis in postweaning growing pigs. J Nutr. 1997;127(12):2342–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/127.12.2342.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dai ZL, Wu ZL, Jia SC, Wu G. Analysis of amino acid composition in proteins of animal tissues and foods as pre-column o-phthaldialdehyde derivatives by HPLC with fluorescence detection. J Chromatogr B. 2014;964:116–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.03.025.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lassala A, Bazer FW, Cudd TA, Datta S, Keisler DH, Satterfield MC, et al. Parenteral administration of L-arginine enhances fetal survival and growth in sheep carrying multiple pregnancies. J Nutr. 2011;141(5):849–55. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.111.138172.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Tekwe CD, Lei J, Yao K, Rezaei R, Li XL, Dahanayaka S, et al. Oral administration of interferon tau enhances oxidation of energy substrates and reduces adiposity in Zucker diabetic fatty rats. Bio Factors. 2013;39(5):552–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/biof.1113.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Draper HH, Squires EJ, Mahmoodi H, Wu J, Agarwal S, Hadley M. A comparative evaluation of thiobarbituric acid methods for the determination of malondialdehyde in biological materials. Free Radic Biol Med. 1993;15(4):353–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-5849(93)90035-S.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Assaad H, Hou YQ, Zhou L, Carroll RJ, Wu G. Rapid publication-ready MS-word tables for two-way ANOVA. Springer Plus. 2015;4(1):33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0795-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Steel RGD, Torrie JH. Principles and procedures of statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kensinger RS, Collier RJ, Bazer FW, Ducsay CA, Becker HN. Nucleic acid, metabolic and histological changes in gilt mammary tissue during pregnancy and lactogenesis. J Anim Sci. 1982;54(6):1297–308. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1982.5461297x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Shennan D, Peaker M. Transport of milk constituents by the mammary gland. Physiol Rev. 2000;80(3):925–51. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.2000.80.3.925.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Guan X, Bequette BJ, Ku PK, Tempelman RJ, Trottier NL. The amino acid need for milk synthesis is defined by the maximal uptake of plasma amino acids by porcine mammary glands. J Nutr. 2004;134(9):2182–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/134.9.2182.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kim SW, Hurley WL, Han IK, Easter RA. Growth of nursing pigs related to the characteristics of nursed mammary glands. J Anim Sci. 2000;78(5):1313–8. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.7851313x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hughes PE, Varley MA. Reproduction in the pig. London: Butterworth; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wholt JE, Clark JH, Derrig RG, Davis CL. Valine, leucine, and isoleucine metabolism by lactating bovine mammary tissue. J Dairy Sci. 1977;60(12):1875–82. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(77)84118-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Viña JR, Williamson DH. Effects of lactation on L-leucine metabolism in the rat. Biochem J. 1981;194(3):941–7. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj1940941.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Wu G. Dietary requirements of synthesizable amino acids by animals: a paradigm shift in protein nutrition. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2014;5(1):34. https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-1891-5-34.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Rulquin H, Pisulewski P. Effects of graded levels of duodenal infusions of leucine on mammary uptake and output in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Res. 2006;73(3):328–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029906001841.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wu G. Amino acids: biochemistry and nutrition. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kim SW, Hurley WL, Wu G, Ji F. Ideal amino acid balance for sows during gestation and lactation. J Anim Sci. 2009;87(suppl_14):E123–32. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1452.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Dosako S, Taneya S, Kimura T, Ohmori T, Daikoku H, Suzuki N, et al. Milk of northern fur seal: composition, especially carbohydrate and protein. J Dairy Sci. 1983;66(10):2076–83. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(83)82053-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Escobar J, Frank JW, Suryawan A, Nguyen HV, Kimball SR, Jefferson LS, et al. Regulation of cardiac and skeletal muscle protein synthesis by individual branched-chain amino acids in neonatal pigs. Am J Phys. 2006;290(4):E612–21. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00402.2005.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Manjarin R, Zamora V, Wu G, Steibel JP, Kirkwood RN, Taylor NP, et al. Effect of amino acids supply in reduced crude protein diets on performance, efficiency of mammary uptake, and transporter gene expression in lactating sows. J Anim Sci. 2012;90(9):3088–100. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4338.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Trottier NL, Shipley CF, Easter RA. Plasma amino acid uptake by the mammary gland of the lactating sow. J Anim Sci. 1997;75(5):1266–78. https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.7551266x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Nielsen TT, Trottier NL, Stein HH, Bellaver C, Easter RA. The effect of litter size and day of lactation on amino acid uptake by the porcine mammary glands. J Anim Sci. 2002;80(9):2402–11. https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.8092402x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Conway ME, Hutson SM. Mammalian branched-chain aminotransferases. Methods Enzymol. 2000;324:355–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(00)24245-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Matsumoto T, Nakamura E, Nakamura H, Hirota M, San Gabriel A, Nakamura KI, et al. The production of free glutamate in milk requires the leucine transporter LAT1. Am J Phys. 2013;305(6):C623–31. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00291.2012.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Nissen S, Faidley TD, Zimmerman DR, Izard R, Fisher CT. Colostral milk fat percentage and pig performance are enhanced by feeding the leucine metabolite β-hydroxy-β-methyl butyrate to sow. J Anim Sci. 1994;72(9):2331–7. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.7292331x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Wang WW, Dai ZL, Wu ZL, Lin G, Jia SC, Hu SD, et al. Glycine is a nutritionally essential amino acid for maximal growth of milk-fed young pigs. Amino Acids. 2014;46(8):2037–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-014-1758-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Wang WW, Wu ZL, Lin G, Hu SD, Wang B, Dai ZL, et al. Glycine stimulates protein synthesis and inhibits oxidative stress in pig small-intestinal epithelial cells. J Nutr. 2014;144(10):1540–8. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.114.194001.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Columbus DA, Fiorotto ML, Davis TA. Leucine is a major regulator of muscle protein synthesis in neonates. Amino Acids. 2015;47(2):259–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-014-1866-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Appuhamy JA, Knoebel NA, Nayananjalie WD, Escobar J, Hanigan M. Isoleucine and leucine independently regulate mTOR signaling and protein synthesis in MAC-T cells and bovine mammary tissue slices. J Nutr. 2012;142(3):484–91. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.111.152595.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Yin YL, Yao K, Liu Z, Gong M, Ruan Z, Deng D, et al. Supplementing L-leucine to a low-protein diet increases tissue protein synthesis in weanling pigs. Amino Acids. 2010;39(5):1477–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-010-0612-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Wang WW, Wu ZL, Dai ZL, Yang Y, Wang JJ, Wu G. Glycine metabolism in animals and humans: implications for nutrition and health. Amino Acids. 2013;45(3):463–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-013-1493-1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Reeds PJ, Burrin DG. Glutamate and the bowel. J Nutr. 2001;131(9):2505S–8S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/131.9.2505S.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Wu G, Bazer FW, Johnson GA, Knabe DA, Burghardt RC, Spencer TE, et al. Important roles for L-glutamine in swine nutrition and production. J Anim Sci. 2011;89(7):2017–30. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3614.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Rezaei R, Wang WW, Wu ZL, Dai ZL, Wang JJ, Wu G. Biochemical and physiological bases for utilization of dietary amino acids by young pigs. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2013;4(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-1891-4-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Yao K, Yin YL, Chu WY, Liu ZQ, Deng D, Li TJ, et al. Dietary arginine supplementation increases mTOR signaling activity in skeletal muscle of neonatal pigs. J Nutr. 2008;138(5):867–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/138.5.867.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Xi PB, Jiang Z, Zheng C, Lin Y, Wu G. Regulation of protein metabolism by glutamine: implications for nutrition and health. Front Biosci (Landmark edition). 2011;16(1):578–97. https://doi.org/10.2741/3707.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Li XL, Johnson GA, Zhou HJ, Burghardt RC, Bazer FW, Wu G. Microarray analysis reveals an important role for dietary L-arginine in regulating global gene expression in porcine placentae during early gestation. Front Biosci (Landmark edition). 2022;27(1):033.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Iwasa M, Kobayashi Y, Mifuji-Moroka R, Hara N, Miyachi H, Sugimoto R, et al. Branched-chain amino acid supplementation reduces oxidative stress and prolongs survival in rats with advanced liver cirrhosis. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e70309. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070309.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Weber MG, Dias SS, de Angelis TR, Fernandes EV, Bernardes AG, Milanez VF, et al. The use of BCAA to decrease delayed-onset muscle soreness after a single bout of exercise: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Amino Acids. 2021;53(11):1663–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-021-03089-2.

  75. Wu G. Functional amino acids in nutrition and health. Amino Acids. 2013;45(3):407–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-013-1500-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Wu G, Li L. The “ideal protein” concept is not ideal in animal nutrition. Exp Biol Med. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/15353702221082658.

  77. Rezaei R, San Gabriel A, Wu G. Dietary supplementation with monosodium glutamate enhances milk production by lactating sows and the growth of suckling piglets. Amino Acids. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-022-03147-3.

  78. He WL, Wu G. Oxidation of amino acids, glucose, and fatty acids as metabolic fuels in enterocytes of developing pigs. Amino Acids. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-022-03151-7.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr. Sichao Jia, Dr. Houssein Assaad, and the late Dr. Darrell A. Knabe for technical assistance with this study.

Funding

This work was supported by Texas A&M AgriLife Research Hatch project (H-8200) and Ajinomoto Co., Tokyo, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GW designed and supervised the study. RR performed the experiment, summarized results, and wrote the manuscript. GW and ASG contributed to data interpretation and manuscript revisions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guoyao Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Texas A&M University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

ASG was employed by Ajinomoto Co., Inc., Tokyo, Japan. RR and GW declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial and financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rezaei, R., Gabriel, A.S. & Wu, G. Dietary supplementation with branched-chain amino acids enhances milk production by lactating sows and the growth of suckling piglets. J Animal Sci Biotechnol 13, 65 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00718-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00718-y

Keywords

  • Branched-chain amino acids
  • Lactation
  • Milk synthesis
  • Milk yield
  • Neonatal growth
  • Sow