Skip to main content
Download PDF

The effects of dietary supplementation with mushroom or selenium enriched mushroom powders on the growth performance and intestinal health of post-weaned pigs

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology volume 14, Article number: 12 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

There is an urgent need to identify natural bioactive compounds that can enhance gastrointestinal health and promote pig growth performance in the absence of pharmacological levels of zinc oxide (ZnO). The objectives of this study were to: 1) compare the effects of mushroom powder supplemented with inorganic selenium (inSeMP) to mushroom powder enriched with organic selenium (orgSeMP) to pharmacological levels of ZnO on growth performance and faecal scores (FS) for the first 21 d post-weaning (Period 1); and 2) compare the molecular and microbial effects of inSeMP and orgSeMP in these pigs on d 39 post-weaning (Period 2).

Methods

In Period 1, pigs (3 pigs/pen; 8 pens/treatment) were assigned to: (1) basal diet (control); (2) basal diet + zinc oxide (ZnO) (3100 mg/kg d 1–14, 1550 mg/kg d 15–21); (3) basal diet + mushroom powder supplemented with inorganic selenium (inSeMP) containing selenium (selenite) content of 0.3 mg/kg feed; (4) basal diet + mushroom powder enriched with organic selenium (orgSeMP) containing selenium (selenocysteine) content of 0.3 mg/kg feed. Mushroom powders were included at 6.5 g/kg of feed.

Results

In Period 1, there was no effect of diets on average daily gain (ADG) and gain:feed (G:F) ratio (P > 0.05). The orgSeMP supplemented pigs had a lower average daily feed intake (ADFI) compared to all other groups (P < 0.05). The ZnO supplemented pigs had reduced FS compared to the basal and mushroom group, while the orgSeMP supplemented pigs had lower FS compared to the basal group during the 21 d experimental period (P < 0.05). In Period 2, there was no effect of diets on ADFI, ADG and G:F ratio (P > 0.05). The orgSeMP supplementation increased the caecal abundance of bacterial members of the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes phylum, including Lactobacillus, Agathobacter, Roseburia, and Prevotella and decreased the abundance of Sporobacter compared to the basal group, while inSeMP increased the caecal abundance of Prevotella and decreased the caecal abundance of Sporobacter compared to the basal group (P < 0.05). Dietary supplementation with inSeMP increased expression of TLR4 and anti-inflammatory cytokine gene IL10 and decreased nutrient transporter gene FABP2 compared to the orgSeMP group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

OrgSeMP is a novel and sustainable way to incorporate selenium and β-glucans into the diet of weaned pigs whilst improving FS and modulating the caecal microbiota.

Background

In commercial pig production systems, weaning involves complex dietary, social, and environmental stressors which cause a transient reduction in feed intake [1]. This contributes to adverse gut morphological and functional changes which leads to epithelial permeability and upregulation of proinflammatory cytokines [2]. As a result, the digestive and absorptive capacity of the small intestine is impaired, with consequent lower nutrient absorption and reduced energy availability [3]. Intestinal inflammation, mediated by the upregulation of proinflammatory cytokines, promotes the intestinal proliferation of pathogenic bacteria like Escherichia coli leading to gut dysbiosis and post-weaning diarrhoea (PWD) [4].

Dietary supplementation with zinc oxide (ZnO) at pharmacological levels (2000 to 3100 mg/kg) during the immediate post-weaning period is an industry-wide practice to alleviate the negative impact of weaning on pig performance and gastrointestinal functionality and health [4, 5]. However, from June 2022, pharmacological doses of ZnO will no longer be authorized in the European Union [6, 7]. Therefore, there is increasing pressure in identifying natural bioactive compounds that may support growth, enhance beneficial microbial populations, and prevent diarrhoea similar to that of ZnO.

Selenium is an essential trace nutrient and has an integral role in promoting immune function, growth performance and meat quality [8, 9]. Selenium has also demonstrated bacterial-modulating activities, including increased Lactobacilli spp. and decreased E. coli spp. counts in the caecum of broilers [10] and faeces of pigs [11]. Dietary supplementation with selenium enriched yeast for 21 d post-weaning improved pig growth performance and reduced the production of cytokines associated with inflammation, including TNF-α and IL-6, in the liver and thymus of pigs exposed to oxidative stress [12].

Selenium occurs in both inorganic and organic forms [13]. Inorganic selenium is mainly used in the form of sodium selenite and is the most widely used selenium supplement in animal diets. However, replacing inorganic selenium in animal diets with an organic form has received considerable interest in recent years as organic sources of selenium exhibit lower toxicity and higher bioavailability in animals compared to inorganic sources [14]. While the National Research Council recommends 0.15–0.30 mg/kg of added selenium in weaned pig diets, the total maximum level of dietary selenium in swine diets is 0.5 mg/kg [15, 16]. Clinical selenium deficiency is a rare occurrence in commercial pig production, however sub-clinical selenium deficiency in young animals is more common and may be responsible for decreased pig health and performance [17]. As the inclusion levels of selenium in pig diets are bound by legal standards, incorporating selenium sources with high bioavailability, such as organic selenium, into pig diets may be an effective method of increasing selenium uptake in pigs.

The utilization of mushrooms as novel feed additives in animal diets is gaining considerable interest in recent years. Mushrooms are a rich natural source of bioactive compounds, such as phenolics, lectins, terpenoids, ergosterols and β-glucans [18, 19]. β-glucans have well recognized anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and immunomodulatory properties [20,21,22]. β-glucans are non-digestible polysaccharides and therefore have the potential to modulate the gastrointestinal microbiota of pigs [23]. Yeast β-glucans in the diet of weaned pigs can increase faecal Lactobacillus populations [24] and decrease faecal Escherichia coli numbers [25] while also improving growth performance [26]. Mushrooms also offer a unique opportunity to incorporate organic selenium into the diet of pigs. Mushrooms are irrigated with sodium selenite solution as a method of selenium enrichment [27]. Sodium selenite, the inorganic form of selenium, is taken up by mushrooms through phosphate transporters and reduced to selenide, before being converted to selenocysteine, the organic form of selenium [28]. Thus, the first objective of this study was to compare the effects of mushroom powder supplemented with inorganic selenium (inSeMP), mushroom powder enriched with organic selenium (orgSeMP) and pharmacological levels of ZnO on growth performance of pigs during the first 21 d post-weaning (Period 1). The second objective of this study was to compare the molecular and microbial effects of inSeMP and orgSeMP supplementation in these pigs on d 39 post-weaning (Period 2). It was hypothesised that orgSeMP would be more effective than inSeMP at enhancing growth performance and gastrointestinal health of post-weaned pigs.

Materials and methods

Experimental design and diets

At weaning (28 d), 96 pigs (48 male and 48 female), progeny of Meatline boars × (Large White × Landrace sows) with an average weight of 6.8 kg ± 0.86 (standard deviation (SD)) were selected from a commercial pig farm. The experiment was designed as a complete randomised block and was split into two periods. Period 1 investigated the effects of inSeMP and orgSeMP supplementation on pig growth performance and faecal scores post-weaning (d 0–21) and Period 2 investigated the molecular and microbial effects of inSeMP and orgSeMP supplementation in pig diets on d 39 post-weaning. The pigs were blocked by weaning weight, sex and litter of origin. In Period 1, pigs were assigned to one of four dietary groups. The diets were as follows: (1) basal diet (control); (2) basal diet + ZnO (3100 mg/kg d 1–14, 1550 mg/kg d 15–21); (3) basal diet + inSeMP containing selenium content of 0.3 mg/kg feed; (4) basal diet + orgSeMP containing selenium content of 0.3 mg/kg feed. All other diets contained a selenium (selenite) content of 0.3 mg/kg feed. The inorganic selenium was in the form of sodium selenite and the organic selenium was in the form of selenocysteine. The detection and quantification of amino acids in selenium enriched Agaricus bisporus mushrooms was performed using the method of Maseko et al. [27]. The predominant amino acid present was found to be selenocysteine in dried mushroom powder, with modest amounts of selenomethionine identified also. The selenium mushroom powder contained a total selenium concentration of 45.8 mg/kg mushroom powder and was included at 6.5 g/kg to achieve the selenium content of 0.3 mg/kg feed [29] and as a result the β-glucan content of the mushroom diets was 650 mg/kg. Mushrooms were irrigated with sodium selenite solution at intermittent cycles as a method of selenium enrichment [27]. The mushroom powders (Agaricus bisporus) were sourced from Monaghan Mushrooms (Tyholland, Co Monaghan, Ireland) and were included at 6.5 g/kg feed. The ZnO was sourced from Cargill (Naas, Kildare, Ireland) and was included at 3100 mg ZnO/kg feed and contained 80% zinc, resulting in an inclusion level of 2500 mg Zn/kg feed. After 15 d the inclusion level of ZnO was halved to 1550 mg ZnO/kg feed. At 21 d post-weaning, the ZnO group was removed from the experiment and seventy-two pigs with an average weight of 12.6 kg ± 2.49 (SD) from (T1), (T3) and (T4) in Period 1 proceeded to Period 2 and were kept on their original diets. The mushroom powder contained 305 g/kg of crude protein, 34 g/kg of ether extract, 2.34 mg/kg selenium and 100 mg/g of β-glucan. The diets were formulated to have equivalent nett energy (10.6 MJ/kg), crude protein (208 g/kg) and standardised ileal digestible lysine (13.0 g/kg). All amino acid requirements were calculated relative to lysine [29]. The composition of diets are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Ingredient and chemical composition of diets
Full size table

Housing and animal management

The pigs were penned in groups of three according to weight and sex and housed on fully slatted floors (1.68 m × 1.2 m). There were 8 replicate pens used per treatment with 3 pigs in each replicate pen. For the first 7 d, the temperature within the weaner house was controlled at 30 ºC and then reduced by 2 ºC per wk until the temperature reached 26 ºC. The relative humidity was maintained at 65%. The experimental diets were given in mash meal form from four-space feeders and pigs had ad libitum access to these diets immediately after weaning up to the final weighing. The diets were formulated to meet all nutrient requirements recommended by National Research Council [29]. Drinking water was available ad libitum from a drinking nipple. Pigs received no medication throughout the experiment. Body weight (BW) was measured using a portable electronic scale (Prattley, Temuka, New Zealand) on d 1, 21 and 39 and average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI) and gain to feed (G:F) were calculated on a per-pen basis. The daily feed intake was measured at a pen level by weighing the feed delivered to each feeder. Faecal scores (FS) were assessed twice daily for each individual pen throughout the experimental period to indicate the presence and severity of diarrhoea. The following scoring system was used to assign FS: 1 = hard, 2 = slightly soft, 3 = soft, partially formed, 4 = loose, semi-liquid, 5 = watery, mucous like [31].

Feed analysis

All the feed samples were milled through a 1-mm screen (Christy and Norris Hammer Mill, Chelmsford, England) and kept for chemical analysis. The gross energy (GE) content was determined using an adiabatic bomb calorimeter (Parr Instruments, Moline, IL, USA) as previously described [32]. The feed was dried for 72 h at 55 °C to determine the dry matter (DM) content of the feed. Feed samples were analysed for crude ash (AOAC.942.05), nitrogen (AOAC.990.03), crude fibre (AOAC.978.10) and crude fat (AOAC.920.39) according to the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists standard procedures [33], and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) was determined according to the method of Van Soest et al. [34]. The MP was analysed for nitrogen (AOAC.990.03), crude fat (AOAC.920.39), selenium and β-glucans. The total glucans of the MP were determined using the kit K-YBGL, purchased from Megazyme (Bray, Co Wicklow, Ireland), following the manufacturer’s recommendations, and as previously described [35]. The total selenium content was measured by Eurofins Food Testing UK Ltd (ICPMS 7800; Wolverhampton, United Kingdom) using the selenium in food method. Briefly, samples were digested by acid solutions (Nitric/Hydrochloric mix) in sealed tubes using heat and pressure in a microwave accelerated reaction system. All samples were measured in duplicate.

Sample collection

On d 39 of the experiment, 8 pigs per treatment (one pig/pen) received a lethal injection with pentobarbitone sodium (Euthatal Solution, 200 mg/mL; Merial Animal Health, Essex, UK) at a rate of 0.71 mL/kg body weight to the cranial vena cava to humanely euthanise the animals. Sections from the duodenum (10 cm from the stomach), jejunum (60 cm from the stomach) and ileum (15 cm from the caecum) were processed for gut morphological analysis as previously described [36]. Digesta from the caecum was collected and stored in sterile containers (Sarstedt, Wexford, Ireland). This was then snap frozen on dry ice and stored at −80 °C for subsequent 16 S rRNA sequencing and volatile fatty acid (VFA) analysis. In addition, tissue samples were taken from the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum to measure the expression of cytokines, nutrient transporters, mucins, tight junctions, and appetite regulators using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). Tissue sections (1 cm) from the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum were cut out, dissected along the mesentery, emptied, and rinsed using sterile phosphate buffered saline (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK). The tissue sections were stripped of the overlying smooth muscle before storage in RNAlater® (5 mL) solution (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) overnight at 4 °C. The RNAlater® was removed before storing the samples at −80 °C.

Volatile fatty acid analysis

Gas liquid chromatography was used to determine the VFA and branched-chain VFA (BCVFA; isobutyrate, isovalerate and valerate) concentrations in the caecal digesta as described previously by Clarke, Sweeney [37]. 1 g of digesta was diluted with water (2.5 × sample weight) and centrifuged (1400 × g for 10 min) using a Sorvall GLC-2B centrifuge (DuPont, Wilmington, DE, USA). 1 mL of supernatant and 1 mL of internal standard (0.05% 3-methyl-n-valeric acid in 0.15 mol/L oxalic acid dihydrate) were mixed with 3 mL of distilled water and then centrifuged for 10 min at (500 × g). The supernatant was then filtered through a syringe filter (0.45 polytetrafluoroethylene (TFE)) into a chromatographic sample vial. Approximately 1 µL of this mixture was injected into a Varian 3800 GC (Ontario, Canada) with an ECTM 1000 Grace column (15 m × 0.53 mm I.D) with a film thickness of 1.20 µm. The temperature program was set to the range 75—95 °C which increased by 3 °C/min and 95—200 °C which increased by 20 °C/min, and this was held for 0.50 min. The detector temperature was 280 °C and the injector temperature was 240 °C. The total analysis time was 12.42 min.

Microbial analyses

Microbial DNA extraction

A QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit (Qiagen, West Sussex, United Kingdom) was used to extract microbial genomic DNA in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. A Nanodrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA) was used to measure the quantity and quality of the DNA.

Illumina sequencing

Bacterial DNA was extracted from the caecal digesta samples and high-throughput sequencing of the V3—V5 hypervariable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was performed on an Illumina MiSeq platform according to their standard protocols (Eurofins Genomics, Ebersberg, Germany).

Bioinformatic

The bioinformatic assessment of the sequences were conducted by Eurofins Genomics (Ebersberg, Germany) using the package (version 1.9.1) Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology [38]. All the raw reads passing the standard Illumina chastity filter were demultiplexed in accordance with their index sequences (read quality score > 30). The primer sequences were clipped from the beginning of the raw forward/reverse reads. If primer sequences did not match perfectly, read pairs were eliminated to retain only high-quality reads. Paired-end reads were then merged, to get a single, longer read that covers the complete target region using the software FLASH 2.2.00 [39]. The pairs were merged with the lowest overlap size of 10 bp to decrease false-positive merges. The forward read was only kept for the subsequent assessment steps when merging was not viable. Merged reads were quality filtered in accordance with the expected and known length variations of the V3—V5 region (ca. 445 bp). The ends of retained forward reads were clipped to a complete read length of 285 bp to eliminate low quality bases. Merged and retained reads comprising of ambiguous bases were removed. The filtered reads were then used for profiling of the microbiome. Chimeric reads were detected and deleted based on the de-novo algorithm of UCHIME [40] as implemented in the VSEARCH package [41]. The remaining set of high-quality reads were then processed using minimum entropy decomposition (MED) to partition reads to operational taxonomic units (OTU) [42, 43]. DC-MEGABLAST alignments of cluster representative sequences to the NCBI nucleotide sequence database were carried out for the taxonomic assignment of every OTU. A sequence identity of 70% across a minimum of 80% of the representative sequence was the minimal prerequisite for considering reference sequences. Abundances of bacterial taxonomic units were normalized using lineage-specific copy numbers of the appropriate marker genes to enhance estimates [44].

The data matrix was made up of the normalized OTU table in combination with the phenotype metadata and phylogenetic tree. The data matrix was then loaded into the phyloseq package in R (http://www.r-project.org; version 3.5.0). Differential abundance analysis was carried out on tables extracted from the phyloseq object at phylum, family, genus and species level. The model assessed the effect of ‘group’, with the individual pig being the experimental unit. Eight pigs per group were used for the statistical analysis of the relative bacterial abundances.

Gene expression in the small intestine

RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

Total RNA was extracted from duodenal and ileal tissues using TRI Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines as previously described [45]. The total RNA (2 μg) was reverse transcribed using a High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and oligo (dT) primers in a final reaction volume of 40 μL, in accordance with manufacturer’s guidelines. The cDNA was then made up to a volume of 360 μL with nuclease-free water.

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)

The qPCR reaction mixture (20 μL) consisted of GoTaq qPCR Master Mix (10 μL) (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), forward and reverse primers (5 μmol/L, 1.2 μL), nuclease-free water (3.8 μL) and cDNA (5 μL). All the qPCR reactions were carried out in duplicate on the 7500 ABI Prism Sequence detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The cycling conditions consisted of a denaturation step of 95 °C for 10 min which was followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and then 60 °C for 1 min. All the primers were designed using the Primer Express Software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and made by MWG Biotech UK Ltd (Milton Keynes, UK) and are all described in Table 2. Dissociation curves were created to verify the specificity of the subsequent PCR products. The qPCR assay efficiencies were determined by plotting the cycling threshold (CT) values resulting from fourfold serial dilutions of cDNA against their arbitrary quantities and only assays demonstrating 90%–110% efficiency and single products were accepted in this analysis. Normalised relative quantities were obtained using the software, qbase PLUS (Biogazelle, Ghent, Belgium) from stable reference genes; H3 histone family member 3A (H3F3A) and tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein zeta (YWHAZ) (duodenum and jejunum), Actin beta (ACTB) and H3F3A (ileum). These genes were selected as reference genes based on their M value (< 1.5) generated by the GeNorm algorithm within GeNorm. The genes analyzed in the current study are as follows: protein transporter, solute carrier family 15 member 1 (SLC15A1; previously known as PEPT1); fatty acid transporter 2 (FABP2); glucose transporters solute carrier family 2 member 2 (SLC2A2; previously known as GLUT2) and solute carrier family 2 member 5 (SLC2A5; previously known as GLUT5); appetite regulator Cholecystokinin (CCK), neuropeptide Y (NPY), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP1) and peptide YY (PYY); cytokines tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), Interleukin 6 (IL6), Interleukin 10 (IL10), Interferon gamma (IFNG), Transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFB1) and Interleukin 17 (IL17); C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 8 (CXCL8) (previously known as Interleukin 8 (IL8); Mucin 2 (MUC2) and Mucin 1 (MUC1); tight junctions Claudin 3 (CLDN3) and Claudin 1 (CLDN1); Toll like receptor 4 (TLR4); selenoproteins iodothyronine deiodinase 1 (DIO1), selenoprotein P (SELENOP) and thioredoxin reductase 1 (TXNRD1).

Table 2 Panel of porcine oligonucleotide primers used for real-time PCR
Full size table

Gut morphological analysis

Standard paraffin embedding techniques were used to prepare the small intestinal tissue for gut morphological analysis, as previously described [36]. A light microscope with an image analyzer (Image-Pro Plus; Media Cybernetics, Oxon, UK) was used to measure the villus height (VH), crypt depth (CD) and villus height to crypt depth ratio (VH:CD). Fifteen measurements of villi and crypt were taken for each section. The VH was measured from the crypt-villus junction to the tip of the villus, and CD was measured from the crypt-villus junction to the base. Results are expressed as mean VH or CD in μm.

Statistical analysis

All data on growth performance, gastrointestinal morphology, gene expression and VFA were checked for normality using the univariate procedure of Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) 9.4 and transformed, if required. The general linearized model (GLM) procedure within SAS was used to analyze the data on growth performance, gastrointestinal morphology, gene expression (Bonferroni adjusted P < 0.05), and VFA concentrations. The model examined the effects of treatment, using weight at weaning as a covariate. FS were averaged for every 3 d for the first 21 d and analysed using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS. The model examined the effect of treatment, time and the associated interaction and using weight at weaning as a covariate. The microbiome data were analysed using PROC GLIMMIX. Results are presented using Benjamini–Hochberg (BH) adjusted P-values. The pen was the experimental unit for growth performance and FS, while the individual pig was the experimental unit for gastrointestinal morphology, gene expression, microbiome and VFA data. The results are presented as least-square means with their standard errors. The probability level that denotes significance is P < 0.05.

Results

Pig performance and faecal consistency in Period 1 (d 0–21)

The effects of dietary supplementation on ADG, ADFI and G:F ratio to d 21 post-weaning are presented in Table 3. While the orgSeMP supplemented pigs had a lower ADFI compared to all other groups (P < 0.05), there was no difference in ADG, G:F and final BW between groups over the 21-day period (P > 0.05).

Table 3 Effect of dietary treatment on pig growth performance (d 0–21; least-square mean values ± SEM)
Full size table

The effects of dietary supplementation on FS from day 0 to 21 post-weaning are presented in Fig. 1. There was no treatment × time interaction on FS (P > 0.05). Overall the ZnO supplemented pigs had reduced FS compared to the basal and inSeMP group during the 21-day experimental period (P < 0.05). The orgSeMP supplemented pigs had lower FS compared to the basal group (P < 0.05).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effect of dietary treatment on faecal scores from day 0 to 21 post-weaning. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. Scale from 1 to 5: 1 = hard, firm faeces; 2 = slightly soft faeces; 3 = soft, partially formed faeces; 4 = loose, semi-liquid faeces and 5 = watery, mucous-like faeces. A total of 8 replicates were used per treatment (replicate = pen, 3 pigs/pen). Treatment (P < 0.05), Time (P < 0.05), Treatment × Time (P > 0.05). Abbreviations: InSeMP, mushroom powder supplemented with inorganic selenium; orgSeMP, mushroom powder enriched with organic selenium

Full size image

Pig performance in Period 2 (d 39)

The effect of dietary supplementation on ADG, ADFI, G:F ratio and final BW is presented in Table 4. Overall, there was no difference in ADG, ADFI, G:F ratio and final BW between groups (P > 0.05).

Table 4 Effect of dietary treatment on pig growth performance (d 21–39; least-square mean values ± SEM)
Full size table

Volatile fatty acids

The effects of dietary supplementation on the total concentrations of caecal VFA are presented in Table 5. Supplementation with inSeMP and orgSeMP decreased the concentration of BCVFA and the concentration of isovalerate compared to the basal group (P < 0.05).

Table 5 The effects of dietary treatment on total concentrations of VFA in the caecum (least-square mean values ± SEM)
Full size table

Effects of mushroom powder supplementation on the caecal microbiota

Differential bacterial abundance analysis

All data on bacterial abundances at phylum, family and genus level are presented in Tables 6, 7 and 8. There were five bacterial phyla identified with Firmicutes being the dominant phyla (~ 79.6%) followed by Bacteriodetes (~ 14.64%), Proteobacteria (~ 1.34%) and Actinobacteria (~ 1.05%). The inSeMP and orgSeMP increased the relative abundance of Bacteriodetes compared to the basal group (P < 0.05).

Table 6 The effect of dietary treatment on the bacterial abundance (%) at phylum level (least-square mean values ± SEM)
Full size table
Table 7 The effect of dietary treatment on the bacterial abundance (%) at family level (least-square mean values ± SEM)
Full size table
Table 8 The effect of dietary treatment on the bacterial abundance (%) at genus level (least-square mean values ± SEM)
Full size table

At family level, dietary supplementation with orgSeMP increased the relative abundance of Lactobacillaceae and decreased the relative abundance of Ruminococcaceae within the Firmicutes phylum compared to the basal group (P < 0.05). Dietary supplementation with orgSeMP and inSeMP increased the relative abundance of Prevotellaceae within the Bacteroidetes phylum (P < 0.05).

At the genus level, dietary supplementation with inSeMP and orgSeMP increased the relative abundance of Prevotella within the family Prevotellaceae and decreased the relative abundance of Sporobacter and Ruminococcus within the family Ruminococcaceae compared to the basal group (P < 0.05). Dietary supplementation with orgSeMP, increased the relative abundance of Lactobacillus within the family Lactobacillaceae, and Agathobacter within the family Lachnospiraceae compared to the basal group (P < 0.05). Supplementation with orgSeMP increased the relative abundance of Roseburia within the family Lachnospiraceae compared to the inSeMP group (P < 0.05).

Gene expression in the small intestine

Differentially expressed genes are presented in Table 9. The complete gene expression data is presented in the supplementary materials (Tables S1).

Table 9 The effects of dietary treatment on the expression of nutrient transporters, immune markers and tight junctions in pigs duodenum, jejunum and ileum (least-square mean values ± SEM)
Full size table

In the duodenum, orgSeMP supplementation decreased the expression of TLR4 compared to the inSeMP group (P < 0.05). The inSeMP supplementation increased the expression of IL10 compared to all other groups (P < 0.05).

In the jejunum, inSeMP supplementation decreased the expression of FABP2 compared to all other groups (P < 0.05). The orgSeMP supplementation decreased the expression of MUC2 compared to the inSeMP group (P < 0.05).

In the ileum, orgSeMP reduced the expression of CLDN3 compared to the inSeMP group (P < 0.05). The inSeMP supplementation increased the expression of DIO1 compared to the basal group (P < 0.05).

Small intestinal morphology

The effect of dietary supplementation on small intestinal morphology is presented in Table 10. In the duodenum, there was no difference in VH, CD and VH:CD among groups (P > 0.05). In the jejunum, pigs supplemented with inSeMP had decreased VH and VH:CD compared to the orgSeMP and basal group (P < 0.05). In the ileum, pigs supplemented with inSeMP had decreased VH compared to the orgSeMP and basal group (P < 0.05).

Table 10 Effect of dietary treatment on villus height and crypt depth in the small intestine (least-square mean values ± SEM)
Full size table

Discussion

In the present study, it was hypothesised that orgSeMP would be more effective than inSeMP at enhancing gastrointestinal health parameters and modulating the caecal microbiota of post-weaned pigs, as organic sources of selenium exhibit lower toxicity and higher bioavailability in animals compared to inorganic sources [14]. In Period 1, dietary supplementation with orgSeMP improved FS compared to the basal group. In Period 2, dietary supplementation with orgSeMP increased the caecal abundance of bacterial members of the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes phylum, including Lactobacillus, Agathobacter, Roseburia and Prevotella and decreased the abundance of Sporobacter. Dietary supplementation with inSeMP increased the caecal abundance of Prevotella and decreased the caecal abundance of Sporobacter. Dietary supplementation with orgSeMP and inSeMP reduced BCVFA in Period 2. The findings from this study indicate that orgSeMP supplementation was superior to inSeMP in supporting intestinal health through improving FS and promoting the development of a healthier microbiome composition in the caecum.

The post-weaning period in commercial pig production systems is characterised by reduced feed intake, growth rates and an increased incidence of diarrhoea [46]. In Period 1, dietary supplementation with orgSeMP reduced feed intake in pigs. A reduction in feed intake is only considered a negative outcome if it has an adverse effect on ADG, however ADG was unaffected in this study. In Period 2, dietary supplementation had no effect on growth performance. The lack of effects seen in the present study may be due to the good hygiene and husbandry practices which are observed in research facilities compared with commercial farms [47]. Previously, Rattigan et al. [48] observed differing responses of pigs to laminarin, a β-(1,3)-glucan from the seaweed Laminaria digitata, depending on the sanitary conditions suggesting that laminarin may have greater bioactivity under more challenging hygiene conditions. Thus perhaps, under more challenging conditions, a greater growth performance response would be observed in this study.

Dietary intervention with natural bioactives may play a role in shaping the structure and function of intestinal microbial communities. β-glucans are non-digestible polysaccharides and thus may enter the large intestine as a fermentation substrate for beneficial microorganisms [23]. Previous studies indicate that β-glucans can selectively stimulate the growth of beneficial bacteria and help to maintain the intestinal health [49, 50]. Selenium is an essential trace element that can modulate the gut microbiome and influence pig health [11]; however, its bioavailability is influenced by the chemical form of the selenium absorbed [51]. In the current study, supplementation with orgSeMP was superior to inSeMP in terms of modulating the caecal microbiota. This may be attributed to the source of selenium, as organic selenium is less toxic and more bioavailable for the animal [52]. Supplementation with orgSeMP altered the gut microbiota of the pigs by increasing the population of potentially beneficial bacteria, within the phylum Firmicutes, including Lactobacillus and Agathobacter compared to the basal group and Roseburia compared to the inSeMP group. Bacterial members of the genus Lactobacillus can enhance host gastrointestinal health through the competitive exclusion of pathogenic bacteria, producing antimicrobial peptides and enhancing immune function [53, 54]. In broilers, dietary supplementation with bacterial organic selenium was associated with increased caecal Lactobacilli spp. counts when compared to diets with inorganic selenium [10]. This further supports the advantageous effects of organic selenium over inorganic selenium on the gut microbiota. Roseburia and Agathobacter are beneficial gut bacteria that produce SCFAs, particularly butyrate [55, 56]. Thus, it may be anticipated that butyrate levels would be increased in the orgSeMP group, however caecal butyrate levels were unaffected in this study and unfortunately colonic butyrate levels were not measured.

InSeMP and orgSeMP supplementation increased the abundance of the phylum Bacteroidetes, including members Prevotella and decreased the abundance of the genera Ruminococcus and Sporobacter, within the phylum Firmicutes. Sporobacter is increased in pigs challenged with F4 + ETEC and may have a detrimental impact on gut health [57]. Both Prevotella and Ruminococcus are involved in the degradation of complex plant carbohydrates, thus their abundance usually increases in plant rich diets [58]. The reduced abundance of Ruminococcus in relation to Prevotella is an interesting finding. This may reflect differences between Ruminococcus and Prevotella in their utilization of carbohydrate substrates and that Prevotella in these pigs were primed towards mushroom β-glucan degradation. The increase in Prevotella in response to β-glucan supplementation is in agreement with previous studies investigating the microbial effects of yeast cell wall [59] and cereal β-glucans [60, 61].

FS remained within a healthy range throughout the duration of this study, which is likely attributed to the high health status of the animals used in this experiment. Nevertheless, orgSeMP improved FS compared to the basal group, and comparable to ZnO. These healthier FS were concurrent with a decrease in the concentration of caecal BCVFA. The inSeMP supplementation also reduced caecal BCVFA concentrations compared to the basal group but did not have the same effects as orgSeMP on FS. The improvement in FS in pigs supplemented with orgSeMP is likely attributed to the beneficial effects of organic selenium on the caecal microbiota, particularly the increased abundance of Lactobacillus. Lactobacillus can improve the immune response, intestinal function, and modulate the microbiome, which consequently, may improve faecal scores [62]. BCVFA are toxic metabolites associated with PWD and poor growth performance in pigs [63]. The reduced BCVFA in both mushroom groups is probably due to the β-glucan content of the mushrooms. In previous studies, pigs fed high fibre diets had reduced caecal [64] and colonic [65] BCVFA concentrations. β-glucans present in the mushrooms contributed to modulation of the caecal microbiota and it is likely that these microbial changes enhanced the utilization of amino acids as energy sources, thereby reducing the amount of BCVFA being produced. The improved FS in association with lower concentrations of BCVFA in the caecum, suggest that these orgSeMP-supplemented pigs had a healthier digestive tract compared to the basal group.

Gastrointestinal homeostasis is of utmost importance to the health of the weaned pig and disruption to this gives rise to intestinal inflammation. In the present study, inSeMP supplementation increased the gene expression of TLR4 and had a tendency to increase the gene expression of IL17 compared to the orgSeMP group. TLR4 is a pathogen recognition receptor and activation of TLR4 can lead to the production of proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-17, which has implications in the pathogenesis of chronic disease [66]. It is well known that increased expression of inflammatory cytokines compromise epithelial barrier function [67]. In the current study, the reduced villus height in the jejunum and ileum of inSeMP supplemented pigs, alongside the increased expression of CLDN3 compared to the orgSeMP group, may be indicative of disruption of epithelial barrier integrity. Furthermore, inSeMP supplemented pigs had increased gene expression of IL10. IL-10 is an anti-inflammatory cytokine which is elevated in patients at early stages of infection, preceding elevations in pro-inflammatory cytokines [68]. As β-glucans are immunostimulatory compounds and initiate the inflammation process, it is possible that feeding β-glucans at high inclusion levels (650 ppm) may over activate the immune response, as observed in inSeMP supplemented pigs. In a previous study, dietary supplementation with 50 mg/kg of yeast β-glucans resulted in a slight immune response in weaned pigs, whereas increasing the β-glucan inclusion level to 200 mg/kg significantly enhanced the immune response [69]. It is worthy to note that supplementation with orgSeMP had a tendency to decrease expression of proinflammatory cytokine gene IL6; indicating a potential immunomodulatory effect of orgSeMP. Supplementation with orgSeMP attenuated the inflammatory response, and this is likely due to the source of selenium. These findings suggest that orgSeMP supplementation may be more effective at maintaining immune homeostasis compared to inSeMP supplementation.

Conclusion

Dietary supplementation with orgSeMP reduced caecal BCVFA concentrations and improved the microbial population of pigs, represented by a higher abundance of several bacterial members, including Lactobacillus, Agathobacter, Roseburia and Prevotella. Dietary supplementation with orgSeMP was more effective at maintaining immune homeostasis compared to inSeMP supplementation. In conclusion, orgSeMP is a novel and sustainable way to incorporate selenium and β-glucans into the diet of weaned pigs whilst improving FS and modulating the caecal microbiota.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated and/or analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ADFI:

Average daily feed intake

ADG:

Average daily gain

β-glucan:

Beta-glucan

BW:

Body weight

CCK:

Cholecystokinin

CD:

Crypt depth

CLDN1:

Claudin 1

CLDN3:

Claudin 3

CP:

Crude protein

CXCL8/IL8:

Interleukin 8

DM:

Dry matter

FABP2:

Fatty acid binding protein 2

G:F:

Gain to feed ratio

GCN:

Gene copy number

Ct:

Threshold cycle

GE:

Gross energy

GLM:

General linearized model

IFNG:

Interferon gamma

IL10:

Interleukin 10

IL17:

Interleukin 17

IL6:

Interleukin 6

inSeMP:

Mushroom powder supplemented with inorganic selenium

MUC1:

Mucin 1

MUC2:

Mucin 2

NDF:

Neutral detergent fibre

orgSeMP:

Mushroom powder enriched with organic selenium

PW:

Post-weaning

QPCR:

Quantitative real-time PCR

Se:

Selenium

SLC15A1/PEPT1:

Peptide transporter 1

SLC2A2/GLUT2:

Glucose transporter 2

SLC2A5/GLUT5:

Glucose transporter 5

SLC5A1/SGLT1:

Sodium glucose linked transporter 1

TGFB1:

Transforming growth factor beta 1

TLR4:

Toll like receptor 4

TNFα:

Tumor necrosis factor alpha

VFA:

Volatile fatty acid

VH:

Villous height

ZnO:

Zinc oxide

References

  1. Campbell JM, Crenshaw JD, Polo J. The biological stress of early weaned piglets. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2013;4(1):19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hu CH, Xiao K, Luan ZS, Song J. Early weaning increases intestinal permeability, alters expression of cytokine and tight junction proteins, and activates mitogen-activated protein kinases in pigs. J Anim Sci. 2013;91(3):1094–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Xia T, Lai W, Han M, Han M, Ma X, Zhang L. Dietary ZnO nanoparticles alters intestinal microbiota and inflammation response in weaned piglets. Oncotarget. 2017;8(39):64878–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhu C, Lv H, Chen Z, Wang L, Wu X, Chen Z, et al. Dietary zinc oxide modulates antioxidant capacity, small intestine development, and jejunal gene expression in weaned piglets. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2017;175(2):331–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sales J. Effects of pharmacological concentrations of dietary zinc oxide on growth of post-weaning pigs: A meta-analysis. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2013;152(3):343–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. SCVMP. Standing Committee on Veterinary Medicinal Products (SCVMP): Summary report of the 19 June 2017 of the Standing Committee on Veterinary Medicinal Products. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  7. EMA. European Medicines Agency (EMA): Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP); Article 35. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burk RF, Hill KE, Motley AK. Selenoprotein metabolism and function: evidence for more than one function for selenoprotein P. J Nutr. 2003;133(5):1517S-S1520.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Surai PF. Selenium in nutrition and health. Nottingham, United Kingdom: Nottingham University Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dalia AM, Loh TC, Sazili AQ, Jahromi MF, Samsudin AA. Effects of vitamin E, inorganic selenium, bacterial organic selenium, and their combinations on immunity response in broiler chickens. BMC vet Res. 2018;14(1):249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lv C, Wang T, Regmi N, Chen X, Huang K, Liao S. Effects of dietary supplementation of selenium-enriched probiotics on production performance and intestinal microbiota of weanling piglets raised under high ambient temperature. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2015;99(6):1161–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu L, Chen D, Yu B, Luo Y, Huang Z, Zheng P, et al. Influences of selenium-enriched yeast on growth performance, immune function, and antioxidant capacity in weaned pigs exposure to oxidative stress. BioMed Res Int. 2021;2021(1):5533210.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kieliszek M. Selenium fascinating microelement, properties and sources in food. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). 2019;24(7):1298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Thiry C, Ruttens A, De Temmerman L, Schneider YJ, Pussemier L. Current knowledge in species-related bioavailability of selenium in food. Food Chem. 2012;130(4):767–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. European Food Safety Authority. Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of selenium compounds (E8) as feed additives for all animal species: sodium selenite (coated granulated preparation), based on a dossier submitted by Doxal Italia SpA. EFSA J. 2015;13(11):4271.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Meyer WR, Mahan DC, Moxon AL. Value of dietary selenium and vitamin E for weanling swine as measured by performance and tissue selenium and glutathione peroxidase activities. J Anim Sci. 1981;52(2):302–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Surai PF. Selenium in pig nutrition and health. Wageningen, Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2021.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Singdevsachan SK, Auroshree P, Mishra J, Baliyarsingh B, Tayung K, Thatoi H. Mushroom polysaccharides as potential prebiotics with their antitumor and immunomodulating properties: a review. Bioact Carbohydr Diet Fibre. 2016;7(1):1–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Elsayed EA, El Enshasy H, Wadaan MAM, Aziz R. Mushrooms: a potential natural source of anti-inflammatory compounds for medical applications. Mediators Inflamm. 2014;2014(1):805841.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lindequist U, Niedermeyer THJ, Jülich WD. The pharmacological potential of mushrooms. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2005;2(3):285–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Deng C, Hu Z, Fu H, Hu M, Xu X, Chen J. Chemical analysis and antioxidant activity in vitro of a β-D-glucan isolated from Dictyophora indusiata. Int J Biol Macromol. 2012;51(1–2):70–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Du B, Lin C, Bian Z, Xu B. An insight into anti-inflammatory effects of fungal beta-glucans. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2015;41(1):49–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lam KL, Cheung PCK. Non-digestible long chain beta-glucans as novel prebiotics. Bioact. 2013;2(1):45–64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tuoi PT, Assavacheep P, Angkanaporn K, Assavacheep A. Effects of Beta-glucan and mannan- oligosaccharide supplementation on growth performance, fecal bacterial population, and immune responses of weaned pigs. Thai J Vet Med. 2016;46(4):589.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou TX, Jung JH, Zhang ZF, Kim IH. Effect of dietary β-glucan on growth performance, fecal microbial shedding and immunological responses after lipopolysaccharide challenge in weaned pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2013;179(1):85–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Li J, Li D, Xing J, Cheng Z, Lai C. Effects of β-glucan extracted from Saccharomyces cerevisiae on growth performance, and immunological and somatotropic responses of pigs challenged with Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide. J Anim Sci. 2006;84(9):2374–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Maseko T, Callahan DL, Dunshea FR, Doronila A, Kolev SD, Ng K. Chemical characterisation and speciation of organic selenium in cultivated selenium-enriched Agaricus bisporus. Food Chem. 2013;141(4):3681–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Winkel LHE, Vriens B, Jones GD, Schneider LS, Pilon-Smits E, Bañuelos GS. Selenium cycling across soil-plant-atmosphere interfaces: A critical review. Nutrients. 2015;7(6):4199–239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 11th ed. Washington, D.C., USA: National Academic Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sauvant D, Perez JM, Tran G. Tables of composition and nutritional value of feed materials: pigs, poultry, cattle, sheep, goats, rabbits, horses and fish. Wageningen, Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Walsh AM, Sweeney T, O’Shea CJ, Doyle DN, O’Doherty JV. Effect of supplementing varying inclusion levels of laminarin and fucoidan on growth performance, digestibility of diet components, selected faecal microbial populations and volatile fatty acid concentrations in weaned pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2013;183(3):151–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. O’Shea C, McAlpine P, Sweeney T, Varley P, O’doherty J. Effect of the interaction of seaweed extracts containing laminarin and fucoidan with zinc oxide on the growth performance, digestibility and faecal characteristics of growing piglets. Br J Nutr. 2014;111(5):798–807.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 1991;74(10):3583–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Garcia-Vaquero M, O’Doherty JV, Tiwari BK, Sweeney T, Rajauria G. Enhancing the extraction of polysaccharides and antioxidants from macroalgae using sequential hydrothermal-assisted extraction followed by ultrasound and thermal technologies. Mar Drugs. 2019;17(8):457.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rattigan R, Sweeney T, Maher S, Thornton K, Rajauria G, O’Doherty J. Laminarin rich extract improves growth performance, small intestinal morphology, gene expression of nutrient transporters, and the large intestinal microbial composition of piglets during the critical post-weaning period. Br J Nutr. 2019;123(3):1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Clarke L, Sweeney T, Curley E, Gath V, Duffy SK, Vigors S, et al. Effect of β-glucanase and β-xylanase enzyme supplemented barley diets on nutrient digestibility, growth performance and expression of intestinal nutrient transporter genes in finisher pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2018;238(1):98–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7(5):335–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Magoč T, Salzberg SL. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(21):2957–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(16):2194–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Rognes T, Flouri T, Nichols B, Quince C, Mahé F. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ. 2016;4:e2584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Eren AM, Maignien L, Sul WJ, Murphy LG, Grim SL, Morrison HG, et al. Oligotyping: differentiating between closely related microbial taxa using 16S rRNA gene data. Methods Ecol Evol. 2013;4(12):1111–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Eren AM, Morrison HG, Lescault PJ, Reveillaud J, Vineis JH, Sogin ML. Minimum entropy decomposition: unsupervised oligotyping for sensitive partitioning of high-throughput marker gene sequences. ISME J. 2015;9(4):968–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Angly FE, Dennis PG, Skarshewski A, Vanwonterghem I, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CopyRighter: a rapid tool for improving the accuracy of microbial community profiles through lineage-specific gene copy number correction. Microbiome. 2014;2(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Rattigan R, O’Doherty JV, Vigors S, Ryan MT, Sebastiano RS, Callanan JJ, et al. The effects of the marine-derived polysaccharides Laminarin and Chitosan on aspects of colonic health in pigs challenged with Dextran Sodium Sulphate. Mar Drugs. 2020;18(5):262.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Heo J, Opapeju F, Pluske J, Kim J, Hampson D, Nyachoti C. Gastrointestinal health and function in weaned pigs: a review of feeding strategies to control post-weaning diarrhoea without using in-feed antimicrobial compounds. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2013;97(2):207–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Cromwell GL. Why and how antibiotics are used in swine production. Anim Biotechnol. 2002;13(1):7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Rattigan R, Sweeney T, Maher S, Ryan MT, Thornton K, O’Doherty JV. Effects of reducing dietary crude protein concentration and supplementation with either laminarin or zinc oxide on the growth performance and intestinal health of newly weaned pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2020;270:114693.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang H, Chen G, Li X, Zheng F, Zeng X. Yeast β-glucan, a potential prebiotic, showed a similar probiotic activity to inulin. Food Funct. 2020;11(12):10386–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhou Y, Luo Y, Yu B, Zheng P, Yu J, Huang Z, et al. Effect of β-Glucan supplementation on growth performance and intestinal epithelium functions in weaned pigs challenged by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Antibiotics. 2022;11(4):519.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Kieliszek M. Selenium - fascinating microelement, properties and sources in food. Molecules. 2019;24(7):1298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Van Zelst M, Hesta M, Gray K, Beech K, Cools A, Alexander LG, et al. Selenium digestibility and bioactivity in dogs: what the can can, the kibble can’t. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0152709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Bøhle LA, Brede DA, Diep DB, Holo H, Nes IF. Specific degradation of the mucus adhesion-promoting protein (MapA) of Lactobacillus reuteri to an antimicrobial peptide. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(21):7306–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Pessione E. Lactic acid bacteria contribution to gut microbiota complexity: lights and shadows. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2012;2(86):1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Tamanai-Shacoori Z, Smida I, Bousarghin L, Loreal O, Meuric V, Fong SB, et al. Roseburia spp.: a marker of health? Future Microbiol. 2017;12(2):157–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Hua X, Zhu J, Yang T, Guo M, Li Q, Chen J, et al. The gut microbiota and associated metabolites are altered in sleep disorder of children with autism Spectrum disorders. Front Psychiatry. 2020;2(11):855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhang W, Zhu YH, Zhou D, Wu Q, Song D, Dicksved J, et al. Oral administration of a select mixture of bacillus probiotics affects the gut microbiota and goblet cell function following escherichia coli challenge in newly weaned pigs of genotype muc4 that are supposed to be enterotoxigenic E. coli F4ab/ac receptor negative. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;83(3):e02747–16.

  58. Hoffmann C, Dollive S, Grunberg S, Chen J, Li H, Wu GD, et al. Archaea and fungi of the human gut microbiome: correlations with diet and bacterial residents. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66019.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Lee JJ, Kyoung H, Cho JH, Choe J, Kim Y, Liu Y, et al. Dietary yeast cell wall improves growth performance and prevents of diarrhea of weaned pigs by enhancing gut health and anti-inflammatory immune responses. Animals. 2021;11(8):2269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Wang Y, Ames NP, Tun HM, Tosh SM, Jones PJ, Khafipour E. High molecular weight barley β-glucan alters gut microbiota toward reduced cardiovascular disease risk. Front Microbiol. 2016;10(7):129.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Fehlbaum S, Prudence K, Kieboom J, Heerikhuisen M, van den Broek T, Schuren FHJ, et al. In Vitro fermentation of selected prebiotics and their effects on the composition and activity of the adult gut microbiota. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(10):3097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Sayan H, Assavacheep P, Angkanaporn K, Assavacheep A. Effect of Lactobacillus salivarius on growth performance, diarrhea incidence, fecal bacterial population and intestinal morphology of suckling pigs challenged with F4+ enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2018;31(8):1308–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. García KE, de Souza TCR, Landín GM, Barreyro AA, Santos MGB, Soto JGG. Microbial fermentation patterns, diarrhea incidence, and performance in weaned piglets fed a low protein diet supplemented with probiotics. Food Nutri Sci. 2014;5(18):1776.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Wellington MO, Thiessen RB, Van Kessel AG, Columbus DA. Intestinal health and threonine requirement of growing pigs fed diets containing high dietary fibre and fermentable protein. Animals. 2020;10(11):2055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Pieper R, Kröger S, Richter JF, Wang J, Martin L, Bindelle J, et al. Fermentable fiber ameliorates fermentable protein-induced changes in microbial ecology, but not the mucosal response, in the colon of piglets. J Nutr. 2012;142(4):661–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Tang H, Pang S, Wang M, Xiao X, Rong Y, Wang H, et al. TLR4 activation is required for il-17-induced multiple tissue inflammation and wasting in mice. J Immunol. 2010;185(4):2563–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Garcia-Hernandez V, Quiros M, Nusrat A. Intestinal epithelial claudins: expression and regulation in homeostasis and inflammation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017;1397(1):66–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Zhao Y, Qin L, Zhang P, Li K, Liang L, Sun J, et al. Longitudinal COVID-19 profiling associates IL-1RA and IL-10 with disease severity and rantes with mild disease. JCI Insight. 2020;5(13):e139834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Wang Z, Guo Y, Yuan J, Zhang B. Effect of dietary beta-1, 3/1, 6-glucan supplementation on growth performance, immune response and plasma prostaglandin E2, growth hormone and ghrelin in weanling piglets. Asian-australas J Anim Sci. 2008;21(5):707–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) and Monaghan Mushrooms [Grant number: 16/RC/3889].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

    Alison Dowley, Eadaoin Conway, Stafford Vigors & John V. O’Doherty

  2. School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

    Torres Sweeney & Marion T. Ryan

  3. Mbio, Monaghan Mushroom Group, Tyholland, Co.Monaghan, Ireland

    Supriya Yadav & Jude Wilson

Authors
  1. Alison Dowley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Torres Sweeney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eadaoin Conway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stafford Vigors
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marion T. Ryan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Supriya Yadav
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jude Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. John V. O’Doherty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The author’s contributions were as follows: JVOD, TS, JW and SY designed the experiment and supervised data collection; AD performed the experiment, collected the samples, carried out the laboratory analyses and wrote the manuscript; EC and MTR assisted in laboratory analyses. TS, JVOD, and SV performed the statistical analyses and corrected the manuscript; All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John V. O’Doherty.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

In this study, all procedures were approved under the University College Dublin Animal Research Ethics Committee, Ireland (AREC-20–22-O’Doherty) and were conducted in accordance with Irish legislation (SI no. 543/2012) and the EU directive 2010/63/EU for animal experimentation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The co-authors (S.Y. and J.W.) are employees of a company that partially financed the project and participated in the design of the study, in the analysis of mushroom supplements, and in the final review of the manuscript. The other authors have no competing interests.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Table S1. The effects of dietary treatment on the expression of nutrient transporters, immune markers and tight junctions in pigs duodenum, jejunum and ileum.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dowley, A., Sweeney, T., Conway, E. et al. The effects of dietary supplementation with mushroom or selenium enriched mushroom powders on the growth performance and intestinal health of post-weaned pigs. J Animal Sci Biotechnol 14, 12 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00808-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00808-x

Keywords

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology

ISSN: 2049-1891