Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Neonatal vitamin A injection promotes cattle muscle growth and increases oxidative muscle fibers

Contributed equally
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology20189:82

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-018-0296-3

  • Received: 4 June 2018
  • Accepted: 26 September 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Vitamin A and its metabolite, retinoic acid (RA), are important regulators of cell differentiation and organ morphogenesis. Its impact on beef cattle muscle growth remains undefined.

Method

Angus steer calves were administrated with 0 (control) or 150,000 IU vitamin A (retinyl palmitate in glycerol, i.m.) per calf at birth and 1 month of age. At 2 months of age, a biopsy of the Biceps femoris muscle was obtained to analyze the immediate effects of vitamin A injection on myogenic capacity of muscle cells. The resulting steers were harvested at 14 months of age.

Results

Vitamin A administration increased cattle growth at 2 months. At 2 months of age, Vitamin A increased PAX7 positive satellite cells and the expression of myogenic marker genes including PAX7, MYF5, MYOD and MYOG. Muscle derived mononuclear cells were further isolated and induced myogenesis in vitro. More myotubes and a higher degree of myogenesis was observed in vitamin A groups. Consistently, vitamin A increased Latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle fiber size at harvest. In addition, vitamin A increased the ratio of oxidative type I and type IIA fibers and reduced the glycolic type IIX fibers. Furthermore, we found that RA, a key bioactive metabolite of vitamin A, activated PPARGC1A promoter, which explains the upregulated expression of PPARGC1A in skeletal muscle.

Conclusion

Vitamin A administration to neonatal calves enhanced postnatal muscle growth by promoting myogenesis and increasing satellite cell density, accompanied with a shift to oxidative muscle fibers.

Keywords

  • Cattle
  • Muscle Fiber type
  • Muscle growth
  • Myogenesis
  • PAX7
  • Satellite cells
  • Vitamin A

Background

Muscle growth is due to both formation of muscle fibers and increase in muscle diameters. During embryonic muscle development, mononucleate myoblasts fuse to form primary myotubes [1]. Secondary myotubes form near the midpoint of primary myotubes under the basal lamina, then grow longitudinally, and eventually separate from the primary myotube [2]. It is widely believed that the total number of muscle fibers in a given muscle is fixed at or near birth for mammals [3, 4]. Postnatal muscle growth is achieved mainly by hypertrophy of existing myofibers [5], during which satellite cells proliferate and fuse with existing muscle fibers [6]. Thus, satellite cell abundance in postnatal muscle is closely associated with postnatal skeletal muscle development.

Skeletal muscle is composed of different types of fibers. Type I is a slow-twitch, oxidative fiber. Type IIA is a fast oxidative-glycolytic fiber. Type IIX is a fast-twitch, glycolytic fiber for beef cattle [7, 8]. The muscle fiber-type composition is an important factor in determining meat quality. Glycolytic muscle fibers accumulate greater amount of lactate during the postmortem stage [9], which is negatively associated with water holding capacity [10]. Muscles with high proportion of type IIX fibers had high lactate content and showed low muscle pH45min [11]. Peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator-1 (PGC-1α) is a transcriptional co-activator abundant in skeletal muscle, which activates mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative metabolism [12, 13]. PGC-1α activates calcineurin signaling and drives the formation of type I oxidative fibers [14]. Consistently, Vitamin A promotes mitochondriogenesis during brown/beige adipogenesis via activation of PGC-1α [1517]. RA enhances PGC-1α and mitochondrial function in liver [18]. These data prompted us to further hypothesize that vitamin A promotes the shifting to oxidative muscle fibers in beef cattle. Up to now, the effects of nutrients on muscle fiber type composition in livestock remain poorly studied.

Vitamin A plays critical roles in animal growth and development. As an active metabolite of vitamin A, retinoic acid (RA) serves as a ligand for RA receptors (RAR) which partner with retinoid X receptors (RXR) [19]. The liganded RAR/RXR complex binds to retinoic acid response elements (RAREs) on target genes [20], which regulates gene expression. RA is an important morphogen during embryogenesis [21], which regulates cell differentiation including adipogenesis [22], myogenesis [23] and neurogenesis [24, 25]. Although several studies found that RA activates myogenesis in cultured cells and in rodents [26, 27], the role of vitamin A in muscle growth of beef cattle remain unexamined. Our previously study showed that administration of vitamin A at birth increased weaning weight of beef cattle [28], and the aim of this study was to explore the effects of neonatal vitamin A administration on bovine muscle growth and muscle fiber type composition.

Methods

Animal treatment

Animal studies were conducted at Washington State University Beef Center and Cattle Feeding Laboratory according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). A total of twenty Black Angus steer calves were randomly selected during spring calving from an Angus based population of cows and heifers at the Washington State University Ensminger Beef Center. The calves were randomly separated into three groups injected (i. m.) with 0 (control), 150,000, or 300,000 IU vitamin A (retinyl palmitate in glycerol) at birth and 1 month of age. The detailed experimental design and animal performance data have been reported in another manuscript [28]. To facilitate biochemical analyses, in this study, we analyzed the difference in muscle fiber characteristics and myogenic potential of muscle tissue/cells between control and the 150, 000 IU vitamin A treated group (samples from 9 animals in each treatment were used, n = 9). The calves were weaned at 210 d of age and transported to the feedlot, where they were fed a backgrounding diet (50% steam-rolled corn, 30% grass hay, 15% potato co-products and 5% dry supplement) with free-choice trace mineral salt (98% NaCl, 0.509% Se, 0.006% Co, 0.01% I, 0.035% Cu, 0.20% Fe, 0.18% Mn, 0.037% Mg, 0.35% Zn) for 80 d. Then, cattle were transited to a finisher diet comprised of 59.5% steam rolled corn, 24% potato co-products (20% potato pieces, 4% cooked French fries), 8% grass hay, 5% dry supplement and 3.5% yellow grease. All diets were formulated to meet National Research Council (NRC, 2016) nutrient requirements for beef cattle. Nutrient analysis of the grass hay and final finisher can be found in Table 1, and composition of the dry supplement is listed in Table 2. Diet samples were collected as a weekly composite and analyzed by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR). At 309 d of age, steers were implanted with Component TE-IS with Tylan (Elanco, Greenfield IL). Steers were harvested at the Washington State University Meats Laboratory at an average of 436 d of age. Weaning weight and weight gain during the backgrounding phase were increased by vitamin A injection [28].
Table 1

Nutrient analysis of grass hay and final finisher on DM basis

Component

Grass hay

Final finisher

Crude protein, %

6.4

13.1

Available protein, %

5.8

13.1

ADFa, %

35.2

7.2

aNDFb, %

56.5

11.4

Lignin, %

4.8

2.0

NFCc, %

28.7

63.3

Starch, %

1.1

55.1

Crude fat, %

2.3

6.6

Ash, %

6.08

5.60

TDNd, %

61

85

NEm, Mcal/lb.

0.57

0.98

NEg, Mcal/lb.

0.32

0.67

Ca, %

0.27

P, %

0.11

aADF: Acid detergent fiber

baNDF: Amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber

cNFC: Nonfiber carbohydrates

dTDN: Total digestible nutrients

Table 2

Composition of the dry supplement

Nutrient

Amount (DM)

Crude protein

76.9%

Crude fat (3.5% yellow grease on DM basis)

1.9%

Ca

12.31%

P

1.03%

Na

4.09%

K

0.3%

Mg

2.08%

S

0.24%

Mn

0.0615%

Zn

0.0924%

Cu

0.0308%

Co

0.0026%

I

0.0087%

Se

0.0006–0.0008%

Vitamin A

90,200 IU/kg

Vitamin D

9020 IU/kg

Vitamin E

226 IU/kg

Rumensin H

616 g/t

Tylan H

123 g/t

At 2 months of age, muscle biopsy (about 3 g) was obtained from the Biceps femoris muscle of each calf, as previously described [29]. Each muscle tissue sample was divided into 4 pieces. One piece (> 0.5 g) was put into cold PBS for satellite cell separation, one (> 0.5 g) was snap frozen in liquid nitrogen for RNA and protein extraction, one (> 0.5 g) was processed for cryosection, and the remaining one (> 0.5 g) was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for histological analysis.

Muscle derived mononuclear cell isolation and myogenic differentiation

Biopsy muscle tissues were cut into small pieces and digested in a digestion buffer containing 0.75 IU/mL collagenase D (Roche, Pleasanton, CA) and 1.0 IU/mL Dipase type II (Roche) for 30 min at 37 °C. The lysate was filtered sequentially through 100 and 40 μm cell strainers, then centrifuged for 5 min at 500×g. The precipitated cells were then resuspended and seeded into collagen pre-coated 12-well culture plates at the density of 1 × 105 cells/well. The resulting cells, containing myogenic satellite cells and nonmyogenic stromal vascular cells, were cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS for 2 d to reach 100% confluence. Myogenesis was induced in DMEM with 2% horse serum. The fusion index was calculated as the ratio of the number of nuclei inside myotubes to the number of total nuclei [30]. PBS and DMEM used in this study were supplemented with 100 IU/mL penicillin (Gibco, Grand Island, NY), 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Gibco), and 250 ng/mL Fungizone B (Gibco). After 6 d of differentiation, cells were fixed in cold methanol for 10 min, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 5 min, blocked with 1% BSA, and incubated with primary antibodies (anti-MHC 1:50; anti-desmin 1:100; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City, IA) at 4 °C overnight. Cells were then stained with corresponding secondary antibodies (1:1,000) at room temperature for 1 h, followed by incubation with DAPI for 10 min. Cells were viewed under an EVOS fluorescence microscope (10 images per animal).

Tissue processing and histology

For analyzing muscle fiber structure and size, tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 12 h at 4 °C, embedded in paraffin and sectioned (5 μm thickness). Sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin as previously described [4]. The size and number of muscle fibers (at least 2,000 fibers per animal) were measured (6 images per section and 5 sections at 50 mm intervals per sample) using Image J (NIH).

For immunohistochemical staining, muscle tissues were frozen in isopentane cooled in liquid nitrogen. Frozen tissues were sectioned (10 μm thickness). Tissue sections were blocked with 5% goat serum in TBS containing 0.3% Triton X-100 for 1 h, incubated with anti-Pax7 antibody (1:10, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City, IA) overnight at 4 °C and the corresponding fluorescent secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Sections were then mounted in a fluoroshield mounting medium with DAPI (ab104139, Cambridge, MA) and viewed under an EVOS fluorescence microscope (6 images per section and 3 samples at 100 mm intervals per sample).

Unfixed frozen tissue sections were used for muscle fiber typing by immunostaining of fiber-type specific myosin heavy chains. For type I fibers, BA-F8 (primary, IgG2b, 1:50; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City, IA) and Goat anti-mouse IgG2b Alexa488 (secondary 1:1,000) antibodies were used. For type I and IIa, BF-35 (primary, IgG1, 1:50; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City, IA) and Goat anti-mouse IgG1 Alexa555 (secondary, 1:1,000) antibodies were used.

Plasmid transfection and luciferase

PPARGC1A promoter plasmid (#8887) was purchased from Addgene (Cambridge, MA). The plasmid was delivered to cells using Lipofectamin 3000 Reagent (Cat. No. L3000015, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The cells were treated with 1 μmol/L RA for 4 h and, then, the luciferase activity was measured using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, Cat. No. E1910).

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from muscle tissue samples (0.1 g per steer) or cultured cells (8 × 104 cells) with TRIzol reagent, followed by DNase (NEB, Ipswich, MA) treatment to remove DNA. The cDNA was synthesized using an iScriptTM cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). qRT-PCR was performed using a CFX RT-PCR detection system (Bio-Rad) with a SYBR green RT-PCR kit from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA). Primer sequences are listed in Table 3. The cycling conditions comprised 2 min polymerase activation at 95 °C and 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 30 s. All PCR efficiencies were above 96%. Relative expression of mRNA was determined after normalization to 18S rRNA using the ΔΔ-Ct method. The gene expression was presented as fold changes to that of the control group. The validity of 18S rRNA as a reference gene was further verified using glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and β-catenin [31].
Table 3

Primer sequences used for quantitative RT-PCR analyses

Gene name

Accession no.

Product size, bp

Direction

Sequence (5′→3′)

PAX3

NM_001206818.1

200

Forward

AGTGAGTTCCATCAGCCGCATC

Reverse

TCTTCAGGGGCAAGTCTGGTTC

PAX7

XM_015462509.1

107

Forward

CGGGCATGTTTAGCTGGGAGA

Reverse

TCTGAGCACTCGGCTAATCGAAC

MYOD

NM_001040478.2

111

Forward

GAACTGCTACGACCGCACTTACT

Reverse

GAGATGCGCTCCACGATGCT

MYF5

XM_015470879.1

93

Forward

CCCACCAGCCCCACCTCAAGT

Reverse

GTAGACGCTGTCAAAACTGCTGCT

MYOG

NM_001111325.1

131

Forward

CTCAACCAGGAGGAGCGCGAC

Reverse

TTGGGGCCAAACTCCAGTGCG

18S

NR_036642.1

118

Forward

CCTGCGGCTTAATTTGACTC

Reverse

AACTAAGAACGGCCATGCAC

PGC1A

NM_177945.3

200

Forward

TGATTAGTTGAGCCCTTGCCG

Reverse

TGCCAGGAGTTTGGTTGTGAT

Western blot analysis

Proteins were extracted from muscle tissue using lysis buffer (1% SDS, 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 10 mmol/L NaCl, 3 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.5% NP-40, and 10 mmol/L NaF). Western blotting was performed as previously described [32]. The protein bands were visualized using the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE). The primary antibodies used were myogenin (F5D, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City, IA) and β-tubulin 90 (#2146, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA). Protein band density was quantified and normalized to β-tubulin content.

Statistical analysis

Unpaired t-test was performed to analyze the difference in means. All data were found to be normally distributed. Significance was accepted at P < 0.05. All data are expressed as means ± standard errors of the mean (SEM).

Results

Vitamin A administration upregulates the expression of myogenic genes

Our previously study showed that vitamin A administration at birth strongly increased beef cattle growth [28], which was mostly likely through promoting muscle growth because muscle accounts close to 50% of body weight and the hip length was not affected (data not shown). To explore the effects of vitamin A administration on myogenesis, we analyzed the expression of myogenic genes in muscle biopsy tissue obtained at 2 months of age. The expression of myogenic transcription factors including PAX3, PAX7, MYF5, MYOD and MYOG was enhanced due to vitamin A treatment (Fig. 1a). Consistently, vitamin A significantly increased MYOG protein content (Fig. 1b and c). These data demonstrated that vitamin A promoted myogenesis in calf muscle.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Vitamin A administration upregulates the expression of myogenic genes. a The level of myogenic mRNAs in muscle biopsy. b Protein content of MYOG in muscle biopsy. c Quantification of MYOG protein. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; Mean ± SEM; n = 9

Vitamin A injection increases density of satellite cells

Using immunohistochemical staining of the muscle biopsy of 2-month old calves, we found that vitamin A injection increased PAX7+ satellite cells (Fig. 2a and b). In addition, we further separated muscle derived mononuclear cells which contain both myogenic satellite cells and nonmyogenic stromal vascular cells [30]. These cells were stained with the myogenic specific marker desmin immediately after the cells attached to the plates. Desmin staining was higher in mononuclear cells separated from vitamin A treated muscle biopsy (Fig. 3a and b). After 2 d of myogenic differentiation, the mRNA expression of MYF5, MYOD and MYOG was higher in the vitamin A group (Fig. 3c). After 6 d, cells were stained for the presence of terminal myogenic differentiation marker, myosin heavy chain (MHC), which expresses in fused myotubes. More myotubes were observed in the vitamin A group (fusion index, Fig. 3d and e), which were consistent with the higher myogenic population in mononuclear cells of vitamin A treated calves (Fig. 2a-b and Fig. 3a-b). Such enhanced myogenesis was associated with a higher population of satellite cells, as shown by increased PAX7 and desmin positive cells.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Satellite cell density is increased due to vitamin A injection. a Muscle biopsy stained by PAX7 (scale bar = 100 μm). b Quantification of PAX7+ cells in muscle biopsy. *P < 0.05; Mean ± SEM; n = 9

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Myogenic differentiation of isolated mononuclear cells is increased in vitamin A treated calves. a Mononuclear cells isolated from muscle biopsy were stained with anti-Desmin antibody. b Quantification of Desmin positive cell number. c The level of myogenic mRNAs after 2 d of myogenesis. d Bright field pictures of cells before inducing myogenic differentiation (scale bar = 100 μm) and immunofluorescence staining of myotubes using anti-MHC antibody after 6 d of myogenic differentiation. e Fusion index. ***P < 0.001; Mean ± SEM; n = 9; scale bar = 100 μm

Effects of neonatal vitamin A administration on beef cattle muscle size

Consistent with the upregulation of myogenic genes and increased satellite cell density in biopsy samples of vitamin A treated calves, the average size of muscle fiber in vitamin A treated cattle at harvest was larger (Fig. 4a-c). In agreement, the REA was also higher (P = 0.069) in vitamin A treated cattle (Fig. 4d).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Muscle fiber diameter and distribution of calves were altered due to vitamin A treatment. a H&E stained LD muscle at harvest (scale bar = 100 μm). b Distribution of fiber diameter of LD muscle at harvest. c Average LD muscle fiber diameter at harvest. d Average REA at harvest. *P < 0.05; Mean ± SEM, n = 9

Vitamin A injection increases oxidative muscle fibers

We further determined the composition of muscle fiber types in biopsy muscle by immunohistochemical staining. Vitamin A injection increased the portion of type I and type IIa oxidative muscle fibers, but reduced that of type IIX glycolytic muscle fibers in 2-month biopsy muscle (Fig. 5a and b). Consistently, vitamin A administration increased the portion of type I and type IIa oxidative muscle fibers, but reduced that of the type IIX glycolytic muscle fibers in LD muscle at harvest (Fig. 5c and d). We furtherly found that vitamin A injection upregulated the expression of PPARGC1A (Fig. 5e), a transcription factor that drives the formation of oxidative muscle fibers [14]. Consistently, the metabolite of vitamin A, all-trans RA, activated PPARGC1A promoter and promoted its transcription in cultured primary myogenic cells (Fig. 5f). There data showed that vitamin A administration increased oxidative muscle fibers which is likely through upregulation of PPARGC1A by RA.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Vitamin A treatment increased oxidative muscle fibers. a Representative images showing fiber types in biopsy muscle (scale bar = 100 μm). b The proportion of fiber type composition in biopsy muscle. c Representative images showing fiber types in LD muscle at harvest. d The proportion of fiber type composition in LD muscle at harvest. e mRNA levels of PPARGC1A in biopsy muscle. f Mononuclear cells isolated from cattle muscle without vitamin A treatment were transfected with Pgc1a plasmid and treated with RA for 4 h, and the luciferase activity driven by the Pgc1a promoter was analyzed. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001; Mean ± SEM; n = 9

Discussion

Beef cattle and other meat animals are raised primarily for their muscle and, thus, enhancing muscle growth is critical for improving production efficiency. Muscle growth is due to both myofiber hyperplasia and hypertrophy. The number of muscle fibers is determined primarily before birth in livestock species [3335]. During fetal development, muscle fibers are formed through primary and secondary myogenesis. A portion of myogenic cells become quiescent and form the stem cell pool for later myogenesis; these stem cells are termed satellite cells [36]. During rapid muscle growth and under injury postnatally, satellite cells are activated and proliferated; a portion of daughter cells replenish the stem cell pool while the majority fuse with existing muscle fibers to increase muscle fiber sizes or generate new muscle fibers to replace damaged fibers [37].

RA is an important morphogen during embryonic and fetal development [21]. Dietary vitamin A is converted into RA, which serves as a ligand for RAR [19], and form a complex with RXR to bind to RAR response elements (RAREs) on target genes [20]. Two cellular retinoic acid binding proteins regulate RA partitioning, with cellular RA binding protein II (CRABP-II) delivers RA to RARs, and fatty acid binding protein type 5 (FABP5) to PPARβ/δ [3840], generating different biological effects [41]. A large number of studies have been conducted on the role of RA in lipid metabolism in beef cattle [4249]. In comparison, the role of vitamin A in muscle growth has only been sparsely studied. To the knowledge of authors, no study was conducted on the role of RA in myogenesis in beef cattle. Based on studies on other species, RA plays an important role in myogenic lineage commitment through binding to RXR [50, 51]. RA blocks chondrogenesis and stimulates myogenesis of limb bud mesenchymal cells [52]. RA promotes in vitro formation of pre-myogenic mesoderm and upregulates myogenic precursor genes [53]. RA is required not only for the myogenic precursor cell commitment but also for the later myogenic differentiation. RA signaling maintains Pax3 and Meox2 in the progenitor and Myf5 and MyoD in the differentiating myoblasts [54]. In the early stage of limb bud development, RA recruits muscle progenitor cells into the limb [54]. RA promotes myogenesis by antagonizing TGFβ signaling via inhibiting C/EBPβ [55] as well as activating FGF8 signaling [26].

In agreement with enhanced myogenesis, in the current study, we found that neonatal vitamin A injection increased the population of satellite cells. Satellite cell proliferation and fusion with existing muscle fibers are critical for postnatal growth of meat animals [56]. The increased satellite cells due to vitamin A administration at the early stage contributed to muscle growth later. Consistently, the average size of muscle fibers was higher in vitamin A treated cattle compared to control cattle. In addition, the REA was larger (P = 0.069) in treated cattle, showing the long-term effect of early vitamin A treatment in the muscle growth of beef cattle. The increased muscle growth also explained the increase in body weight observed in the previous study [28], where vitamin A administration significantly increased body weight without influencing bone growth, suggesting an increase in muscle mass.

Muscle fiber type composition affects the quality of meat [57]. PPARGC1A signaling plays an important role in the development of oxidative muscle fibers via regulating mitochondrial functional capacity and cellular energy metabolism [58, 59]. Forced overexpression of PPARGC1A in skeletal muscle increases oxidative type IIA and type I fibers [14]. On the contrary, muscle specific PPARGC1A knock out mice exhibited a shift from type IIA and type I toward type IIB and IIX muscle fibers [60]. PPARGC1A is inducible in response to increased mitochondrial energy demand in different physiologic conditions, such as exercise [61, 62] and fasting [63]. PPARGC1A mediates exercise induced adaptation of muscle fibers [62, 64]. In skeletal muscle, PPARGC1A is found to be activated by AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), a key regulator of cellular energy homeostasis [65]. RA increased PPARGC1A expression in brown adipocytes [66]. Consistently, we found that RA upregulated PPARGC1A by directly activating its promoter, which in turn increased oxidative muscle fibers. Our data are in agreement with a previous report in mice where RA was found to stimulate oxidative capacity of muscle via activation of PPARGC1A [67]. In summary, vitamin A administration increased the proportion of oxidative muscle fibers and slightly reduced that of glycolytic muscle fibers. The slight change in muscle fiber composition due to vitamin A treatment in calves might improve the water holding capacity of beef through reducing postmortem glycolysis and thus the ultimate pH of beef. Also, oxidative muscle fibers are associated with higher amounts of intramuscular fat and intramyocellular lipids, which may also improve beef quality.

Conclusion

Vitamin A administration to neonatal calves increased muscle growth, which is associated with enhanced satellite cell activation. In addition, vitamin A treatment during the early stage had long-term effect on muscle fiber type composition in beef cattle by shifting to oxidative fiber types. Thus, to obtain optimal growth performance, the vitamin A levels in beef cattle need to be carefully managed.

Notes

Abbreviations

LD: 

latissimus dorsi

MHC: 

myosin heavy chain

MYOD: 

myogenic differentiation 1

MYOG: 

myogenin

NIR: 

near-infrared spectroscopy

PAX7: 

paired box 7

PFA: 

paraformaldehyde

PPARGC1A: 

PPARG coactivator 1 alpha

RA: 

retinoic acid

REA: 

rib eye area

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Dr. R. L. Stuart (Stuart Products, Bedford, TX 76022) donated injectable vitamin A for this study, and Mrs. Corrine Harris for assistance in the cattle management and collection of muscle samples.

Funding

This project was supported by Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grants No. 2015–67015-23219 and 2016–68006-24634 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets and materials are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

BW, WN, XF, and YM conducted the experiments. BW wrote the manuscript. JMD provided assistance in cattle management and related analyses. MLN and MD designed the study and revised the manuscript. JRB carried out meat quality analyses and participated in experimental design. MM and SMP took charge of artificial insemination and muscle biopsy respectively. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval

Animal use protocol of this project was approved by Washington State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Animal Subjects Protocol #04354).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State Key Lab of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, People’s Republic of China
(2)
Department of Animal Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA
(3)
Department of Animal Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
(4)
College of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, 730070, Gansu, People’s Republic of China
(5)
School of Food Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA
(6)
College of Veterinary Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA

References

  1. Dennis MJ, Ziskind-Conhaim L, Harris AJ. Development of neuromuscular junctions in rat embryos. Dev Biol. 1981;81:266–79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ross JJ, Duxson MJ, Harris AJ. Formation of primary and secondary myotubes in rat lumbrical muscles. Development. 1987;100:383–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Yan X, Zhu MJ, Dodson MV. Du M. developmental programming of fetal skeletal muscle and adipose tissue development. J Genomics. 2013;1:29–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Zhu MJ, Ford SP, Nathanielsz PW, Du M. Effect of maternal nutrient restriction in sheep on the development of fetal skeletal muscle. Biol Reprod. 2004;71:1968–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Ontell M, Feng KC, Klueber K, Dunn RF, Taylor F. Myosatellite cells, growth, and regeneration in murine dystrophic muscle: a quantitative study. Anat Rec. 1984;208:159–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. White RB, Bierinx AS, Gnocchi VF, Zammit PS. Dynamics of muscle fibre growth during postnatal mouse development. BMC Dev Biol. 2010;10:21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Brooke MH, Kaiser KK. Muscle fiber types: how many and what kind? Arch Neurol. 1970;23:369–79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Peter JB, Barnard RJ, Edgerton VR, Gillespie CA, Stempel KE. Metabolic profiles of three fiber types of skeletal muscle in Guinea pigs and rabbits. Biochemistry. 1972;11:2627–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Poso AR, Puolanne E. Carbohydrate metabolism in meat animals. Meat Sci. 2005;70:423–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Larzul C, Lefaucheur L, Ecolan P, Gogue J, Talmant A, Sellier P, et al. Phenotypic and genetic parameters for longissimus muscle fiber characteristics in relation to growth, carcass, and meat quality traits in large white pigs. J Anim Sci. 1997;75:3126–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Choe J, Choi Y, Lee S, Shin H, Ryu Y, Hong KC. Etal. The relation between glycogen, lactate content and muscle fiber type composition, and their influence on postmortem glycolytic rate and pork quality. Meat Sci. 2008;80:355–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Wu Z, Puigserver P, Andersson U, Zhang C, Adelmant G, Mootha V, et al. Mechanisms controlling mitochondrial biogenesis and respiration through the thermogenic coactivator PGC-1. Cell. 1999;98:115–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Vega RB, Huss JM, Kelly DP. The coactivator PGC-1 cooperates with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α in transcriptional control of nuclear genes encoding mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation enzymes. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:1868–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Lin J, Wu H, Tarr PT, Zhang CY, Wu Z, Boss O, et al. Transcriptional co-activator PGC-1 alpha drives the formation of slow-twitch muscle fibres. Nature. 2002;418:797–801.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Wang B, Fu X, Liang X, Wang Z, Yang Q, Zou T, et al. Maternal retinoids increase PDGFRalpha+ progenitor population and beige adipogenesis in progeny by stimulating vascular development. EBioMedicine. 2017;18:288–99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Mercader J, Ribot J, Murano I, Felipe F, Cinti S, Bonet ML, et al. Remodeling of white adipose tissue after retinoic acid administration in mice. Endocrinology. 2006;147:5325–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Harms M, Seale P. Brown and beige fat: development. function and therapeutic potential Nat Med. 2013;19:1252–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Tripathy S, Chapman JD, Han CY, Hogarth CA, Arnold SL, Onken J, et al. All-trans-retinoic acid enhances mitochondrial function in models of human liver. Mol Pharmacol. 2016;89:560–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Chawla A, Repa JJ, Evans RM, Mangelsdorf DJ. Nuclear receptors and lipid physiology: opening the X-files. Science. 2001;294:1866–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. de The H, Vivanco-Ruiz MM, Tiollais P, Stunnenberg H, Dejean A. Identification of a retinoic acid responsive element in the retinoic acid receptor beta gene. Nature 1990;343:177-180.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Duester G. Retinoic acid synthesis and signaling during early organogenesis. Cell. 2008.Google Scholar
  22. Schwarz EJ, Reginato MJ, Shao D, Krakow SL, Lazar MA. Retinoic acid blocks adipogenesis by inhibiting C/EBPbeta-mediated transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17:1552–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Ryan T, Liu J, Chu A, Wang L, Blais A, Skerjanc IS. Retinoic acid enhances skeletal myogenesis in human embryonic stem cells by expanding the premyogenic progenitor population. Stem Cell Rev. 2012;8:482–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Yu S, Levi L, Siegel R, Noy N. Retinoic acid induces neurogenesis by activating both retinoic acid receptors (RARs) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta/delta (PPARbeta/delta). J Biol Chem. 2012;287:42195–205.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Sartore RC, Campos PB, Trujillo CA, Ramalho BL, Negraes PD, Paulsen BS, et al. Retinoic acid-treated pluripotent stem cells undergoing neurogenesis present increased aneuploidy and micronuclei formation. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20667.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Hamade A, Deries M, Begemann G, Bally-Cuif L, Genêt C, Sabatier F, et al. Retinoic acid activates myogenesis in vivo through Fgf8 signalling. Dev Biol. 2006;289:127–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhu GH, Huang J, Bi Y, Su Y, Tang Y, He BC, et al. Activation of RXR and RAR signaling promotes myogenic differentiation of myoblastic C2C12 cells. Differentiation. 2009;78:195–204.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Harris CL, Wang B, Deavila JM, Busboom JR, Maquivar M, Parish SM, et al. Vitamin a administration at birth promotes calf growth and marbling fat development in Angus beef cattle. Journal of animal science and biotechnology. 2018; In press.Google Scholar
  29. Wei S, Fu X, Liang X, Zhu M, Jiang Z, Parish S, et al. Enhanced mitogenesis in stromal vascular cells derived from subcutaneous adipose tissue of wagyu compared with those of Angus cattle. J Anim Sci. 2015;93:1015–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Fu X, Zhu M, Zhang S, Foretz M, Viollet B. Du M. obesity impairs skeletal muscle regeneration through inhibition of AMPK. Diabetes. 2016;65:188–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wei S, Fu X, Liang X, Zhu MJ, Jiang Z, Parish SM, et al. Enhanced mitogenesis in stromal vascular cells derived from subcutaneous adipose tissue of wagyu compared with those of Angus cattle. J Anim Sci. 2015;93:1015–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang B, Yang G, Liang X, Zhu M. Du M. grape seed extract prevents skeletal muscle wasting in interleukin 10 knockout mice. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;14:162.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Du M, Tong J, Zhao J, Underwood KR, Zhu M, Ford SP. Etal. Fetal programming of skeletal muscle development in ruminant animals. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:E51–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Wegner J, Albrecht E, Fiedler I, Teuscher F, Papstein HJ, Ender K. Growth-and breed-related changes of muscle fiber characteristics in cattle. J Anim Sci. 2000;78:1485–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Albrecht E, Teuscher F, Ender K, Wegner J. Growth-and breed-related changes of muscle bundle structure in cattle. J Anim Sci. 2006;84:2959–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Kuang S, Kuroda K, Le Grand F, Rudnicki MA. Asymmetric self-renewal and commitment of satellite stem cells in muscle. Cell. 2007;129:999–1010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Yin H, Price F, Rudnicki MA. Satellite cells and the muscle stem cell niche. Physiol Rev. 2013;93:23–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Berry DC, Soltanian H, Noy N. Repression of cellular retinoic acid-binding protein II during adipocyte differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:15324–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Budhu AS, Noy N. Direct channeling of retinoic acid between cellular retinoic acid-binding protein II and retinoic acid receptor sensitizes mammary carcinoma cells to retinoic acid-induced growth arrest. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:2632–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Schug TT, Berry DC, Shaw NS, Travis SN, Noy N. Opposing effects of retinoic acid on cell growth result from alternate activation of two different nuclear receptors. Cell. 2007;129:723–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang B, Yang Q, Harris CL, Nelson ML, Busboom JR, Zhu MJ, et al. Nutrigenomic regulation of adipose tissue development -role of retinoic acid: a review. Meat Sci. 2016;120:100–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Ward AK, McKinnon JJ, Hendrick S, Buchanan FC. The impact of vitamin a restriction and ADH1C genotype on marbling in feedlot steers. J Anim Sci. 2012;90:2476–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Pickworth CL, Loerch SC, Fluharty FL. Effects of timing and duration of dietary vitamin a reduction on carcass quality of finishing beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 2012;90:2677–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith SB, Kawachi H, Choi CB, Choi CW, Wu G, Sawyer JE. Cellular regulation of bovine intramuscular adipose tissue development and composition. J Anim Sci. 2009;87:E72–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Arnett AM, Dikeman ME, Daniel MJ, Olson KC, Jaeger J, Perrett J. Effects of vitamin a supplementation and weaning age on serum and liver retinol concentrations, carcass traits, and lipid composition in market beef cattle. Meat Sci. 2009;81:596–606.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Bryant TC, Wagner JJ, Tatum JD, Galyean ML, Anthony RV, Engle TE. Effect of dietary supplemental vitamin a concentration on performance, carcass merit, serum metabolites, and lipogenic enzyme activity in yearling beef steers. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:1463–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Gorocica-Buenfil MA, Fluharty FL, Loerch SC. Effect of vitamin Arestriction on carcass characteristics and immune status of beef steers. J Anim Sci. 2008;86:1609–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Gorocica-Buenfil MA, Fluharty FL, Bohn T, Schwartz SJ, Loerch SC. Effect of low vitamin a diets with high-moisture or dry corn on marbling and adipose tissue fatty acid composition of beef steers. J Anim Sci. 2007;85:3355–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Gorocica-Buenfil MA, Fluharty FL, Reynolds CK, Loerch SC. Effect of dietary vitamin a restriction on marbling and conjugated linoleic acid content in Holstein steers. J Anim Sci. 2007;85:2243–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Bouchard F, Paquin J. Differential effects of retinoids and inhibitors of ERK and p38 signaling on adipogenic and myogenic differentiation of P19 stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2013;22:2003–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. May M, Mach H, Lacroix N, Hou C, Chen J, Li Q. Contribution of retinoid X receptor signaling to the specification of skeletal muscle lineage. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:26806–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Pacifici M, Cossu G, Molinaro M, Tato F. Vitamin a inhibits chondrogenesis but not myogenesis. Experimental cellresearch. 1980;129:469–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Wong J, Mehta V, Voronova A, Coutu J, Ryan T, Shelton M, et al. Beta-catenin is essential for efficient in vitro Premyogenic mesoderm formation but can be partially compensated by retinoic acid Signalling. PLoS One. 2013;8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Reijntjes S, Francis-West P, Mankoo BS. Retinoic acid is both necessary for and inhibits myogenic commitment and differentiation in the chick limb. Int J Dev Biol 2010;54:125-134.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Lamarche E, Lala-Tabbert N, Gunanayagam A, St-Louis C, Wiper-Bergeron N. Retinoic acid promotes myogenesis in myoblasts by antagonizing transforming growth factor-beta signaling via C/EBP beta. Skelet Muscle. 2015;5(8).Google Scholar
  56. Dayton WR, White ME. Cellular and molecular regulation of muscle growth and development in meat animals. J Anim Sci. 2008;86:E217–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Seideman SC, Crouse JD. The effects of sex condition, genotype and diet on bovine muscle fiber characteristics. Meat Sci. 1986;17(1):55–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Finck BN, Kelly DP. PGC-1 coactivators: inducible regulators of energy metabolism in health and disease. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(3):615–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Zechner C, et al. Total skeletal muscle PGC-1 deficiency uncouples mitochondrial derangements from fiber type determination and insulin sensitivity. Cell Metab. 2010;12(6):633–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Handschin C, Chin S, Li P, Liu F, Maratos-Flier E, LeBrasseur NK, et al. Skeletal muscle fiber-type switching, exercise intolerance, and myopathy in PGC-1α muscle-specific knock-out animals. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:30014–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Terada S, Goto M, Kato M, Kawanaka K, Shimokawa T, Tabata I. Effects of low-intensity prolonged exercise on PGC-1 mRNA expression in rat epitrochlearis muscle. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;296:350–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Baar K, Wende AR, Jones TE,Marison M, Nolte LA, Chen M, et al. Adaptations of skeletal muscle to exercise: rapid increase in the transcriptional coactivator PGC-1. FASEB J 2002;16:1879-1886.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Rhee J, Inoue Y, Yoon JC, Puigserver P, Fan M, Gonzalez FJ, et al. Regulation of hepaticfasting response by PPARgamma coactivator-1alpha (PGC-1): requirement for hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha in gluconeogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:4012–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Handschin C, Spiegelman BM. The role of exercise and PGC1α in inflammation and chronic disease. Nature. 2008;454:463–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Shan T, Liang X, Bi P, Kuang S. Myostatin knockout drives browning of white adipose tissue through activating the AMPK-PGC1α-Fndc5 pathway in muscle. FASEB J. 2013;27:1981–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Puigserver P, Wu Z, ParkCW GR, Wright M. Spiegelman BM. A cold-inducible coactivator of nuclear receptors linked to adaptive thermogenesis. Cell. 1998;92:829–39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Amengual J, Ribot J, BonetML, Palou a. retinoic acid treatment increases lipid oxidation capacity in skeletal muscle of mice. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008;16(3):585–591.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement