Skip to main content
Download PDF

Minimizing sperm oxidative stress using nanotechnology for breeding programs in rams

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology volume 14, Article number: 106 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Artificial insemination (AI) is a routine breeding technology in animal reproduction. Nevertheless, the temperature-sensitive nature and short fertile lifespan of ram sperm samples hamper its use in AI. In this sense, nanotechnology is an interesting tool to improve sperm protection due to the development of nanomaterials for AI, which could be used as delivery vehicles. In this work, we explored the feasibility of vitamin E nanoemulsion (NE) for improving sperm quality during transport.

Results

With the aim of evaluating this proposal, ejaculates of 7 mature rams of Manchega breed were collected by artificial vagina and extended to 60 × 106 spz/mL in Andromed®. Samples containing control and NE (12 mmol/L) with and without exogenous oxidative stress (100 µmol/L Fe2+/ascorbate) were stored at 22 and 15 ºC and motility (CASA), viability (YO-PRO/PI), acrosomal integrity (PNA-FITC/PI), mitochondrial membrane potential (Mitotracker Deep Red 633), lipoperoxidation (C11 BODIPY 581/591), intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and DNA status (SCSA®) monitored during 96 h. Our results show that NE could be used to maintain ram spermatozoa during transport at 15 and 22 ºC for up to 96 h, with no appreciable loss of kinematic and physiological characteristics of freshly collected samples.

Conclusions

The storage of ram spermatozoa in liquid form for 2–5 d with vitamin E nanoemulsions may lead more flexibility to breeders in AI programs. In view of the potential and high versatility of these nanodevices, further studies are being carried out to assess the proposed sperm preservation medium on fertility after artificial insemination.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

Artificial insemination (AI) determines the success of a breeding program by far. AI is a technique developed to facilitate the dissemination of genetic improvement, as well as to allow the connection of the population necessary for the correct genetic evaluation of breeding stock. AI requires an appropriate management model and animals with high productive performance for the traits of interest [1].

Despite the great advantages achieved in AI, many methods face several limitations for a clear translation to breeding programs. AI constrains depend on multiple factors, such as the compulsory use of synchronization treatments, semen quality and conservation, adaptation to the functional and physiological characteristics of the native breeds linked to special production systems. However, low fertility rates and the high variability found between batches in AI is mainly attributed to collection, processing, conservation and application of semen doses [2]. In this regard, monitoring conservation would facilitate transporting longer distances to lead to successful inseminations [3].

Nowadays, the two most widely alternatives used to transport semen samples are: for shorter distances, samples are refrigerated between 0–15 °C, slowing down biochemical functions of spermatozoa which implies a reduction for fertility of 10%–35% per day [1]; for longer distances, cryopreservation is the most extended alternative being the samples frozen on straws at −196 °C by using liquid nitrogen [4]. In both scenarios, when spermatozoa are cooled, the total amount of immobile cells and abnormally shaped is increased. In addition, the distribution of membrane lipids is altered and the levels of intracellular calcium increases. These changes are currently known as cold shock [5].

Regrettably, ram spermatozoa are more sensitive to cold shock than other mammals species due to a very low cholesterol/phospholipid ratio and a low content of saturated fatty acid in the membrane [6]. On ram spermatozoa, cold shock can diminish sperm motility and viability up to 60% [7]. Besides, it can increase the risk of DNA fragmentation with all its consequences for the spermatozoon [8, 9]. These characteristics cause relative short fertile lifespan of ram spermatozoa, which is a problem for industrial-scale sheep breading operations. Besides, mammalian spermatozoa are particularly sensitive to oxidative stress which result in collateral damage to sperm plasma membrane proteins and lipids [10]. It is a proven fact that during storage and transport the impact of oxidative stress on the sperm cell increases [11].

Minimizing oxidative stress and cold shock on storage to maintain ram sperm fertility would pave the way for ram AI. In this context, nanotechnology is a tool to be explored. During the last years, our research group have developed different vitamin E nanodevices for AI, such as nanoemulsions [12, 13] and hydrogels [12]. The viability and feasibility of such nanodevices were tested on red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) and ram (Ovis aries), using both fresh and thawed samples. The use of these nanodevices showed beneficial effects on sperm motility parameters compared to free vitamin E while ROS production and lipid peroxidation were reduced under oxidative stress conditions. Vitamin E is renowned for its exceptional antioxidative properties, making it a gold standard in spermatology for its ability to safeguard sperm samples by effectively reducing ROS production and lipid peroxidation. Furthermore, studies have shown that vitamin E can significantly reduce DNA and acrosome damage, further highlighting its crucial role [14]. However, despite its remarkable benefits, this potent antioxidant is not without limitations. It is vulnerable to instability when exposed to oxidative processes or changes in pH, and can potentially exhibit prooxidant effects even at low concentrations. Additionally, its low solubility presents challenges, requiring administration with organic solvents such as ethanol or dimethyl sulfoxide, which have been shown to be toxic to sperm cells [15] and associated with decreased sperm motility [14, 16,17,18,19]. These problems with free vitamin E have been overcome using nanoemulsions. Herein, we made progress in the assessment on vitamin E nanoemulsion (NE) for AI. To do so, we studied its availability for storing with the purpose of assisting sperm transport. The transport of sperm samples is challenging and those were chosen as a proof of concept in this work. Therefore, the efficacy of the use of NE on the main structural and kinematic parameters of ram spermatozoa during a long-term incubation period (up to 96 h) is reported.

Although under normal conditions ovine sperm samples are not usually subjected to high levels of oxidative stress, our experiment aims to subject them to extreme oxidative stress to mimic the worst scenarios that sperm cells may face in vivo. These scenarios may include exposure to toxins, prolonged sample transport, suboptimal sample storage, poor nutrition, or presence of infectious diseases [20]. Moreover, it is known that males of high economic or genetic value may be more susceptible to oxidative stress due to their high reproductive demand. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the performance of vitamin E nanoemulsions under these conditions, as it would allow the development of an antioxidant protection system capable of acting in the worst possible scenarios. This would represent a significant breakthrough in the application of nanotechnology in the reproductive industry, particularly in the area of antioxidant protection for sperm.

Materials and methods

Reagents and media

Cytometry equipment (software and consumables) were acquired from Beckman Coulter (Fullerton, CA, USA), while Andromed® was purchased from (Minitüb, Tiefenbach, Germany). Acetone, FeSO4·7H2O, propidium iodide, L-α-phosphatidylcholine from soy bean, Pluronic® F-127 and vitamin E (CAS number 10191–41-0) were obtained from the Sigma Chemical Co. (Madrid, Spain). Fluorescent probes were purchases from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Barcelona, Spain), unless otherwise stated and their stock solutions are the follow: PI: 1.5 × 10–3 mol/L in Milli-Q water; YO-PRO-1: 5 × 10–5 mol/L in DMSO; PNA-FITC: 2 × 10–7 mol/L in DMSO; Mitotracker Deep Red 633: 1 × 10–3 mol/L in DMSO; C11 BODIPY 581/591: 2 × 10–4 mol/L in DMSO; CMH2DFCDA: 5 × 10–4 mol/L in DMSO. All the fluorescent stocks were kept at −20 °C, in the dark until needed.

The oxidant solution was prepared as 0.01 mol/L FeSO4 and 0.05 mol/L sodium ascorbate (Fe2+) in water. The TNE buffer was composed of 0.01 mol/L Tris–HCl, 0.15 mol/L NaCl and 1 × 10–3 mol/L EDTA (pH 7.5) [21]. Z-sizer NanoZS from Malvern (UK) were used for the characterization of the nanoemulsions.

Vitamin E nanoemulsion formulation

The protocol described by Sanchez-Rubio et al. [13] was used to obtain the vitamin E nanoemulsions. Briefly, nanoemulsion were obtained by employing controlled emulsification, when an organic phase comprised ethanol/acetone (1:20), 93 mg of vitamin E and L-α-phosphatidylcholine (20 mg) were poured onto 10 mL of a 0.2% (w/v) aqueous solution of Poloxamer 127. Then, the mixture was homogenized with an Ultra-Turrax disperser for 10 min at 14,000 r/min and the organic solvents removed using a rotary evaporator for 30 min at 14,000 r/min. Parameters such as hydrodynamic radio (RH), polydispersity index (PDI), and Z-potential were obtained using dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements.

Animals

Animal handling was performed in accordance with Spanish Animal Protection Regulation, RD 53/2013, which conforms to European Union Regulation 2010/63. A total of seven Manchega rams (> 3 years of age) housed at the Experimental Farm of the University of Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), were used in this study. All animal experimentation was performed following Ethics Committee University of Castilla‐La Mancha.

Semen collection and initial evaluation

For this study, one ejaculate was used for male, which was collected by using an artificial vagina. After collection, sperm samples were transported to the laboratory at room temperature. Immediately, volume (mL), mass and individual sperm motility (scale 1–5), percentage of motile sperm (%) and sperm concentration (spz/mL) were evaluated [22], using a bright field and phase contrast microscopy (Eclipse 50i Nikon; Tokyo, Japan). Sperm concentration was calculated using a Makler counting chamber and the Sperm Class Analyzer software (SCA®) (Microptic, Barcelona, Spain). The samples with a minimum of 70% motile sperm and wave motion of 3.5, measured subjectively, were used in this study. Samples were not pooled for this study.

Experimental design

This experiment was designed to explore the protective effect of vitamin E nanoemulsions during sperm incubation up to 96 h (22 ºC vs. 15 ºC) on sperm parameters. Sperm samples were diluted in Andromed® to 60 × 106 spermatozoa/mL. The sperm solution was split among aliquots in microtubes. Two of them was left untreated as the control and subsequently incubate one of them at 22 ºC and the other at 15 ºC. The other two were diluted supplemented with nanoemulsions to a final concentration of vitamin E of 12 mmol/L (NE12), and then incubated to 22 or 15 ºC, respectively. All treatments were split in turn into two aliquots. One of them was subjected to oxidative stress by adding 100 µmol/L Fe2+ and 500 μmol/L ascorbate. Fe2+ oxidizes to Fe3+, which is recycled by the ascorbate, producing the highly reactive hydroxyl radical (HO). The microtubes were incubated, 22 or 15 ºC, and analysed after 0, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h. This experiment was replicated 7 times with samples from seven different males.

Sperm motility analysis

The semen samples were diluted down to 15 × 106 spz/mL in incubation media and loaded into a Makler counting chamber (10 µm depth) at 37 °C. Samples were captured and analysed using the Sperm Class Analyzer® (SCA V6.2, Microptic S.L; Barcelona, Spain). The image sequences were saved and later analysed and the software settings were adjusted for assessing ram sperm. The parameter used were: 25 frames/s; 30–100 µm2 for head area; VCL > 10 µm/s to classify a spermatozoon as motile. For each sperm, the software rendered the follows parameters: percentage of motile sperm, percentage of progressive motile sperm (PM), curvilinear velocity (VCL; µm/s), straight-line velocity path (VSL; µm/s) and average path velocity (VAP; µm/s) [23].

Flow cytometry analysis

Two flow cytometers were employed in our study. Sperm viability and apoptosis-like changes, acrosome integrity, mitochondrial activity, lipid peroxidation and ROS production tests were carried out using a Cytoflex LX (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA), which was controlled with the CytExpert version 2.3.0.84 (Beckman Coulter). SCSA® was performed on a FC‐500 (Beckman Coulter) controlled with the MXP software (v.3). Raw data were analysed with IDEAS® software and WEASEL software (WEHI, Melbourne, Australia), respectively. In all cases, 10,000 events were acquired per sample. Mitotracker Deep Red was excited with a 633-nm helium–neon laser, Hoechst 33342 was excited with a 405-nm violet laser and all other fluorochromes were excited with a 488-nm laser. To exclude debris from sperm population, dot plots with forward-scatter light and side-scatter light or aspect ratio and area were employed in the respective cytometers.

Fluorescence probes

Sperm viability and apoptosis-like changes

YO-PRO-1 and PI were used on sperm viability and apoptotic-like status tests. Spermatozoa were analysed by means of flow cytometry after 15 min of dark incubation period [24]. Specifically, we evaluated the fluorescent DNA markers for cells with compromised plasma membrane. Three subpopulations were obtained: viable (unstained: YO-PRO-1−⁄PI−), apoptotic-like membrane changes (YO-PRO-1+ ⁄ PI−) and non-viable (membrane damaged: PI+) [25].

Assessment of acrosome integrity

PI and PNA-FITC were used to determine the acrosome integrity. PNA (peanut agluttinin) binds specifically to the internal side of the external membrane of the acrosome, labelling acrosome-damaged spermatozoa. This fluorescent technique allows distinguishing among four sperm populations: alive with intact acrosomes (PNA−/PI−), dead with intact acrosomes (PNA−/PI+), alive with damaged acrosomes (PNA+ /PI−) and dead with damaged acrosomes (PNA+ /PI+) [26].

Assessment of mitochondrial activity

The mitochondrial status, investigated through the assessment of mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), was evaluated using a Mitotracker Deep Red 633 fluorescent probe. The percentage of sperm Mitotracker+/YO-PRO-1− represented the proportion of viable sperm with active mitochondria [27]. The stained samples were incubated for 30 min in the dark before being run through the flow cytometer.

Assessment of lipid peroxidation

Lipid peroxidation was estimated using the C11-BODIPY 581/591 fluorescent probe. An aliquot of each sample was incubated for 30 min with C11-BODIPY 581/591. The sperm samples were washed by means of centrifugation (600 × g, 5 min) and were extended in BGM [14]. These steps were repeated at 4, 8 and 24 h and analyzed by using flow cytometry.

Production of reactive oxygen species

Reactive oxygen species production was recorded using the fluorescent probe 5-(and-6)-chloromethyl-2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein acetyl ester (CM-H2DCFDA). CM-H2DCFDA penetrates the plasma membrane and is retained after intracellular esterases cleave the acetate groups and emits green fluorescent (504 nm) upon oxidation [14]. The intensity of fluorescence of CM-H2DCFDA increases simultaneously as ROS production. The samples were analyzed and the median H2DCFDA fluorescence of the viable sperm population value was noted [25].

Sperm chromatin structure assay

Chromatin stability was assessed following the SCSA® (Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay), based on the susceptibility of sperm DNA to acid-induced denaturation in situ and on the subsequent staining with the metachromatic fluorescent dye acridine orange [28].

Two parameters were analysed: a) DNA Fragmentation Index ( % of spermatozoa with DFI > 25) and HDS (High DNA Stainability: % of spermatozoa with green fluorescence higher than channel 600, of 1024 channels)[29].

Statistical analysis

The assumption of normality and the equality of variance of data were checked prior to statistical analysis using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov normality test and a Levene's test, respectively. Later, vitamin E effect; time; oxidant; temperature; motility; viability; acrosome integrity; mitochondrial membrane potential; ROS and lipid peroxidation production; and DNA damage were analyzed by factorial ANOVA with IBM SPSS Statistics 25 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). In the model we included the random effect of male. When a significant effect was observed, post hoc Tukeys’ correction were carried out to adjust the P-values and account for multiple testing. Results are presented as mean ± SEM, and statistical significance was accepted for P < 0.05.

Results

In this work, we explored the feasibility of NE for improving sperm quality during transport, which is a solution for increasing the life spam of ram spermatozoa.

Effects of vitamin E nanoemulsions on ram sperm motility assessed by CASA

Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the impact of NE on the kinematic parameters of ram sperm, specifically motility and velocity. In the absence of exogenous oxidative stress, two distinct scenarios were observed (Fig. 1): a) when samples were incubated at 22 ºC, the motility parameters (total and progressive) exhibited a significantly higher percentage of motility in the control samples after 48 h; b) however, when samples were incubated at 15 ºC, these differences vanished and NE12 even displayed superior results compared to the control (72.78 ± 6.34 vs. 54.55 ± 9.83) after 96 h (P < 0.01).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effect of vitamin E nanoemulsion (NE) on kinematic parameters: a) total and b) progressive motility. Plots show the quadruple interaction of treatments × oxidative treatment × temperature × incubation time for CASA-derived variables. α,β,γ,δ (P < 0.05) indicate significant differences among hours of incubation within each treatment and temperature of incubation without oxidative stress (purple line). a–d (P < 0.05) indicates significant differences among hours of incubation within each treatment and temperature of incubation under oxidative stress (orange line). *(P < 0.05) indicate differences between oxidative stress and non-oxidative stress treatments within each temperature and time of incubation

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of vitamin E nanoemulsion (NE) on kinematic parameters: a) curvilinear velocity (VCL), b) straight-line velocity (VSL) and c) average path velocity (VAP). Plots show the quadruple interaction of treatments × oxidative stress × incubation temperature × incubation time for kinematic sperm motility parameters. α,β,γ (P < 0.05) indicate significant differences among hours of incubation within each treatment and temperature of incubation without oxidative stress purple line). a–d (P < 0.05) indicates significant differences among hours of incubation within each treatment and temperature of incubation under oxidative stress (orange line). *(P < 0.05) indicate differences between oxidative stress and non-oxidative stress treatments within each temperature and time of incubation

Full size image

Speed parameters VCL, VSL, and VAP showed no significant differences compared to the patterns observed for total and progressive motility (Fig. 2). In the absence of oxidative stress, NE12 samples did not yield improved results compared to the control samples. However, under oxidative stress conditions, NE12 demonstrated improvement over the control. For instance, as a representative example, after 96 h of incubation, the VCL in samples treated with NE12 (127.40 ± 27.10) was comparable to the results obtained by the control samples after 24 h (146.94 ± 15.72) and significantly better than the control after 72 h (11.67 ± 30.88).

Effects of vitamin E nanoemulsion on ram sperm viability and acrosome integrity

Sperm viability was assessed using YO-PRO-1/IP staining (Fig. 3). After 96 h of incubation, the samples exhibited the following pattern: NE12 at 15 ºC ≈ control at 15 ºC > NE12 at 22 ºC ≈ control at 15 ºC. Control samples subjected to oxidative stress conditions showed a significant reduction in the percentage of viable cells after 24 h at 22 ºC and 48 h at 15 ºC, compared to non-oxidative stress samples. These differences were more pronounced when comparing to NE12 treatments. At 22 ºC, NE12 was able to maintain the viable cell population at levels comparable to non-oxidative conditions, while at 15 ºC, the viability after 96 h was similar to that observed at time 0 (control at 15 ºC 0 h: 39.31 ± 9.35 vs. NE12 at 15 ºC 96 h: 37.99 ± 9.03). Without oxidative stress, the samples displayed better viability results after 96 h at 15 ºC (P < 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed between the treatments (control vs. NE12) within the same temperature interval (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of vitamin E nanoemulsion (NE) on sperm viability: a) % of alive spermatozoa, b) % of apoptosis-like changes and c) % of death spermatozoa. Plots show the quadruple interaction of treatments × oxidative stress × incubation temperature × incubation time for the flow cytometry analysis of sperm viability. α,β,γ (P < 0.05) indicate significant differences among hours of incubation within each treatment and temperature of incubation without oxidative stress (purple line). a–c (P < 0.05) indicates significant differences among hours of incubation within each treatment and temperature of incubation under oxidative stress (orange line). *(P < 0.05) indicate differences between oxidative stress and non-oxidative stress treatments within each temperature and time of incubation

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of vitamin E nanoemulsion (NE) on sperm viability: comparison between control and NE12 over time. Plots show the quadruple interaction of treatments × oxidative stress × incubation temperature × incubation time for the flow cytometry analysis of sperm viability. α,β (P < 0.05) indicate significant differences among treatments × temperature without oxidative stress at the same incubation time (purple line). a–c (P < 0.05) indicates significant differences among treatments × temperature under oxidative stress at the same incubation time (orange line). *(P < 0.05) indicate differences between oxidative stress and non-oxidative stress treatments within each treatment

Full size image

The acrosomal status exhibited a similar pattern to the viability results described earlier (Fig. 5). The percentage of spermatozoa with intact acrosomes was influenced by time and temperature, following the following pattern: NE12 at 15 ºC > control at 15 ºC > NE12 at 22 ºC > control at 15 ºC. In the absence of oxidative stress, no significant differences were observed between the treatments within the same temperature interval. The most notable finding regarding acrosomal status occurred under oxidative stress conditions at 15 ºC. In this scenario, the percentage of spermatozoa with intact acrosomes in the control samples decreased from 76.13 ± 10.47 to 16.17 ± 8.47 after 96 h, while NE12 treatments were able to maintain it at levels close to those observed at 0 h of incubation (NE12 at 15 ºC 96 h: 72.39 ± 14.45) (P < 0.001).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effect of NE on acrosome integrity. Plots show the quadruple interaction of treatments × oxidative stress × incubation temperature × incubation time for the flow cytometry analysis of acrosome integrity (PNA− /PI−). α,β,γ (P < 0.05) indicate significant differences among hours of incubation within each treatment and temperature of incubation without oxidative stress (purple line). a–d (P < 0.05) indicates significant differences among hours of incubation within each treatment and temperature of incubation under oxidative stress (orange line). *(P < 0.05) indicate differences between oxidative stress and non-oxidative stress treatments within each temperature and time of incubation

Full size image

Effects of vitamin E nanoemulsion on ram sperm mitochondrial activity

No significant differences in mitochondrial activity (ΔΨm) were observed at any incubation time under both temperature conditions without oxidative stress (Fig. 6). However, under oxidative stress conditions, the best results after 96 h were achieved by NE12 at 15 ºC (control at 22 ºC: no mitochondrial activity; control at 15 ºC: 0.02 ± 0.01 vs. NE12 at 22 ºC: 2.19 ± 1.38; NE12 at 15 ºC: 38.01 ± 10.85) (Fig. 7). Throughout the entire incubation period, NE12 treatments consistently demonstrated better results than the control, particularly after 48 h.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Effect of NE on mitochondrial activity. Plots show the quadruple interaction of treatments × oxidative stress × incubation temperature × incubation time for the flow cytometry analysis of mitochondrial activity (YO-PRO-1− /Mitotracker deep red+). α,β,γ (P < 0.05) indicate significant differences among hours of incubation within each treatment and temperature of incubation without oxidative stress (purple line). a–d (P < 0.05) indicates significant differences among hours of incubation within each treatment and temperature of incubation under oxidative stress (orange line). *(P < 0.05) indicate differences between oxidative stress and non-oxidative stress treatments within each temperature and time of incubation

Full size image
Fig. 7
figure 7

Effect of vitamin E nanoemulsion (NE) on mitochondrial activity: comparison between control and NE12 over time. Plots show the quadruple interaction of treatments × oxidative stress × incubation temperature × incubation time for the flow cytometry analysis of sperm viability. α,β (P < 0.05) indicate significant differences among treatments × temperature without oxidative stress at the same incubation time (purple line). a–c (P < 0.05) indicates significant differences among treatments × temperature under oxidative stress at the same incubation time (orange line). *(P < 0.05) indicate differences between oxidative stress and non-oxidative stress treatments within each treatment. DNA Stainability, although the data is not shown in the figure

Full size image

Effects of vitamin E nanoemulsion on ram sperm intracellular ROS production, lipid peroxidation and DNA

In general, the levels of lipid peroxidation were consistent with ROS production (Fig. 8). In the absence of oxidative stress, intracellular ROS did not exhibit significant differences between treatments at any time or temperature (Fig. 8a). However, under oxidative stress conditions and at both temperatures, significant differences were observed after NE12 treatment at all time points (P < 0.01). NE12 treatments effectively maintained ROS levels similar to those observed in non-oxidative stress treatments for up to 96 h (control 0 h non-oxidative stress at 15 ºC: 2136.80 ± 260.03 vs. NE12 96 h at 15 ºC: 2064.51 ± 418.83) (Fig. 8a).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Effect of vitamin E nanoemulsion (NE) on: a) ROS production and b) lipid peroxidation. Plots show the quadruple interaction of treatments × oxidative stress × incubation temperature × incubation time for the flow cytometry analysis of reactive oxygen species (median fluorescence of H2DCFDA in PI− sperm) and lipid peroxidation (median green fluorescence of BODIPY C11). a–d (P < 0.05) indicates significant differences among hours of incubation within each treatment and temperature of incubation under oxidative stress (orange line). *(P < 0.05) indicate differences between oxidative stress and non-oxidative stress treatments within each temperature and time of incubation

Full size image

Lipid peroxidation levels displayed a similar pattern to ROS production (Fig. 8b). NE12 treatments significantly reduced the BODIPY C11 fluorescence signal below the control in oxidized samples, maintaining levels close to those observed at 0 h of incubation at all time points and temperatures (Fig. 9).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Effect of vitamin E nanoemulsion (NE) on ROS production: comparison between control and NE12 over time. Plots show the quadruple interaction of treatments × oxidative stress × incubation temperature × incubation time for the flow cytometry analysis of sperm viability. α,β (P < 0.05) indicate significant differences among treatments × temperature without oxidative stress at the same incubation time (purple line). a–c(P < 0.05) indicates significant differences among treatments × temperature under oxidative stress at the same incubation time (orange line). *(P < 0.05) indicate differences between oxidative stress and non-oxidative stress treatments within each treatment

Full size image

Figure 10 illustrates the results obtained for the DNA fragmentation index after 96 h of incubation under oxidative and non-oxidative stress conditions. No significant differences were observed between the treatments. Similar results were obtained for High DNA Stainability, although the data is not shown in the figure.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Effect of vitamin E nanoemulsion (NE) on DNA fragmentation. Plots show the quadruple interaction of treatments × oxidative treatment × temperature × incubation time for the flow cytometry analysis of sperm viability. No significant differences were observed

Full size image

Discussion

This work let us propose a better suitable media to improve quality in sperm storage for AI programs. The media might be of particular interest to those breeders working on ram species. Ram spermatozoa disclose a relatively short fertile lifespan which make them difficult to be transported, therefore making mandatory cryopreservation when considerable distances exist between livestock farms and reproduction centers [1, 7]. In this sense, NE previously described by some of us [30] has been studied as efficient tools for ram spermatozoa preservation at long intervals. The effects of NE were assessed on spermatozoa collected by artificial vagina and stored for 96 h at 22 or 15 ºC.

The relationship between temperature and sperm quality is crucial in both short-distance and long-distance semen transportation methods. In shorter distances, refrigeration at temperatures ranging from 0–15 °C is commonly employed to slow down the biochemical processes of spermatozoa. However, this cooling process can have negative effects on sperm fertility, with a reduction of 10%–35% per day [1]. Similarly, in long-distance transportation, cryopreservation is widely utilized, involving freezing the samples at −196 °C using liquid nitrogen [4]. Regardless of the method, cooling the spermatozoa leads to an increase in the percentage of immobile cells and abnormalities in their shape. Moreover, the distribution of membrane lipids is altered, and intracellular calcium levels rise, collectively referred to as cold shock [5]. These temperature-related changes significantly impact sperm quality and need to be carefully considered in order to preserve their reproductive potential during transportation.

To start with, the incorporation of NE into the media significantly improved sperm motility, following patterns previously reported in red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) [12, 13] and ram (Ovis aries) spermatozoa [30]. However, in these previous reports, samples were incubated at 37 ºC and not for more than 24 h. In this study, we expand the study to more time and different temperatures to ascertain that NE maintain the quality of ram spermatozoa for up to 96 h without losing sperm motility. These results are particularly relevant because fertility is correlated with kinematic parameters in several species such as boar [31], bull [32], ram [33] or stallion [34]. The use of different commercially extenders has been tested in different species, such as alpaca [35] or stallion [36], looking forward to finding out a viable alternative to frozen semen which give rise to a loss of sperm motility. As far as we are concerned, this is the first study in animal spermatozoa in which the use the nanotechnology is applied to increase the viable lifespan for up to 96 h preserving all kinematic parameters. The beneficial effects of our lipid-based nanoparticles are due to their bioavailability, biocompatibility, biodegradability of major components, low toxicity, and the ability to carry hydrophobic compounds such as VE. The report by Soares et al. [37] is a good example on the difficulty of finding viable carriers for showing beneficial effect on post-thawing board sperm quality.

Then, the preservation of spermatozoa motility was positively correlated with the results on mitochondrial activity. Mitochondria is an organelle key in several process, such as ATP synthesis and sperm motility, and any damage to them could lead to apoptosis. In this case, sperm cryopreservation is a procedure where the mitochondrial membrane potential integrity is compromised [38]. Several studies reported that oxidative phosphorylation performed by mitochondria is the main source of ATP production required for flagellar movement and that mitochondrial alterations are related with loss of sperm motility [39]. In the current study, the controlled release of vitamin E through nanoemulsions before incubation at 15 and 22 ºC, increased mitochondrial potential in comparison to control group under exogenous oxidative stress conditions. Therefore, from the correlation between motility parameters and mitochondrial activity in samples supplemented with NE, we hypothesize that the protective effect of NE on sperm motility could be due to its effect on mitochondrial activity, together with the values obtained for acrosome integrity. These results are in accordance with our previous studies carried out on red deer [12, 13] and ram spermatozoa [30]. This relationship between spermatozoa motility and mitochondrial activity has been reported in other specie by other research groups. For example, Swegen et al. [40] proved a straight relationship between ATP content, mitochondrial activity, and sperm motility on stallion spermatozoa.

In addition, sperm viability is preserved for up to 96 h after NE treatments. These results open a new way in the use of AI, particularly in ram where the application of intracervical AI needs the use of liquid semen [41]. These samples must have a minimum shelf-life of between 2–4 d to be transported large distances [42]. In this study, the use of NE maintained the final percentage of live cells after 96 h near to control levels at 0 h. This effect was observed with and without oxidative stress conditions. At the same time and according with previous studies [12, 13, 30], a protective effect on acrosome integrity was observed. In accordance with the rest of the results, the NE showed a protective effect on the health of sperm DNA, which is an essential factor for fertilization [43]. All these results lead us to determine that the supplementation of medium extender with NE have a protective effect against cold shock on ram spermatozoa. This protective effect had been observed previously, but only with free vitamin E [44, 45].

Finally, the results showed that ROS production and lipid peroxidation levels decrease significantly in NE treatment with respect to control under oxidative stress conditions. This effect has been described previously in red deer [12, 14, 16, 21], bulls [46, 47], boars [48, 49] and humans [50] but never over such a long period of time. Through sperm storage, spermatozoa are subjected to several sources of oxidative stress, such as storage under low temperatures and the common oxidative metabolism in the mitochondrial [51]. This large amount of ROS is particularly critical on rams, where their spermatozoa show a high percentage of polyunsaturated fatty acids, which makes especially susceptible to lipid peroxidation in the presence of ROS [52]. At the same time, spermatozoa require a certain amount of ROS in order to control essential sperm functions, such as the acrosome reaction [53]. Therefore, the search of an appropriative balance between ROS scavenging and production is crucial. In this study, we ascertain that the use of NE provides an optimal oxidative stress defense for up to 96 h reaching normal levels for lipid peroxidation. This result is remarkable due to an increase of lipid peroxidation makes a plasma membrane dysfunction with the consequent loss of fertilizing potential [54].

Conclusion

Existing protocols for sperm samples transport must be improved in AI to take part in breeding programs, especially for species with short fertile lifespan such as ram. From this work, we propose the use of nanotechnology as a tool to minimize oxidative stress and cold shock during sperm transport for longer intervals of time. Our results show that NE could be used to maintain ram spermatozoa during transport at 15 and 22 ºC for up to 96 h, with no appreciable loss of kinematic and physiological characteristics of freshly collected samples. Our results will be particularly relevant when the situation of increased oxidative stress is not due to mimicking in the laboratory but to situations where it actually increases due to exposure to toxins, prolonged sample transport, suboptimal sample storage, poor nutrition, or presence of infectious diseases. The storage of ram spermatozoa in liquid form for 2–5 d may lead more flexibility to breeders in AI programs. In view of the potential and high versatility of these nanodevices, further studies are being carried out to assess the proposed sperm preservation medium on fertility after artificial insemination.

Availability of data and material

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy.

Abbreviations

AI:

Artificial insemination

ATP:

Adenosine triphosphate

DFI:

DNA Fragmentation Index

DLS:

Dynamic light scattering

HDS:

High DNA Stainability

MMP:

Mitochondrial membrane potential

NE:

vitamin E nanoemulsion

PDI:

Polydispersity index

PI:

Propidium Iodide

PM:

Progressive motile sperm

PNA:

Peanut agluttinin

RH :

Hydrodynamic radio

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

SCA:

Sperm class analyzer

TM:

Total motile sperm

VAP:

Average path velocity

VCL:

Curvilinear velocity

VSL:

Straight-line velocity path

References

  1. Salamon S, Maxwell WM. Storage of ram semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 2000;62:77–111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anel L, Kaabi M, Abroug B, Alvarez M, Anel E, Boixo JC, et al. Factors influencing the success of vaginal and laparoscopic artificial insemination in churra ewes: a field assay. Theriogenology®. 2005;63:1235–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brinsko SP. Insemination doses: how low can we go? Theriogenology. 2006;66:543–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pini T, Leahy T, de Graaf SP. Sublethal sperm freezing damage: Manifestations and solutions. Theriogenology. 2018;118:172–81.

  5. Rajabi-Toustani R, Mehr M, Motamedi-Mojdehi R. Reduction of seminal plasma concentration can decrease detrimental effects of seminal plasma on chilled ram spermatozoa. Anim Reprod. 2021;18(1):e20200211.

  6. Holt WV, North RD. Cryopreservation, actin localization and thermotropic phase transitions in ram spermatozoa. J Reprod Fert. 1991;91:451–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Salamon S, Maxwell WMC. Frozen storage of ram semen I. Processing, freezing, thawing and fertility after cervical insemination. Anim Reprod Sci. 1995;37:185–249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Soria-Meneses PJ, Jurado-Campos A, Gómez-Rubio V, Sánchez-Ajofrín I, Soler AJ, Garde JJ, et al. Determination of ram (Ovis aries) sperm DNA damage due to oxidative stress: 8-OHdG immunodetection assay vs. SCSA(®). Animals (Basel). 2022;12(23):3286.

  9. Soria-Meneses PJ, Jurado-Campos A, Montoro V, Soler AJ, Garde JJ, Fernández-Santos MDR. Ovine sperm DNA oxidation quantification using an 8-OHdG immunodetection assay. Reprod Domest Anim. 2019;54(Suppl 4):59–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aitken RJ, Gibb Z, Baker MA, Drevet J, Gharagozloo P. Causes and consequences of oxidative stress in spermatozoa. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2016;28:1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu Y, Hu J, Pang W, Yang G, Chu G. Astaxanthin improves preserved semen quality at 17°C by enhancing sperm antioxidant and motility properties. Reprod Domest Anim. 2022;57(10):1187–97.

  12. Jurado-Campos A, Soria-Meneses PJ, Sánchez-Rubio F, Niza E, Bravo I, Alonso-Moreno C, et al. Vitamin E delivery systems increase resistance to oxidative stress in red deer sperm cells: hydrogel and nanoemulsion carriers. Antioxidants. 2021;10(11):1780.

  13. Sánchez-Rubio F, Soria-Meneses PJ, Jurado-Campos A, Bartolomé-García J, Gómez-Rubio V, Soler AJ, et al. Nanotechnology in reproduction: Vitamin E nanoemulsions for reducing oxidative stress in sperm cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2020;160:47–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Domínguez-Rebolledo AE, Fernández-Santos MR, Bisbal A, Ros-Santaella JL, Ramón M, Carmona M, et al. Improving the effect of incubation and oxidative stress on thawed spermatozoa from red deer by using different antioxidant treatments. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2010;22:856–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fernández-Santos MR, Esteso MC, Soler AJ, Montoro V, Garde JJ. The effects of different cryoprotectants and the temperature of addition on the survival of red deer epididymal spermatozoa. Cryo Letters. 2005;26:25–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Anel-López L, García-Álvarez O, Maroto-Morales A, Iniesta-Cuerda M, Ramón M, Soler AJ, et al. Reduced glutathione addition improves both the kinematics and physiological quality of post-thawed red deer sperm. Anim Reprod Sci. 2015;162:73–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Anel-López L, García-Álvarez O, Parrilla I, Del Olmo D, Fernández-Santos MR, Soler AJ, et al. The effect of oxidative stress on thawed bulk-sorted red deer sperm. Reprod Domest Anim. 2016;51:407–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Domínguez-Rebolledo AE, Fernández-Santos MR, García-Álvarez O, Maroto-Morales A, Garde JJ, Martínez-Pastor F. Washing increases the susceptibility to exogenous oxidative stress in red deer spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 2009;72:1073–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rahimipour M, Talebi AR, Anvari M, Sarcheshmeh AA, Omidi M. Effects of different doses of ethanol on sperm parameters, chromatin structure and apoptosis in adult mice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170:423–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Aitken RJ. Reactive oxygen species as mediators of sperm capacitation and pathological damage. Mol Reprod Dev. 2017;84:1039–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fernández-Santos MR, Martínez-Pastor F, García-Macías V, Esteso MC, Soler AJ, Paz P, et al. Sperm characteristics and DNA integrity of Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) epididymal spermatozoa frozen in the presence of enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants. J Androl. 2007;28:294–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Malo AF, Garde JJ, Soler AJ, García AJ, Gomendio M, Roldan ER. Male fertility in natural populations of red deer is determined by sperm velocity and the proportion of normal spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 2005;72:822–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Van de Hoek M, Rickard JP, de Graaf SP. Motility Assessment of Ram Spermatozoa. Biology (Basel). 2022;11(12):1715.

  24. Martínez-Pastor F, Aisen E, Fernández-Santos MR, Esteso MC, Maroto-Morales A, García-Álvarez O, et al. Reactive oxygen species generators affect quality parameters and apoptosis markers differently in red deer spermatozoa. Reproduction. 2009;137:225–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Del Olmo E, Bisbal A, García-Álvarez O, Maroto-Morales A, Ramón M, Jiménez-Rabadán P, et al. Free-radical production after post-thaw incubation of ram spermatozoa is related to decreased in vivo fertility. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2015;27:1187–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Del Olmo E, García-Álvarez O, Maroto-Morales A, Ramón M, Jiménez-Rabadán P, Iniesta-Cuerda M, et al. Estrous sheep serum enables in vitro capacitation of ram spermatozoa while preventing caspase activation. Theriogenology. 2016;85:351–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hallap T, Nagy S, Jaakma U, Johannisson A, Rodriguez-Martinez H. Mitochondrial activity of frozen-thawed spermatozoa assessed by MitoTracker Deep Red 633. Theriogenology. 2005;63:2311–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Evenson DP. The Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA®) and other sperm DNA fragmentation tests for evaluation of sperm nuclear DNA integrity as related to fertility. Anim Reprod Sci. 2016;169:56–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Evenson DP, Wixon R. Clinical aspects of sperm DNA fragmentation detection and male infertility. Theriogenology. 2006;65:979–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jurado-Campos A, Soria-Meneses PJ, Arenas-Moreira M, Alonso-Moreno C, Bravo I, Rodríguez-Robledo V, et al. Vitamin E lipid-based nanodevices as a tool for ovine sperm protection against oxidative stress: impact on sperm motility. Antioxidants. 2022;11(10):1988.

  31. Holt C, Holt W, Moore H, Reed HC, Curnock RM. Objectively measured boar sperm motility parameters correlate with the outcomes of on-farm inseminations: results of two fertility trials. J Androl. 1997;18:312–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Farrell PB, Presicce GA, Brockett CC, Foote RH. Quantification of bull sperm characteristics measured by computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) and the relationship to fertility. Theriogenology. 1998;49(4):871–9.

  33. Robayo I, Montenegro V, Valdés C, Cox JF. CASA assessment of kinematic parameters of ram spermatozoa and their relationship to migration efficiency in ruminant cervical mucus. Reprod Domest Anim. 2008;43:393–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Love CC. Relationship between sperm motility, morphology and the fertility of stallions. Theriogenology. 2011;76:547–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Al-Essawe EM, Abraham C, Kunkitti P, Axnér E, de Verdier K, Båge R, et al. Extenders for alpaca epididymal spermatozoa: Comparison of INRA96 and andromed. Anim Reprod Sci. 2020;223:106629.

  36. Ferrer MS, Canisso IF, Ellerbrock RE, Podico G, Lister BN, Hurley DJ, et al. Optimization of cryopreservation protocols for cooled-transported stallion semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 2020;221:106581.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Soares SL, Brito CRC, Anciuti AN, Gatti NC, Corcini CD, Varela AS Jr, et al. Nanocarried antioxidants in freezing extenders for boar spermatozoa. Andrologia. 2021;53(10):e14199.

  38. Rezaie FS, Hezavehei M, Sharafi M, Shahverdi A. Improving the post-thaw quality of rooster semen using the extender supplemented with resveratrol. Poult Sci. 2021;100:101290.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Amaral A, Lourenço B, Marques M, Ramalho-Santos J. Mitochondria functionality and sperm quality. Reproduction. 2013;146(5):R163–74.

  40. Swegen A, Lambourne SR, Aitken RJ, Gibb Z. Rosiglitazone improves stallion sperm motility, atp content, and mitochondrial function. Biol Reprod. 2016;95:107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. de Paz P, Esteso MC, Álvarez M, Mata M, Chamorro CA, Anel L. Development of extender based on soybean lecithin for its application in liquid ram semen. Theriogenology. 2010;74:663–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ollero M, Pérez-Pe R, Muiño-Blanco T, Cebrian-Pérez JA. Improvement of ram sperm cryopreservation protocols assessed by sperm quality parameters and heterogeneity analysis. Cryobiology. 1998;37:1–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Pool KR, Rickard JP, de Graaf SP. Melatonin improves the motility and DNA integrity of frozen-thawed ram spermatozoa likely via suppression of mitochondrial superoxide production. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2021;74:106516.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jeong YJ, Kim MK, Song HJ, Kang EJ, Ock SA, Kumar BM, et al. Effect of alpha-tocopherol supplementation during boar semen cryopreservation on sperm characteristics and expression of apoptosis related genes. Cryobiology. 2009;58:181–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Khellouf A, Benhenia K, Fatami S, Iguer-Ouada M. The complementary effect of cholesterol and vitamin e preloaded in cyclodextrins on frozen bovine semen: motility parameters, membrane integrity and lipid peroxidation. Cryo Letters. 2018;39:113–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Nasiri AH, Towhidi A, Zeinoaldini S. Combined effect of DHA and α-tocopherol supplementation during bull semen cryopreservation on sperm characteristics and fatty acid composition. Andrologia. 2012;44:550–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Yuan C, Wang H, Li X, Liu H, Zhao J, Lu W, et al. Combined effect of flaxseed oil and vitamin e supplementation during bull semen cryopreservation on sperm characteristics. Biopreserv Biobank. 2021;6:520–8.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Peña FJ, Johannisson A, Wallgren M, Rodríguez Martínez H. Antioxidant supplementation in vitro improves boar sperm motility and mitochondrial membrane potential after cryopreservation of different fractions of the ejaculate. Anim Reprod Sci. 2003;78:85–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Satorre MM, Breininger E, Beconi MT, Beorlegui NB. α-Tocopherol modifies tyrosine phosphorylation and capacitation-like state of cryopreserved porcine sperm. Theriogenology. 2007;68:958–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Taylor K, Roberts P, Sanders K, Burton P. Effect of antioxidant supplementation of cryopreservation medium on post-thaw integrity of human spermatozoa. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18:184–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bucak MN, Tekin N. Protective effect of taurine, glutathione and trehalose on the liquid storage of ram semen. Small Rumin Res. 2007;73:103–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Partyka A, Łukaszewicz E, Niżański W. Effect of cryopreservation on sperm parameters, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzymes activity in fowl semen. Theriogenology. 2012;77:1497–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ford WC. Regulation of sperm function by reactive oxygen species. Hum Reprod Update. 2004;10:387–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Alvarez J, Storey BT. Spontaneous lipid peroxidation in rabbit epididymal spermatozoa: its effect on sperm motility. Biol Reprod. 1982;27:1102–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Juan Angel Laborda for his invaluable help in the laboratory.

Funding

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support; grants AGL2017-85603-P, PID2020-120281RB-100 and PID2020-117788RB-100 funded by MCIN/AEI/10,13039/501100011033 and grants SBPLY/21/180501/000111 and SBPLY/21/180501/000050 funded by JCCM by EU through Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional. AJ-C. was supported by a UCLM scholarship, and PJS-M. was supported by a JCCM scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SaBio IREC (CSIC—UCLM—JCCM), Campus Universitario, S/N, 02071, Albacete, Spain

    Alejandro Jurado-Campos, Pedro Javier Soria-Meneses, Virginia Rodríguez-Robledo, Ana Josefa Soler, José Julián Garde & María del Rocío Fernández-Santos

  2. Departamento de Química Inorgánica, Orgánica Y Bioquímica-Centro de Innovación en Química Avanzada (ORFEO-CINQA), Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 02008, Albacete, Spain

    María Arenas-Moreira & Carlos Alonso-Moreno

  3. Centro Regional de Investigación Biomédicas, Unidad nanoDrug, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 02008, Albacete, Spain

    María Arenas-Moreira & Carlos Alonso-Moreno

  4. Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Castilla La Mancha, 02071, Albacete, Spain

    Virginia Rodríguez-Robledo & María del Rocío Fernández-Santos

Authors
  1. Alejandro Jurado-Campos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pedro Javier Soria-Meneses
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. María Arenas-Moreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Carlos Alonso-Moreno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Virginia Rodríguez-Robledo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ana Josefa Soler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. José Julián Garde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. María del Rocío Fernández-Santos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, AJ-C and MdRF-S; methodology, AJ-C, PJS-M, MA-M, CA-M and MdRF-S; software, AJ-C, PJS-M and MA-M; validation, AJ-C and MdRF-S; formal analysis, AJ-C, PJS-M and MdRF-S; investigation, AJ-C, PJS-M, VR-R, MdRF-S and CA-M; resources, MdRF-S.; data curation, AJ-C and PJS-M; writing—original draft preparation, AJ-C; writing—review and editing, AJ-C, CA-M, VR-R, AJS and MdRF-S; supervision, JJG and MdRF-S; funding acquisition, JJG and MdRF-S.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María del Rocío Fernández-Santos.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, due to the fact that the animal samples used were collected from previously dead animals unconnected to the project. The data provided in the present research were attained in compliance with the Ethical Principles in Animal Research. Animal handling and protocols were performed according to the guidelines approved by the Spanish Ministry of Presidency (RD53/2013) which conforms to European Union Regulation 2010/63.

Consent for publication

All of the authors have approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jurado-Campos, A., Soria-Meneses, P.J., Arenas-Moreira, M. et al. Minimizing sperm oxidative stress using nanotechnology for breeding programs in rams. J Animal Sci Biotechnol 14, 106 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-023-00907-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-023-00907-3

Keywords

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology

ISSN: 2049-1891