Skip to main content

Suitability of Hermetia illucens larvae meal and fat in broiler diets: effects on animal performance, apparent ileal digestibility, gut histology, and microbial metabolites

Abstract

Background

The possibility of partially replacing soybean meal (SBM) with Hermetia illucens (HI) defatted larvae meal in broiler nutrition has frequently been suggested. For sustainability reasons, however, the larvae fat produced during defatting should also be used and could be particularly beneficial regarding gut health due to its fatty acid composition. To evaluate the suitability of HI larvae as protein and fat source, a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement with two types of protein, i.e. SBM (S) or SBM and 15% of its crude protein replaced by HI larvae meal (L), and three levels of fat sources, namely 0 (0 L), 50% (50 L) or 100% HI larvae fat (100 L) at the expense of soybean oil was applied.

Results

In the starter phase, an interaction showed higher body weight (BW), average daily gain (ADG) and improved feed conversion ratio (FCR) if 50% or 100% HI larvae fat was fed with HI larvae meal. Moreover, BW, ADG and FCR improved when feeding HI larvae meal as protein source. Additionally, we observed an increased average daily feed intake in the grower, finisher, and overall phase in the L groups and an improved FCR in 0 L compared to 50 L groups during the overall period. Regarding apparent ileal digestibility, HI larvae meal feeding increased dry matter, organic matter, and fat digestibility. Feeding HI larvae meal as protein source decreased the concentrations of agmatine, spermidine, spermine and ammonia in the caecal digesta, whereas fat source affected agmatine with higher concentrations in 50 L compared to 0 L in the colonic digesta. In contrast, caecal ethanolamine concentrations increased in HI larvae meal groups compared to SBM. Caecal butyric acid concentrations decreased with HI larvae meal feeding. An interaction was found for the jejunal villus area, being higher in L + 100 L compared to S + 100 L. Furthermore, L groups had greater villus width.

Conclusions

A partial replacement of SBM with HI larvae meal and soybean oil with HI larvae fat in broiler diets without impairing animal performance or gut health seems possible. Feeding HI larvae meal affected broiler performance positively in the starter phase and improved apparent ileal digestibility.

Introduction

To cover the high demand for protein-rich feeds in European poultry production, soybean meal (SBM) imports, in particular from South America, currently represent the largest source [1, 2]. Due to the strong import dependency on this protein source, keen interest exists on investigations of insects as alternative protein source. Insects constitute a natural part of poultry diets in wildlife [3, 4] and are seen as a possible alternative valuable feedstuff in animal nutrition [5,6,7,8,9]. The larvae of the black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens, HI) are rich in crude protein (CP) and fat, with levels of about 42% and 15–37% in dry matter (DM), respectively [10, 11]. Moreover, CP content can be further increased by defatting, in order to generate a protein meal [10]. Additionally, separation of protein and fat may enable a more balanced and precise diet formulation. However, usage of the remaining larvae fat should be considered with respect to sustainability reasons and because of potential positive nutritionally and antimicrobial effects of the fatty acids [12]. Hermetia illucens larvae fat is characterised by saturated medium-chain fatty acids (MCFA) (C6:0-C12:0), of which lauric acid (C12:0) accounts for the largest proportion of more than 50% of total fatty acids [13,14,15]. Medium-chain-fatty acids are regarded as readily digestible, since they do not require bile acid-mediated micelle formation to emulsify in the aqueous phase of digesta, but are absorbed by simple passive diffusion and thus an immediate energy source e.g. for enterocytes [12, 16, 17]. Consequently, positive effects on nutrient digestibility and intestinal morphology may result, which need to be investigated. Besides, blending animal fats with vegetable oils may have synergistic effects, mainly arising from balanced ratios of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids [18]. Furthermore, MCFA, especially lauric acid, are ascribed a potentially favourable antimicrobial effect by disrupting the bacterial cell electron transport chain and consequently impairing the energy supply [12, 19, 20]. By influencing the microbial composition, effects of MCFA on the microbial fermentation profile can also result [21] and investigating microbial metabolites, such as biogenic amines and ammonia, as well as short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) that derive from protein or carbohydrate fermentation, could provide knowledge about the effects of HI larvae fat.

In accordance with others, we have previously shown that HI larvae meal, used in small quantities (5% in diet fresh matter), is suitable to reduce SBM in broiler feeds without detrimental effects on performance, apparent ileal amino acid digestibility and histology [22,23,24,25]. Regarding the use of insect fats in broiler feeding, complete replacement of soybean oil with HI larvae fat seemed possible without adverse impact on growth performance [15, 26,27,28]. Although more and more studies are being conducted on feeding both HI larvae meal and fat, to the best of our knowledge, there have been no studies on the influence of feeding both components simultaneously but in separated form. Therefore, the present study aimed to document the performance of broilers during the 35-d growing period when fed HI larvae meal and fat in different ratios and assess the impact of HI meal and fat use on nutrient digestibility as well as on gut health variables, i.e. intestinal morphology and microbial metabolites in the caecal and colonic digesta. We hypothesised that the partial replacement of SBM and total replacement of soybean oil with HI larvae meal and fat, respectively, is possible without impairing digestibility and consequently animal performance characteristics. As result of the above-mentioned antimicrobial effects, potentially favourable shifts in the production of microbial metabolites, e.g. biogenic amines and SCFA, may occur. This study is first to describe the effects of simultaneously feeding HI larvae meal and fat on broiler performance, digestibility, and gut health apart from studies feeding whole larvae. It should therefore provide new knowledge on the targeted applicability of HI larvae components as poultry feed.

Materials and methods

Birds, housing, and diets

The present trial has been carried out under compliance with the 1st regulation of keeping of animals (BGBl. II Nr. 485/2004) and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna with the reference number 2021/006. It took place at a poultry research station rented by the University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria. All environmental conditions, such as ambient temperature, lighting scheme or humidity, were adjusted to meet standard breeding practices ([29] Aviagen: Ross broiler management handbook) and described previously in Hartinger et al. [25]. In total, 432, one-day-old Ross 308 male broiler chickens were randomly assigned to one of six dietary treatments and allotted to 36 pens with 12 animals per pen, resulting in six replicates per treatment. Each pen was equipped with a feeder, an automatic drinker and wood shavings as litter material. Birds had an initial BW of 42.5 g (±0.63 g) and were purchased from a commercial local hatchery (Geflügelhof Laßnitzhöhe GmbH, Laßnitzhöhe, Austria). All diets were formulated according to the breeder’s nutritional specifications [30] within a three phases feeding program: starter diet was fed from d 1 to d 14, grower diet from d 15 to d 28 and finisher diet from d 29 to d 36. The HI larvae meal and fat were obtained from a commercial company (Ecofly GmbH, Antiesenhofen, Austria) and their nutrient composition is shown in Table 1. As data concerning larvae meal amino acid digestibility are scarce and inconsistent, diets were calculated based on total amino acids (Ross 308 Broiler Nutrition Specifications (2019)) [30]. The experimental design was a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement with two types of protein, i.e. either SBM solely (S) or SBM and 15% of its CP replaced by HI larvae meal (L), as well as three levels of fat sources, namely 0 HI larvae fat (0 L), 50% HI larvae fat (50 L) or 100% HI larvae fat (100 L) at the expense of soybean oil (Table 2). Therefore, the six treatments were: S + 0 L, S + 50 L, S + 100 L, L + 0 L, L + 50 L, L + 100 L. During all phases, diets were formulated to be isoenergetic and isonitrogenous (Table 3) and were provided ad libitum. To determine the ileal digestibility, titanium dioxide was included (3 g/kg fresh matter) in the finisher feeds. The starter diet was fed in crumbled form (granulation gap 1.7 mm), whereas grower (2.3 mm) and finisher (2.8 mm) diets were offered in pelleted form.

Table 1 Proximate analysis (% of dry matter) and fatty acid composition of defatted Hermetia illucens larvae meal and Hermetia illucens larvae fat
Table 2 Composition of experimental diets
Table 3 Analysed nutrient and fatty acid composition of experimental diets

Performance parameters

Animals were weighed pen-wise on d 1, 14, and 28 as well as individually on d 35 to determine BW. Average daily gain (ADG) and average daily feed intake (ADFI) were recorded at pen level at the end of each feeding phase. Feed conversion rate (FCR) was calculated from ADG and ADFI for each feeding phase and for the overall experimental period. Any clinical signs of illness or mortality were recorded daily, and dead birds were weighed to determine the losses.

Sample collection

After 36 d of fattening, all broilers were slaughtered. Directly after slaughtering, digesta were collected from six representative broilers per pen (n = 216) being closest to the median of BW of the pen. Digesta from three gut sections [ileum (Meckel’s diverticulum until colon), caecum (whole caecum) and colon (whole colon)] were collected. Therefore, the intestinal tract was removed and opened. To gain enough digesta, homogenously mixed samples of six animals were pooled per pen, put into narrow mouth bottles and immediately frozen at − 20 °C until further analysis. Two representative broilers per pen (n = 72 animals), which had already been taken for digesta sampling, were selected to collect intestinal gut tissue samples. For purpose of histological analysis, samples from the jejunum were excised halfway between the duodenum and the Meckel’s diverticulum, and the ileum 3–6 cm above the ileocaecal junction. Samples were flushed thoroughly with ice-cold phosphate buffered saline to remove the entire digesta content, embedded in slotted cassettes and immersed in 4% paraformaldehyde (v/v) for 48 h. Excreta of all birds were collected pen-wise on d 34 for determination of AMEN. For this purpose, excreta samples were frozen immediately at − 20 °C and calculation of AMEN was done according to Kong and Adeola [31].

Chemical analyses of feed, excreta and digesta samples

Prior to analysis, ileal digesta samples were thawed at 4 °C and freeze-dried, whereas caecal and colonic digesta samples were analysed in fresh matter. Hermetia illucens larvae meal, diet and ileal digesta samples were ground to pass a 1-mm sieve and proximate composition was analysed according to the standard procedures of VDLUFA [32]. These analyses are: dry matter (DM; method no. 3.1.4), crude ash (CA; method no. 8.1.1), ether extract (EE; method no. 5.1.1), ether extract after acid hydrolysis (EEh; method no. 5.1.2) and crude fibre (CF; method no. 6.1.2). The gross energy (GE) content in feed and excreta was determined using an adiabatic bomb calorimetry (IKA C 200, IKA Werke GmbH & Co. KG, Staufen, Germany). To determine the nitrogen content, dumas combustion method (DuMaster 480, Büchi AG, Flawil, Switzerland) (method no. 4.1.2) [33] was used and multiplied by 6.25 to determine CP concentration. The amount of acid-detergent fibre (ADF) and ADF-linked protein was determined according to Licitra et al. [34]. Additionally, wet-ashing in a microwave oven (CEM Mars 6, CEM Corp. Matthews, NC, USA) was applied to analyse Ca and Na by flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAnalyst200, Perkin Elmer Inc. Massachusetts, USA), and P photometrically (Tecan Group Ltd., Männedorf, Switzerland) using the vanado-molybdate method at 436 nm.

Finisher feed and ileal digesta samples were also analysed for titanium dioxide (TiO2) concentration as described by Leone et al. [35]. Therefore, 0.5 g of sample was mixed with a catalyst tablet and 25 mL concentrated sulphuric acid. The mixture was digested at 400 °C for 115 min on a block digesta. After removing and cooling the tubes, digestion was transferred to a volumetric flask and the volume was made up to 100 mL with distilled water. After filtration, 5 mL of each sample was blended with 1 mL of 1 mol/L sulphuric acid and 1 mL hydrogen peroxide (300 mL/L). Subsequently, measurement was made in comparison to a titanium sulphate standard at 405 nm using a UV-vis spectrophotometer (UV-1800, Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan). Total amino acid analyses of HI larvae meal and diets were performed by reverse-phase HPLC according to Waters AccQ. Tag method [36], after hydrolysis in 6 mol/L HCl for 24 h at 110 °C.

Determination of the fatty acid profile in feed was performed according to the 1-step methylation method of Sukhija and Palmquist [37]. Briefly, for extraction, 0.5 g of sample was treated with 3 mL of toluene including nonadecanoic acid as internal standard (concentration 1 mg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany). Samples were transmethylated by addition of 3 mL 5% methanol-hydrochloric acid solution to determine fatty acid as methyl esters (FAME). To avoid oxidation processes, samples were flushed with nitrogen for 30 s. Subsequently, tubes were closed gas-tight and heated in a water bath (at 70 °C) for 2 h while vortexing every 30 min. Following cooling for 30 min, a biphasic separation was obtained by adding 5 mL of 6% potassium carbonate solution and 1 mL toluene to each sample. Tubes were then shaken vigorously, vortexed and centrifuged at 175 × g for 5 min. The supernatant was then transferred to a 1.5-mL vial. The FAME were quantified by gas chromatography (Agilent Technologies 7890A, Waldbronn, Germany), equipped with a J&W HP-88 GC column (112-88A7, Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA; 100 m × 250 μm × 0.20 μm) and flame-ionization detector. Hydrogen was used as carrier gas at a constant pressure of 11 psi. The injector temperature was 250 °C and detector temperature 260 °C. The oven temperature was set to 100 °C for 5 min afterwards temperature was raised by 4 °C/min to 240 °C, which was then held for 30 min. Peaks were identified based on commercially available FAME mixtures (37-Component FAME Mix, Supelco Inc., Bellefonte, PA, USA). The results are expressed as the percentage (%) of total detected FAME.

$$ Fatty\kern0.28em acids\kern0.28em \left(\%\kern0.28em FAME\right)\kern0.28em =\frac{\left( area\kern0.28em peak\kern0.28em sample\right)}{\left( Sum\kern0.28em of\kern0.28em peak s\kern0.28em area\kern0.28em -\kern0.28em area\kern0.28em internal\kern0.28em s\tan dard\right)} $$

Microbial metabolites

Analyses of the concentrations of biogenic amines in caecal and colonic digesta were performed according to Saarinen [38] using reverse-phase HPLC (Waters 2695e Separations Module, Waters, Milford, USA). For this purpose, a RP-18 column (InertClone™ 5 μm ODS (2) 150 Å, 250mm × 4.6 mm, Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany) was used and the detection was conducted by UV (Waters 2489 UV-visible detector, Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Data were calculated using the software Empower 3 (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). As eluents, 0.1 mol/L ammonia-acetate buffer (pH 5) (Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany) and acetonitrile (HPLC grade; Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany) were used. To determine the ammonia content, approximately 1.0 g of digesta sample was vortexed with 1.0 mL perchloric acid (1 mol/L). Subsequently, the mixture was allowed to settle for 10 min before 8 mL of double-distilled H2O was added and vortexed again. Samples were then shaken (POLYMAX 1040, Heidolph Instruments, Schwabach, Germany) for 1 h, before being centrifuged at room temperature for 10 min at 3215 × g (Centrifuge 5810R, Eppendorf, Wesseling-Berzdorf, Germany). Storage of the supernatant took place at − 20 °C. Before being analysed, thawed samples were centrifuged at 12,045 × g for 5 min (Minispin, Eppendorf, Wesseling-Berzdorf, Germany) at room temperature and supernatant was used for analysis of ammonia.

The ammonia concentration was analysed by preparing a mixture of 0.5 mL of salicylate-nitroprusside colour reagent (blend of equal parts of sodium hydroxide 0.3 mol/L, double-distilled H2O and salicylate-nitroprusside solution) and 0.25 mL of dichloroisocyanurate solution (0.050 g dichloroisocyanurate dissolved in 50 mL double-distilled H2O). To ensure a proper colouring reaction, 1.0 mL of diluted sample extract or standard solution (Ammonia standard solution ROTI®Star, Karlsruhe, Germany) was added immediately afterwards. Following incubation for 1.5 h at room temperature in the dark, the concentration of ammonia was analysed spectrophotometrically at 660 nm (Tecan Austria GmbH, Grödig, Austria).

The SCFA concentrations were determined by applying the method of Zhao et al. [39]. The digesta sample (~ 1 g) was weighed and 1 mL of 5 mmol/L internal standard solution (2-ethylbutyric-acid 99%, Sigma Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) was added to reach a final concentration of 1 mmol/L. Subsequently, 4 mL of double-distilled water were added, the tubes were thoroughly mixed and put for 1 h on a shaker (Polymax 1040, Heidolph Instruments, Schwabach, Germany). Afterwards, HCl (5 mol/L) was used for a pH adjustment to 2–3. Subsequently, the tubes were centrifuged at 3215 × g for 20 min (Centrifuge 5810R, Eppendorf, Wesseling-Berzdorf, Germany) after 10 min of incubation. The supernatant was immediately stored at − 20 °C. For analysis, the samples were thawed and centrifuged at 12,045 × g for 20 min (Minispin, Eppendorf, Wesseling-Berzdorf, Germany). Acetic acid, propionic acid, isobutyric acid, butyric acid, isovaleric acid, valeric acid, isocapronic acid, heptanoic acid and hexanoic acid were separated and quantified using a gas chromatographic system (Agilent Technologies 7890A-G3440A-GC System, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA) with a C-18 capillary column (Agilent CP-Sil 5CB, length 25 m, diameter 0.32 mm) by a flame ionisation detection unit.

Histomorphometry

For purpose of histological analysis, intestinal gut tissue samples were first dehydrated and embedded in paraffin wax blocks, before being sectioned at 5 μm thickness using a microtome (Leica RM2255, Leica Biosystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and mounted onto glass slides (Menzel-Gläser Superfrost-Plus, Thermo Scientific, Braunschweig, Germany). Sections were subsequently stained (Leica Auto-Stainer XL ST5010, Leica Biosystems GmbH, Nussloch, Germany) following the standard protocol for Alcian blue-periodic acid–Schiff. For visualisation, a light microscope (Leica DM 6000 B, Leica) and the software Leica Application Suite (Version 4.13, Leica) were used. Morphometric indices examined were: villus height (Vh; measured from the tip of the villus to the villus-crypt axis), villus width (Vw; at the crypt-villus axis), villus area (Va; as cross-sectional area of a villus measured above the villus-crypt axis) and crypt depth (Cd; from the base of the villus to the submucosa). Using measurement of Vh and Cd, their ratio (Vh:Cd) was calculated. Goblet cells were counted and are expressed as number of cells per 200 μm of villus epithelium. In addition, the thickness of the submucosa and muscularis circularis was determined. For all these indices, measurements were taken on six well oriented villi, their crypts, and the underlying tissue layer that were regularly distributed along the entire intestinal surface. The respective means of these six measurements were subsequently used for statistical analysis.

Calculations

The following equation was used to calculate the apparent ileal digestibility (AID):

$$ \boldsymbol{AID}\kern0.5em \%=\left\{\mathbf{1}\hbox{-} \left[\left(\frac{\boldsymbol{T}\ {\boldsymbol{iO}}_{\boldsymbol{2}}\kern0.5em \%\kern0.5em \boldsymbol{diet}}{\boldsymbol{T}\ {\boldsymbol{iO}}_{\boldsymbol{2}}\kern0.5em \%\kern0.5em \boldsymbol{digesta}}\right)\kern0.5em \times \kern0.5em \right.\left(\frac{\boldsymbol{Nutrient}\kern0.5em \%\kern0.5em \boldsymbol{digesta}}{\boldsymbol{Nutrient}\kern0.5em \%\kern0.5em \boldsymbol{diet}}\right)\right\}\kern0.5em \times \kern0.5em \mathbf{100} $$

Statistical analyses

The following statistical model was used:

$$ {Y}_{ij k}=\mu +{\alpha}_i+{\beta}_j+{\left(\alpha \times \beta \right)}_{ij}+{b}_k+{e}_{ij k}. $$

where Yijk is the dependent variable, μ the overall mean, αi the fixed effect of protein source (i = SBM or HI larvae meal (15%)), βj the fixed effect of fat substitution (j = soybean oil, 50/50 soybean oil and HI larvae fat or 100% HI larvae fat), bk the random effect of pen (k = 1, 2, 3,..., 6) and eijk the residual error term. Statistics of performance parameters, digestibility coefficients, histological measurements and microbial metabolites were subjected to mixed model analysis using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS v. 9.4 (Cary, NC, USA). Priorly, data were analysed for normal distribution using PROC UNIVARIATE. Significance was defined at P < 0.05, a trend at 0.05 ≤ P < 0.1 and results are expressed as least square means. Differences between the least squares means were post-hoc tested using an adjusted Tukey test.

Results

Animal performance

Performance data are presented in Table 4. Animals developed well during the entire experimental period and mortality was 5.0%, without differences between treatment groups.

Table 4 Summarised performance results of the starter, grower, and finisher period as well as the overall broiler trial (n = 6)

In the starter period, an interaction for the protein and fat source was observed for BW (P = 0.03), ADG (P = 0.03) and FCR (P = 0.01). Body weight and ADG increased in L + 100 L compared to S + 100 L. Regarding FCR, S + 50 L was higher than L + 50 L. Concerning the main effect protein, BW and ADG were affected with on average 2% higher BW for L groups compared to S groups. Similarly, FCR improved in L groups compared to S groups (P < 0.001). For fat source, a trend was detected for BW (P = 0.08) with 0 L being higher than 100 L. Average daily feed intake was not affected by interaction, protein or fat source in the starter period.

In the grower period, no interaction effect on performance parameters was observed. Referring to protein source, an effect for ADFI (P = 0.04) and FCR (P = 0.01) was detected. Feeding HI larvae meal as protein source increased ADFI compared to SBM, but impaired FCR. No effects of fat source on performance were detected in the grower period.

In the finisher period, performance was not affected by the interaction of the experimental factors protein and fat. Concerning the protein source, performance in terms of ADFI (P = 0.0005) and ADG (P = 0.07) increased or tended to increase in L groups compared to S groups. With regard to the effect of fat source, there was a trend for improved FCR in 0 L groups compared to 50 L groups (P = 0.05). Body weight was not affected in the finisher period.

In the overall period, animal performance parameter did not show interaction of protein and fat source. For the effect of protein source, ADFI was higher in L groups compared to S groups (P = 0.005). Fat source tendentially impaired FCR in the overall period in 50 L groups compared to 0 L groups (P = 0.05).

Apparent ileal digestibility

Table 5 illustrates the AID of crude nutrients. A trend for an interaction of protein and fat source was observed concerning the AID of fat, being improved in L + 50 L compared to S + 50 L. Protein source affected the AID of DM (P < 0.01) OM (P < 0.01) and fat (P = 0.02), all being increased by HI larvae feeding. Fat source tended (P = 0.08) to affect the AID of CP, showing improved CP digestibility in 100 L compared to 0 L.

Table 5 Apparent ileal digestibility of broilers fed with HI larvae meal and fat

Microbial metabolites and intestinal morphometric indices

Concentrations of biogenic amines and ammonia in the caecum are given in Table 6. No interaction effect on microbial metabolites determined in the caecum was observed. Concerning the effect of protein source, agmatine (P < 0.01), ethanolamine (P = 0.02), spermidine (P < 0.01), spermine (P < 0.01) and ammonia (P < 0.01) concentrations were affected. This effect manifested itself with higher concentrations in S groups compared to L groups for agmatine, spermidine, spermine and ammonia. In contrast, the ethanolamine concentration was higher for L groups compared to S groups. Moreover, protein source tended to affect methylamine and putrescine concentrations (P = 0.06 each) being lower with HI larvae meal inclusion. Regarding the main effect of fat, a trend was determined for the concentration of spermine being higher in 0 L groups compared to 100 L groups (P = 0.07). No effect was observed for cadaverine, histamine and tyramine.

Table 6 Biogenic amines and ammonia in caecal digesta of broilers

Table 7 shows the concentration of SCFA in caecal digesta. Isocaproic acid, hexanoic acid and heptanoic acid concentrations were additionally analysed but values were below detection limit. No interaction effect on the determined SCFA concentrations was observed. With regard to the protein source, an effect on the concentration of butyric acid was monitored with higher concentrations in S groups compared to L groups (P = 0.03). The fat source tendentially affected the concentration of acetic acid increasing in 100 L groups compared to 50 L groups (P = 0.07). The concentration of propionic, valeric, isobutyric and isovaleric acid were neither affected by an interaction nor by the main effects protein and fat source.

Table 7 Short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations in caecal digesta of broilers

The concentrations of biogenic amines in the colonic digesta are presented in Table 8. Neither an interaction effect nor an effect of the protein source was observed. Concerning the fat source, HI larvae fat increased the concentration of agmatine (P = 0.03) when feeding 50% HI larvae fat compared to 0 HI larvae fat.

Table 8 Biogenic amines in colonic digesta of broilers

The analysis of the intestinal morphometric indices in the jejunum (Table 9) showed an interaction of protein and fat for Va (P = 0.01), which increased in L +  100 L compared to S + 100 L, as well as increased in 50 L compared to 0 L groups when fed HI larvae meal, but not when fed SBM. Regarding the protein source, Va (P = 0.02) and Vw (P = 0.03) were affected with L groups being higher than S groups. Fat source affected Va (P = 0.03) and tended to affect Vh (P = 0.06) and the ratio of Vh:Cd (P = 0.09). Villus area and Vh were higher in 50 L groups compared to 0 L groups. With respect to the ratio of Vh:Cd, 50 L tended to have a better ratio than 100 L. The variables crypth depth, number of goblet cells, mucosa, submucosa and tunica muscularis were neither affected by an interaction, nor protein or fat in the jejunum. In the ileum, an interaction was observed for Vw (P = 0.03), which was higher in L + 0 L compared to L + 100 L. No effect of protein source was observed. Concerning the fat source, a trend was observed for greater thickness of the submucosa in 50 L compared to 100 L groups. No interaction or main effects were observed for Vh, Va, Vh:Cd, number of goblet cells, mucosa and tunica muscularis in the ileum.

Table 9 Intestinal morphometric indices of broilers

Discussion

Animal performance

Our study showed that the use of HI larvae meal and fat did not negatively affect the performance of the animals. Remarkably, in the particularly important starter phase, the use of HI larvae meal even had a positive effect on chicken growth as evidenced by increased BW and ADG. For HI larvae fat, this was also true when exclusively fed together with HI larvae meal, which altogether confirms our hypothesis that HI larvae meal and fat can be fed without detrimental effects on performance. Regarding the effect of HI larvae meal as protein source, this coincides with the results of other studies showing that used in small amounts (5–10% of fresh matter in the diet), HI larvae meal leads to similar or even improved animal performance [22, 23, 25, 40].

The substitution of soybean oil with up to 100% of HI larvae fat has previously been shown to allow similar broiler performance [26, 28]. It has been stated that fatty acid digestibility increases with the degree of unsaturation and Tancharoenrat et al. [41] found a lower digestibility of palmitic and stearic acid compared to oleic and linoleic acids. Regarding oleic acid, there was a slightly higher concentration, i.e. one percentage unit, in L + 100 L compared to S + 100 L diet, which might have contributed to better performance in the starter phase. Furthermore, synergistic effects of blending vegetable and animal fats, as a result of an improved ratio of unsaturated to saturated fatty acids [42], cannot serve as an explanation for the improved performance observed in the present experiment, since first this ratio did not differ between these treatment groups in the starter phase (Table 3). Second, differences did occur when feeding HI larvae fat solely and were better for the combination of HI larvae fat with HI larvae meal. An explanation for the improved performance in the starter phase could be related to the limited capacity for fat digestion in young chickens. It is known that bile secretion and recirculation are low in the early life of broilers [18]. Since MCFA digestion does not depend on the formation of bile acid-mediated micelles [12], feeding HI larvae fat, which is rich in MCFA, may indeed be advantageous in broiler production. Likewise, the slightly higher lauric acid concentration in L + 100 L compared to S + 100 L would support the explanation of this mode of action also for the HI larvae meal, as evidenced by the higher fat digestibility when this protein source was fed.

Furthermore, it was noticeable that ADFI increased in L groups compared to S groups during grower, finisher, and the overall experimental period. This observed increased ADFI could be due to birds’ originally entomophagous food habit. This matches observations of Cullere et al. [43], who observed that quails tended to consume more feed if HI larvae meal was included. A similar behaviour was also observed by Nascimento et al. [44], determining a preference of broilers towards Tenebrio molitor meal in a cafeteria-type feeding. However, the opposite has previously been observed by Kieronczyk et al. [27], where broilers consumed less feed with higher HI larvae fat inclusion, which nevertheless resulted in a better FCR. However, as far as the present study is concerned, the higher ADFI did not lead to a higher ADG, which is why the FCR got worse in the grower period. Since there are yet no studies available investigating the effects of simultaneously feeding separated HI larvae meal and fat to broilers, direct comparisons of the observed interaction with other data are not yet possible.

Apparent ileal digestibility

Although the higher digestibility of DM, OM and ether extracts in the HI larvae meal diets has to be considered positive, it did only lead to a numerically higher performance in the finisher phase, when digestibility was measured, which is important from an economic point of view. When considering the results, however, it must be borne in mind that the present diets in general fulfilled or even exceeded the nutrient requirements, such as CP, lysine and AMEN concentrations. An improved digestibility likely could have exerted an effect on performance if the nutrient supply was limited or in shortage of the requirements. Provided the improved digestibility in the finisher phase can be extrapolated to all feeding phases, this may explain the enhanced performance of birds in the starter phase, in which high nutrient digestibility is especially important due to an immature gut development [18].

In terms of AID of CP, the present results fall neatly into those of previous studies suggesting an equal ileal CP digestibility when HI larvae meal accounted for low amounts (5%) in broiler diets [25]. Feeding broiler quails, Cullere et al. [43] found no effects of HI larvae meal (10–15% in the diet) on AID of nutrients except for a lower ether extract digestibility.

The lack of fat source-related effects on AID was rather surprising, as the different FA composition of HI larvae oil compared to soybean oil would have suggested changes in fat digestibility. On the one hand, HI larvae fat is known to contain MCFA and so the lauric acid content in the present finisher diets increased almost thirtyfold and twelvefold from 0 to 100% HI larvae fat (Table 3). As already stated, MCFA do not require bile acid-mediated micelle formation to be soluble in the aqueous phase [12], are passively absorbed and thus an immediate energy source for enterocytes and are therefore regarded readily available for the animal [12, 16]. On the other hand, this advantageous effect of MCFA and lauric acid may have been counteracted by the high share of longer saturated FA, which more than doubled in the finisher feeds from 0 to 100% HI larvae fat. Previous reports suggested poorer absorption of animal fats due to their highly bile-acid dependent digestion [18].

Additionally, synergistic effects have been reported for the blend of vegetable oils and animal fats improving fat digestion [18]. In the present study, the ratio of unsaturated to saturated FA in the diet has at least halved over all feeding phases within protein sources from groups with 0 larvae fat to 100% larvae fat. Contrary to the aforementioned observations of previous studies [12, 16, 18], we have neither seen an increase in digestibility due to lauric acid or a decrease due to saturated FA in 100% HI larvae fat groups, nor an improvement in the 50 L groups. In future research projects, however, it is worth investigating digestibility in the starter phase as well, to assess potential differences in this crucial phase of broiler production.

Microbial metabolites in the gut (biogenic amines, ammonia and SCFA)

Nutrients escaping the host digestion and absorption in the small intestine are subsequently exposed to microbial fermentation by the caecal microbiota [45], whose fermentation profile can provide valuable information about the metabolic response of the intestinal microorganisms to nutritional influences [46]. The key findings concerning microbial metabolites, namely higher concentrations of agmatine, spermidine, spermine, ammonia and a trend for higher putrescine concentrations in S groups, were surprising, since present data on CP AID did not differ between treatments, which means that no increased flow of undigested protein was expected. Consequently, other factors must have been caused the changes observed in microbial fermentation.

Merging the observations concerning biogenic amines with the findings related to SCFA analyses, i.e. an interaction of protein and fat on acetate and higher butyrate concentrations in SBM groups, some explanatory approaches arise. The first possible explanation for decreased putrefaction products in digesta of HI larvae fed groups may be chitin, which is found in the exoskeleton of insects and may act as (potential) prebiotic [47]. There is evidence that the addition of shrimp meal as source of chitin is able to beneficially shape caecal fermentation from protein to carbohydrate fermentation, thereby decreasing the caecal ammonia concentration in broilers [48]. This explanation also dovetails nicely with the studies of Biasato et al. [49] and Borrelli et al. [47], who concluded that an increase in SCFA-producing bacteria during HI larvae meal feeding may be related to the bacteria’s ability to degrade chitin. Moreover, similar observations, meaning a shift from protein to carbohydrate fermentation, accompanied by a reduced formation of biogenic amines and ammonia with increasing fermentable carbohydrates, have been made previously in pigs [50].

Secondly, the simultaneous observation of a tendency for higher putrescine and ammonia concentrations in SBM groups along with increased butyrate concentrations when feeding solely SBM may indicate a causal relation. Since those measured metabolite concentrations are not only the result of production but also absorption [51, 52], it thus remains questionable whether the higher caecal butyrate concentration derives from a higher production, or if it is rather the result of an accumulation due to impaired butyrate absorption. Interestingly, putrescine and ammonia have been shown to downregulate the expression of specific butyrate transporters (monocarboxylate transporter) in pigs, resulting in reduced energy supply to colonocytes [53, 54]. Thus, increased levels of putrescine and ammonia in SBM groups may have resulted in a downregulation of butyrate transporters, which may explain the higher amount of butyrate in SBM compared to HI larvae meal groups. Thus, on the one hand, an increased butyrate concentration can be regarded as positive in terms of improved energy provision for enterocytes [55]. On the other hand, it seems conceivable that increased butyrate concentrations in SBM groups result from reduced absorption, due to the above-mentioned downregulation of the monocarboxylate transporter, which would diminish its metabolic meaning.

Contrary to our hypothesis, we have not seen effects of the fat source on the concentrations of microbial metabolites, apart from a trend for less spermine concentrations in the caecum. This was unexpected, since previous studies indicated an antimicrobial activity of lauric acid [9]. However, there are contradictory results on the effects of MCFA in the distal gastrointestinal tract. On the one hand, it is assumed that MCFA are largely absorbed in the proximal intestine [12], which may reduce their presence in the hindgut. On the other hand, Wu et al. [21] showed that both the composition of the caecal microbiome and its fermentation profile changed through supplemented lauric acid to the diet.

Although the level of potentially harmful microbial fermentation products decreased with HI larvae meal inclusion, it remains to be elucidated why the butyrate level increased in the SBM group, which makes a more in-depth investigation of the microbiome and the metabolic mechanisms related to this effect necessary.

Histology

With its primary function to digest and subsequently absorb nutrients, the small intestine has a fundamental role for improving animal performance. In the present study, intestinal morphometric indices were analysed in the jejunum and ileum, since both segments are essential for fat digestion, i.e. the jejunum constitutes the major site for fat absorption [18], although changes in fat utilisation have mainly been associated with an increased absorption in the ileum [56]. The present analysis revealed that the jejunal Va was higher in L + 100 L compared to S + 100 L. Therefore, this was like the pattern observed for performance characteristics in the starter period, when both ADG and BW were higher in L + 100 L than S + 100 L. Assuming that the effect on Va was already present during starter phase, it may explain the improved animal performance in L + 100 L, since these animals would have a higher absorptive surface in the jejunum.

Apart from a slight tendency for the fat source to influence Vh:Cd in the jejunum, there was an absence of differences in Cd and Vh:Cd between treatments in both gut segments. This observation can be considered positive, as these indices are used to evaluate the turnover rate of the intestinal mucosa [57]. Thereby, deeper crypts indicate an increased cell turnover, since the stem-cell zone in the crypts is the starting point for cell renewal [58]. As an increased turnover rate means higher requirements for energy, which is then not available for muscle growth, the findings on Cd and Vh:Cd suggest that feeding the present amounts of HI larvae meal and fat to broilers will not change energy provision for growth. However, it has been shown by others that higher amounts of HI larvae meal negatively affect intestinal morphology in terms of shorter villi, deeper crypts and lower Vh:Cd [22, 59].

Another important parameter for assessing intestinal integrity are the goblet cells or the mucus secreted by them. The mucus produced serves the epithelium as protective barrier against physical and chemical damage [60] and operates as lubrication and transport medium between the contents of the lumen and the epithelium [61]. The present evaluation showed that the feeding of HI larvae meal and fat had no effect on the number of goblet cells in the jejunum and ileum. Based on the assumption that this number can indeed be used to infer the secretion activity of mucins, a similar level of mucus production can be deduced. Thus, no antinutritional factors seemed to be present in HI larvae protein and fat, which otherwise would have damaged the mucous epithelial protective barrier or which would have necessitated a higher level of mucus protection [60]. Based on an unchanged thickness of the tunica muscularis between the experimental groups, it can be assumed that intestinal peristalsis and thus contact of the luminal contents with the mucosa and ultimately nutrient absorption were undiminished [62]. Generally, the lack of substantial effects in the ileum is consistent with previous studies showing no alterations when feeding low amounts of HI larvae meal or up to 100% HI larvae fat to broiler chickens [25, 26].

Conclusions

The present study was the first to test the simultaneous use of HI larvae meal and HI larvae fat, administered separately, in broiler feeding. The performance results suggest the possibility of replacing up to 15% CP from SBM with HI larvae meal and up to 100% soybean oil with HI larvae fat without impairments in animal performance. The improved animal performance in terms of increased ADG and BW, observed in the starter period, shows that the use of HI larvae meal and fat is not only an adequate substitute for SBM, but can even have positive effects. This may be attributed to a higher AID, as indicated by improved AID when feeding HI larvae meal as protein source in the finisher phase. In addition, the use of HI larvae protein has partially reduced the concentration of potentially harmful microbial metabolites, which may be regarded as positive in terms of gut health. To confirm the assumption that the improved performance observed in the starter period is attributed to a higher digestibility, it would be useful to explicitly examine the digestibility in the starter phase in the future. Furthermore, assessment of the gut microbiota may help to understand the observed changes in microbial metabolites and should therefore be conducted in future studies.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AA:

Amino acids

ADF:

Acid-detergent fibre

ADFI:

Average daily feed intake

ADG:

Average daily gain

ADIN:

Acid-detergent insoluble nitrogen

AID:

Apparent ileal digestibility

AMEN :

Apparent metabolizable energy corrected for nitrogen

BW :

Body weight

CP:

Crude protein

FAME:

Fatty acid methyl ester

FCR:

Feed conversion rate

HI:

Hermetia illucens

MCFA:

Medium-chain fatty acids

SCFA:

Short-chain fatty acids

SBM:

Soybean meal

Va:

Villus area

Vh:

Villus height

Vh:Cd:

Villus height:Crypt depth

Vw:

Villus width

References

  1. European Commission. EU feed protein balance sheet. 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/food-farming-fisheries/farming/documents/eu-feed-protein-balance-sheet_2017-18_en.pdf. Accessed 8 Nov 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  2. ISAA. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2016: ISAA brief no. 52. Ithaca: ISAA; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sogari G, Amato M, Biasato I, Chiesa S, Gasco L. The potential role of insects as feed: a multi-perspective review. Animals. 2019;9(4):119. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040119.

  4. Józefiak A, Kierończyk B, Rawski M, Mazurkiewicz J, Benzertiha A, Gobbi P, et al. Full-fat insect meals as feed additive – the effect on broiler chicken growth performance and gastrointestinal tract microbiota. J Anim Feed Sci. 2018;27:131–9. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/91967/2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dicke M. Insects as feed and the sustainable development goals. J Insects Food Feed. 2018;4(3):147–56. https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2018.0003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gasco L, Acuti G, Bani P, Dalle Zotte A, Danieli PP, de Angelis A, et al. Insect and fish by-products as sustainable alternatives to conventional animal proteins in animal nutrition. Ital J Anim Sci. 2020;19(1):360–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2020.1743209.

  7. Gasco L, Biasato I, Dabbou S, Schiavone A, Gai F. Animals fed insect-based diets: state-of-the-art on digestibility, performance and product quality. Animals. 2019;9(4):170. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040170.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gasco L, Finke M, van Huis A. Can diets containing insects promote animal health? J Insects Food Feed. 2018;4(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2018.x001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abd El-Hack M, Shafi M, Alghamdi W, Abdelnour S, Shehata A, Noreldin A, et al. Black soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) meal as a promising feed ingredient for poultry: a comprehensive review. Agriculture. 2020;10(8):339. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10080339.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Makkar HP, Tran G, Heuzé V, Ankers P. State-of-the-art on use of insects as animal feed. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2014;197:1–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.07.008.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Caligiani A, Marseglia A, Leni G, Baldassarre S, Maistrello L, Dossena A, et al. Composition of black soldier fly prepupae and systematic approaches for extraction and fractionation of proteins, lipids and chitin. Food Res Int. 2018;105:812–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.12.012.

  12. Çenesiz AA, Çiftci. Modulatory effects of medium chain fatty acids in poultry nutrition and health. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2020;76(2):234–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00439339.2020.1739595.

  13. Finke MD. Complete nutrient content of four species of feeder insects. Zoo Biol. 2013;32(1):27–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21012.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Danieli PP, Lussiana C, Gasco L, Amici A, Ronchi B. The effects of diet formulation on the yield, proximate composition, and fatty acid profile of the black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens L.) prepupae intended for animal feed. Animals. 2019;9:178. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040178.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Cullere M, Schiavone A, Dabbou S, Gasco L, Dalle ZA. Meat quality and sensory traits of finisher broiler chickens fed with black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens L.) larvae fat as alternative fat source. Animals. 2019;9:140. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040140.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Bach AC, Babayan VK. Medium-chain triglycerides: an update. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982;36(5):950–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/36.5.950.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zentek J, Buchheit-Renko S, Ferrara F, Vahjen W, van Kessel AG, Pieper R. Nutritional and physiological role of medium-chain triglycerides and medium-chain fatty acids in piglets. Anim Health Res Rev. 2011;12(1):83–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252311000089.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ravindran V, Tancharoenrat P, Zaefarian F, Ravindran G. Fats in poultry nutrition: digestive physiology and factors influencing their utilisation. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2016;213:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.01.012.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Borrelli L, Varriale L, Dipineto L, Pace A, Menna LF, Fioretti A. Insect derived lauric acid as promising alternative strategy to antibiotics in the antimicrobial resistance scenario. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:620798. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.620798.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zeitz JO, Fennhoff J, Kluge H, Stangl GI, Eder K. Effects of dietary fats rich in lauric and myristic acid on performance, intestinal morphology, gut microbes, and meat quality in broilers. Poult Sci. 2015;94(10):2404–13. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev191.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu Y, Zhang H, Zhang R, Cao G, Li Q, Zhang B, et al. Serum metabolome and gut microbiome alterations in broiler chickens supplemented with lauric acid. Poult Sci. 2021;100(9):101315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101315.

  22. Dabbou S, Gai F, Biasato I, Capucchio MT, Biasibetti E, Dezzutto D, et al. Black soldier fly defatted meal as a dietary protein source for broiler chickens: effects on growth performance, blood traits, gut morphology and histological features. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2018;9(1):49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-018-0266-9.

  23. Velten S, Neumann C, Bleyer M, Gruber-Dujardin E, Hanuszewska M, Przybylska-Gornowicz B, et al. Effects of 50 percent substitution of soybean meal by alternative proteins from Hermetia illucens or Spirulina platensis in meat-type chicken diets with graded amino acid supply. Open J Anim Sci. 2018;08(02):119–36. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2018.82009.

  24. Schiavone A, Dabbou S, Petracci M, Zampiga M, Sirri F, Biasato I, et al. Black soldier fly defatted meal as a dietary protein source for broiler chickens: effects on carcass traits, breast meat quality and safety. Animal. 2019;13(10):2397–405. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119000685.

  25. Hartinger K, Greinix J, Thaler N, Ebbing MA, Yacoubi N, Schedle K, et al. Effect of graded substitution of soybean meal by Hermetia illucens larvae meal on animal performance, apparent ileal digestibility, gut histology and microbial metabolites of broilers. Animals. 2021;11(6):1628. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061628.

  26. Schiavone A, Dabbou S, de Marco M, Cullere M, Biasato I, Biasibetti E, et al. Black soldier fly larva fat inclusion in finisher broiler chicken diet as an alternative fat source. Animal. 2018;12(10):2032–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117003743.

  27. Kierończyk B, Sypniewski J, Rawski M, Czekała W, Świątkiewicz S, Józefiak D. From waste to sustainable feed material: the effect of Hermetia Illucens oil on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and gastrointestinal tract morphometry of broiler chickens. Ann Anim Sci. 2020;20(1):157–77. https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2019-0066.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schiavone A, Cullere M, de Marco M, Meneguz M, Biasato I, Bergagna S, et al. Partial or total replacement of soybean oil by black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens L.) fat in broiler diets: effect on growth performances, feed-choice, blood traits, carcass characteristics and meat quality. Ital J Anim Sci. 2017;16(1):93–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2016.1249968.

  29. Aviagen. Ross Broiler Management Handbook. 2018. http://en.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_Broiler/Ross-BroilerHandbook2018-EN.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2021.

  30. Aviagen. Ross 308 Broiler Nutrition Specifications. 2019. http://en.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_Broiler/RossBroilerNutritionSpecs2019-EN.pdf. Accessed 24 Mar 2020.

  31. Kong C, Adeola O. Evaluation of amino acid and energy utilization in feedstuff for swine and poultry diets. Asian-australas J Anim Sci. 2014;27(7):917–25. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.r.02.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Verband Deutscher Landwirtschaftlicher Untersuchungs- und Forschungsanstalten (VDLUFA). Die chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln. 3rd ed. Darmstadt: VDLUFA-Verlag; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hansen B. Determination of nitrogen as elementary N, an alternative to Kjeldahl. Acta Agric Scand. 1989;39(2):113–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00015128909438504.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Licitra G, Hernandez TM, van Soest PJ. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1996;57(4):347–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00837-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Leone JL. Collaborative study of the quantitative determination of titanium dioxide in cheese. J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1973;56(3):535–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/56.3.535.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Waters Corporation. Waters AccQ. Tag Chemistry Package Instruction Manual, Manual number WAT052874; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sukhija PS, Palmquist DL. Rapid method for determination of total fatty acid content and composition of feedstuffs and feces. J Agric Food Chem. 1988;36(6):1202–6. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00084a019.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Saarinen MT. Determination of biogenic amines as dansyl derivatives in intestinal digesta and feces by reversed phase HPLC. Chromatographia. 2002;55(5-6):297–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02491662.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhao G, Nyman M, Jönsson JA. Rapid determination of short-chain fatty acids in colonic contents and faeces of humans and rats by acidified water-extraction and direct-injection gas chromatography. Biomed Chromatogr. 2006;20(8):674–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmc.580.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Moula N, Detilleux J. A meta-analysis of the effects of insects in feed on poultry growth performances. Animals. 2019;9(5):201. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9050201.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Tancharoenrat P, Ravindran V, Zaefarian F, Ravindran G. Digestion of fat and fatty acids along the gastrointestinal tract of broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2014;93(2):371–9. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03344.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ketels E, De Groote G. Effect of ratio of unsaturated to saturated fatty acids of the dietary lipid fraction on utilization and metabolizable energy of added fats in young chicks. Poult Sci. 1989;68(11):1506–12. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0681506.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cullere M, Tasoniero G, Giaccone V, Miotti-Scapin R, Claeys E, de Smet S, et al. Black soldier fly as dietary protein source for broiler quails: apparent digestibility, excreta microbial load, feed choice, performance, carcass and meat traits. Animal. 2016;10(12):1923–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731116001270.

  44. Nascimento Filho MA, Pereira RT, Oliveira ABS, de Suckeveris D, Burin Junior AM, Mastrangelo TA, et al. Cafeteria-type feeding of chickens indicates a preference for insect (Tenebrio molitor) larvae meal. Animals. 2020;10:627. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040627.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Apajalahti J, Vienola K. Interaction between chicken intestinal microbiota and protein digestion. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2016;221:323–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.004.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rehman HU, Vahjen W, Awad WA, Zentek J. Indigenous bacteria and bacterial metabolic products in the gastrointestinal tract of broiler chickens. Arch Anim Nutr. 2007;61(5):319–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450390701556817.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Borrelli L, Coretti L, Dipineto L, Bovera F, Menna F, Chiariotti L, et al. Insect-based diet, a promising nutritional source, modulates gut microbiota composition and SCFAs production in laying hens. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):16269. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16560-6.

  48. Khempaka S, Chitsatchapong C, Molee W. Effect of chitin and protein constituents in shrimp head meal on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, intestinal microbial populations, volatile fatty acids, and ammonia production in broilers. J Appl Poult Res. 2011;20(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2010-00162.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Biasato I, Ferrocino I, Dabbou S, Evangelista R, Gai F, Gasco L, et al. Black soldier fly and gut health in broiler chickens: insights into the relationship between cecal microbiota and intestinal mucin composition. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2020;11(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-019-0413-y.

  50. Pieper R, Kröger S, Richter JF, Wang J, Martin L, Bindelle J, et al. Fermentable fiber ameliorates fermentable protein-induced changes in microbial ecology, but not the mucosal response, in the colon of piglets. J Nutr. 2012;142(4):661–7. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.111.156190.

  51. Topping DL, Clifton PM. Short-chain fatty acids and human colonic function: roles of resistant starch and nonstarch polysaccharides. Physiol Rev. 2001;81(3):1031–64. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.2001.81.3.1031.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Montoya CA, Rutherfurd SM, Moughan PJ. Kiwifruit fibre level influences the predicted production and absorption of SCFA in the hindgut of growing pigs using a combined in vivo-in vitro digestion methodology. Br J Nutr. 2016;115(8):1317–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114515002883.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Gilbert MS, Ijssennagger N, Kies AK, van Mil SWC. Protein fermentation in the gut; implications for intestinal dysfunction in humans, pigs, and poultry. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2018;315(2):G159–70. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00319.2017.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Villodre Tudela C, Boudry C, Stumpff F, Aschenbach JR, Vahjen W, Zentek J, et al. Down-regulation of monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1) gene expression in the colon of piglets is linked to bacterial protein fermentation and pro-inflammatory cytokine-mediated signalling. Br J Nutr. 2015;113(4):610–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114514004231.

  55. Rinttila T, Apajalahti J. Intestinal microbiota and metabolites—implications for broiler chicken health and performance1. J Appl Poult Res. 2013;22(3):647–58. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2013-00742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Rodriguez-Sanchez R, Tres A, Sala R, Guardiola F, Barroeta AC. Evolution of lipid classes and fatty acid digestibility along the gastrointestinal tract of broiler chickens fed different fat sources at different ages. Poult Sci. 2019;98(3):1341–53. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey458.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. van Nevel CJ, Decuypere JA, Dierick NA, Molly K. Incorporation of galactomannans in the diet of newly weaned piglets: effect on bacteriological and some morphological characteristics of the small intestine. Arch Anim Nutr. 2005;59(2):123–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450390512331387936.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Yamauchi K. Review of a histological intestinal approach to assessing the intestinal function in chickens and pigs. Animal Sci J. 2007;78(4):356–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2007.00448.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Cutrignelli MI, Messina M, Tulli F, Randazzo B, Olivotto I, Gasco L, et al. Evaluation of an insect meal of the black soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) as soybean substitute: intestinal morphometry, enzymatic and microbial activity in laying hens. Res Vet Sci. 2018;117:209–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.12.020.

  60. Kim YS, Ho SB. Intestinal goblet cells and mucins in health and disease: recent insights and progress. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2010;12(5):319–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-010-0131-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Deplancke B, Gaskins HR. Microbial modulation of innate defense: goblet cells and the intestinal mucus layer. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;73(6):1131S–41S. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/73.6.1131s.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Alshamy Z, Richardson KC, Hünigen H, Hafez HM, Plendl J, Al MS. Comparison of the gastrointestinal tract of a dual-purpose to a broiler chicken line: a qualitative and quantitative macroscopic and microscopic study. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0204921. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204921.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We kindly acknowledge the help of Thomas Hartinger for his help during performing the trial, as well as Maria Corcuera Gomez, Markus Schmidt, Rene Strecha and Tanja Lenz (Institute of Animal Nutrition, Livestock Products, and Nutrition Physiology) for their support in laboratory analyses.

Funding

The research was supported by the Federal Ministry Republic of Austria, Agriculture, Regions and Tourism (LE 14–20; Application number 16.1.1-S2–23/18 and 16.2.1.-S2–23/18), within an EIP-Project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KH and MG designed the experiment. KH, KF and MAE prepared the diets and performed the trial. KH, KF and MAE collected experimental data. KH and KF investigated zootechnical performance, BB determined histomorphological parameters, KH established microbial metabolites. KH and MG performed statistical analyses. KH, KF, KS, CS and MG analysed and interpreted the data. KH wrote the first draft of the manuscript. The manuscript was critically reviewed, and its final version approved to be published by all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Gierus.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The feeding trial was authorised by the Federal Office for Food Safety (Austria) according to § 10 Abs 1 Futtermittelgesetz 1999, BGBl. I Nr. 139/1999 (FMG) with the reference number BAES-FMT-FV-2018-0001. The Ethics Committee of the University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna approved the trial with the reference number 2021/006.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hartinger, K., Fröschl, K., Ebbing, M.A. et al. Suitability of Hermetia illucens larvae meal and fat in broiler diets: effects on animal performance, apparent ileal digestibility, gut histology, and microbial metabolites. J Animal Sci Biotechnol 13, 50 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00701-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00701-7

Keywords

  • Broiler chicken
  • Hermetia illucens
  • Larvae fat
  • Larvae meal
  • Lauric acid
  • Microbial metabolites
  • Performance