Skip to main content
Download PDF

Zearalenone toxicosis on reproduction as estrogen receptor selective modulator and alleviation of zearalenone biodegradative agent in pregnant sows

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology volume 13, Article number: 36 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Zearalenone (ZEA) is a resorcylic acid lactone derivative derived from various Fusarium species that are widely found in food and feeds. The molecular structure of ZEA resembles that of the mammalian hormone 17β-oestradiol, thus zearalenone and its metabolites are known to compete with endogenous hormones for estrogen receptors binding sites and to activate transcription of oestrogen-responsive genes. However, the effect of long-term low-dose ZEA exposure on the reproductive response to Bacillus subtilis ANSB01G culture for first-parity gilts has not yet been investigated. This study was conducted to investigate the toxic effects of ZEA as an estrogen receptor selective modulator and the alleviating effects of Bacillus subtilis ANSB01G cultures as ZEA biodegraders in pregnant sows during their first parity.

Results

A total of 80 first-parity gilts (Yorkshire × Landrace) were randomly assigned to four dietary treatments during gestation: CO (positive control); MO (negative control, 246 μg ZEA/kg diet); COA (CO + B. subtilis ANSB01G culture with 2 × 109 CFU/kg diet); MOA (MO + B. subtilis ANSB01G culture with 2 × 109 CFU/kg diet). There were 20 replications per treatment with one gilt per replicate. Feeding low-dose ZEA naturally contaminated diets disordered most of reproductive hormones secretion and affected estrogen receptor-α and estrogen receptor-β concentrations in serum and specific organs and led to moderate histopathological changes of gilts, but did not cause significant detrimental effects on reproductive performance. The addition of Bacillus subtilis ANSB01G culture to the diet can effectively relieve the competence of ZEA to estrogen receptor and the disturbance of reproductive hormones secretion, and then ameliorate toxicosis of ZEA in gilts.

Conclusions

Collectively, our study investigated the effects of feeding low-dose ZEA on reproduction in pregnant sows during their first parity. Feeding low-dose ZEA could modulate estrogen receptor-α and -β concentrations in specific organs, cause disturbance of reproductive hormones and vulva swelling, and damage organ histopathology and up-regulate apoptosis in sow models. Diet with Bacillus subtilis ANSB01G alleviated negative effects of the ZEA on gilts to some extent.

Introduction

Zearalenone (ZEA), also called F-2 toxin, is a non-steroid estrogen mycotoxin, or a mycoestrogen produced by Fusarium species of mold [1]. The structure of ZEA (presence of a phenol ring) resembles that of 17beta-oestradiol (17β-oestradiol) [2]. ZEA and its metabolites, especially alpha- zearalenone (α-ZEL), are well known to compete with endogenous hormones for estrogen receptor binding sites and to activate transcription of oestrogen-responsive genes [3, 4]. The estrogenic activity of α-ZEL is 3–4 times higher than ZEA. Pigs, particularly replacement gilts, are the most susceptible to ZEA [5]. Previous studies have demonstrated that ZEA oestrogenicity cause numerous reproductive dysfunctions in gilts, such as infertility, abortion, ovarian dysfunction, ovulation inhibition, vulvovaginitis, false estrus embryotoxic effects, lesions, ovarian changes, abnormal birth and stillbirth [6,7,8]. Furthermore, ZEA has also been hepatotoxic, haematotoxic, immunotoxic and genotoxic [9,10,11].

Growing studies have demonstrated that mycotoxin contamination has been a worldwide problem for food and feed production for a long time [12]. Therefore, the prevention and management of mycotoxins contamination are one of the main goals of the agriculture, food and by-product processing industries [13]. It was well known that mycotoxin biodegradation cites the process of producing non-toxic degradation products by destroying the toxic groups in the molecular structure of the toxin through the action between microbes and their enzymes produced by metabolism and toxins. Several studies demonstrated that some microbes can degrade ZEA [14, 15]. For example, previous studies reported that Aspergillus spp. has the ability to transform ZEA over a broad range of ZEA concentrations (5 to 150 μg/mL), and then sulfonation could lead to a less toxic compound [14]. Also, several Rhodococcus species are effective in the degradation of economically important mycotoxins, including aflatoxin B1, ZEA, fumonisin B1, T2 toxin and ochratoxin A [15]. Due to its efficient, specific and environmentally protective characteristics and advantages, biodegradation has gained much attention [8, 16, 17]. A strain of B. subtilis ANSB01G was screened in our previous work, which could degrade 84.6%, 83.0%, and 66.3% of ZEA in naturally contaminated corn, pig feed, and distiller’s dried grains with soluble, respectively [18, 19]. Some studies had confirmed that Bacillus subtilis ANSB01G cultures can ameliorate the effects of ZEA toxicity in sexually-immature or prepubertal gilts [8, 20]. The supplementation of MBA (Bacillus subtilis ANSB01G and Devosia sp. ANSB714 mixed in ratio) into diets ameliorated these damages induced by dietary toxins (596.86 μg/kg ZEA and 796 μg/kg DON), which MBA administration significantly increased ADG, decreased the vulva sizes, reduced the levels of IgG, IL-8 and PRL in plasma, and regulated apoptosis in ovaries and uteri of gilts [8]. However, the effect of long-term exposure to low-dose ZEA on the reproductive response to the supplementation of B. subtilis ANSB01G culture for first-parity gilts is unknown.

Therefore, the objective of this study was to find out the effects of B. subtilis ANSB01G culture on reproductive performance, vulva size, serum hormones and organ histopathology in first-parity gilts fed with long-term low-dose corn naturally contaminated with ZEA diets before breeding up to farrowing.

Materials and methods

Analysis of dietary mycotoxin

Before the researchers began the experiment, normal and natural moldy corn samples were collected, and then mycotoxins (e.g., ZEA, deoxynivalenol (DON), aflatoxin (AF), and ochratoxin A (OTA)) were detected by the High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) method as previously described [20]. If the concentrations of ZEA in the moldy corn samples met the requirements, we then purchase the same batch of normal and moldy corn in large quantities. Meanwhile, in the beginning, middle and end of the experiment, corn and feed samples were collected for ZEA, DON, AF and OTA analysis. The HPLC method was used to determine the concentrations of ZEA, DON, AF and OTA in corn and diets according to previous reports [8, 20]. Therefore, in the current study, the detection limits for these mycotoxins were 1.5 μg/kg for the ZEA, 0.1 μg/kg for the AF (aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), aflatoxin B2 (AFB2), aflatoxin G1 (AFG1), and aflatoxin G2 (AFG2), 0.02 mg/kg for the DON and 0.5 μg/kg for the OTA, respectively.

ZEA biodegradation agent

The B. subtilis ANSB01G was isolated and confirmed to degrade ZEA efficiently [18, 20]. It was from one batch-fermented at 37 °C for 24 h and then dried at 65 °C. This ZEA biodegradation agent was consisted mainly of 60% carrier (rice husk meal) and 40% B. subtilis ANSB01G, using industrial fermentation methods and dry processing techniques. Fermented-dried B. subtilis ANSB01G possessed a total viability number of 1 × 109 colony forming unit (CFU)/g.

Animals, diets and experimental design

A total of 80 first-parity sows (Landrace × Yorkshire) with an average initial weight of 140 ± 6.5 kg were randomly assigned to a factorial arrangement of 2 (normal and moldy diet) × 2 (supplemented with and without ZEA biodegradation agent) treatments: 1) basal control diet containing 60.52% normal corn (CO); 2) basal diet containing 60.52% moldy corn (MO; 164 mg/kg ZEA); 3) CO diet supplemented with 2 g/kg of ZEA biodegradation agent (2 × 109 CFU/kg diet); 4) MO diet supplemented with 2 g/kg of ZEA biodegradation agent (2 × 109 CFU/kg diet). There were 20 replicates of each treatment with one gilt per replicate. Isocaloric and isonitrogenous formulated diets were used in this study. The diets (Table 1) were provided with the nutrients required by the gilts to meet or exceed the requirements of the National Research Council (NRC) [21].

Table 1 Diet composition (as-fed basis)
Full size table

After the first estrus, all of the gilts were immediately housed in individual stalls (2.0 m × 0.6 m) with the slatted plastic flooring and controlled by environmental control facilities and mechanical ventilation systems. The room was strictly controlled, with disturbances avoided as much as possible, and the inner temperature was kept approximately at 20 to 25 °C by air conditioning system. To facilitate ad libitum access to water and restrict access to diet for gilts throughout the gestation period, a self-feeder and nipple waterer were equipped in each pen. On the d 35 after artificial insemination, pregnancy status was assessed by transabdominal ultrasonography (Honda HS-1600 scanner, Honda Electronics, Tokyo, Japan) in those gilts that had not resumed estrus. After artificial insemination, the gilts were fed treatment diets daily respectively according to the following program: 2 kg/d from d 1 to d 4, 2.4 kg/d from d 5 to d 49, 2.3 kg/d from d 50 to d 90, and 3.2 kg/d from d 90 to d 107 of gestation. The gilts were then transferred to farrowing crates (2.13 m × 0.66 m) and were fed individually from d 108 of gestation until farrowing. From d 108 to d 111 of gestation, 3.5 kg of diet was provided daily. Then the diet was decreased daily by 1.0 kg until farrowing. At parturition, all producing sows were allocated 1 kg of feed and received 1.5 kg of feed on the first postpartum day.

Experimental methods, sampling, and analysis

On d 60 ± 2 of gestation and after farrowing (114 d), eight sows were randomly selected for each treatment. In this study, blood samples were collected after 12-h fasting for the measurement of serum ZEA and serum hormones. Therefore, on gestation d 60 and d 114, jugular vein blood samples were collected using sterile syringes, and then serum was obtained by centrifugation of blood sample at 3000 r/min for 15 min at 4 °C. In addition, on gestation d 60 ± 2, samples of fecal (at least 0.5 kg) were obtained from each treatment of the same eight sows by rectal massage. All fecal samples were stored at − 20 °C for further analysis of ZEA residues in feces [22]. Residual ZEA and its mentabolites, hormones and estrogen receptor parameters were examined in the serum samples. First, the level of residual ZEA and its metabolites (α-zearalanol, β-zearalanol, α-zearalenol, β-zearalenol and zearalanone) in serum were determined using the HPLC method [22]. Next, serum levels of estradiol (E2), progesterone (PROG), testosterone (T), prolactin (PRL), luteotrophic hormone (LH), and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) were measured using the commercial radioimmunoassay kits (Beijing Chemical in Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) in accordance with the manufacturers’ recommendations. To briefly describe the experimental method, samples with iodine (125I) in monoclonal antibody solution were incubated, and then the binding activity of the incubated samples after aspirating was measured using a gamma counter (GC-1200, USTC Chuangxin Co., Ltd., Zonkia Branch, China). The serum estrogen receptor-α (ERα) and estrogen receptor-β (ERβ) concentrations were determined by a direct solid-phase radioimmunoassay using the commercial kits (BIM Biological Technology Co., Ltd., CA, USA). In addition, the analytical detection limit of the assay was found in the instructions of these kits.

From d 0 and weekly up to d 98 of gestation, from breeding to farrowing, the length, width and height of sows’ vulva were measured and the vulva dimensions were calculated as approximately cylindrical (π × length of vulva × width of vulva × height/4 of vulva) according to the previously described method with slight modifications [20].

At birth, the number and BW of newborn piglets, and the number of stillborn piglets were recorded. After parturition (114 d), 18 sows were randomly selected from CO, MO or MOA treatments (six sows per group), respectively, and all sows were sacrificed using electric shock and bloodletting. The left kidney, liver, spleen, uterus, ovary, and 18 mammary gland samples were collected rapidly by a team of trained personnel. In line with the above procedure, the ERα and ERβ contents in the kidney, liver, spleen, ovary, uterus and mammary glands were determined using the commercial radioimmunoassay kits (BIM Biological Technology Co., Ltd., CA, USA). Then, the samples (ovary, uterus and mammary gland) from each group were fixed in 10% neutral formalin. The tissues were trimmed after fixation and embedded in paraffin. Paraffin samples were cut into 5-μm slices and mounted on the slide, then stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and examined histopathologically with an Olympus optical microscope.

Statistical analysis

The variability of the data was expressed using standard error of the mean (SEM). The variability between means was determined using 2 × 2 factorial design analysis. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS 9.1 (SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC, USA): fixed factors included toxins content, MBA content, and their interactions, and random factors included experimental period and animal. When interactions were present, means were compared by using Duncan’s range test to determine significant differences among means with a significant level of P <  0.05.

Results

Mycotoxin content of the experimental diets

ZEA were not detected in the normal corn. The concentrations of ZEA were 467 mg/kg in the moldy corn. The concentrations of ZEA were 10.2 μg/kg, 14.2 μg/kg, 246 μg/kg and 260 μg/kg in CO, COA, MO and MOA diets, respectively. The concentrations of AF were 1.9 and 2.2 μg/kg in MO and MOA, respectively. AF in CO and COA as well as DON and OA in any of the diets were not detected.

Reproductive performance

Dietary treatments had no effect on the total born piglets per litter, born alive piglets per litter, stillbirth piglets per litter, average initial litter weight or average birth weight (Table 2).

Table 2 Effects of MBA on reproductive performance of first-parity gilts when exposed to ZEAa
Full size table

Vulva size

As shown in Table 3, the significant interactions (P <  0.05) between toxin and MBA were observed from the vulva size of first gilts at 28, 35, and 98 days of gestation, suggesting the supplementation of MBA effectively ameliorated (P <  0.05) the negative effects of ZEA on the reproductive tract. Also, the vulva size in gilts fed with toxin diets was significantly increased (P <  0.05) compared with the gilts fed with no toxin diets at 28, 35, and 98 days of gestation. However, dietary treatments had no effect on vulva size in this research.

Table 3 Effects of MBA on vulva size of first-parity gilts when exposed to ZEAc
Full size table

Serum hormones

There were interactions (P <  0.05) in serum concentrations of estradiol (E2) and luteotrophic hormone (LH) between four diets group in the middle of gestation (Table 4). The content of serum E2 in the MO group was significantly increased (P <  0.05) than that in other groups. The toxins diets exhibited a significant increase (P <  0.05) in serum LH concentration. The addition of MBA to the diet had no effect on serum hormones. No difference was observed in the levels of progesterone (PROG), prolactin (PRL), testosterone (T), or follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) among all groups.

Table 4 Effects of MBA on serum hormones of first-parity gilts when exposed to ZEAc
Full size table

At 60 days of gestation, the significant interactions (P <  0.05; Table 4) between toxin and MBA were observed from the concentrations of serum E2 and serum LH of gilts. Also, at 114 days of gestation, the significant interactions (P <  0.05) between toxin and MBA were observed from the levels of serum E2, PROG, FSH, LH, and PRL of gilts, suggesting the administration of MBA effectively alleviated the physiological dysfunction caused by ZEN. Of note, the concentrations of serum E2, PROG, FSH, and LH in gilts fed with toxin diets were dramatically increased (P <  0.05) compared with the gilts fed with no toxin diets after farrowing (114 d). The addition of MBA to the diet did not affect the serum hormones.

ERα and ERβ concentrations in serum and organs

In the middle of gestation, there were interactions in serum estrogen receptor-α (ERα) and estrogen receptor-β (ERβ) concentrations between toxins and MBA (P <  0.05; Table 5). The toxins diets increased (P <  0.05) serum ERα and ERβ concentrations, while the addition of MBA did not affect serum ERα and ERβ concentrations.

Table 5 Effects of MBA on ERα and ERβ in serum and organs of first-parity gilts when exposed to ZEAc
Full size table

On farrowing, significant interactions between four diets group in ERα and ERβ levels of liver and ERβ levels of spleen, ovary, uterus and mammary gland were observed (P <  0.05; Table 5). The toxins diets increased serum ERα and ERβ levels (P <  0.05). The addition of MBA reduced (P <  0.05) serum ERβ content. MO group increased (P <  0.05) ERβ content in the ovary, uterus and mammary gland compared with CO group. No differences were tested in ERα or ERβ levels of liver and kidney among all groups.

Residual ZEA in serum and feces

The ZEA and its metabolites (α-zearalanol, β-zearalanol, α-zearalenol, β-zearalenol and zearalanone) were not detected in the serum (data not shown). Interestingly, as shown in the previous study, the residual ZEA content in feces of gilts fed ZEA-contaminated diets supplemented with MBA was significantly lower than that of gilts fed ZEA contaminated diets.

Histopathology in organs

As shown in Fig. 1, histological structures of all the organs, including the ovary, uterus, and mammary gland, were observed to be normal and essentially lesion-free in the CO group. In contrast, moderate lesions such as swelling, degeneration, inflammatory cell infiltration, hemorrhage, and necrosis were observed in the ovary, uterus and mammary gland to varying degrees in the Mo group. Very interestingly, our results revealed that the administration of MBA significantly ameliorated the lesion of ZEA exposure in the ovary, uterus and mammary gland.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effects of MBA on histopathology in organs of first-parity gilts when exposed to ZEA. A Uterus (CO group): a small amount of inflammatory cell infiltration in inner membrance; capillaries are mildly hyperemic or stagnant. B Uterus (MO group): a large amount of inflammatory cell infiltration in inner membrance; severe bleeding in lamina propria. C Uterus (MOA group): a small amount of inflammatory cell infiltration in inner membrance; capillaries are mildly hyperemic or stagnant. D Mammary gland (CO group): a small amount of reticular secretion in the acinar cavity; glandular epithelial cells swell and become fatty; occasionally, glandular epithelial cells exfoliate and become necrotic. E Mammary gland (MO group): a small amount of reticular or mass secretion in the acinar cavity; glandular epithelial cells swell and become fatty; A large number of glandular epithelial cells disintegrate from myoepithelial cell; the glandular cavity contains exfoliated and necrotic glandular epithelial cells. F Mammary gland (MOA group): no secretions found in the acinar cavity; glandular epithelial cells swell slightly; a small amount of steatosis occurs. G Ovary (CO group): normal structure; a small amount of eosinophils; no obvious histopathological changes observed. H Ovary (MO group): bleeding seen in the follicular membrane; a small amount of eosinophils; necrosis in the follicular granulocytes. I Ovary (MOA group): bleeding seen in the follicular membrane; a small amount of eosinophils

Full size image

Discussion

Reproductive performance

It is generally accepted that pigs are a very sensitive species to ZEA, with prepubertal gilts being the most sensitive stage. Recently, it is well documented that diets with ZEA [7, 23] alone or ZEA with DON together [8, 24,25,26] might cause detrimental effects on growth performance, cells, tissues and organs, oocyte maturation, antioxidant activities, metabolic process, digestive enzymes, microRNAs, and digestive system in weanling, immature or pre-pubertal gilts. However, fewer studies were conducted to determine the impact of ZEA on the gestation period in first-parity gilts [20, 27,28,29].

Feeding ZEA contaminated diets (> 1000 μg/kg) decreased the litter size and increased the number of stillborn piglets without any effect on the number of abortion in sows and gits [30]. Yorkshire gilts fed diets containing purified ZEA (3000 μg/kg) after estrus had a higher stillbirth rate, but lower total born piglets or birth weight [31]. Based on the above results, a preliminary conclusion can be made that feeding high ZEA diets increased the stillbirth rate on gilts, but decreased total born piglets, born alive piglets and birth weight. However, we failed to observe the detrimental effects of low-dose ZEA (246 μg/kg) on reproductive performance including stillbirth rate in (Yorkshire × Landrace) first-parity gilts fed naturally contaminated diets from breeding up to farrowing in the present study. Besides, all the gilts were successful in breeding, pregnancy and farrowing. The discrepancy in the stillbirth rate may be due to the different ZEA levels, exposure timing, exposure duration and breed. ZEA levels used in previous studies [27, 29] were 1.2 or 2.8 times higher than those in our study. The very high DON levels (5500 μg/kg or 5700 μg/kg) in previous studies may have a synergistic effect with ZEA. The exposure duration might be nearly 21 d in previous studies, while this was 114 d in the herein study. Besides, it can be seen that the average birth weight among all groups was low due to the large litter size, which even doubled the size compared with previous studies due to the different breed [28]. Based on the findings of European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain [32], for sexually mature female pigs, a no-observed-effect level (NOAEL) of 40 μg/kg body weight per day was determined based on the results of prolonged cycling and for sows, the highest estimated chronic exposure (P95) for ZEA was 9% of the NOAEL as 3.6 μg/kg body weight per day. This was just consistent with the ZEA level in our study if the assumed average daily feed intake (ADFI) was 3 kg. Therefore, it was supposed that gilts may be more tolerant to low-dose ZEA for a long time than high-dose for short time, especially in the key period during late gestation. Moreover, compared with the CO group, the supplementation of MBA did not affect the reproductive performance of gilts. However, the reproductive performance in the MO group showed a decreasing trend, while the MOA diet group had a higher trend average initial litter weight and average birth weight of gilts than the MO diet.

In our study, according to our description in the Materials and methods section, this MBA reagent contains a large amount of B. subtilis ANSB01G culture, which the total viable counts of fermented-dried B. subtilis ANSB01G was 1 × 109 CFU/g. Therefore, the supplementation of MBA not only alleviates toxic damage caused by ZEN but also may improve the reproductive performance of gilts. As previously reported, these results have shown that adding B. subtilis PB6 to sows’ feed during late gestation and lactation could enhance the growth performance of suckling piglets, and improve the gut health of sows during late gestation [33]. Also, a previous study reported that the administration of B. subtilis and E. faecium remarkably improved the average daily feed intake of sows and the weight gain of piglets, while significantly decreased the backfat loss and constipation rate of sows [34]. However, during lactation, B. subtilis C-3102-fed sows tended to have increased feed intake, but it did not affect sow performance [35], which was consistent with our results.

Vulva size

Previous research has documented that high concentrations of ZEA (250–5000 μg/kg) can cause vulva swelling in prepubertal gilts [27, 36, 37]. Similarly, several studies also indicated that ZEN resulted in vulvar swelling and vaginal prolapse [20, 38]. In our study, increased vulva size was only observed in the 2nd and 3rd month when gilts fed low dose-ZEA contaminated diets in the current study. However, the absence of ZEN effect in 1st and 4th month were needed to be further studied in addition to the dose. It was well known that female pigs were generally regarded as being a very sensitive species to ZEN. For sexually mature female pigs, a NOAEL of 40 μg/kg body weight per day was identified based on the results of prolonged cycling. Meanwhile, the lowest observed-effect-levels for uterus, ovary and vulva of female pigs ranged from 17 to 200 μg/kg body weight per day and the overall no-observed-effect-level (NOEL) was 10.4 μg/kg body weight per day [32]. Very interestingly, in the present study, the daily feed intake of gilts was 3 kg, while the daily intake of ZEN toxin was 3.5 μg/kg body weight, which was lower than the recommended NOEL value. However, in our study, the significant interactions between toxin and MBA were observed from the vulva size of first gilts at 28, 35, and 98 days of gestation, suggesting the administration of MBA effectively ameliorated the negative effects of low-dose ZEA for a long time on vulva size, which is consistent with previous study [8]. Also, Shi et al. [8] reported that the supplementation of mycotoxin biodegradation agent composed of Bacillus subtilis ANSB01G and Devosia sp. ANSB714 could effectively relieve the estrogenic swelling in the vulva of gilts caused by the combination of ZEA and DON (596.86 μg/kg and 796 μg/kg, respectively).

Serum hormones

It is known that ZEA and its metabolites, especially α-ZEL has oestrogenicity to act similarly to the endogenous steroidal sex hormone 17β-oestradiol [39], which may influence the levels of the hormones. Furthermore, ZEA interferes with steroid metabolism mainly by altering the activities of several enzymes [40]. Feeding 2000 μg/kg ZEA diets increased serum PRL level in gilts [41], which was consistent with two previous studies conducted by our lab [8, 20]. Shi et al. [8] and Zhao et al. [20] concluded that serum PRL was significantly increased in gilts fed diets containing ZEA + DON (596.86 μg/kg feed + 796 μg/kg feed; 238.57 μg/kg feed + 0 μg/kg feed, respectively), but no effect on serum FSH, LH or E2. On the contrary, we did not observe any effect of the toxins diets on the levels of serum PRL, E2, PROG, T, or FSH during middle gestation in the present study. However, the toxins diets had a significant effect on serum E2, PROG, FSH and LH after farrowing, which may indicate the time-dependent effect of ZEA on serum hormones. Furthermore, the MO group increased the levels of serum E2 and LH, which was reduced by the addition of MBA in our study. LH and E2 play a vital role in the maturation of follicular cells in the reproductive organs of gilts. LH can induce early follicular membrane cell differentiation, promote follicular dominance formation and induction of ovulation, while E2 can stimulate follicular growth, induce sexual behavior and maintain a normal estrous cycle [42]. The increased serum E2 and LH demonstrated that exogenous ZEA interfered with the normal secretion of reproductive hormones in gilts. Notwithstanding, the results of several studies using purified ZEA in immature gilts were not always consistent. For example, Wu et al. [43] reported that the concentrations of serum LH in immature gilts fed purified ZEA 200 μg/kg, 800 μg/kg, and 1600 μg/kg for 14 d were significantly reduced by 3.61%, 4.01%, and 5.61%, respectively. Fu et al. [44] also revealed that after 14 days of diets contaminated with 1.2 mg/kg ZEA, serum LH level of gilts was decreased compared with the controls. Taken together, these results may indicate that the mature gilts appear to be more sensitive and predisposed to ZEA insult during gestation and farrowing compared to other growth stages.

ERα and ERβ concentrations in serum and organs

ZEA and its metabolites, especially α-ZEL, compete with the endogenous hormones for estrogen receptor binding sites in vivo and cause serious hyperestrogenism in gilts [39, 40]. Therefore, exposure to ZEA usually leads to precocious puberty and reproductive system disorders [11, 40]. In the herein study, the MO group increased ERα and ERβ levels in serum, ERβ level in the uterus, ovary and mammary gland. No difference in ERα or ERβ concentrations of liver and kidney was observed among all groups. This indicated that uterus and ovary may be the main target organ for ZEA. Although ERα in the uterus was not affected, gilts fed ZEA diets (1500 μg/kg) had 2.0–3.5 fold higher ERβ mRNA and protein abundance in prepubertal gilts [37]. On the contrary, 500–2000 μg/kg ZEA increased ERα levels in uterus and vagina but decreased ERβ levels in the gilts [42]. From the significant changes in ERβ level in ovary, uterus and mammary gland of our results and previous studies, it is possible that ERα may be the primary estrogenic mediator in uterine tissue and ERβ might in part be responsible for uterine growth and maintenance in response to low-dose ZEA, which was mirrored by the lack of reproductive performance difference in this study. The addition of MBA partially relieved these effects on ER.

Residual ZEA in serum

Previous studies observed that neither ZEA nor its metabolites were detected in liver samples. They explained that low levels (less than 1000 μg/kg) in the diet may be the main reason for the lack of residual ZEA in the serum, liver or muscle tissues of gilts in reserve [8, 20]. The level of ZEA (246 μg/kg) in the present study was even lower than the above studies and the residual ZEA in serum were not detected during middle gestation. This was supported by a previous study, which demonstrated that ZEA may rapidly be excreted by urine with low residue probability. However, several studies observed a very low level of ZEA residue as ng/g in organs and serum. Gilts fed low ZEA diets (200–400 μg/kg BW) had very low residue of ZEA and its metabolites in serum ranged from 4.1 to 18.1 ng/mL after 5.5 h [24]. A previous study confirmed that ZEA was accumulated in the gastrointestinal tissues and liver (1.4–8.6 ng/g) after weeks of exposure in gilts fed low ZEA (1000 μg/kg) diets [2]. A recent study conducted revealed that ZEA accumulated in all intestinal tissues (21.6–153.7 ng/g) in gilts administered ZEA at 40 μg/kg BW [8]. If ZEA mainly accumulated in the gastrointestinal tissues, they may be quickly excreted through urine and feces like the discovery by a previous study [45]. ZEA and its metabolites are excreted mainly as glucuronides via the fecal route. The extensive excretion of bile and the occurrence of a significant enterohepatic circulation are probably the main reason for the relatively long-term persistence of mycotoxin and its derivatives in vivo, especially in pigs [32].

Histopathology in organs

ZEA may lead to dysfunction of organs and tissues, disrupt homeostasis [25]. Numerous studies indicated that ZEA alone or ZEA with DON together did damage to the histological structures in lamina propria, liver, intestine mucosa and ovaries [4, 26, 40, 46]. In agreement with previous results, moderate lesions such as swelling, degeneration, inflammatory cell infiltration, hemorrhage, and necrosis were observed in the ovary, uterus and mammary gland to varying degrees in the MO group. A review demonstrated that the target organ of ZEA may be the uterus, ovary, then liver and kidney [47]. Similarly, Oliver et al. [48] reported that reproductive tract weight and uterine endometrial gland development were increased in ZEA fed gilts. Several studies observed apparent histological changes in the ovary in gilts fed ZEA diets [49, 50]. Interestingly, compared with the MO pigs, the supplementation of MBA effectively improved multiple organ dysfunction syndromes caused by ZEA [46]. On the contrary, histological examination of the ovaries between the control and high exposure group in gilts fed 290 μg/kg ZEA, did not indicate any differences in the follicle phase distribution [32]. Also, a previous study showed that gilts treated with ZEN diet (40 μg/kg body weight) for six weeks did not alter the architecture of the mucosa or the ratio between goblet and adsorptive cells in the epithelium [4]. Thus, further studies are needed to get insight into this complexity and understand the precise molecular mechanisms underlying the current observations in animal models.

Conclusions

Combining the above data and discussion, we can conclude that long-term low-dose ZEA did not cause detrimental effects on reproductive performance, but significant interactions between toxin and MBA on serum E2, LH, ERα, ERβ and ERβ of spleen, ovary, uterus and mammary gland in first-parity gilts were found in the present study. These significant interactions suggested that low levels of ZEA in diet adversely affected the above indices, while the addition of MBA (Bacillus subtilis ANSB01G) mitigated these damages and the cytotoxicity of the uterus and ovary caused by the dietary toxins. Therefore, Bacillus subtilis ANSB01G culture used in this study was considered as a potential application for detoxification of ZEA in animal production.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets produced and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AF:

Aflatoxin

Ca:

Calcium

CFU:

Colony forming unit

DON:

Deoxynivalenol

DM:

Dry matter

E2:

Estradiol

ERα:

Estrogen receptor-α

ERβ:

Estrogen receptor-β

FM:

Fumonisin

FSH:

Follicle-stimulating hormone

GSH-Px:

Glutathione peroxidase

GMA:

Glucomannan mycotoxin adsorbent

H&E:

Haematoxylin and eosin

LH:

Luteotrophic hormone

MBA:

Mycotoxin biodegradation agent

MDA:

Malondialdehyde

NOEL:

No-observed-effect-level

N:

Nitrogen

OA:

Ochratoxin

P:

Phosphorus

PRL:

Prolactin

PROG:

Progesterone

SEM:

Standard error means

SOD:

Superoxide dismutase

TUNEL:

Transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling method

T:

Testosterone

ZEA:

Zearalenone

References

  1. Hueza IM, Raspantini PC, Raspantini LE, Latorre AO, Górniak SL. Zearalenone, an estrogenic mycotoxin, is an immunotoxic compound. Toxins (Basel). 2014;6(3):1080–95. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins6031080.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zielonka Ł, Gajęcka M, Rozicka A, Dąbrowski M, Żmudzki J, Gajęcki M. The effect of environmental mycotoxins on selected ovarian tissue fragments of multiparous female wild boars at the beginning of astronomical winter. Toxicon. 2014;89:26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2014.06.021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gajęcka M, Waśkiewicz A, Zielonka Ł, Goliński P, Rykaczewska A, Lisieska-Żołnierczyk S, et al. Mycotoxin levels in the digestive tissues of immature gilts exposed to zearalenone and deoxynivalenol. Toxicon. 2018;153:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.08.002.

  4. Lewczuk B, Przybylska-Gornowicz B, Gajęcka M, Targońska K, Ziółkowska N, Prusik M, et al. Histological structure of duodenum in gilts receiving low doses of zearalenone and deoxynivalenol in feed. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2016;68(2–3):157–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etp.2015.11.008.

  5. Zielonka Ł, Waśkiewicz A, Beszterda M, Kostecki M, Dąbrowski M, Obremski K, et al. Zearalenone in the intestinal tissues of immature gilts exposed per os to mycotoxins. Toxins (Basel). 2015;7(8):3210–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins7083210.

  6. Avantaggiato G, Havenaar R, Visconti A. Assessing the zearalenone-binding activity of adsorbent materials during passage through a dynamic in vitro gastrointestinal model. Food Chem Toxicol. 2003;41(10):1283–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6915(03)00113-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang H, Camargo Rodriguez O, Memili E. Mycotoxin alpha-zearalenol impairs the quality of preimplantation porcine embryos. J Reprod Dev. 2012;58(3):338–43. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.11-113h.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shi D, Zhou J, Zhao L, Rong X, Fan Y, Hamid H, et al. Alleviation of mycotoxin biodegradation agent on zearalenone and deoxynivalenol toxicosis in immature gilts. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2018;9:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-018-0255-z.

  9. Conková E, Laciaková A, Pástorová B, Seidel H, Kovác G. The effect of zearalenone on some enzymatic parameters in rabbits. Toxicol Lett. 2001;121(3):145–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4274(01)00312-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Abbès S, Salah-Abbès JB, Ouanes Z, Houas Z, Othman O, Bacha H, et al. Preventive role of phyllosilicate clay on the immunological and biochemical toxicity of zearalenone in Balb/c mice. Int Immunopharmacol. 2006;6(8):1251–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2006.03.012.

  11. Zinedine A, Soriano JM, Moltó JC, Mañes J. Review on the toxicity, occurrence, metabolism, detoxification, regulations and intake of zearalenone: an oestrogenic mycotoxin. Food Chem Toxicol. 2007;45(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2006.07.030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zain ME. Impact of mycotoxins on humans and animals. J Saudi Chem Soc. 2011;15(2):129–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2010.06.006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Varga J, Kocsubé S, Péteri Z, Vágvölgyi C, Tóth B. Chemical, physical and biological approaches to prevent ochratoxin induced toxicoses in humans and animals. Toxins. 2010;2(7):1718–50. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins2071718.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Jard G, Liboz T, Mathieu F, Guyonvarc'h A, André F, Delaforge M, et al. Transformation of zearalenone to zearalenone-sulfate by aspergillus spp. World Mycotoxin J. 2010;3(2):183–91. https://doi.org/10.3920/wmj2009.1184.

  15. Cserháti M, Kriszt B, Krifaton C, Szoboszlay S, Háhn J, Tóth S, et al. Mycotoxin-degradation profile of Rhodococcus strains. Int J Food Microbiol. 2013;166(1):176–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.06.002.

  16. Kabak B, Dobson AD, Var I. Strategies to prevent mycotoxin contamination of food and animal feed: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2006;46(8):593–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408390500436185.

  17. Schatzmayr G, Zehner F, Täubel M, Schatzmayr D, Klimitsch A, Loibner AP, et al. Microbiologicals for deactivating mycotoxins. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2006;50(6):543–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.200500181.

  18. Lei YP, Zhao LH, Ma QG, Zhang JY, Zhou T, Gao CQ, et al. Degradation of zearalenone in swine feed and feed ingredients by Bacillus subtilis ANSB01G. World Mycotoxin J. 2014;7(2):143–51. https://doi.org/10.3920/wmj2013.1623.

  19. Zhou J, Ao X, Lei Y, Ji C, Ma Q. Bacillus subtilis ANSB01G culture alleviates oxidative stress and cell apoptosis induced by dietary zearalenone in first-parity gestation sows. Anim Nutr. 2020;6(3):372–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2020.03.011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao L, Lei Y, Bao Y, Jia R, Ma Q, Zhang J, et al. Ameliorative effects of Bacillus subtilis ANSB01G on zearalenone toxicosis in pre-pubertal female gilts. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2015;32(4):617–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2014.976845.

  21. National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of swine: eleventh revised edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Duca RC, Bravin F, Delaforge M, Vladescu L, Badea IA, Criste RD. Development of a new HPLC method used for determination of zearalenone and its metabolites in broiler samples. Influence of zearalenone on the nutritional properties of broiler meat. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57(22):10497–504. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9014608.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zielonka Ł, Gajęcka M, Lisieska-Żołnierczyk S, Dąbrowski M, Gajęcki MT. The effect of different doses of zearalenone in feed on the bioavailability of zearalenone and alpha-zearalenol, and the concentrations of estradiol and testosterone in the peripheral blood of pre-pubertal gilts. Toxins (Basel). 2020;12(3):1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12030144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Obremski K, Gajęcki M, Zwierzchowski W, Bakuła T, Apoznański J, Wojciechowski J. The level of zearalenone and A-zearalenol in the blood of gilts with clinical symptoms of toxicosis, fed diets with a low zearalenone content. J Anim Feed Sci. 2003;12(3):529–38. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/67729/2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tralamazza SM, Bemvenuti RH, Zorzete P, de Souza GF, Corrêa B. Fungal diversity and natural occurrence of deoxynivalenol and zearalenone in freshly harvested wheat grains from Brazil. Food Chem. 2016;196:445–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.09.063.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Obremski K, Gajecka M, Zielonka L, Jakimiuk E, Gajecki M. Morphology and ultrastructure of small intestine mucosa in gilts with zearalenone mycotoxicosis. Pol J Vet Sci. 2005;8(4):301–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwj002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Díaz-Llano G, Smith TK. Effects of feeding grains naturally contaminated with fusarium mycotoxins with and without a polymeric glucomannan mycotoxin adsorbent on reproductive performance and serum chemistry of pregnant gilts. J Anim Sci. 2006;84(9):2361–6. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-699.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Díaz-Llano G, Smith TK. The effects of feeding grains naturally contaminated with fusarium mycotoxins with and without a polymeric glucomannan adsorbent on lactation, serum chemistry, and reproductive performance after weaning of first-parity lactating sows. J Anim Sci. 2007;85(6):1412–23. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Amata A, Adejumo DO, Bratte L. Contamination of swine diets by feed borne fusarium mycotoxins and its effect on metabolism and reproduction in first parity gilts: use of mycotoxin binders. J Anim Vet Adv. 2009;8(2):332–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2008.03.014.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Stoev SD. Foodborne mycotoxicoses, risk assessment and underestimated hazard of masked mycotoxins and joint mycotoxin effects or interaction. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015;39(2):794–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2015.01.022.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Young LG, King GJ. Low concentrations of zearalenone in diets of mature gilts. J Anim Sci. 1986;63(4):1191–6. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1986.6341191x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. EFSA, European Food Safety Authority Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM). Scientific Opinion on the risks for human and animal health related to the presence of modified forms of certain mycotoxins in food and feed. EFSA J. 2014;12(12):3916. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3916.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang Q, Li J, Cao M, Li Y, Zhuo Y, Fang Z, et al. Dietary supplementation of Bacillus subtilis PB6 improves sow reproductive performance and reduces piglet birth intervals. Anim Nutr. 2020;6(3):278–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2020.04.002.

  34. Wang C, Wei S, Xu B, Hao L, Su W, Jin M, et al. Bacillus subtilis and enterococcus faecium co-fermented feed regulates lactating sow's performance, immune status and gut microbiota. Microb Biotechnol. 2021;14(2):614–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13672.

  35. Menegat MB, DeRouchey JM, Woodworth JC, Dritz SS, Tokach MD, Goodband RD. Effects of Bacillus subtilis C-3102 on sow and progeny performance, fecal consistency, and fecal microbes during gestation, lactation, and nursery periods1,2. J Anim Sci. 2019;97(9):3920–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz236.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang JP, Chi F, Kim IH. Effects of montmorillonite clay on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, vulva size, faecal microflora, and oxidative stress in weaning gilts challenged with zearalenone. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2012;178(3):158–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.09.004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Tiemann U, Dänicke S. In vivo and in vitro effects of the mycotoxins zearalenone and deoxynivalenol on different non-reproductive and reproductive organs in female pigs: a review. Food Addit Contam. 2007;24(3):306–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030601053626.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jiang SZ, Yang ZB, Yang WR, Gao J, Liu FX, Broomhead J, et al. Effects of purified zearalenone on growth performance, organ size, serum metabolites, and oxidative stress in postweaning gilts. J Anim Sci. 2011;89(10):3008–15. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3658.

  39. Takemura H, Shim JY, Sayama K, Tsubura A, Zhu BT, Shimoi K. Characterization of the estrogenic activities of zearalenone and zeranol in vivo and in vitro. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;103(2):170–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2006.08.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Döll S, Dänicke S. The fusarium toxins deoxynivalenol (DON) and zearalenone (ZON) in animal feeding. Prev Vet Med. 2011;102(2):132–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.04.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen F, Ma Y, Xue C, Ma J, Xie Q, Wang G, et al. The combination of deoxynivalenol and zearalenone at permitted feed concentrations causes serious physiological effects in young pigs. J Vet Sci. 2008;9(1):39–44. https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2008.9.1.39.

  42. Wang D, Ma Q, Zhang N, Qi D. Genistein inhibit the proliferation induced by zearalenone in MCF-7 cells. Mol Cellu Toxicol. 2010;6(1):25–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13273-010-0004-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Wu F, Cui J, Yang X, Liu S, Han S, Chen B. Effects of zearalenone on genital organ development, serum immunoglobulin, antioxidant capacity, sex hormones and liver function of prepubertal gilts. Toxicon. 2021;189:39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2020.11.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Fu G, Ma J, Wang L, Yang X, Liu J, Zhao X. Effect of degradation of Zearalenone-contaminated feed by bacillus licheniformis CK1 on Postweaning female piglets. Toxins (Basel). 2016;8(10):1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8100300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Braicu C, Selicean S, Cojocneanu-Petric R, Lajos R, Balacescu O, Taranu I, et al. Evaluation of cellular and molecular impact of zearalenone and Escherichia coli co-exposure on IPEC-1 cells using microarray technology. BMC Genomics. 2016;17(1):576. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2830-z.

  46. Weaver AC, See MT, Kim SW. Protective effect of two yeast based feed additives on pigs chronically exposed to deoxynivalenol and zearalenone. Toxins (Basel). 2014;6(12):3336–53. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins6123336.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Dänicke S, Winkler J. Invited review: diagnosis of zearalenone (ZEN) exposure of farm animals and transfer of its residues into edible tissues (carry over). Food Chem Toxicol. 2015;84:225–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2015.08.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Oliver WT, Miles JR, Diaz DE, Dibner JJ, Rottinghaus GE, Harrell RJ. Zearalenone enhances reproductive tract development, but does not alter skeletal muscle signaling in prepubertal gilts. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2012;174(1–2):79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.02.012.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Zwierzchowski W, Przybyłowicz M, Obremski K, Zielonka L, Skorska-Wyszyńska E, Gajecka M, et al. Level of zearalenone in blood serum and lesions in ovarian follicles of sexually immature gilts in the course of zearalenone micotoxicosis. Pol J Vet Sci. 2005;3:209–18. https://doi.org/16180582.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Gajecki M. Zearalenone--undesirable substances in feed. Pol J Vet Sci. 2002;5(2):117–22. https://doi.org/12189947.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31772637, 31301981), and a Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201403047).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China

    Jianchuan Zhou, Lihong Zhao, Shimeng Huang, Qingxiu Liu, Yuanpei Lei, Cheng Ji & Qiugang Ma

  2. Sichuan tieqilishi Food Co., Ltd, Mianyang, 610000, Sichuan province, China

    Jianchuan Zhou & Xiang Ao

Authors
  1. Jianchuan Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lihong Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shimeng Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qingxiu Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiang Ao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yuanpei Lei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Cheng Ji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Qiugang Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JCZ performed the experiments and drafted the manuscript. YPL and XA carried out the statistical analysis. QGM, SMH, QXL, and LHZ helped the revision of this manuscript. QGM and CJ contributed to the supervision and guidance of the present study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiugang Ma.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal protocols used in this study were approved and carried out according to the guidelines for the ethical treatment of animals by the institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of China Agricultural University (Beijing, China; NO. AW80011202–1-2).

Consent for publication

All the authors read and agree to the content of this paper and its publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, J., Zhao, L., Huang, S. et al. Zearalenone toxicosis on reproduction as estrogen receptor selective modulator and alleviation of zearalenone biodegradative agent in pregnant sows. J Animal Sci Biotechnol 13, 36 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00686-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00686-3

Keywords

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology

ISSN: 2049-1891