Skip to main content
Download PDF

Phytogenic feed additives alleviate pathogenic Escherichia coli-induced intestinal damage through improving barrier integrity and inhibiting inflammation in weaned pigs

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology volume 13, Article number: 107 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of each phytogenic feed additive (PFA; PFA1, bitter citrus extract; PFA2, a microencapsulated blend of thymol and carvacrol; PFA3, a mixture of bitter citrus extract, thymol, and carvacrol; PFA4, a premixture of grape seed, grape marc extract, green tea, and hops; PFA5, fenugreek seed powder) on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, intestinal morphology, and immune response in weaned pigs infected with Escherichia coli (E. coli).

Results

A total of 63 4-week-old weaned pigs were placed in individual metabolic cages and assigned to seven treatment groups. The seven treatments were as follows: 1) NC; basal diet without E. coli challenge, 2) PC; basal diet with E. coli challenge, 3) T1; PC + 0.04% PFA1, 4) T2; PC + 0.01% PFA2, 5) T3; PC + 0.10% PFA3, 6) T4; PC + 0.04% PFA4, 7) T5; PC + 0.10% PFA5. The experiments lasted in 21 d, including 7 d before and 14 d after the first E. coli challenge. In the E. coli challenge treatments, all pigs were orally inoculated by dividing a total of 10 mL of E. coli F18 for 3 consecutive days. The PFA-added groups significantly increased (P < 0.05) average daily gain and feed efficiency and decreased (P < 0.05) the fecal score at d 0 to 14 post-inoculation (PI). Tumor necrosis factor α was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the PFA-added groups except for T1 in d 14 PI compared to the PC treatment. The T3 had a higher (P < 0.05) immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin A concentration compared to the PC treatment at d 7 PI. Also, T3 showed significantly higher (P < 0.05) villus height:crypt depth and claudin 1 expression in ileal mucosa, and significantly down-regulated (P < 0.05) the expression of calprotectin compared to the PC treatment.

Conclusions

Supplementation of PFA in weaned pigs challenged with E. coli alleviated the negative effects of E. coli and improved growth performance. Among them, the mixed additive of bitter citrus extract, thymol, and carvacrol showed the most effective results, improving immune response, intestinal morphology, and expression of tight junctions.

Background

Post-weaning diarrhea (PWD) results in increased dehydration, mortality, and lowered growth performance in weaned pigs [1]. PWD is considered the main cause of economic loss in the swine industry because it destabilizes the health status of pigs, reduces production efficiency, and increases production costs as a result [2, 3]. PWD is caused by significant changes in gastrointestinal physiology, microbiology, and immunology due to weaning stress, the biggest stressor in piglets [4]. Pathogenic Escherichia coli (E. coli) is known to be a major cause of PWD [5]. E. coli damages the intestinal epithelium, weakening mucosal and cellular barrier functions and increasing the adhesion of pathogenic bacteria to the mucosal layer [4, 6].

Phytogenic feed additives (PFA) contain various physiologically active ingredients such as alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, tannins phenolics, polyphenols, thymol, and allicin, and have positive activity including antibacterial, immune-modulating, antioxidant, and growth-promoting effects in animals [7, 8]. When weaned pigs challenged with E. coli were fed a blended plant feed additive containing naringin flavonoids, intestinal damage was prevented by reducing the main acute phase protein of pigs and better controlling the inflammatory response [9]. Also, the addition of essential oils to the diet of weaned pigs challenged with E. coli increased growth performance and the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of nutrients and decreased the incidence of diarrhea [10].

However, no studies have compared the effects of different PFA supplements in weaned pigs infected with E. coli at the same time. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the effects of individual PFAs on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, intestinal morphology, and immune response in weaned pigs infected with E. coli, which is a principal causative agent of PWD, and then identify the PFA effective against PWD.

Materials and methods

Test phytogenic feed additives

Five types of PFA were used in this study. PFA1 is composed of bitter citrus extract (BioFlavex GC, HTBA, Beniel, Spain) and contains 25 ~ 27% naringin and 11 ~ 15% neohesperidin. PFA2 is a microencapsulated blend of thymol and carvacrol (Avipower 2, VetAgro SpA, Reggio, Emmilia, Italy), containing 7% of thymol and 7% of carvacrol. PFA3 is a mixture of PFA1, PFA2 and excipient in a ratio of 4:1:5. It contains 0.7% thymol, 0.7% carvacrol, 10 ~ 10.8% naringin and 4.4 ~ 6% neohesperidin. PFA 4 is a premixture of grape seed and grape marc extract, green tea, and hops (AntaOx Flavosyn, DR. Eckel GmbH, Niederzissen, Germany). It contains more than 10% of flavonoids. PFA5 is composed of fenugreek seed powder (Fenugreek Seed Powder, P&D Export, Jaguar, India) and contains 12% saponin. All PFAs used in this study was obtained by a commercial company (Eugene-Bio, Suwon, South Korea).

Bacterial strains and culture

Shiga toxin-producing E. coli F18 was provided in stock form. The F18 E. coli expressed heat labile toxin (LT) and shiga toxin type 2e (stx2e). Ten microliters of thawed E. coli stock was inoculated into 10 mL of nutrient broth and cultured at 37 °C for 24 h, and then subcultured. Thereafter, the subcultured E. coli was smeared on MacConkey agar to confirm the bacterial enumeration. A final concentration of 1.2 × 1010 CFU/mL was used in this study.

Animals, treatments and experimental design

A total of 63 4-week-old crossbred weanling pigs [(Landrace × Yorkshire) × Duroc] with initial body weight (BW) of 8.03 ± 0.43 kg were used in this study. All pigs were assigned to a completely randomized seven treatment groups based on the initial BW. There was one pig in a cage and nine replicate cages per treatment. Pigs were individually placed in 45 cm × 55 cm × 45 cm stainless steel metabolism cages in an environmentally controlled room. Pigs were housed in individual pens for 21 d, including 7 d before and 14 d after the first E. coli challenge (d 0). Dietary treatments were as follow: 1) NC (negative control; basal diet without E. coli challenge), 2) PC (positive control; basal diet with E. coli challenge), 3) T1 (PC + 0.04% PFA1), 4) T2 (PC + 0.01% PFA2), 5) T3 (PC + 0.10% PFA3), 6) T4 (PC + 0.04% PFA4), 7) T5 (PC + 0.10% PFA5). All diets were formulated to meet or exceed the NRC requirement (Table 1) [11]. All treatment groups were fed the experimental diet for 21 d, including 7 d of adaptation. The diets were mixed with water in a 1:1 ratio before feeding and were fed at 08:30 and 17:30 each day. The pigs had ad libitum access to water.

Table 1 Compositions of basal diets (as-fed-basis)
Full size table

In the E. coli challenge treatments, all pigs were orally inoculated by dividing a total of 10 mL of E. coli F18 for 3 consecutive days from d 0 post-inoculation (PI) after 7 d of adaptation.

Sampling and measurements

Growth performance and fecal score

Pigs were weighed individually at the beginning (d −7), d 0 before inoculation, and d 7, 14 PI. Feed intake (FI) was recorded daily the diet supply amount and remaining amount. Average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), and feed efficiency (G:F) were calculated for each interval from d − 7 to 0, d 0 to 7 PI, d 7 to 14 PI and d 0 to 14 PI. The fecal scores were individually recorded at 08:00 and 17:00 by the same person during the entire experimental period. The fecal score was assigned as follows: 0, Normal feces; 1, Soft feces; 2, Mild diarrhea; 3, Severe diarrhea. The fecal score of each pig was calculated as an average within the period before and after the E. coli challenge.

Nutrient digestibility

Chromium oxide (Cr2O3, 2 g/kg) was added to the diets as an indigestible marker to measure digestibility [12]. Pigs were fed diets mixed with chromium oxide for 4 consecutive days from d 4 and d 11, fresh excreta samples were collected in that period. At the same time, 9 replications of these feed samples were collected. Fresh fecal and feed samples were stored in a freezer at − 20 °C immediately after collection. At the end of the experiment, fecal samples were dried at 70 °C for 72 h and then crushed on a 1-mm screen. The procedures utilized for the determination of dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP) digestibility were conducted with the methods by the AOAC [13]. Chromium levels were determined via UV absorption spectrophotometry (UV-1201, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) using the Williams et al. [14] method. For calculating the ATTD of the nutrients, we used the following equation: Digestibility = 1 − [(Nf × Cd)/(Nd × Cf)] × 100, where Nf = concentration of nutrient in fecal, Nd = concentration of nutrient in the diet, Cd = concentration of chromium in the diet, and Cf = concentration of chromium in the fecal.

Complete blood count and measurement of serum immunoglobulin, interleukin and TNF-α

Blood samples were collected from the jugular vein of all pigs before the E. coli challenge (d 0), and on d 7 and 14 PI. At the time of collection, blood samples were collected into vacuum tubes containing K3EDTA for complete blood count analysis, and nonheparinized tubes for serum analysis, respectively. After collection, serum samples were centrifuged at 3000×g for 20 min at 4 °C. Thereafter, the blood sample tubes were stored in − 20 °C refrigerator until analysis. The white blood cell (WBC), basophil, neutrophil, and lymphocyte levels in the whole blood were measured using an automatic blood analyzer (ADVIA 120, Bayer, NY, USA). Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin A (IgA) levels were gauged using an automatic biochemistry blood analyzer (Hitachi 747; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) concentrations were determined using commercially available ELISA kits (Quantikine, R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and the absorbance was measured at 450 nm.

Intestinal morphology

At the end of the experiment (d 14), pigs were anesthetized with carbon dioxide gas after blood sampling and euthanized by exsanguination. After euthanization, intestinal tissues of about 10 cm from the ileum (close to the ileocecal junction) were collected and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin (NBF; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for intestinal morphology and expression analysis of intestinal tight junction proteins. After cutting the intestine sample, it was dehydrated and dealcoholized. The samples were then installed on slides, treated with paraffin, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The slides were examined using an Olympus IX51 inverted phase-contrast microscope. Intestinal morphological measurements included the villus height (VH), crypt depth (CD), and villus height:crypt depth ratio (VH:CD).

Immunohistochemical staining

The expression of calprotectin and claudin 1 (CLDN1) was studied by using immunohistochemistry (IHC). The ileal tissue fixed in 10% NBF solution was cut, embedded in a paraffin wax block and sectioned to a thickness of 5 μm. After deparaffinizing the paraffin sections and rehydrating the tissues, they were placed in running tap water for 10 min. This section was reacted in 0.03% hydrogen peroxide solution for 15 min, and then dipped in distilled water (DW) for 10 min. Then, the antigen was retrieved and dipped in DW for 10 min, followed by blocking in 4% bovine serum albumin solution for 30 min. The tissue section was then incubated with primary antibodies, anti-calprotectin (1:800, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and anti-claudin1 (1:200, Novus Biologicals, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Then, it was incubated with the secondary antibodies, envision anti-mouse (Dako, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and envision anti-rabbit (Dako). The sections were washed with tris-buffered saline-tween and incubated with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) to visualize immune complexes. The processed slide sections were slide-scanned through Axio Scan Z1 (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). The completed file was analyzed using Zen Image Analysis, an Axio Scan Z1 program (Zen 3.4 blue edition). Analysis was analyzed by the contrast of DAB of IHC and positive reaction color to total tissue area, and the results were expressed as a total area, a positive area, and the percentage of positive area.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed via the general linear model procedures of SAS (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA), using each pen as the experimental unit. Differences between treatment means were determined using Tukey’s multiple range test. A probability level of P < 0.05 was indicated to be statistically significant, and a level of 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10 was considered to have such a tendency.

Results

Growth performance

There was no difference between treatment groups in the initial BW of pigs (Table 2). At d 7 PI, T2 showed a significantly higher (P < 0.05) BW than the other treatment groups. Compared with the NC treatment, the PC treatment reduced (P < 0.05) ADG and G:F at d 0 to 7 PI. Also, at d 0 to 7 PI, the PFA-added treatment groups showed higher (P < 0.05) ADG and G:F compared to the PC treatment. At d 7 to 14 PI, the T3 had a significantly lower (P < 0.05) ADFI than other treatments, but showed a higher tendency (P = 0.073) in G:F. Compared with the PC treatment, the PFA-added treatment groups significantly increased ADG and G:F (P < 0.05) at d 0 to 14 PI, but there was no difference in ADFI.

Table 2 Effect of PFAs on growth performance in weaned pigs challenged with E. coli1
Full size table

Fecal score

Before E. coli inoculation, there was no difference in the fecal score at d −  7 to 0 (Table 3). The fecal score from d 0 to 7 PI was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the PC treatment than in other treatment groups. Also, in d 0 to 14 PI, the PC treatment showed significantly higher (P < 0.05) fecal scores than other treatment groups, and the PFA-added treatment groups showed similar or lower (P < 0.05) fecal scores to the NC treatment.

Table 3 Effect of PFAs on fecal score in weaned pigs challenged with E. coli1
Full size table

Nutrient digestibility

At d 7 PI, there were no significant differences in DM and CP digestibility between treatment groups (Table 4). The DM digestibility was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the PFA-added treatment groups at d 14 PI compared to the PC treatment. No difference was observed in CP digestibility at d 14 PI among treatment groups.

Table 4 Effect of PFAs on nutrient digestibility in weaned pigs challenged with E. coli1
Full size table

Blood profile

WBC, basophil, neutrophil, and lymphocyte levels did not differ significantly between treatment groups on d 0 before E. coli inoculation (Table 5). The number of WBCs in whole blood was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in T2 and NC treatment at d 7 PI compared to other treatment groups. Also, T2 had a significantly lower percentage (P < 0.05) of neutrophils and a significantly higher percentage (P < 0.05) of lymphocytes at d 7 PI. The neutrophils and lymphocytes of the PFA-added treatment groups except for T1 were recovered to the NC treatment level at d 14 PI, and among them, T2 showed significantly similar values (P < 0.05) to the NC treatment.

Table 5 Effect of PFAs on blood profile in weaned pigs challenged with E. coli1
Full size table

Serum immunoglobulin

In serum IgG, IgA, TNF-α, and IL-6, there was no significant difference between treatment groups at d 0 before E. coli inoculation (Table 6). At d 7 PI, T3 had a higher IgG and IgA concentration (P < 0.05) compared to PC treatment. TNF-α was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the PFA-added treatment groups than in the PC treatment at d 7 PI, among which T3 and T5 were the lowest (P < 0.05). At d 7 PI, T3 showed the lowest IL-6 (P < 0.05) compared to other treatments. At d 14 PI, the IgG concentration showed a tendency for T3 to be higher (P = 0.077) than the PC treatment. TNF-α was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the PFA-added treatment groups except for T1 in d 14 PI compared to the PC treatment.

Table 6 Effect of PFAs on immunoglobulins and cytokines in weaned pigs challenged with E. coli1
Full size table

Intestinal morphology

VH in T3 and NC treatment was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than in PC treatment (Table 7; Fig. 1). In CD, the PFA-added treatment groups showed a tendency to be numerically lower (P = 0.067) than those of the PC treatment. VH:CD showed significantly higher values (P < 0.05) in T3 than PC treatment.

Table 7 Effect of PFAs on intestinal morphology in weaned pigs challenged with E. coli1
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Effect of PFAs on intestinal microscopic morphology in weaned pigs challenged with E. coli. NC, basal diet without E. coli challenge (negative control); PC, basal diet with E. coli challenge (positive control); T1, PC + 0.04% PFA1; T2, PC + 0.01% PFA2; T3, PC + 0.10% PFA3; T4, PC + 0.04% PFA4; T5, PC + 0.10% PFA5. Scale bar is 100 μm

Full size image

Tight junction

T3 and NC treatment significantly down-regulated (P < 0.05) the expression of calprotectin in the ileum mucosa compared to other treatments (Table 8). The expression of CLDN1 in the ileal mucosa was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the PFA-added treatment groups than in the PC treatment, and the T3 showed the highest (P < 0.05) among the PFA-added treatment groups.

Table 8 Effect of PFAs on expression of tight junction proteins in weaned pigs challenged with E. coli1
Full size table

Discussion

E. coli-induced PWD is a common intestinal disease in weaned pigs, causing economic loss by reducing growth performance and increasing mortality [15]. This disease usually occurs in the early weaning of pigs at 3 to 4 weeks of age, and the symptoms appear between 3 and 10 d after weaning [16, 17]. In the results of this study, after the E. coli challenge, crypt depth and the expression of calprotectin were increased, and the villus height was decreased compared to the NC treatment. Also, 61% of pigs in this study had diarrhea for 7 d after the E. coli challenge. These observations are consistent with those seen in weaned pigs infected with E. coli in previous studies [18,19,20]. Therefore, these obvious clinical signs and symptoms indicated that the pigs were successfully infected with E. coli.

Our study was performed to assess the effects of several PFAs added to the diets of E. coli-infected weaned pigs and to determine which PFAs were effective for PWD. The results of this study indicated that all PFAs had a positive effect on the growth performance of E. coli-infected weaned pigs. The findings suggest that PFAs may help weaned pigs cope with stress during the post-weaning phase when impaired pig growth performance most commonly occurs. Naringin and neohesperidin are the major antioxidants in citrus fruits, with naringin, in particular, reported to have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties [21, 22]. Through this action, ADG and the feed efficiency of weaned pigs were improved when naringin was added to the diet of weaned pigs in our study, as well as in a previous study [23]. According to Windisch et al. [24], essential oils, including thymol and carvacrol, might enhance the activity of digestive enzymes and hence, increase nutritional absorption, resulting in a higher feed efficiency. This is consistent with the results of the current study. Also, the addition of essential oils reduced the incidence of diarrhea by 50% [25]. Previous studies reported that both thymol and carvacrol had antibacterial and anti-inflammatory effects [26, 27]. According to Ouwehand et al. [28], beneficial microorganisms like Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria were less susceptible to the antibacterial activity of essential oils than potentially harmful bacteria like E. coli and Salmonella. For this reason, in this study, it seems that a microencapsulated blend of thymol and carvacrol reduced the fecal scores by causing the positive modulation of intestinal microflora. Although no previous studies on bitter citrus extract, thymol, and carvacrol mixed additives have been conducted, the results in the present study suggest that the positive effects such as antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties in the components of each additive may have alleviated the adverse effects of E. coli challenge. In particular, this mechanism can explain the improvement of the T3 group’s growth performance and fecal scores.

In the case of nutrient digestibility, there was no significant difference between the treatment groups 7 d after the E. coli challenge. However, after 14 d, DM digestibility was higher in the PFA-added treatment groups than in the PC treatment. The enhanced digestive capacity of the small intestine could be attributed to PFA, which stabilizes microbial eubiosis in the gut [29]. Previous studies showed that polyphenols helped digestion by reducing inflammation and increasing the synthesis of digestive enzymes [30]. PWD-induced weaned pigs fed fenugreek extract showed higher DM digestibility than pigs fed the basal diet after an E. coli challenge [29]. In the present study, the T3 group fed a mixture of bitter citrus extract, thymol and carvacrol showed the highest DM digestibility on 14 d after the E. coli challenge. This is considered to be a synergistic effect of the addition of each PFA. There was no significant difference in CP digestibility between the treatment groups at both d 7 PI and d 14 PI. However, when CP digestibility was viewed only as a numerical value, and not a statistical difference, supplementation with thymol and carvacrol showed a digestibility similar to or higher than that of the NC treatment that was not subjected to an E. coli challenge. These results indicate that the addition of essential oils to E. coli-infected pigs could improve nutrient absorption by stimulating saliva and bile secretion and increasing enzymatic activity [8, 31].

An increase in the total number of WBCs indicates the presence of systemic inflammation [32]. Lymphocytes in the whole blood provide specific cellular and humoral immune responses, whereas neutrophils serve as a first-line defense against bacterial infections [17]. Their ratio is commonly utilized as a biomarker to diagnose systemic inflammation severity [32]. According to Liu et al. [33], an E. coli challenge could induce systemic inflammation in weaned pigs by increasing the total number of WBCs and neutrophils. The present study also confirmed that the E. coli challenge increased WBCs and neutrophils and decreased lymphocytes at both d 7 PI and d 14 PI. Among them, supplementation with thymol and carvacrol showed the same or significantly improved WBCs, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts at d 7 PI, and neutrophil and lymphocyte counts at d 14 PI compared to the NC treatment not infected with E. coli. This suggests that the addition of thymol and carvacrol to weaned pigs infected with E. coli could attenuate systemic inflammation caused by an E. coli infection. Similarly, in pigs challenged with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from E. coli, the addition of essential oils showed improved WBCs and neutrophil results compared to pigs fed the basal diet after the LPS challenge due to the anti-inflammatory response to essential oils [34].

Serum IgA and IgG are important immunoglobulins in humoral immunity [35]. In particular, IgG has been found in high amounts in the serum in response to external infection, with a lengthy half-life [36]. Due to weaning stress and the immaturity of the piglet immune system, a reduction in serum IgG concentrations normally occurs during the weaning phase [37]. The study results showed that the E. coli challenge significantly decreased serum IgG and IgA concentrations at d 7 PI compared to the NC treatment, and showed a decreased tendency at d 14 PI. Furthermore, the feeding of a mixture of bitter citrus extract, thymol and carvacrol to pigs infected with E. coli showed significantly higher IgG and IgA concentrations at both d 7 PI and d 14 PI compared to PC treatment. Ahmed et al. [38] reported that the feeding of essential oils in the E. coli challenge condition increased the IgG levels of weaned pigs, consistent with the results of the present study. Thymol contained in essential oils can increase goblet cells in the animal ileum and inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria [39, 40]. Also, the addition of essential oils could improve immunity by regulating the humoral immune system of weaned pigs [41]. The mechanism by which PFA increases IgG levels requires further study, but it has been suggested that active phytogenic (flavonoids and polyphenols) molecules may act as additional ligands of Fc receptors to bind IgG and stimulate immune responses [42]. Cytokines are also involved in the maintenance of immune homeostasis [35]. The pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF -α are frequently used as potential markers in weaning pigs to diagnose pathogenic infections [43]. TNF- α and IL-6 impair animal performance by impairing immunity and nutrient metabolism [44]. This could emphasize the crucial role of cytokines in the regulation of immune and inflammatory responses. In the present study, the E. coli challenge significantly increased TNF-α at both d 7 PI and d 14 PI. Also, the E. coli challenge increased IL-6 at d 7 PI and showed a high trend at d 14 PI. However, both TNF-α and IL-6 were significantly lower in the T3 group fed a mixture of bitter citrus ext ract, thymol and carvacrol than in the PC treatment, suggesting that this PFA positively modulated the immune and inflammatory responses. TNF-α levels in the blood have been linked to gut inflammatory disease, and a previous study found that a combination of carvacrol and thymol lowered TNF-α mRNA expression in the intestine of weaned pigs, leading to improved gut health and growth performance [45]. Therefore, the present results suggest tha t the addition of a mixture of bitter citrus extract, thymol, and carvacrol could suppress the inflammatory response caused by E. coli in weaned pigs and have a beneficial effect on health status.

Intestinal morphology is commonly assessed by measuring VH, CD, and the VH:CD ratio [46]. Intestinal morphology can reveal some information on gut health. A shortening of the villus and deeper crypts may decrease the surface area for nutrient absorption. Therefore, the VH:CD ratio value is utilized as a useful measure of nutrient digestion and absorption [47]. The E. coli inoculum used in the present study expresses LT and Stx2e, which could induce intestinal morphological lesions such as villus atrophy and leaky gut in weaned pigs [33, 48]. These lesions impair nutrient absorption and are a major cause of reduced growth performance [49, 50]. In this study, the E. coli challenge also reduced the VH:CD ratio, indicating the deterioration of intestinal health. However, supplementation with a mixture of bitter citrus extract, thymol, and carvacrol improved VH, CD, and the VH:CD ratio in pigs compared to those in the PC treatment. Essential oils reduce the number of pathogenic bacteria in the gut through their antibacterial action [28]. It has been reported that essential oils can improve epithelial cell proliferation to build intestinal villus and improve intestinal morphology [51]. In addition, the antioxidant effect could decrease the intestinal damage caused by oxidative stress and improve the intestinal morphology of weaned pigs [52]. Therefore, the improvement in intestinal morphology in the T3 group was thought to be due to the complex antibacterial and antioxidant actions of thymol, carvacrol, and bitter citrus extract.

The intestinal epithelia, especially the internal tight junctions such as occludin and CLDN1 between enterocytes, are critical in maintaining intestinal permeability [53]. Enteric infections and endotoxin translocation can increase the permeability of the intestinal epithelium by altering tight junctions [54]. A disruption in intestinal barrier function might also be caused by a disruption in the expression of tight junction proteins [1, 55]. As a result of the diminished intestinal integrity, bacterial translocation is enhanced, and cellular pro-inflammatory responses stimulated by foreign invading bacteria might be increased [15, 56, 57]. Calprotectin mainly plays a role in preventing the binding of bacteria to mucosal epithelial cells through zinc competition and is used as an indicator to quantify the extent of intestinal inflammation in infectious and inflammatory diseases [19, 58]. In the current study, supplementation with bitter citrus extract, thymol, and carvacrol down-regulated the expression of calprotectin and up-regulated the expression of CLDN1 in the ileal mucosa on d 14 PI. A previous study reported that feeding guava leaf extract containing naringin to weaned pigs challenged with E. coli improved intestinal permeability and mucosal damage caused by E. coli and improved tight junction integrity [59]. The down-regulation of calprotectin could be seen as an indicator of attenuated intestinal inflammation caused by PFA. Therefore, these results indicated that supplementation with bitter citrus extract, thymol, and carvacrol helped to maintain normal intestinal integrity and immune functions, enhancing disease resistance and the performance of E. coli-challenged pigs.

Conclusion

In weaned pigs infected with E. coli, the addition of PFA alleviated the negative effects of E. coli and improved growth performance. When supplemented with thymol and carvacrol, the antibacterial and anti-inflammatory effects of thymol and carvacrol have been shown to prevent diarrhea. When a mixture of bitter citrus extract, thymol, and carvacrol was fed, immunity, intestinal morphology, and tight junction expression were all improved. Therefore, when a mixture of bitter citrus extract, thymol, and carvacrol is added, each PFA effect seems to be added and synergistic, and it is considered that this mixed additive is the most effective PFA among the five additives used in the study. However, it seems that additional studies are needed on the proper amount of each additive and the basic mechanism of PFA against PWD.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets from the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ADFI:

Average daily feed intake

ADG:

Average daily gain

ATTD:

Apparent total tract digestibility

BW:

Body weight

CD:

Crypt depth

CLDN1:

Claudin 1

CP:

Crude protein

DAB:

3,3′-diaminobenzidine

DM:

Dry matter

DW:

Distilled water

E. coli :

Escherichia coli

FI:

Feed intake

G:F:

Feed efficiency

IgA:

Immunoglobulin A

IgG:

Immunoglobulin G

IHC:

Immunohistochemistry

IL-6:

Interleukin-6

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharide

LT:

Heat labile toxin

NBF:

Neutral buffered formalin

NC:

Negative control

PC:

Positive control

PFA:

Phytogenic feed additive

PI:

Post-inoculation

PWD:

Post-weaning diarrhea

Stx2e:

Shiga toxin type 2e

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor α

VH:

Villus height

VH:CD:

Villus height:crypt depth

WBC:

White blood cell

References

  1. Kim K, He Y, Xiong X, Ehrlich A, Li X, Raybould H, et al. Dietary supplementation of Bacillus subtilis influenced intestinal health of weaned pigs experimentally infected with a pathogenic E. coli. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2019;10:52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Piva A, Morlacchini M, Casadei G, Gatta PP, Biagi G, Prandini A. Sodium butyrate improves growth performance of weaned piglets during the first period after weaning. Ital J Anim Sci. 2002;1:35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Park JH, Sureshkumar S, Kim IH. Effects of dietary lysozyme supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, intestinal microbiota, and blood profiles of weanling pigs challenged with Escherichia coli. J Anim Sci Technol. 2021;63:501.

  4. Heo JM, Opapeju FO, Pluske JR, Kim JC, Hampson DJ, Nyachoti CM. Gastrointestinal health and function in weaned pigs: a review of feeding strategies to control post-weaning diarrhoea without using in-feed antimicrobial compounds. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2013;97:207–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Luppi A, Gibellini M, Gin T, Vangroenweghe F, Vandenbroucke V, Bauerfeind R, et al. Prevalence of virulence factors in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolated from pigs with post-weaning diarrhoea in Europe. Porc Health Manag. 2016;2:20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pluske JR, Hampson DJ, Williams IH. Factors influencing the structure and function of the small intestine in the weaned pig: a review. Livest Prod Sci. 1997;51:215–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang C, Chowdhury MA, Huo Y, Gong J. Phytogenic compounds as alternatives to in-feed antibiotics: potentials and challenges in application. Pathogens. 2015;4(1):137–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Upadhaya SD, Kim IH. Efficacy of phytogenic feed additive on performance, production and health status of monogastric animals–a review. Ann Anim Sci. 2017;17:929–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Montoya D, D’Angelo M, Martín-Orúe SM, Rodríguez-Sorrento A, Saladrigas-García M, Araujo C, et al. Effectiveness of two plant-based in-feed additives against an Escherichia coli F4 oral challenge in weaned piglets. Animals. 2021;11:2024.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Tian Q, Piao X. Essential oil blend could decrease diarrhea prevalence by improving antioxidative capability for weaned pigs. Animals. 2019;9:847.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th ed. Washington: National Academy Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mun D, Kyoung H, Kong M, Ryu S, Jang KB, Baek J, et al. Effects of Bacillus-based probiotics on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and intestinal health of weaned pigs. J Anim Sci Technol. 2021;63:1314.

  13. AOAC, editor. Official methods of analysis. 18th ed. Gaithersburg: AOAC International; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Williams CH, David DJ, Iismaa O. The determination of chromic oxide in faces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. J Agric Sci. 1962;59:381–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Almeida JAS, Liu Y, Song M, Lee JJ, Gaskins HR, Maddox CW, et al. Escherichia coli challenge and one type of smectite alter intestinal barrier of pigs. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2013;4:52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Nagy B, Fekete PZ. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in veterinary medicine. Int J Med Microbiol. 2005;295:443–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. He Y, Kim K, Kovanda L, Jinno C, Song M, Chase J, et al. Bacillus subtilis: a potential growth promoter in weaned pigs in comparison to carbadox. J Anim Sci. 2020;98:9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kim K, He Y, Jinno C, Kovanda L, Li X, Song M, et al. Trace amounts of antibiotic exacerbated diarrhea and systemic inflammation of weaned pigs infected with a pathogenic Escherichia coli. J Anim Sci. 2021;99:3.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tang ZR, Deng H, Zhang XL, Zen Y, Xiao DF, Sun WZ, et al. Effects of orally administering the antimicrobial peptide buforin II on small intestinal mucosal membrane integrity, the expression of tight junction proteins and protective factors in weaned piglets challenged by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2013;186:177–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun Y, Duarte ME, Kim SW. Dietary inclusion of multispecies probiotics to reduce the severity of post-weaning diarrhea caused by Escherichia coli F18+ in pigs. Anim Nutr. 2021;7:326–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lipiński K, Mazur M, Antoszkiewicz Z, Purwin C. Polyphenols in monogastric nutrition–a review. Ann Anim Sci. 2017;17:41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Goliomytis M, Kartsonas N, Charismiadou MA, Symeon GK, Simitzis PE, Deligeorgis SG. The influence of naringin or hesperidin dietary supplementation on broiler meat quality and oxidative stability. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0141652.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Goodarzi Boroojeni F, Männer K, Zentek J. The impacts of Macleaya cordata extract and naringin inclusion in post-weaning piglet diets on performance, nutrient digestibility and intestinal histomorphology. Arch Anim Nutr. 2018;72:178–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Windisch W, Schedle K, Plitzner C, Kroismayr A. Use of phytogenic products as feed additives for swine and poultry. J Anim Sci. 2008;86(suppl 14):E140–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Li SY, Ru YJ, Liu M, Xu B, Péron A, Shi XG. The effect of essential oils on performance, immunity and gut microbial population in weaner pigs. Livest Sci. 2012;145:119–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Michiels J, Missotten J, Fremaut D, De Smet S, Dierick N. In vitro dose–response of carvacrol, thymol, eugenol and trans-cinnamaldehyde and interaction of combinations for the antimicrobial activity against the pig gut flora. Livest Sci. 2007;109:157–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Michiels J, Missotten J, Van Hoorick A, Ovyn A, Fremaut D, De Smet S, et al. Effects of dose and formulation of carvacrol and thymol on bacteria and some functional traits of the gut in piglets after weaning. Arch Anim Nutr. 2010;64:136–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ouwehand AC, Kettunen H, Schulze H, Rautonen N. In vitro activity of essential oils towards intestinal microbes. Reprod Nutr Dev. 2006;46:S110.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mohana Devi S, Lee SI, Kim LH. Effect of phytogenics on growth performance, fecal score, blood profiles, fecal noxious gas emission, digestibility, and intestinal morphology of weanling pigs challenged with Escherichia coli K88. Pol J Vet Sci. 2015;18:557–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hussain T, Wang J, Murtaza G, Metwally E, Yang H, Kalhoro MS, et al. The role of polyphenols in regulation of heat shock proteins and gut microbiota in weaning stress. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2021;2021:6676444.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Platel K, Srinivasan K. Digestive stimulant action of spices: a myth or reality? Indian J Med Res. 2004;119:167–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gordon-Smith T. Structure and function of red and white blood cells. Medicine. 2009;37:119–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu Y, Song M, Che TM, Almeida JAS, Lee JJ, Bravo D, et al. Dietary plant extracts alleviate diarrhea and alter immune responses of weaned pigs experimentally infected with a pathogenic Escherichia coli. J Anim Sci. 2013;91:5294–306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kwak WG, Song MH, Lee DH, Yun W, Lee JH, Lee CH, et al. The effects of microencapsulated compounds supplementation on growth performance, immune cells, and rectal temperature in weaned pigs by lipopolysaccharides. Can J Anim Sci. 2019;99:505–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Han Y, Zhan T, Tang C, Zhao Q, Dansou DM, Yu Y, et al. Effect of replacing in-feed antibiotic growth promoters with a combination of egg immunoglobulins and phytomolecules on the performance, serum immunity, and intestinal health of weaned pigs challenged with Escherichia coli K88. Animals. 2021;11:1292.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Horton R, Vidarsson G. Antibodies and their receptors: different potential roles in mucosal defense. Front Immunol. 2013;4:200.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Klobasa F, Butler JE, Werhahn E, Habe F. Maternal-neonatal immunoregulation in swine. II. Influence of multiparity on de novo immunoglobulin synthesis by piglets. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1986;11:149–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ahmed ST, Hossain ME, Kim GM, Hwang JA, Ji H, Yang CJ. Effects of resveratrol and essential oils on growth performance, immunity, digestibility and fecal microbial shedding in challenged piglets. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 2013;26:683–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang W, Zhu YH, Zhou D, Wu Q, Song D, Dicksved J, et al. Oral administration of a select mixture of Bacillus probiotics affects the gut microbiota and goblet cell function following Escherichia coli challenge in newly weaned pigs of genotype MUC4 that are supposed to be enterotoxigenic E. coli F4ab/ac receptor negative. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;83:e02747–16.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Hedegaard CJ, Strube ML, Hansen MB, Lindved BK, Lihme A, Boye M, et al. Natural pig plasma immunoglobulins have anti-bacterial effects: potential for use as feed supplement for treatment of intestinal infections in pigs. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0147373.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Tan BF, Lim T, Boontiam W. Effect of dietary supplementation with essential oils and a Bacillus probiotic on growth performance, diarrhoea and blood metabolites in weaned pigs. Anim Prod Sci. 2020;61:64–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Nimmerjahn F, Ravetch JV. Antibody-mediated modulation of immune responses. Immunol Rev. 2010;236:265–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang L, Xu YQ, Liu HY, Lai T, Ma JL, Wang JF, et al. Evaluation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG using an Escherichia coli K88 model of piglet diarrhoea: effects on diarrhoea incidence, faecal microflora and immune responses. Vet Microbiol. 2010;141:142–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Spurlock ME. Regulation of metabolism and growth during immune challenge: an overview of cytokine function. J Anim Sci. 1997;75:1773–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wei HK, Xue HX, Zhou ZX, Peng J. A carvacrol–thymol blend decreased intestinal oxidative stress and influenced selected microbes without changing the messenger RNA levels of tight junction proteins in jejunal mucosa of weaning piglets. Animal. 2017;11:193–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Liu Y, Chen F, Odle J, Lin X, Jacobi SK, Zhu H, et al. Fish oil enhances intestinal integrity and inhibits TLR4 and NOD2 signaling pathways in weaned pigs after LPS challenge. J Nutr. 2012;142:2017–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Montagne L, Cavaney FS, Hampson DJ, Lallès JP, Pluske JR. Effect of diet composition on postweaning colibacillosis in piglets. J Anim Sci. 2004;82:2364–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sonntag AK, Bielaszewska M, Mellmann A, Dierksen N, Schierack P, Wieler LH, et al. Shiga toxin 2e-producing Escherichia coli isolates from humans and pigs differ in their virulence profiles and interactions with intestinal epithelial cells. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:8855–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Rose R, Whipp SC, Moon HW. Effects of Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin b on small intestinal villi in pigs, rabbits, and lambs. Vet Pathol. 1987;24:71–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Dubreuil JD. Escherichia coli STb toxin and colibacillosis: knowing is half the battle. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008;278:137–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Mourão JL, Pinheiro V, Alves A, Guedes CM, Pinto L, Saavedra MJ, et al. Effect of mannan oligosaccharides on the performance, intestinal morphology and cecal fermentation of fattening rabbits. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2006;126:107–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Han X, Piao XS, Zhang HY, Li PF, Yi JQ, Zhang Q, et al. Forsythia suspensa extract has the potential to substitute antibiotic in broiler chicken. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 2012;25:569–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Gao Y, Han F, Huang X, Rong Y, Yi H, Wang Y. Changes in gut microbial populations, intestinal morphology, expression of tight junction proteins, and cytokine production between two pig breeds after challenge with Escherichia coli K88: a comparative study. J Anim Sci. 2013;91:5614–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Moretó M, Pérez-Bosque A. Dietary plasma proteins, the intestinal immune system, and the barrier functions of the intestinal mucosa. J Anim Sci. 2009;87(Suppl 14):E92–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Dubreuil JD. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli targeting intestinal epithelial tight junctions: an effective way to alter the barrier integrity. Microb Pathog. 2017;113:129–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Lessard M, Dupuis M, Gagnon N, Nadeau E, Matte JJ, Goulet J, et al. Administration of Pediococcus acidilactici or Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii modulates development of porcine mucosal immunity and reduces intestinal bacterial translocation after Escherichia coli challenge. J Anim Sci. 2009;87:922–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Ashida H, Ogawa M, Kim M, Mimuro H, Sasakawa C. Bacteria and host interactions in the gut epithelial barrier. Nat Chem Biol. 2012;8:36–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Kalla R, Kennedy NA, Ventham NT, Boyapati RK, Adams AT, Nimmo ER, et al. Serum calprotectin: a novel diagnostic and prognostic marker in inflammatory bowel diseases. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:1796–805.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Wang D, Zhou L, Zhou H, Hu H, Hou G. Chemical composition and protective effect of guava (Psidium guajava L.) leaf extract on piglet intestines. J Sci Food Agric. 2021;101:2767–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was carried out with the support of “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (Project No. PJ01622001)” Rural Development Administration, Korea.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Se Yeon Chang and Min Ho Song contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, 28644, South Korea

    Se Yeon Chang, Ji Hwan Lee, Han Jin Oh, Yong Ju Kim, Jae Woo An, Young Bin Go, Dong Cheol Song, Hyun Ah. Cho & Jin Ho Cho

  2. Division of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, 34134, South Korea

    Min Ho Song

  3. Eugene-Bio, Suwon, 16675, South Korea

    Seung Yeol Cho, Dong Jun Kim & Mi Suk Kim

  4. Department of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan, 31116, South Korea

    Hyeun Bum Kim

Authors
  1. Se Yeon Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Min Ho Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ji Hwan Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Han Jin Oh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yong Ju Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jae Woo An
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Young Bin Go
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Dong Cheol Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hyun Ah. Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Seung Yeol Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Dong Jun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Mi Suk Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Hyeun Bum Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Jin Ho Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CSY1 and SMH conducted the animal work, laboratory work and wrote most of the manuscript. LJH, OHJ, KYJ, AJW, GYB, SDC, and CHA helped to conduct animal trials and part of the laboratory work and helped to revise the manuscript. CSY3, KDJ, and KMS conducted laboratory work on the functionality of the phytogenic feed additives and manufactured and provided phytogenic feed additives used in this study. KHB and CJH was the principal investigator, oversaw the development of the study, and wrote the last version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hyeun Bum Kim or Jin Ho Cho.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The protocol for this study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea (approval no. CBNUA-1618-21-02).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this study.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, S.Y., Song, M.H., Lee, J.H. et al. Phytogenic feed additives alleviate pathogenic Escherichia coli-induced intestinal damage through improving barrier integrity and inhibiting inflammation in weaned pigs. J Animal Sci Biotechnol 13, 107 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00750-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00750-y

Keywords

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology

ISSN: 2049-1891