Skip to main content

Supplementation with alpha-glycerol monolaurate during late gestation and lactation enhances sow performance, ameliorates milk composition, and improves growth of suckling piglets

Abstract

Background

Physiological changes during lactation cause oxidative stress in sows, reduce immunity, and hamper the growth capacity of piglets. Alpha-glycerol monolaurate (α-GML) has potential for enhancing the antimicrobial activity of sows and the growth of suckling piglets.

Methods

Eighty sows were allocated randomly to four groups: basal diet and basal diets supplemented with 500, 1000, or 2000 mg/kg α-GML. The experiment started on d 85 of gestation and lasted until piglets were weaned on d 21 of lactation. The number of live-born piglets was standardized to 12 ± 1 per sow on day of parturition. On d 0 and 21 of lactation, body weight of piglets was measured and milk samples were obtained from sows, and serum samples and feces from piglets were obtained on d 21.

Results

Feed intake, backfat loss, and weaning estrus interval did not differ among the four groups of sows. Maternal α-GML supplementation increased (P < 0.05) the body weight of piglets at weaning and the apparent total tract digestibility of crude fat of sows. The immunoglobulin A and immunoglobulin G levels were greater (P < 0.05) in a quadratic manner in the milk of sows as dietary α-GML increased. Concerning fatty acid profile, C12:0, C15:0, C17:0, C18:2n6c, C18:3n3, C24:0, and C22:6n3 were higher (P < 0.05) in linear and quadratic manners in colostrum of sows-fed α-GML diets compared with the control sows. There was lower (P < 0.05) n-6:n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid ratio in milk than in the control sows. Maternal α-GML increased the abundance of Firmicutes (P < 0.05) and decreased the abundance of Proteobacteria (P < 0.05) of piglet fecal microbiota.

Conclusions

Dietary supplementation with α-GML improved milk immunoglobulins and altered fatty acids of sows, thereby improving the health of piglets.

Background

Litter size and weaning weights are the main parameters that define productivity and profitability on pig barn [1]. Improvements in swine genetics [2], management [3], and nutrition [4] have increased the number of weaned piglets per litter [5], which are associated with larger litter size, pre-weaning survival and weaning weight. Three-quarters of fetal weight gain occurs in the last quarter of pregnancy, during which sufficient nutrient is required to meet the needs of the sow [6]. It is important to provide adequate nutrients or nutritional interventions through late pregnancy and lactation.

Studies have found that dietary supplementation of fatty acids during late pregnancy and/or lactation can increase the overall litter growth and pig weaning weights [7], reduce body weight loss during lactation and shorten the weaning-to-estrus interval [6]. Furthermore, the type and amount of fat in daily feed rations also affect the sow milk yield and the milk fatty acids profile [8]. Alpha-glycerol monolaurate (α-GML) is an α-monoglyceride of medium-chain fatty acid (MCFA) lauric acid and is recognized by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) food emulsifier [9]. As a natural and edible lipid, α-GML possesses multiple pharmacological and biological activities, including excellent antibacterial and antiviral properties. The strong antibacterial properties of GML make it widely used in food preservation and medicine [10,11,12]. Moreover, in vitro study showed that GML inhibited the infectivity and transmission of the African swine fever virus (ASFv) in feed [13]. A recent study reveals that GML can be used as an effective feed additive to improve animal growth performance and quality control [14]. Our previous study has demonstrated that dietary 1000 mg/kg α-GML supplementation significantly reduces diarrhea rate, improves intestinal morphology, nutrient digestibility, antioxidant capacity, and immune status, and ameliorates gut microbiota in weaned piglets [15]. It is reported that the addition of 2000 mg/kg GML in a low protein diet could improve the intestinal tight junction barrier function and immune status of weaned piglets [16]. However, whether α-GML can improve the health of suckling piglets through the mother is not yet conclusive. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the effect of maternal α-GML supplementation during gestation and lactation on the reproductive performance of sows, the fatty acids profile of milk, the growth performance, the serum immunoglobulins, and the fecal microbiota of piglets.

Methods

The experimental protocol of this study was following the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals prepared by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of China Agricultural University. This experiment was conducted in the FengNing Swine Research Unit of China Agricultural University (Academician Workstation in Chengde Jiuyun Agricultural and Livestock Co., Ltd., Hebei, China). The product α-GML was provided by Zhejiang Libiduo Biotechnology Co., Ltd., and the α-GML accounted for 85% of the products.

Animals and experimental design

Fifth or sixth parity sows (n = 80; Landrace × Large White) with similar backfat (BF) thickness were assigned randomly to one of four treatments: control diet (corn-soybean basal diet, n = 20), 500 mg/kg α-GML diet (basal diet + 500 mg/kg α-GML, n = 20), 1000 mg/kg α-GML diet (basal diet + 1000 mg/kg α-GML, n = 20), and 2000 mg/kg α-GML diet (basal diet + 2000 mg/kg α-GML, n = 20). Each treatment (Table 1) consisted of a gestation and a lactation diet and were formulated to meet nutritional requirements of late gestation (d 85 to 107 of gestation) and lactation (d 107 of gestation to weaning) sows according to the recommendations by the National Research Council [17]. Sows were housed individually in stalls from d 85 to 107 of gestation on partially slatted concrete floors and ingested a total of 2.5 kg diet daily (9:00 and 15:00). Then, sows were moved to farrowing stalls on d 107 of gestation and ingested 2.76 kg of daily diet (9:00 and 15:00) from d 107 of gestation to parturition. Sows were offered approximately 0.5 kg on the first day after farrowing and then fed daily feed allotment was increased 1.0 kg more every day until maximum feed intake was reached. When maximum feed intake was achieved, sows were allowed ad libitum access to feed. Throughout the experiment, sows and piglets were allowed ad libitum access to water. On the day of farrowing (day = 0), litter size was adjusted to 12 ± 1 piglets by cross-fostering within dietary treatment. The ambient temperature in the farrowing room for sows was maintained at 20–23 ℃. Heat lamps were used to provided heat to neonatal pigs. The suckling piglets underwent routine tooth clipping, tail removal, subcutaneous iron dextran injections, and immunization. During the entire experiment, sow's milk was the sole food source for suckling piglets. Feed intake of the sows was recorded daily to allow calculation of average daily feed intake (ADFI) during the entire lactation period, and piglets were weighed at birth and d 21 of lactation. The growth performance and survival rates of sucking piglets were determined. Backfat thickness (P2, 6 cm from the midline at the head of the last rib) of sows at d 110 of gestation and d 21 of lactation was measured using an ultrasonic device (Piglog105; SFK Technology A/S, Helver, Denmark) to assess the body condition of sows.

Table 1 Ingredient composition and calculated nutrient concentrations of gestation and lactation basal diets (as-fed basis)

Collection of feed and Feces from sows

Approximately 1 kg of gestation and lactation feed were collected weekly during the experiment. From d 19 to 21 of lactation, six sows each group were sued to collect fresh feces by the rectal palpation method. Samples were pooled within sows over the three collection days and immediately frozen at −20 °C. Feces were dried at 65 °C for 72 h. All feed and feces samples were ground to pass through a 1-mm sieve and stored at −20 °C for further analysis.

Collection of colostrum and milk from sows

Six sows from each group were randomly selected by injection of 10 IU oxytocin via the ear vein to induce milk letdown into the teat canal on d 0 (colostrum, within 2 h after starting delivery of the sows) and 21 (milk) of lactation. Milk samples were collected from different mammary glands (front, middle, and rear), and equal volumes (15 mL) of milk from three glands of a sow were mixed, and the samples were stored at –20 ℃ for subsequent analysis.

Collection of blood samples from piglets

Blood samples (2 mL) were obtained from six randomly piglets each group via the jugular vein using non-heparinized vacutainer tubes on d 21 of lactation. Serum samples were harvested for each blood sample after centrifugation at 3000 × g for 15 min, and were stored at –20 ℃ frige for subsequent analysis.

Collection of fecal samples from piglets

Six piglets each group were used to collect fresh feces by the rectal palpation method on d 21 of lactation. Fecal samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and placed at −80 ℃ frige for subsequent analysis.

Analysis of nutrient digestibility

Gross composition of diets and feces were determined according to the Association of Official Analytical Chemists methods [18]. Moisture, ash, crude protein (CP), and crude fat (CF) of feed and fecal samples were analyzed using AOAC methods 930.15, 942.05, 990.03, and 996.01, respectively. Gross energy (GE) was determined using an adiabatic bomb calorimeter (Parr 1281, Automatic Energy Analyzer; Moline, IL, USA). Apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of dry matter (DM), CP, CF, and GE was determined by the indigestible marker method using inherent acid insoluble ash (AIA) as the indigestible marker. The AIA concentrations in diets and feces were determined based on procedures described by Prawirodigdo et al. [19]. The ATTD of nutrients was calculated using the following equation:

$$\textit{ATTD of nutrients}={\textit{1-(AIA}}_\textit{diet}\times{\textit{Nutrients}}_\textit{feces}\textit{)}/{\textit{(AIA}}_\textit{feces}\times{\textit{Nutrients}}_\textit{diet}\textit{)}$$

Analysis of immunoglobulin in colostrum and milk

The concentrations of immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin G (IgG), and immunoglobulin M (IgM) in colostrum and milk were determined according to Che et al. [20]. Briefly, the optical density values of IgA, IgG and IgM standards were measured at 340, 700, and 340 nm using a UV–VIS recording spectrophotometer (UV-2401PC, Shimadzu Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan), and the concentration of each immunoglobulin was calculated by standard curve.

Analysis of fatty acid profiles in colostrum and milk

For analysis of fatty acid composition, milk samples (1 g) were transferred to a 25-mL Teflon-lined tube and neutralized with 4 mL of n-Hexane:isopropanol (3:2) and 2 mL of sodium sulfate (6.67%). After centrifugation at 5000 × g for 10 min, all supernatants were transferred to a 20-mL hydrolysis tube, 200 µL of C11:0 internal standard was added, and dry with mixed nitrogen. Add 4 mL of hydrochloric acid methanol (3 mol/L) solution to the hydrolysis tube and tighten the cap, then reflux in a water bath at 80 ℃ for 2 h. After the water bath, 5 mL of 7% K2CO3 and 3 mL of hexane were added to the hydrolytic tube, mix by vortexing, centrifuged at 1000 × g for 1 min, and about 1 mL of the upper liquid was filtered into a 1.5-mL glass bottle with a filter (filter pore size of 0.22 μm). Finally, the fatty acid methyl ester dissolved in the supernatant was analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry using Agilent 7890 B (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) gas chromatograph and Agilent J&W DB-23 column (60 m × 250 μm ID, 0.25 μm) column. Fatty acids were expressed as the proportion of each individual fatty acid to the total amount of all fatty acids in the sample. n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA), n-6 PUFA, and n-6:n-3 PUFA ratio were calculated.

Analysis of immunoglobulin in serum

Concentrations of IgA, IgG, and IgM were analyzed using ELISA kits validated for swine (Nanjing Jiancheng Biology Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China) according to methods described [6].

Fecal microbial flora composition

Total feces bacterial DNA (n = 6) was extracted according to the manufacturer's instructions of the QIAamp DNA stool extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The V3-V4 hypervariable regions of bacterial 16S rRNA were amplified by a PCR system using universal primers 338F (5'-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3') and 806R (5'-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3'). The PCR amplification procedures were set in ABI GeneAmp® 9700 system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) as follows: predenaturation (95 ℃, 3 min), amplification (95 ℃, 30 s; 55 ℃, 30 s; 72 ℃, 45 s; a total of 27 cycles), extended (72 ℃, 10 min) [21]. The paired-end reads of pooled purified amplicons were sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq PE300 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The original sequences were demultiplexed, quality filtered, trimmed, and denoised using Trimmomatic and merged according to the overlapping relationship by FLASH software (v1.2.11, http://ccb.jhu.edu/software/FLASH/index.shtml) [22]. The operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with 97% similarity threshold were clustered using UPARSE (version 7.1, http://drive5.com/uparse/) and their representative sequence categorized and analyzed by the RDP Classifier (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/) against the Silva (SSU128) 16S rRNA database with a confidence threshold of 70% [17]. The composition and structure of fecal microbiota were analyzed according to the standardized OUT with the QIIME software (version 1.8.0) [23]. The linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) algorithm was applied to identify specific taxa from phylum to genus level among each group of samples.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using the one-way ANOVA procedure of IBM SPSS statistical software (version 26.0, IBM Crop, Armonk, NY, USA). Each sow (litter) or piglet was considered as the experimental unit. Data were evaluated for normality and homoscedasticity by the Shapiro–Wilk and Levene's tests, respectively. The linear and quadratic effects of different α-GML levels were determined using orthogonal polynomials for reproductive performance, concentrations of immunoglobulin and fatty acid composition of sows in milk, and serum antioxidant capacity and immunoglobulin levels of piglets. The bacterial community at the phylum, genus, and species level were analyzed by non-parametric factorial Kruskal–Wallis test and unpaired Wilcoxon Comparison test. P < 0.05 was considered significant, and 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10 was classified as trends.

Results

Reproductive performance

There were no differences (P > 0.05) in ADFI of sows and weaning estrus interval among the four groups (Table 2). Litter size at weaning and average weight at birth of piglets did not differ (P > 0.05) among treatments. Litter weight at birth and weaning, and average weight at weaning of piglets increased in a quadratic manner (P < 0.05) as dietary α-GML content increased.

Table 2 Effects of α-glycerol monolaurate (α-GML) supplementation on reproductive performance of sows

Nutrient digestibility

Dietary supplementation with α-GML increased (P < 0.05) ATTD of CF compared to the control group (Table 3).

Table 3 Effects of α-glycerol monolaurate (α-GML) supplementation during late gestation and lactation on apparent total tract digestibility of nutrients (%) of sows

Concentrations of immunoglobulin of sows in colostrum and milk

The IgA and IgG levels in the colostrum and IgA levels in the milk increased in a quadratic manner (P < 0.05), whereas the IgG level in the milk increased in linear and quadratic manners (P < 0.05) as dietary α-GML content increased (Table 4). No differences (P > 0.05) in concentrations of IgM in colostrum and milk were detected among the four groups of sows.

Table 4 Effects of α-glycerol monolaurate (α-GML) supplementation during late gestation and lactation on immunoglobulin levels in colostrum and milk of sows

Fatty acid profiles of sows in colostrum and milk

Fatty acid profiles in colostrum and milk of sows were summarized in Tables 5 and 6. In colostrum, C12:0, C15:0, C17:0, C18:2n6c, C18:3n3, C24:0, and C22:6n3 increased (P < 0.05) in linear and quadratic manners, C20:3n6 increased in quadratic manner and C20:5n3 increased in linear manner (P < 0.05), C8:0 decreased (P < 0.05) in linear manner as dietary α-GML content increased. In milk, C12:0, C18:3n3, and C20:5n3 increased (P < 0.05) in linear and quadratic manners, C22:0 increased (P < 0.05) in linear manner, and C23:0, C24:0, and C24:1 increased (P < 0.05) in quadratic manner as dietary α-GML content increased. Moreover, C8:0, C10:0, and C14:0 decreased (P < 0.05) in linear and quadratic manners, and C14:1 decreased (P < 0.05) in quadratic manner, and C20:3n6 decreased (P < 0.05) in linear manner in dietary α-GML supplemented sow milk compared with the control sows.

Table 5 Effects of α-glycerol monolaurate (α-GML) supplementation during late gestation and lactation on fatty acid profiles in colostrum of sows
Table 6 Effects of α-glycerol monolaurate (α-GML) supplementation during late gestation and lactation on fatty acid profiles in milk of sows

Serum immunoglobulin levels of piglets

Effects of α-GML supplementation on levels of IgA, IgG, and IgM in the serum of piglets are summarized in Table 7. Concentrations of IgG and IgM in serum from piglets tended to increase (P < 0.10) in quadratic manner, whereas the concentration of IgA tended to increase (P < 0.10) in linear manner.

Table 7 Effects of α-glycerol monolaurate (α-GML) supplementation during late gestation and lactation on serum immunoglobulin levels on d 21 of piglets

Fecal microbiota community of piglets

There were 760, 724, 726, and 690 OTUs obtained from piglets in 0, 500, 1000, and 2000 mg/kg α-GML groups, respectively, of which 511 were common OTUs (Fig. 1A). Besides, a total of 128 unique OTUs were detected within the four groups. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) showed significant clustering characteristics of fecal microbial composition between control and α-GML groups (Fig. 1B). The α-diversity indexes including Sobs, Chao, Shannon, and Simpson indexes were not affected by dietary treatments (Fig. 1C–F). At the phylum level, Firmicutes and Bacteroides were the dominant phyla in the fecal microbial composition of suckling piglets representing approximately 90%, followed by Proteobacteria and Actinobacteriota (Fig. 2A). The relative abundance of Firmicutes was increased (P < 0.05), while the relative abundance of Proteobacteria was decreased (P < 0.05) in piglets from α-GML-fed sows (Fig. 2B). At the family level, Lactobacillaceae and Oscillospiraceae were the dominant families, followed by Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae, Peptostreptococcaceae, Erysipelotrichaceae, Bacteroidaceae, Christensenellaceae, Clostridiaceae, etc. (Fig. 2C). The relative abundance of Lactobacillaceae was increased (P < 0.05), while the relative abundance of Bacteroidaceae, Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcaceae, Eggerthellaceae, Marinifilaceae, and norank_o__Clostridia_vadinBB60_group were decreased (P < 0.05) in piglets from α-GML-fed sows (Fig. 2D).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Fecal microbial composition and diversity of suckling piglets. A The bacterial operational taxonomic units (OUTs) community composition of the feces in suckling piglets; B β-diversity analysis was performed using the unweighted version of the UniFrac-based PcoA; CF α-diversity analysis based on indices of Sobs, Chao, Shannon, and Simpson. Data were means ± SD (n = 6); CON, control group; GML1, 500 mg/kg α-GML supplemental group; GML2, 1000 mg/kg α-GML supplemental group; GML3, 2000 mg/kg α-GML supplemental group

Fig. 2
figure 2

Differences in fecal microbial phylum level and genus level of suckling piglets. A and C Fecal microbial composition of suckling piglets at phylum level; B and D Fecal microorganisms of suckling piglets differ at the family level. Data were means ± SD (n = 6); *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 compared with the CON group. CON, control group; GML1, 500 mg/kg α-GML supplemental group; GML2, 1000 mg/kg α-GML supplemental group; GML3, 2000 mg/kg α-GML supplemental group

Discussion

Sows are mobilizing body fat and protein to provide precursors and energy for milk production when nutrient intake fails to meet energy requirements [24]. This results in a negative effect on the litter growth and subsequent reproductive performance [25]. Gatlin et al. [26] observed that supplementing with 10% MCT for lactating sows decreased feed intake, in comparison with the control group. The explanation may be that lipid supplementation improved the caloric intake of lactating sows, and the voluntary feed intake of lactation sows was affected by the energy density of the diet [27, 28]. In the present study, maternal α-GML supplementation improved the growth performance of piglets compared with the control group, which was consistent with Gatlin et al. [26], who observed that the growth performance was increased in piglets from MCT-fed sows. It is supposed that this improvement was related to the antibacterial effects, potent anti-inflammatory, or energy density of the diets [14, 29].

In the present study, greater IgA and IgG levels in colostrum and milk of sows-fed α-GML diets, which was consistent with Chen et al. [6], who observed that supplementing the sows’ diet with 7.75 g coated MCFA/kg increased the contents of IgA, IgG, and IgM in colostrum. The increased immunoglobulin in colostrum and milk could enhance the immune status of suckling piglets, which may further improve the growth performance. Previous study has shown that GML could alter the lipid dynamics of human T cells, leading to a reduction in cytokine production, such as IL-2, IFN-γ, and TNF-α [30]. Therefore, the increased IgA and IgG levels may be related to the change in the inflammatory environment induced by α-GML.

The present experiment confirmed that the fatty acid profile in sow’s colostrum was influenced by the dietary α-GML. Previous studies have shown that the impact of dietary fatty acid composition during the last gestation and lactation on fatty acid profile of colostrum and milk [7, 8]. However, this study is the first one using α-GML for sow nutrition. We found that dietary α-GML inhibited de novo lipogenesis of the mammary gland (lower percentage of the sum of C8:0, C10:0, C12:0, and C14:0 in milk) [31]. Consistent with the experimental diet treatment, C12:0 in colostrum and milk was higher from sows-fed α-GML than the control sows. As the sole food source, α-GML from milk for piglets can improve growth performance by improving intestinal morphology and immune status and ameliorating gut microbiota, this was confirmed by our previous study [15]. The odd-chain fatty acids (C15:0, C17:0) mainly exist in milk of ruminants and are mostly synthesized by bacteria [32]. Goat mammary gland can also synthesize these odd-chain fatty acids [33]. Few studies have reported the presence of odd-chain fatty acids in sow milk. In this study, we found that in sow colostrum, C15:0 and C17:0 take about 0.39% of all fatty acids, and α-GML improved their proportion to 0.40%–0.47% in colostrum. In contrast to ruminants, these precursor volatile fatty acids (VFA) are not present in sufficient amounts to produce milk fatty acids. Mo et al. [34] showed that GML could enhance the content of fecal short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) by anticolitis effect. Propionate can enhance odd-chain fatty acids production, because they can be used to generate propionyl-CoA, which is the precursor for the biosynthesis of odd-chain fatty acids [35]. Thus, it cannot be excluded that a shift towards propionate production, under a different balance of gut microbiota, due to α-GML addition could contribute to these variations in odd number fatty acids. The fatty acid composition of the milk reflects the nutritional status of sows during gestation and lactation as previously described [36]. The inclusion of α-GML in the sow diets was reflected in the higher proportions of C18:2n6c, C18:3n3, C20:3n6, C20:5n3, and C22:6n3 in colostrum. Moreover, C18:3n3 and C20:5n3 were higher in milk in sows-fed α-GML diets than in the control sows. Given that long-chain fatty acids cannot be synthesized in the body, they are mainly supplied by soy oil in the diet, we speculated that α-GML supplementation altered the composition of long-chain fatty acids in milk by improving the ATTD of CF of sows. Moreover, the presence of higher levels of these fatty acids elevated the proportion of n-3 PUFA and n-6 PUFA in colostrum and n-3 PUFA in milk. Higher ratio of n-6:n-3 may limit the production of anti-inflammatory eicosanoids derived from eicosapentaenoic acid [37]. Maternal diets with varying n-6:n-3 PUFA ratios affected the antioxidant status, immune cell eicosanoid responses, immunoglobulins, fatty acids composition, and growth performance [38, 39]. Previous studies have shown the lower ratio of n-6:n-3 PUFA could improve the growth performance in weaned piglets [40] and reproductive function in boar [41].

The gut microbiota in the gastrointestinal tract has numerous roles benefiting the host, such as the production of vitamins, maintenance of normal functions of the intestinal villi, and regulation of the immune responses [42]. Firmicutes and Bacteroidota play key roles in creating and maintaining an anaerobic environment in the intestinal tract of piglets with a relative abundance approximately of 90% in this study, which was consistent with the previous report on suckling piglets [43]. Desulfovibrio in Proteobacteria has been shown to further induce increased intestinal permeability and destruction of intestinal barrier structure by reducing sulfate to sulfide and inhibiting the growth of intestinal epithelial cells [44, 45]. In the present study, maternal α-GML supplementation increased the abundance of Firmicutes and decreased the abundance of Proteobacteria in the feces of suckling piglets, which indicated that α-GML can modulate the structure and diversity of intestinal microbiota in suckling piglets. The Lactobacillaceae family, belonging to the Firmicutes phylum, is considered a beneficial microbe to improve growth performance by modulating gut health and immunity [46]. Our results showed that Lactobacillaceae was increased in piglets from α-GML-fed sows, which could explain the improvement of growth and immunity. Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcus, as aerobic or facultative anaerobic bacteria, mainly settle in the intestinal tract of piglets on d 1 and 3 [47]. With the further development of the piglet intestinal flora, the anaerobic environment formed in the piglet intestinal tract is favorable for obligate anaerobic bacteria such as Bacteroides, Lachnospira, and Clostridium, and the formation of a bacterial community structure with Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes as dominant bacteria accompanied by a decrease in the abundance of Proteobacteria [47]. In this study, a higher abundance of Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcaceae in the feces of piglets in the control group that only appeared in the intestinal tract of piglets in the early stage of birth, which to some extent indicated that the intestinal development of piglets was not perfect, and there was a higher risk of opportunistic pathogens infection. Together, these findings indicated that the maternal α-GML could influence the composition of the intestinal microbiota in suckling piglets.

Conclusions

In conclusion, α-GML supplementation could altere immunoglobulins and fatty acid composition in milk, thus ameliorating intestinal microbe in suckling piglets, which may contribute to improving the growth performance in suckling piglets.

Abbreviations

α-GML:

Alpha-glycerol monolaurate

ADFI:

Average daily feed intake

ASFv:

African swine fever virus

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

GRAS:

Generally Recognized as Safe

IgA:

Immunoglobulin A

IgG:

Immunoglobulin G

IgM:

Immunoglobulin M

LDA:

Linear discriminant analysis

MCFA:

Medium-chain fatty acid

MCT:

Medium-chain triglyceride

OTUs:

Operational taxonomic units

PCoA:

Principal coordinate analysis

PUFA:

Polyunsaturated fatty acid

SCFAs:

Short-chain fatty acids

VFA:

Volatile fatty acid

References

  1. Ocepek M, Rosvold EM, Andersen-Ranberg I, Andersen IL. Can we improve maternal care in sows? Maternal behavioral traits important for piglet survival in loose-housed sow herds. J Anim Sci. 2017;95(11):4708–17. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas2017.1725.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kemp B, Da Silva CLA, Soede NM. Recent advances in pig reproduction: Focus on impact of genetic selection for female fertility. Reprod Domest Anim. 2018;2:28–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gerritsen R, Soede NM, Langendijk P, Taverne MA, Kemp B. Early embryo survival and development in sows with lactational ovulation. Reprod Domest Anim. 2008;43(1):59–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2007.00855.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yuan TL, Zhu YH, Shi M, Li TT, Li N, Wu GY, et al. Within-litter variation in birth weight: impact of nutritional status in the sow. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2015;16(6):417–35. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1500010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmitt O, Baxter EM, Lawlor PG, Boyle LA, O’Driscoll K. A single dose of fat-based energy supplement to light birth weight pigs shortly after birth does not increase their survival and growth. Animals (Basel). 2019;9(5):227. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9050227.

  6. Chen J, Xu Q, Li Y, Tang Z, Sun W, Zhang X, et al. Comparative effects of dietary supplementations with sodium butyrate, medium-chain fatty acids, and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in late pregnancy and lactation on the reproductive performance of sows and growth performance of suckling piglets. J Anim Sci. 2019;97(10):4256–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz284.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Holen JP, Woodworth JC, Tokach MD, Goodband RD, DeRouchey JM, Gebhardt JT, et al. Evaluation of essential fatty acids in lactating sow diets on sow reproductive performance, colostrum and milk composition, and piglet survivability. J Anim Sci. 2022;100(6):skac167. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skac167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lavery A, Lawlor PG, Miller HM, Magowan E. The effect of dietary oil type and energy intake in lactating sows on the fatty acid profile of colostrum and milk, and piglet growth to weaning. Animals (Basel). 2019;9(12):1092. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9121092.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao M, Jiang Z, Cai H, Li Y, Mo Q, Deng L, et al. Modulation of the gut microbiota during high-dose glycerol monolaurate-mediated amelioration of obesity in mice fed a high-fat diet. mBio. 2020;11(2):e00190-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00190-20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang H, Wei H, Cui Y, Zhao G, Feng F. Antibacterial interactions of monolaurin with commonly used antimicrobials and food components. J Food Sci. 2009;74(7):M418–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01300.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu D, Jiang Q, Xu Y, Xia W. The shelf life extension of refrigerated grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) fillets by chitosan coating combined with glycerol monolaurate. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;101:448–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.03.038.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fosdick MG, Chheda PR, Tran PM, Wolff A, Peralta R, Zhang MY, et al. Suppression of human T cell activation by derivatives of glycerol monolaurate. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):8943. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88584-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Jackman JA, Hakobyan A, Zakaryan H, Elrod CC. Inhibition of African swine fever virus in liquid and feed by medium-chain fatty acids and glycerol monolaurate. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2020;11(1):114. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-020-00517-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Fortuoso BF, Dos Reis JH, Gebert RR, Barreta M, Griss LG, Casagrande RA, et al. Glycerol monolaurate in the diet of broiler chickens replacing conventional antimicrobials: Impact on health, performance and meat quality. Microb Pathog. 2019;129:161–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2019.02.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Li L, Wang H, Zhang N, Zhang T, Ma Y. Effects of α-glycerol monolaurate on intestinal morphology, nutrient digestibility, serum profiles, and gut microbiota in weaned piglets. J Anim Sci. 2022;100(3):skac046. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skac046.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cui Z, Wang X, Hou Z, Liao S, Qi M, Zha A, et al. Low-protein diet supplemented with medium-chain fatty acid glycerides improves the growth performance and intestinal function in post-weaning piglets. Animals. 2020;10(10):1852. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101852.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. NRC. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th ed. Washington: National Academy Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  18. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 18th ed. Gaithersburg: AOAC International; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Prawirodigdo S, Gannon NJ, Leury BJ, Dunshea FR. Acid-insoluble ash is a better indigestible marker than chromic oxide to measure apparent total tract digestibility in pigs. Anim Nutr. 2021;7(1):64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2020.07.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Che LQ, Zhan LM, Fang ZF, Lin Y, Yan TH, Wu D. Effects of dietary protein sources on growth performance and immune response of weanling pigs. Livestock Sci. 2012;148(1–2):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.04.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sutherland MA, Niekamp SR, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Salak-Johnson JL. Impacts of chronic stress and social status on various physiological and performance measures in pigs of different breeds. J Anim Sci. 2006;84(3):588–96. https://doi.org/10.2527/2006.843588x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kong L, Wang Z, Xiao C, Zhu Q, Song Z. Glycerol monolaurate ameliorated intestinal barrier and immunity in broilers by regulating intestinal inflammation, antioxidant balance, and intestinal microbiota. Front Immunol. 2021;12:713485. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.713485.

  23. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7(5):335–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Young JM, Bergsma R, Knol EF, Patience JF, Dekkers JC. Effect of selection for residual feed intake during the grow/finish phase of production on sow reproductive performance and lactation efficiency. J Anim Sci. 2016;94(10):4120–32. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-0130.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sulabo RC, Jacela JY, Tokach MD, Dritz SS, Goodband RD, DeRouchey JM, et al. Effects of lactation feed intake and creep feeding on sow and piglet performance. J Anim Sci. 2010;88(9):3145–53. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2131.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gatlin LA, Odle J, Soede J, Hansent JA. Dietary medium- or long-chain triglycerides improve body condition of lean-genotype sows and increase suckling pig growth. J Anim Sci. 2002;80(1):38–44. https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.80138x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rosero DS, van Heugten E, Odle J, Arellano C, Boyd RD. Response of the modern lactating sow and progeny to source and level of supplemental dietary fat during high ambient temperatures. J Anim Sci. 2012;90(8):2609–19. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-4242.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rosero DS, van Heugten E, Odle J, Cabrera R, Arellano C, Boyd RD. Sow and litter response to supplemental dietary fat in lactation diets during high ambient temperatures. J Anim Sci. 2012;90(2):550–9. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4049.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rosero DS, Boyd RD, McCulley M, Odle J, van Heugten E. Essential fatty acid supplementation during lactation is required to maximize the subsequent reproductive performance of the modern sow. Anim Reprod Sci. 2016;168:151–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.03.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang MS, Sandouk A, Houtman JC. Glycerol Monolaurate (GML) inhibits human T cell signaling and function by disrupting lipid dynamics. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30225. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30225.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ma C, Liu Y, Liu S, Lévesque CL, Zhao F, Yin J, et al. Branched chain amino acids alter fatty acid profile in colostrum of sows fed a high fat diet. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2020;11:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-019-0423-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Vlaeminck B, Fievez V, Demeyer D, Dewhurst RJ. Effect of forage:concentrate ratio on fatty acid composition of rumen bacteria isolated from ruminal and duodenal digesta. J Dairy Sci. 2006;89(7):2668–78. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72343-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Massart-Leën AM, Roets E, Peeters G, Verbeke R. Propionate for fatty acid synthesis by the mammary gland of the lactating goat. J Dairy Sci. 1983;66(7):1445–54. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(83)81958-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mo Q, Liu T, Fu A, Ruan S, Zhong H, Tang J, et al. Novel gut microbiota patterns involved in the attenuation of dextran sodium sulfate-induced mouse colitis mediated by glycerol monolaurate via inducing anti-inflammatory responses. mBio. 2021;12(5):e0214821. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02148-21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang LS, Liang S, Zong MH, Yang JG, Lou WY. Microbial synthesis of functional odd-chain fatty acids: a review. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;36(3):35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-020-02814-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. de Quelen F, Boudry G, Mourot J. Linseed oil in the maternal diet increases long chain-PUFA status of the foetus and the newborn during the suckling period in pigs. Br J Nutr. 2010;104(4):533–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114510000772.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gerster H. Can adults adequately convert alpha-linolenic acid (18:3n-3) to eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5n-3) and docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n-3)? Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 1998;68(3):159–73.

  38. Yao W, Li J, Wang JJ, Zhou W, Wang Q, Zhu R, et al. Effects of dietary ratio of n-6 to n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on immunoglobulins, cytokines, fatty acid composition, and performance of lactating sows and suckling piglets. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2012;3(1):43. https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-1891-3-43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Lauridsen C, Stagsted J, Jensen SK. N-6 and n-3 fatty acids ratio and vitamin E in porcine maternal diet influence the antioxidant status and immune cell eicosanoid response in the progeny. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2007;84(1–2):66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2007.04.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Huber LA, Hooda S, Fisher-Heffernan RE, Karrow NA, de Lange CFM. Effect of reducing the ratio of omega-6-to-omega-3 fatty acids in diets of low protein quality on nursery pig growth performance and immune response. J Anim Sci. 2018;96(10):4348–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky296.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Lin Y, Cheng X, Mao J, Wu D, Ren B, Xu SY, et al. Effects of different dietary n-6/n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid ratios on boar reproduction. Lipids Health Dis. 2016;15:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-016-0193-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Gresse R, Chaucheyras-Durand F, Fleury MA, Van de Wiele T, Forano E, Blanquet-Diot S. Gut microbiota dysbiosis in postweaning piglets: understanding the keys to health. Trends Microbiol. 2017;25(10):851–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2017.05.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Chen L, Xu Y, Chen X, Fang C, Zhao L, Chen F. The maturing development of gut microbiota in commercial piglets during the weaning transition. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1688. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01688.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Rowan F, Docherty NG, Murphy M, Murphy B, Calvin Coffey J, O’Connell PR. Desulfovibrio bacterial species are increased in ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(11):1530–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181f1e620.

  45. Douglas GM, Hansen R, Jones CMA, Dunn KA, Comeau AM, Bielawski JP, et al. Multi-omics differentially classify disease state and treatment outcome in pediatric Crohn’s disease. Microbiome. 2018;6(1):13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0398-3.

  46. Yang J, Qian K, Wang C, Wu Y. Roles of probiotic lactobacilli inclusion in helping piglets establish healthy intestinal inter-environment for pathogen defense. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2018;10(2):243–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-017-9273-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bian G, Ma S, Zhu Z, Su Y, Zoetendal EG, Mackie R, et al. Age, Introduction of solid feed and weaning are more important determinants of gut bacterial succession in piglets than breed and nursing mother as revealed by a reciprocal cross-fostering model. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18(5):1566–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13272.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2021YFD1300300).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors' responsibilities were as follows: YXM and LXL designed the research; LXL and HKW conducted the research; LXL, HKW, NZ, and TZ analyzed the data; HKW wrote the manuscript; YXM, HKW, and LXL revised the manuscript; all authors have read and approved this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongxi Ma.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The animals used for this research were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of China Agricultural University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interest

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, L., Wang, H., Dong, S. et al. Supplementation with alpha-glycerol monolaurate during late gestation and lactation enhances sow performance, ameliorates milk composition, and improves growth of suckling piglets. J Animal Sci Biotechnol 14, 47 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-023-00848-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-023-00848-x

Keywords

  • Alpha-glycerol monolaurate
  • Fatty acid
  • Immune status
  • Microbiota
  • Sows
  • Suckling piglets