Skip to main content
Download PDF

Enhancement of porcine in vitro embryonic development through luteolin-mediated activation of the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology volume 14, Article number: 148 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Oxidative stress, caused by an imbalance in the production and elimination of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), has been recognized for its detrimental effects on mammalian embryonic development. Luteolin (Lut) has been documented for its protective effects against oxidative stress in various studies. However, its specific role in embryonic development remains unexplored. This study aims to investigate the influence of Lut on porcine embryonic development and to elucidate the underlying mechanism.

Results

After undergoing parthenogenetic activation (PA) or in vitro fertilization, embryos supplemented with 0.5 µmol/L Lut displayed a significant enhancement in cleavage and blastocyst formation rates, with an increase in total cell numbers and a decrease in the apoptosis rate compared to the control. Measurements on D2 and D6 revealed that embryos with Lut supplementation had lower ROS levels and higher glutathione levels compared to the control. Moreover, Lut supplementation significantly augmented mitochondrial content and membrane potential. Intriguingly, activation of the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway was observed in embryos supplemented with Lut, leading to the upregulation of antioxidant-related gene transcription levels. To further validate the relationship between the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway and effects of Lut in porcine embryonic development, we cultured PA embryos in a medium supplemented with brusatol, with or without the inclusion of Lut. The positive effects of Lut on developmental competence were negated by brusatol treatment.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that Lut-mediated activation of the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway contributes to the enhanced production of porcine embryos with high developmental competence, and offers insight into the mechanisms regulating early embryonic development.

Background

In vitro production (IVP) of embryos, which encompasses in vitro culture (IVC), serves as the cornerstone for various embryo engineering techniques. It is an invaluable asset for animal husbandry, assisted reproductive technologies, and the study of early embryogenesis mechanisms [1]. Although numerous studies have sought to refine IVC conditions to enhance the quality of IVP embryos, the in vivo microenvironment during embryonic development remains challenging to replicate fully [2, 3]. Consequently, there is an urgent need for the continual development and optimization of IVC systems to improve IVP embryo quality.

One of the primary challenges facing IVP embryos is their reduced developmental capacity. This is attributed to the oxidative stress induced by exposure to light, oxygen, and oxidizing agents during IVP, which leads to an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels [4]. The ROS family, which includes the superoxide radical, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radical, is produced as a byproduct of intracellular metabolic activities, particularly in the mitochondrial respiratory chain. ROS are critical in regulating various cellular signaling pathways, including proliferation, differentiation, and survival [5]. However, excessive intracellular accumulation of ROS disrupts redox homeostasis, leading to oxidative stress. This can have a range of detrimental effects, including lipid peroxidation, protein denaturation, DNA damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, and apoptosis [6, 7]. In the in vivo environment, the female reproductive tract synthesizes several antioxidant enzymes, such as catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxidase (GPX). These enzymes are part of antioxidant systems that protect against ROS-induced damage. However, these systems are often deficient in IVC conditions [8]. This is particularly concerning for porcine embryos, which are highly susceptible to changes in the culture environment due to their elevated cellular lipid content compared to other species [9]. Previous studies have attempted to mitigate oxidative stress by supplementing IVC media with various ROS scavengers, such as vitamin C, melatonin, and lycopene [10,11,12]. However, the efficiency of porcine IVP still falls short when compared to the natural in vivo environment. This highlights the need to identify more potent antioxidants and to understand the underlying mechanisms governing the developmental capacity of porcine IVP embryos.

Luteolin (Lut), a flavonoid compound, also recognized as 3,4,5,7-tetrahydroxyflavone, is present in a diverse array of plants, including herbs, vegetables, and fruits [13]. Lut possesses an assortment of pharmacological properties owing to its ability to modulate redox states. These properties encompass anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, anticancer, antiangiogenic, and neuroprotective activities [14]. Importantly, Lut possesses antioxidant activity and has been shown to curtail the formation of free radicals, thereby combating oxidative stress in numerous cell types [15,16,17]. While the biological and physiological functions of Lut have been extensively documented, its impact on porcine in vitro embryonic development and the associated signaling pathways remains unexplored.

The nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)/Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1) signaling pathway is widely recognized as a key oxidative stress defense mechanism, as it regulates the expression of antioxidant enzymes and genes related to redox homeostasis [18]. Under normal conditions, Nrf2 is ubiquitinated by Keap1 in the cytoplasm and subsequently degraded through the proteasome pathway. However, when cells experience electrophilic or oxidative stress, Nrf2 dissociates from Keap1 and migrates to the nucleus. There, it binds to the antioxidant response element (ARE) and orchestrates antioxidant activity by modulating the expression of genes involved in detoxification and antioxidant defense mechanisms [19]. Among the target genes are SOD, CAT, GPX, heme oxygenase-1, and NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1, which are critical for cellular survival and are instrumental in neutralizing harmful oxidants within the cellular environment [20]. Therefore, the induction of this signaling pathway using external activators may hold significant promise for managing excessive ROS accumulation and fostering embryonic development.

Numerous studies have highlighted the protective role of Lut against oxidative stress through the activation of the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway [21, 22]. However, evidence elucidating the relationship between Lut and the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway specifically in porcine in vitro embryonic development is currently lacking. Consequently, this study aimed to investigate the porcine in vitro embryonic development and to elucidate the underlying mechanism by adding optimal concentrations of Lut to the IVC medium. This was achieved by assessing the quality of the blastocysts, monitoring intracellular levels of ROS and glutathione (GSH), and evaluating mitochondrial content and membrane potential. Additionally, we sought to discern the connection between the role of Lut and the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway during porcine early embryogenesis.

Methods

Chemicals

All the chemicals and reagents employed in this study were procured from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO, USA), except where specified otherwise.

Oocyte collection and in vitro maturation (IVM)

Porcine ovaries were sourced from a local abattoir in close proximity. The ovaries were transported in 0.9% saline solution, supplemented with 75 μg/mL of benzyl-penicillin potassium G and 50 μg/mL of streptomycin sulfate, at a temperature of 38.5 °C. Cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were extracted from follicles of 3 to 6 mm in diameter by aspiration, using a disposable 10-mL syringe fitted with an 18-gauge needle. The COCs were then rinsed in 0.9% saline solution enriched with 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA). Subsequently, the COCs underwent maturation in IVM medium (Tissue Culture Medium 199, complemented with 10% porcine follicular fluid, 0.57 mmol/L cysteine, 10 ng/mL epidermal growth factor, and 25 μmol/L β-mercaptoethanol), with the addition of 10 IU/mL pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (HOR-272, Prospec, Israel) and 10 IU/mL Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HOR-250, Prospec). This maturation process was carried out in a 4-well dish (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) under an atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 38.5 °C for an initial period of 22 h. Following the initial 22 h maturation period, the COCs underwent further maturation in IVM medium, this time without hormones, for an additional 22 h. Post-IVM, the cumulus cells were detached by gentle pipetting in the presence of 0.1% hyaluronidase. Only oocytes displaying a visible polar body, indicative of normal morphology and homogeneous cytoplasm, were used in subsequent experiments.

Parthenogenetic activation (PA), in vitro fertilization (IVF), and IVC

For PA, selected metaphase II oocytes were exposed to 15 μmol/L of ionomycin in the dark for 5 min in Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS; Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 60 μg/mL gentamicin sulfate salt, 75 μg/mL streptomycin sulfate, and 4 mg/mL BSA. Subsequently, these metaphase II oocytes were cultured in IVC medium (porcine zygote medium-3 containing 4 mg/mL BSA) supplemented with 5 µg/mL cytochalasin B and 2 mmol/L 6-dimethylaminopurine under a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 38.5 °C for 4 h. After this period, the activated oocytes were transferred to fresh IVC medium and incubated under 5% CO2 at 38.5 °C for 6 d.

For IVF, the modified Tris-buffered medium (mTBM) was prepared with 113.1 mmol/L NaCl, 3 mmol/L KCl, 7.5 mmol/L CaCl2·2H2O, 20 mmol/L Tris (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States), 11 mmol/L glucose, 5 mmol/L sodium pyruvate, 2.5 mmol/L caffeine sodium benzoate, and 1 mg/mL BSA. Fresh swine spermatozoa were washed three times with sperm washing medium (DPBS containing 60 μg/mL gentamicin sulfate salt, 75 μg/mL streptomycin sulfate, and 1 mg/mL BSA). After washing, 2 mL of sperm washing medium was gently added to the spermatozoa pellet, followed by incubation for 15 min under 5% CO2 at 38.5 °C. The spermatozoa were then resuspended in 1 mL of mTBM. A 2-μL aliquot of this diluted spermatozoa solution was added to mTBM containing 10–15 oocytes, achieving a final concentration of 1.5 × 105 spermatozoa/mL. Oocytes and spermatozoa were co-incubated under 5% CO2 at 38.5 °C for 6 h. Following this, attached spermatozoa were removed by gentle pipetting, and the embryos were cultured in IVC medium under 5% CO2 at 38.5 °C for 6 d. Cleavage and blastocyst formation were evaluated on 2 and 6 d, respectively.

Chemical treatment

Lut (L9283, purity ≥ 98%; Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and further diluted with IVC medium to achieve final concentrations of 0, 0.05, 0.5, and 5 μmol/L. To investigate the correlation between Lut and the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway, brusatol (SML1868; Sigma-Aldrich) was also dissolved in DMSO and diluted with IVC medium to reach final concentrations of 0, 20, 50, and 100 nmol/L. The final DMSO concentration in the IVC medium was maintained below 0.2%.

Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-digoxygenin nick end-labeling (TUNEL) assay

The TUNEL assay was performed using the In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Blastocysts were fixed in a formalin solution overnight. After fixation, the blastocysts were washed three times in DPBS containing 0.1% polyvinyl alcohol (PVA-PBS) and then permeabilized in DPBS containing 1% (v/v) Triton X-100 at room temperature (RT) for 1 h. Following this, blastocysts were washed three times with PVA-PBS and stained with fluorescein-conjugated dUTP and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase for 1 h at 38.5 °C. After incubation, the blastocysts were rinsed three times in PVA-PBS and mounted on slides with Vectashield containing DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). DAPI-labeled and TUNEL-positive nuclei were visualized using a fluorescence microscope (DMi8; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).

Measurement of intracellular ROS and GSH Levels

The intracellular levels of ROS and GSH were measured using CM-H2DCFDA (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and CMF2HC (Invitrogen), respectively. Embryos on D2 and blastocysts on D6 were washed three times with PVA-PBS and then incubated in PVA-PBS containing 5 μmol/L CM-H2DCFDA (for ROS) or 10 μmol/L CMF2HC (for GSH) for 10 min and 30 min, respectively. After incubation, both the D2 embryos and D6 blastocysts were washed three times with PVA-PBS, and their fluorescence was observed under a fluorescence microscope (Leica) with ultraviolet filters (460 nm for ROS and 370 nm for GSH). Fluorescence intensities were analyzed using ImageJ software (version 1.47; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) and normalized to the control embryo size.

Assessment of mitochondrial content and membrane potential

The content of active mitochondria and the mitochondrial membrane potential were evaluated using MitoTracker Red CMXRos (Invitrogen) and tetramethylrhodamine, methyl ester (TMRM; Invitrogen), respectively. For MitoTracker staining, D2 embryos and D6 blastocysts were washed three times with PVA-PBS and then incubated in PVA-PBS containing 200 nmol/L MitoTracker for 30 min. Following incubation, they were washed three times with PVA-PBS and observed under a fluorescence microscope (Leica). For TMRM staining, D2 embryos and D6 blastocysts underwent a similar process, but with incubation in PVA-PBS containing 200 nmol/L TMRM for 30 min. Subsequently, they were stained with 10 μg/mL Hoechst 33342 for 10 min and then observed under a fluorescence microscope (Leica). Fluorescence intensities were quantified using ImageJ software and normalized to the control embryo size.

Immunocytochemistry

Blastocysts were fixed in a formalin solution overnight and subsequently washed three times in PVA-PBS. They were then permeabilized with DPBS containing 1% Triton X-100 at RT for 1 h. After permeabilization, blastocysts were washed three more times in PVA-PBS and transferred to a blocking solution (DPBS containing 0.05% v/v Tween 20 and 2 mg/mL BSA) for 1 h at RT. Following this, blastocysts were incubated with primary antibodies Nrf2 (1:200; ab31163; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, United States) and Keap1 (1:200; ab226997; Abcam) overnight at 4 °C [23]. After incubation with primary antibodies, blastocysts were washed three times with DPBS containing 0.05% v/v Tween 20 and again placed in blocking solution for 1 h at RT. They were then incubated with the secondary antibody (1:200; Alexa Fluor 488-labeled goat anti-rabbit) for 1 h at RT. Finally, the blastocysts were washed with DPBS containing 0.05% v/v Tween 20 and mounted on slides with DAPI. Signal intensities were observed under a fluorescence microscope (Leica), and fluorescence intensities were quantified using ImageJ software and normalized to the control embryo size.

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

Poly(A) mRNAs were extracted from blastocysts using the Dynabeads mRNA Direct Kit (Invitrogen), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The samples were lysed for 5 min at RT using 100 μL of lysis/binding buffer, and 30 μL of Dynabeads oligo (dT)25 was added to each sample. Subsequently, the beads were separated from the binding buffer using a Dynal magnetic bar (Invitrogen). The bound poly(A) mRNA and beads were isolated by washing with washing buffers A and B, followed by the addition of 7 μL of Tris buffer. Reverse transcription was then carried out using the Prime Script RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan), as per the manufacturer's instructions. The resulting cDNA was used as a template for PCR amplification, with PCR conditions set at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 20 s and 60 °C for 20 s. The experiments were conducted using an Mx3000P QPCR system (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, United States) and SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara Bio Inc.). The primers used in the study are listed in Additional file 1.

Experimental design

We aimed to investigate the effect of Lut on porcine early embryogenesis. We conducted experiments using PA embryos to prevent variations due to sperm factors associated with IVF. In Exp. 1, a total of 783 PA embryos were used for five independent replicates to evaluate the effect of Lut at various concentrations (0, 0.05, 0.5, and 5 µmol/L) on cleavage and blastocyst formation rate, and total cell numbers. Based on embryonic development results, we chose a 0.5-µmol/L concentration of Lut for following experiments. A total of 84 PA blastocysts were used for three independent replicates to evaluate the cellular apoptosis and a total of 120 PA blastocysts were used for three independent replicates to examine the mRNA expression levels of developmental potential and apoptosis-related genes. In Exp. 2, we examined the antioxidant activity of Lut on porcine early embryogenesis. A total of 96 D2 4-cell embryos and 52 D6 blastocysts were used for three independent replicates to evaluate the intracellular ROS levels and a total of 72 D2 4-cell embryos and 48 D6 blastocysts were used for three independent replicates to evaluate the intracellular GSH levels. In Exp. 3, we examined the effect of Lut on mitochondrial functions in porcine PA embryos. A total of 102 D2 4-cell embryos and 52 D6 blastocysts were used for three independent replicates to evaluate the mitochondrial content and a total of 46 D2 4-cell embryos and 48 D6 blastocysts were used for three independent replicates to evaluate the mitochondrial membrane potential. In Exp. 4, we examined the expression levels of proteins and mRNAs associated with the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway in porcine early embryogenesis. A total of 48 and 60 D6 blastocysts were used for three independent replicates to analyze the expression levels of Nrf2 and Keap1 by immunocytochemistry and a total of 120 D6 blastocysts were used for three independent replicates to analyze the mRNA expression levels of downstream target genes associated with the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway. To elucidate the interplay between the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway and the beneficial effects of Lut, we applied 50 nmol/L brusatol (an Nrf2 inhibitor) based on our preliminary experiment (Additional file 6: Table S6, Additional file 9: Fig. S1). In Exp. 5, a total of 541 PA embryos were used for five independent replicates to evaluate the effect of Lut and brusatol on cleavage and blastocyst formation rate. A total of 63 D6 PA blastocysts were used for five independent replicates to evaluate the cellular apoptosis. In Exp. 6, a total of 108 and 114 D2 4-cell embryos were used for three independent replicates to evaluate the effect of Lut and brusatol on intracellular ROS and GSH levels. A total of 126 and 72 D2 4-cell embryos were used for three independent replicates to evaluate the effect of Lut and brusatol on mitochondrial content and membrane potential.

Statistical analyses

All experiments were conducted at least in triplicate, and data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data for two groups were compared using Student's t-test, while data for three or more groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance), followed by the Tukey–Kramer test. We used SigmaStat software (version 18; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for all statistical analyses.

Results

Lut enhances the developmental competence of porcine IVP embryos

To explore the impact of Lut on porcine early embryogenesis, we cultured PA embryos in a culture medium supplemented with various concentrations of Lut (0, 0.05, 0.5, and 5 µmol/L) for 6 d. The cleavage rate, blastocyst formation rate, and total cell numbers significantly increased with the supplementation of 0.5 µmol/L Lut, in comparison to the control (Fig. 1A–D, Additional file 2: Table S2). Through the TUNEL assay, we found that 0.5 µmol/L Lut supplementation significantly reduced both the number of apoptotic cells and the apoptosis rate compared to the control (Fig. 1E–G, Additional file 3: Table S3). Additionally, the expression levels of developmental potential-related genes (OCT4 and CDX2) were significantly elevated in the Lut group compared to the control. Although there was no significant difference in the expression levels of the pro-apoptosis-related gene (BAX), the expression levels of the anti-apoptosis-related gene (BCL-XL) and the BCL-XL/BAX ratio were significantly higher in the Lut group than in the control (Fig. 1H). Based on these findings, we selected 0.5 µmol/L Lut as the optimal concentration for promoting porcine embryonic development.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effects of luteolin (Lut) on the developmental competence of porcine parthenogenetic activation (PA) embryos. A Representative bright-field images (upper, scale bar = 200 µm) and nuclear-stained images (lower, scale bar = 50 µm) of blastocysts cultured with or without varying concentrations of Lut. B-D Quantification of cleavage rate, blastocyst formation rate, and total cell number in the indicated groups (0; n = 197, 0.05; n = 196, 0.5; n = 195, 5; n = 195). E Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase-Mediated dUTP Nick End Labeling (TUNEL) assay of blastocysts in the indicated groups. Embryos were stained for TUNEL (green, indicated by white arrows) and nuclei (blue). Scale bar = 50 µm. F, G Quantification of the number and proportion of apoptotic cells in the indicated groups (n = 42 per group). H Quantitative RT-PCR results for developmental potential and apoptosis-related genes in blastocysts (n = 3 per group). The data are derived from at least three independent experiments, and means with similar superscripts do not differ (P > 0.05)

Full size image

Furthermore, we investigated whether Lut supplementation could enhance the developmental competence of IVF embryos. In line with the results for PA, all parameters of developmental competence, including cleavage rate, blastocyst formation rate, total cell number, and cellular survival, were significantly improved with Lut supplementation compared to the control (Additional files 4 and 5: Tables S4 and S5, Additional file 9: Fig. S1). These results suggest that Lut supplementation positively affects porcine early embryogenesis.

Lut reduces oxidative stress in porcine PA embryos

To evaluate the antioxidant properties of Lut in porcine IVP embryos, we analyzed the intracellular levels of ROS and GSH in D2 embryos and D6 blastocysts. The intracellular ROS levels were significantly lower in D2 embryos and D6 blastocysts that were supplemented with Lut compared to the control (Fig. 2A and B). Conversely, the intracellular GSH levels were significantly higher in D2 embryos and D6 blastocysts with Lut supplementation compared to the control (Fig. 2C and D). These findings indicate that Lut exhibits antioxidant activity during porcine early embryogenesis.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effects of Lut on intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and glutathione (GSH) levels in porcine PA embryos. A Fluorescent images of D2 embryos and D6 blastocysts stained with CM-H2DCFDA in the indicated groups. Scale bar = 100 µm. B Quantification of ROS fluorescence intensity in the indicated groups (D2; n = 48 per group, D6; n = 26 per group). C Fluorescent images of D2 embryos and D6 blastocysts stained with CMF2HC in the indicated groups. Scale bar = 100 µm. D Quantification of GSH fluorescence intensity in the indicated groups (D2; n = 36 per group, D6; n = 24 per group). The data are derived from three independent experiments, and means with similar superscripts do not differ (P > 0.05)

Full size image

Lut enhances mitochondrial function in porcine PA embryos

To investigate the impact of Lut on mitochondrial function in porcine IVP embryos, we assessed mitochondrial content and membrane potential in D2 embryos and D6 blastocysts using MitoTracker and TMRM staining, respectively. Both the MitoTracker and TMRM intensity levels were significantly elevated in D2 embryos and D6 blastocysts that were supplemented with Lut compared to the control (Fig. 3). These findings suggest that Lut supplementation boosts the developmental competence of porcine IVP embryos by shielding mitochondrial function from ROS-mediated damages.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effects of Lut on mitochondrial functions in porcine PA embryos. A Fluorescent images of D2 embryos and D6 blastocysts stained with MitoTracker in the indicated groups. Scale bar = 100 µm. B Quantification of MitoTracker fluorescence intensity in the indicated groups (D2; n = 51 per group, D6; n = 26 per group). C Fluorescent images of D2 embryos and D6 blastocysts stained with TMRM in the indicated groups. Scale bar = 50 µm. D Quantification of TMRM fluorescence intensity in the indicated groups (D2; n = 23 per group, D6; n = 24 per group). The data are derived from three independent experiments, and means with similar superscripts do not differ (P > 0.05)

Full size image

Lut activates the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway in porcine PA embryos

The Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway is renowned for its role in cellular defense mechanisms against oxidative stress. To determine whether Lut activates the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway during porcine early embryogenesis, we examined the expression levels of proteins and mRNAs associated with the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway in porcine blastocysts. The Nrf2 levels were significantly higher, while the Keap1 levels were notably lower in the Lut group compared to the control (Fig. 4A–D). Furthermore, Lut supplementation altered the expression levels of downstream target genes associated with the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway (Fig. 4E), suggesting that Lut activates this pathway during porcine early embryogenesis. Additionally, we cultured PA embryos in a culture medium treated with various concentrations of brusatol (an Nrf2 inhibitor; 0, 20, 50, and 100 nmol/L) for 6 d. While brusatol did not influence the cleavage rate, it significantly diminished the blastocyst formation rate and total cell number in a concentration-dependent manner (Additional file 6: Table S6, Additional file 10: Fig. S2). Consequently, we selected 50 nmol/L brusatol for subsequent experiments.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effects of Lut on the Nrf2/Keap1 pathway in porcine PA embryos. A Fluorescent images of blastocysts stained for Nrf2 in the indicated groups. Scale bar = 50 µm. B Quantification of Nrf2 fluorescence intensity in the indicated groups (n = 24 per group). C Fluorescent images of blastocysts stained for Keap1 in the indicated groups. Scale bar = 50 µm. D Quantification of fluorescence intensity in the indicated groups (n = 30 per group). E Quantitative RT-PCR results for Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway-related genes in blastocysts (n = 3 per group). The data are derived from three independent experiments, and means with similar superscripts do not differ (P > 0.05)

Full size image

Lut counteracts the detrimental effects of brusatol on the developmental competence of porcine PA embryos

To elucidate the interplay between the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway and the beneficial effects of Lut, we cultured PA embryos in IVC medium supplemented with brusatol, with or without Lut, and evaluated the cleavage rate, blastocyst formation rate, and apoptosis rate. The reduction in the blastocyst formation rate caused by brusatol exposure was alleviated by Lut supplementation, restoring it to control levels, although it did not influence the cleavage rate (Fig. 5A–C, Additional file 7: Table S7). Additionally, from the TUNEL assay, we observed that the Lut supplementation ameliorated the brusatol-induced decrease in total cell number and increase in apoptosis rate (Fig. 5D–G, Additional file 8: Table S8). To further substantiate these observations, we assessed intracellular ROS and GSH levels. Intracellular ROS levels were significantly elevated, and GSH levels were markedly diminished in D2 embryos supplemented with brusatol. However, Lut supplementation reestablished this imbalance to control levels (Fig. 6A–D). Moreover, the decrease in mitochondrial content and membrane potential induced by brusatol exposure was also counteracted by Lut supplementation (Fig. 6E–H).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Role of the Nrf2/Keap1 pathway in the effects of Lut on the early development of porcine PA embryos. A Representative bright-field images of blastocysts cultured in the indicated groups. Scale bar = 200 µm. B, C Quantification of the cleavage rate and blastocyst formation rate in the indicated groups (Con; n = 180, Bru; n = 180, Bru + Lut; n = 181). D TUNEL assay of blastocysts in the indicated groups. Embryos were stained for TUNEL (green, white arrow) and nuclei (blue). Scale bar = 50 µm. E-G Quantification of the total cell number, number of apoptotic cells, and proportion of apoptotic cells in the indicated groups (n = 21 per group). The data are derived from five independent experiments, and means with similar superscripts do not differ (P > 0.05)

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Role of the Nrf2/Keap1 pathway in the effects of Lut on ROS, GSH, and mitochondrial function in porcine PA embryos. A Fluorescent images of embryos stained with CM-H2DCFDA in the indicated groups. Scale bar = 100 µm. B Quantification of ROS fluorescence intensity in the indicated groups (n = 36 per group). C Fluorescent images of embryos stained with CMF2HC in the indicated groups. Scale bar = 100 µm. D Quantification of GSH fluorescence intensity in the indicated groups (n = 38 per group). E Fluorescent images of embryos stained with MitoTracker in the indicated groups. Scale bar = 100 µm. F Quantification of MitoTracker fluorescence intensity in the indicated groups (n = 42 per group). G Fluorescent images of embryos stained with TMRM in the indicated groups. Scale bar = 50 µm. H Quantification of TMRM fluorescence intensity in the indicated groups (n = 24 per group). The data are derived from three independent experiments, and means with similar superscripts do not differ (P > 0.05)

Full size image

Discussion

During IVC, oxidative stress can hinder the developmental competence of porcine IVP embryos, affecting parameters such as blastocyst formation, cell numbers, and cellular survival. Although considerable efforts have been made to enhance IVC systems by employing various antioxidants, the quality of porcine IVP embryos still falls short in comparison to in vivo-derived embryos [12, 24]. This underscores the need for continued exploration of more effective antioxidants and the optimization of IVC systems to both improve the quality of porcine IVP embryos and uncover the mechanisms involved. In this study, we delved into the effects of Lut on porcine IVP embryos and probed the potential underlying mechanisms. Our findings reveal that Lut ameliorates the developmental competence of porcine IVP embryos against oxidative stress, which is mediated through the activation of the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Graphical overview of the beneficial effects of Lut on porcine early embryogenesis. Lut supplementation during in vitro culture increases cleavage rate, blastocyst formation rate, total cell number, and cellular survival in porcine in vitro produced (IVP) embryos. Additionally, Lut exhibits antioxidant activity and enhances mitochondrial function. Notably, Lut activates the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway, and the impairments in early embryogenesis caused by brusatol are alleviated by Lut supplementation. These results suggest that Lut exerts beneficial effects on the developmental competence of porcine IVP embryos by reducing oxidative stress through the activation of the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway

Full size image

Lut, a yellow dye compound extracted from the plant Reseda luteola, contributes to the plant's ability to counter oxidative stress. Its antioxidant activity has been attributed to several mechanisms [14]. Structurally, Lut scavenges ROS through its oxidation, stabilizing the radical group, an ability attributed to the presence of a double bond between C2 and C3, a carbonyl group on C4, and 3′,4′ hydroxylation [25]. Furthermore, Lut curtails ROS generation by chelating transition metal ions and restraining xanthine oxidase activity [26]. It also directly inhibits enzymes responsible for the oxidation of cellular components, including lipoxygenase and cyclooxygenase [27]. Additionally, Lut can augment antioxidant activity synergistically through interactions with other antioxidants, such as vitamins and the cellular redox system [28]. Prior studies have highlighted effects of Lut in attenuating oxidative damage and mitigating free radical formation in rat cortical cells and neuroblastoma cells [29, 30]. Notably, our previous studies have shown that Lut can improve porcine oocyte quality and subsequent embryonic development by alleviating oxidative damage across various organelle dynamics [31, 32]. In the present study, we observed that embryos supplemented with Lut exhibited significantly lower levels of ROS and higher levels of GSH compared to the control. Furthermore, the addition of Lut during IVC markedly enhanced the developmental competence, as evidenced by the increase in cleavage rate, blastocyst formation rate, cell numbers, and cellular survival in porcine PA and IVF embryos. These findings underscore the potential of Lut as an antioxidant agent in porcine IVC systems.

Building on the understanding of Lut's antioxidant activity, we turned our focus to its relationship with the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway, which is instrumental in maintaining cellular redox homeostasis through the activation of antioxidant enzymes. An accumulating body of evidence underscores the significance of the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway within the female reproductive system. For instance, Nrf2 knockout mice display accelerated ovarian failure, a shortened gestation period, diminished birth weight, and increased cellular apoptosis [33, 34]. Moreover, silencing Nrf2 through the injection of small interfering RNA into fully grown oocytes adversely affects the maintenance of spindle assembly and meiotic division [35]. While previous studies have documented that Lut counteracts oxidative stress by fortifying the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway in diverse cell types [21, 36], no studies have yet explored the impact of Lut on this signaling pathway in the context of porcine early embryogenesis. Our findings reveal that the inclusion of Lut in the IVC significantly elevates Nrf2 levels and the abundance of downstream antioxidant target mRNAs, while concurrently decreasing Keap1 levels. This suggests that Lut may thwart proteasomal degradation of the Nrf2 protein by interfering with the Keap1-dependent E3 ubiquitin activity, culminating in the stabilization and nuclear accumulation of Nrf2. Additionally, Nrf2 is identified as an essential regulator of self-renewal and pluripotency in human embryonic stem cells [37]. Previous studies have posited that the inclusion of antioxidants in IVC bolsters blastocyst formation rate, cell numbers, and pluripotency by mitigating oxidative stress via the activation of the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway in porcine IVP embryos [38, 39]. In alignment with these studies, our data reveals that Lut supplementation during IVC significantly elevates both the developmental competence and the expression levels of developmental potential-related genes, which suggests that Nrf2 is instrumental in governing pluripotency during cellular reprogramming. These findings compellingly indicate that the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway is central to porcine early embryogenesis.

To further ascertain whether Lut's antioxidant activity enhances the developmental competence of porcine IVP embryos by modulating the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway, we employed brusatol, a specific inhibitor of Nrf2. Brusatol induces a rapid and transient depletion of Nrf2 proteins via post-transcriptional mechanisms, such as the inhibition of protein synthesis and the stimulation of ubiquitination and proteolysis [40]. Previous studies have shown that treatment with brusatol impairs mouse embryonic development by inhibiting cell cycle progression; however, these adverse effects can be ameliorated by microinjection of an Nrf2 overexpression plasmid [41]. Furthermore, brusatol treatment has been found to substantially decrease blastocyst formation, total cell number, and cellular survival in porcine embryos [42]. Consistent with these studies, our data demonstrates that brusatol substantially and concentration-dependently reduces the blastocyst formation rate and total cell number. Intriguingly, Lut supplementation was able to mitigate the detrimental effects of brusatol on porcine early embryogenesis, underscoring the intimate link between beneficial effects of Lut and the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway.

Mitochondria are integral organelles for the successful maturation of oocytes, fertilization, and embryonic development, owing to their role in regulating cellular energy metabolism, calcium signaling, and apoptosis [43]. Consequently, mitochondrial membrane potential is extensively employed as an indicator of mitochondrial function. Nonetheless, excessive accumulation of ROS can inhibit the process of mitochondrial biogenesis, which encompasses the synthesis of new mtDNA, membrane formation, and mitochondrial division [44]. A study has revealed that Lut fosters mitochondrial biogenesis by amplifying the levels of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator 1α, a principal orchestrator of mitochondrial biogenesis, and nitric oxide levels, which sets in motion signaling events that underpin mitochondrial biogenesis [45]. Additionally, Lut stimulates sirtuins and forkhead box O3a, which are situated in the mitochondria and modulate metabolism by curbing ROS production [46]. In alignment with previous studies, our findings indicate that Lut supplementation during IVC augments mitochondrial content and membrane potential in porcine IVP embryos, signifying that Lut bolsters mitochondrial function by alleviating oxidative stress. It is noteworthy that one of the salient functions of Nrf2 is to oversee mitochondrial biogenesis and functionality by enhancing the antioxidant response [47]. Nrf2 boosts mitochondrial membrane potential for ATP production by promoting glucose uptake and pyruvate flux [48]. Our findings demonstrated that Lut supplementation counteracts the depletion of mitochondrial content and membrane potential induced by brusatol exposure. Collectively, these findings suggest that Lut exerts protective effects on mitochondrial biogenesis and ameliorates mitochondrial dysfunction by activating the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway.

Conclusion

This study represents the first investigation into the potential association between Lut and the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway in porcine IVP embryos. These results may offer a promising strategy for enhancing porcine IVC systems and afford insights into the role of the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway in porcine early embryogenesis. Our findings can be applied to obtain a higher yield from assisted reproductive technologies as a method to improve pig production and also as a basic tool for preserving endangered porcine breeds.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ARE:

Antioxidant response element

BSA:

Bovine serum albumin

CAT:

Catalase

COCs:

Cumulus-oocyte complexes

DMSO:

Dimethyl sulfoxide

GPX:

Glutathione peroxidase

GSH:

Glutathione

IVC:

In vitro culture

IVF:

In vitro fertilization

IVM:

In vitro maturation

IVP:

In vitro production

Keap1:

Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1

Lut:

Luteolin

mTBM:

Modified Tris-buffered medium

Nrf2:

Erythroid-2-related factor 2

PA:

Parthenogenetic activation

PVA-PBS:

0.1% Polyvinyl alcohol

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

RT:

Room temperature

SOD:

Superoxide dismutase

TUNEL:

Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase-Mediated dUTP-Digoxygenin Nick End-Labeling

References

  1. Fowler KE, Mandawala AA, Griffin DK, Walling GA, Harvey SC. The production of pig preimplantation embryos in vitro: current progress and future prospects. Reprod Biol. 2018;18(3):203–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repbio.2018.07.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jeong PS, Yoon SB, Choi SA, Song BS, Kim JS, Sim BW, et al. Iloprost supports early development of in vitro-produced porcine embryos through activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/akt signalling pathway. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2017;29(7):1306–18. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD15391.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Luo D, Zhang JB, Liu W, Yao XR, Guo H, Jin ZL, et al. Leonurine improves in vitro porcine embryo development competence by reducing reactive oxygen species production and protecting mitochondrial function. Theriogenology. 2020;156:116–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.06.038.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Martinez CA, Cuello C, Parrilla I, Maside C, Ramis G, Cambra JM, et al. Exogenous melatonin in the culture medium does not affect the development of in vivo-derived pig embryos but substantially improves the quality of in vitro-produced embryos. Antioxidants (Basel). 2022;11:6. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11061177.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ray PD, Huang BW, Tsuji Y. Reactive oxygen species (ros) homeostasis and redox regulation in cellular signaling. Cell Signal. 2012;24(5):981–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.01.008.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Guerin P, El Mouatassim S, Menezo Y. Oxidative stress and protection against reactive oxygen species in the pre-implantation embryo and its surroundings. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7(2):175–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/7.2.175.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hardy MLM, Day ML, Morris MB. Redox regulation and oxidative stress in mammalian oocytes and embryos developed in vivo and in vitro. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111374.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Agarwal A, Gupta S, Sharma RK. Role of oxidative stress in female reproduction. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2005;3:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-3-28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kikuchi K, Ekwall H, Tienthai P, Kawai Y, Noguchi J, Kaneko H, et al. Morphological features of lipid droplet transition during porcine oocyte fertilisation and early embryonic development to blastocyst in vivo and in vitro. Zygote. 2002;10(4):355–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0967199402004100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hu J, Cheng D, Gao X, Bao J, Ma X, Wang H. Vitamin C enhances the in vitro development of porcine pre-implantation embryos by reducing oxidative stress. Reprod Domest Anim. 2012;47(6):873–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01982.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Liang S, Jin YX, Yuan B, Zhang JB, Kim NH. Melatonin enhances the developmental competence of porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos by preventing DNA damage induced by oxidative stress. Sci Rep. 2017;7:11114. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11161-9.

  12. Kang HG, Lee S, Jeong PS, Kim MJ, Park SH, Joo YE, et al. Lycopene improves in vitro development of porcine embryos by reducing oxidative stress and apoptosis. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021;10:2. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10020230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Imran M, Rauf A, Abu-Izneid T, Nadeem M, Shariati MA, Khan IA, et al. Luteolin, a flavonoid, as an anticancer agent: a review. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;112:108612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108612.

  14. Lin Y, Shi R, Wang X, Shen HM. Luteolin, a flavonoid with potential for cancer prevention and therapy. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2008;8(7):634–46. https://doi.org/10.2174/156800908786241050.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ashokkumar P, Sudhandiran G. Protective role of luteolin on the status of lipid peroxidation and antioxidant defense against azoxymethane-induced experimental colon carcinogenesis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2008;62(9):590–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2008.06.031.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. An F, Wang S, Yuan D, Gong Y, Wang S. Attenuation of oxidative stress of erythrocytes by plant-derived flavonoids, orientin and luteolin. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2016;2016:3401269. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3401269.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Z, Xu P, Yu H, Shi L. Luteolin protects PC-12 cells from H2O2-induced injury by up-regulation of microRNA-21. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;112:108698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108698.

  18. Nguyen T, Nioi P, Pickett CB. The Nrf2-antioxidant response element signaling pathway and its activation by oxidative stress. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(20):13291–5. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R900010200.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Keum YS, Choi BY. Molecular and chemical regulation of the Keap1-Nrf2 signaling pathway. Molecules. 2014;19(7):10074–89. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules190710074.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dionne G, Calder M, Betts DH, Rafea BA, Watson AJ. Expression and localization of Nrf2/Keap1 signalling pathway genes in mouse preimplantation embryos exposed to free fatty acids. Gene Expr Patterns. 2022;46:119281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gep.2022.119281.

  21. Lin CW, Wu MJ, Liu IY, Su JD, Yen JH. Neurotrophic and cytoprotective action of luteolin in PC12 cells through erk-dependent induction of Nrf2-driven HO-1 expression. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58(7):4477–86. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf904061x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Baiyun R, Li S, Liu B, Lu J, Lv Y, Xu J, et al. Luteolin-mediated PI3K/AKT/Nrf2 signaling pathway ameliorates inorganic mercury-induced cardiac injury. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;161:655–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.06.046.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Giraud S, Kerforne T, Zely J, Ameteau V, Couturier P, Tauc M, et al. The inhibition of eif5a hypusination by GC7, a preconditioning protocol to prevent brain death-induced renal injuries in a preclinical porcine kidney transplantation model. Am J Transplant. 2020;20(12):3326–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Joo YE, Jeong PS, Lee S, Jeon SB, Gwon MA, Kim MJ, et al. Anethole improves the developmental competence of porcine embryos by reducing oxidative stress via the sonic hedgehog signaling pathway. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2023;14:32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00824-x.

  25. Gendrisch F, Esser PR, Schempp CM, Wolfle U. Luteolin as a modulator of skin aging and inflammation. BioFactors. 2021;47(2):170–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/biof.1699.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nagao A, Seki M, Kobayashi H. Inhibition of xanthine oxidase by flavonoids. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1999;63(10):1787–90. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.63.1787.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Robak J, Shridi F, Wolbis M, Krolikowska M. Screening of the influence of flavonoids on lipoxygenase and cyclooxygenase activity, as well as on nonenzymic lipid oxidation. Pol J Pharmacol Pharm. 1988;40(5):451–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wolfle U, Haarhaus B, Schempp CM. The photoprotective and antioxidative properties of luteolin are synergistically augmented by tocopherol and ubiquinone. Planta Med. 2013;79(11):963–5. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1328716.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim S, Chin YW, Cho J. Protection of cultured cortical neurons by luteolin against oxidative damage through inhibition of apoptosis and induction of heme oxygenase-1. Biol Pharm Bull. 2017;40(3):256–65. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.b16-00579.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang YC, Gan FF, Shelar SB, Ng KY, Chew EH. Antioxidant and Nrf2 inducing activities of luteolin, a flavonoid constituent in ixeris sonchifolia hance, provide neuroprotective effects against ischemia-induced cellular injury. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013;59:272–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2013.05.058.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Park SH, Jeong PS, Joo YE, Kang HG, Kim MJ, Lee S, et al. Luteolin orchestrates porcine oocyte meiotic progression by maintaining organelle dynamics under oxidative stress. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:689826. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.689826.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Jeong PS, Yang HJ, Jeon SB, Gwon MA, Kim MJ, Kang HG, et al. Luteolin supplementation during porcine oocyte maturation improves the developmental competence of parthenogenetic activation and cloned embryos. PeerJ. 2023;11:e15618. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15618.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Hu X, Roberts JR, Apopa PL, Kan YW, Ma Q. Accelerated ovarian failure induced by 4-vinyl cyclohexene diepoxide in Nrf2 null mice. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26(3):940–54. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.26.3.940-954.2006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sussan TE, Sudini K, Talbot CC Jr, Wang X, Wills-Karp M, Burd I, et al. Nrf2 regulates gene-environment interactions in an animal model of intrauterine inflammation: Implications for preterm birth and prematurity. Sci Rep. 2017;7:40194. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40194.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ma R, Liang W, Sun Q, Qiu X, Lin Y, Ge X, et al. Sirt1/Nrf2 pathway is involved in oocyte aging by regulating Cyclin B1. Aging (Albany NY). 2018;10:10:2991–3004. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.101609.

  36. Li L, Luo W, Qian Y, Zhu W, Qian J, Li J, et al. Luteolin protects against diabetic cardiomyopathy by inhibiting NF-kB-mediated inflammation and activating the Nrf2-mediated antioxidant responses. Phytomedicine. 2019;59:152774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2018.11.034.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Jang J, Wang Y, Kim HS, Lalli MA, Kosik KS. Nrf2, a regulator of the proteasome, controls self-renewal and pluripotency in human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2014;32(10):2616–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.1764.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu RP, Wang J, Wang XQ, Wang CR, He SY, Xu YN, et al. Xanthoangelol promotes early embryonic development of porcine embryos by relieving endoplasmic reticulum stress and enhancing mitochondrial function. Reprod Biomed Online. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.04.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang XQ, Liu RP, Wang J, Luo D, Li YH, Jiang H, et al. Wedelolactone facilitates the early development of parthenogenetically activated porcine embryos by reducing oxidative stress and inhibiting autophagy. PeerJ. 2022;10:e13766. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13766.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ma R, Li H, Zhang Y, Lin Y, Qiu X, Xie M, et al. The toxic effects and possible mechanisms of brusatol on mouse oocytes. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(5):e0177844. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177844.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lin Y, Sui LC, Wu RH, Ma RJ, Fu HY, Xu JJ, et al. Nrf2 inhibition affects cell cycle progression during early mouse embryo development. J Reprod Dev. 2018;64(1):49–55. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2017-042.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kim EH, Kim GA, Taweechaipaisankul A, Lee SH, Qasim M, Ahn C, et al. Melatonin enhances porcine embryo development via the Nrf2/ARE signaling pathway. J Mol Endocrinol. 2019;63(3):175–85. https://doi.org/10.1530/JME-19-0093.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. McBride HM, Neuspiel M, Wasiak S. Mitochondria: More than just a powerhouse. Curr Biol. 2006;16(14):R551–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.054.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Bhatti JS, Bhatti GK, Reddy PH. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in metabolic disorders - a step towards mitochondria based therapeutic strategies. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2017;1863(5):1066–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.11.010.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Suh KS, Chon S, Choi EM. Luteolin alleviates methylglyoxal-induced cytotoxicity in osteoblastic mc3t3-e1 cells. Cytotechnology. 2016;68(6):2539–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-016-9977-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kim A, Lee W, Yun JM. Luteolin and fisetin suppress oxidative stress by modulating sirtuins and forkhead box o3a expression under in vitro diabetic conditions. Nutr Res Pract. 2017;11(5):430–4. https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2017.11.5.430.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Esteras N, Abramov AY. Nrf2 as a regulator of mitochondrial function: Energy metabolism and beyond. Free Radic Biol Med. 2022;189:136–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.07.013.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Holmstrom KM, Baird L, Zhang Y, Hargreaves I, Chalasani A, Land JM, et al. Nrf2 impacts cellular bioenergetics by controlling substrate availability for mitochondrial respiration. Biol Open. 2013;2(8):761–70. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.20134853.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was supported by the Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB) Research Initiative Program (KGM4252331, KGM5382322), Republic of Korea.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Se-Been Jeon and Pil-Soo Jeong contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Futuristic Animal Resource & Research Center (FARRC), Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), Cheongju, 28116, Republic of Korea

    Se-Been Jeon, Pil-Soo Jeong, Min Ju Kim, Hyo-Gu Kang, Bong-Seok Song, Sun-Uk Kim & Bo-Woong Sim

  2. Department of Animal Science, College of Natural Resources & Life Science, Pusan National University, Miryang, 50463, Republic of Korea

    Se-Been Jeon & Min Ju Kim

  3. Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, 34134, Republic of Korea

    Hyo-Gu Kang

  4. Department of Functional Genomics, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon, 34113, Republic of Korea

    Sun-Uk Kim

  5. Department of Animal Science, Life and Industry Convergence Research Institute (RICRI), College of Natural Resources & Life Science, Pusan National University, Miryang, 50463, Republic of Korea

    Seong-Keun Cho

Authors
  1. Se-Been Jeon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pil-Soo Jeong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Min Ju Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hyo-Gu Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bong-Seok Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sun-Uk Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Seong-Keun Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Bo-Woong Sim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S-BJ and P-SJ designed the study, performed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. MJK, H-GK, and B-SS performed experiments and analyzed data. S-UK acquired funding and discussed study. S-KC discussed study and contributed to data interpretation. B-WS designed and supervised the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bo-Woong Sim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Table S1. Primer sequences for qRT-PCR.

Additional file 2:

Table S2. Effects of Luteolin (Lut) concentrations on in vitro development of porcine parthenogenetic activation (PA) embryos.

Additional file 3:

Table S3. Effects of Lut on cell survival in porcine PA blastocysts.

Additional file 4:

Table S4. Effects of Luteolin (Lut) concentrations on in vitro development of porcine in vitro fertilization (IVF) embryos.

Additional file 5:

Table S5. Effects of Lut on cell survival in porcine IVF blastocysts.

Additional file 6:

Table S6. Effects of Brusatol (Bru) concentrations on in vitro development of porcine PA embryos.

Additional file 7:

Table S7. Co-treatment effects of Bru and Lut on in vitro development of porcine PA embryos.

Additional file 8:

Table S8. Co-treatment effects of Bru and Lut on cell survival in porcine PA blastocysts.

Additional file 9:

Fig. S1. Effects of Lut on the developmental competence of porcine in vitro fertilization embryos. A Representative bright-field images (upper, scale bar = 200 µm) and nuclear-stained images (lower, scale bar = 50 µm) of blastocysts cultured in the presence or absence of Lut. B–D Quantification of cleavage rate, blastocyst formation rate, and total cell number in the indicated groups (0; n = 214, 0.5; n = 216). E TUNEL assay of blastocysts in the indicated groups. Embryos were stained for TUNEL (green, indicated by white arrows) and nuclei (blue). Scale bar = 50 µm. F, G Quantification of the number and proportion of apoptotic cells in the indicated groups (n = 34 per group). The data are derived from three independent experiments, and means with similar superscripts do not differ (P > 0.05).

Additional file 10:

Fig. S2. Effects of Brusatol on Developmental Competence of Porcine PA Embryos. A Representative bright-field (upper, scale bar = 200 µm) and nuclear-stained (lower, scale bar = 50 µm) images of blastocysts cultured with or without varying concentrations of brusatol. B-D Quantification of the cleavage rate, blastocyst formation rate, and total cell number in the indicated groups (0; n = 181, 20; n = 182, 50; n = 181, 100; n = 181). The data are derived from five independent experiments, and means with similar superscripts do not differ (P > 0.05).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jeon, SB., Jeong, PS., Kim, M.J. et al. Enhancement of porcine in vitro embryonic development through luteolin-mediated activation of the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway. J Animal Sci Biotechnol 14, 148 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-023-00947-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-023-00947-9

Keywords

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology

ISSN: 2049-1891