Open Access

Impacts of prenatal nutrition on animal production and performance: a focus on growth and metabolic and endocrine function in sheep

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology20178:75

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-017-0205-1

Received: 18 March 2017

Accepted: 17 August 2017

Published: 1 September 2017

Abstract

The concept of foetal programming (FP) originated from human epidemiological studies, where foetal life nutrition was linked to health and disease status later in life. Since the proposal of this phenomenon, it has been evaluated in various animal models to gain further insights into the mechanisms underlying the foetal origins of health and disease in humans. In FP research, the sheep has been quite extensively used as a model for humans. In this paper we will review findings mainly from our Copenhagen sheep model, on the implications of late gestation malnutrition for growth, development, and metabolic and endocrine functions later in life, and discuss how these implications may depend on the diet fed to the animal in early postnatal life. Our results have indicated that negative implications of foetal malnutrition, both as a result of overnutrition and, particularly, late gestation undernutrition, can impair a wide range of endocrine functions regulating growth and presumably also reproductive traits. These implications are not readily observable early in postnatal life, but are increasingly manifested as the animal approaches adulthood. No intervention or cure is known that can reverse this programming in postnatal life. Our findings suggest that close to normal growth and slaughter results can be obtained at least until puberty in animals which have undergone adverse programming in foetal life, but manifestation of programming effects becomes increasingly evident in adult animals. Due to the risk of transfer of the adverse programming effects to future generations, it is therefore recommended that animals that are suspected to have undergone adverse FP are not used for reproduction. Unfortunately, no reliable biomarkers have as yet been identified that allow accurate identification of adversely programmed offspring at birth, except for very low or high birth weights, and, in pigs, characteristic changes in head shape (dolphin head). Future efforts should be therefore dedicated to identify reliable biomarkers and evaluate their effectiveness for alleviation/reversal of the adverse programming in postnatal life. Our sheep studies have shown that the adverse impacts of an extreme, high-fat diet in early postnatal life, but not prenatal undernutrition, can be largely reversed by dietary correction later in life. Thus, birth (at term) appears to be a critical set point for permanent programming in animals born precocial, such as sheep. Appropriate attention to the nutrition of the late pregnant dam should therefore be a priority in animal production systems.

Keywords

Adipose tissue Endocrine function Foetal programming Metabolic function Sheep

Background

The term ‘foetal metabolic programming’ was defined in the early 1990s as a phenomenon linking long-term adverse health consequences in animal species with adverse nutritional exposures in utero [1, 2]. In the past, foetal programming (FP) and its long-term impacts have been evaluated particularly from a human health and disease perspective [3, 4], and such studies have revealed that FP has implications for a wide range of body functions, which are also key determinants of animal productivity. However, knowledge about the potential long-term implications of FP for animal productivity is still scare. Such knowledge is needed in order to assign the best management strategies (postnatal feeding, culling, etc.) to minimize implications of adverse FP for animal productivity and avoid possible trans-generational transfer of undesirable FP outcomes. In this review we will primarily focus on what has been found in sheep, where the long-term implications of foetal life malnutrition for development and metabolic and endocrine functions later in life have been extensively studied. Furthermore, we will also evaluate to what extent the diet fed in postnatal life can influence the phenotypic manifestation of the prenatal FP. In this regards, observations from other species will only be included where appropriate.

Animal experimental approaches to the study of foetal programming

In the past, early nutritional programming has mostly been investigated in rodent models with a focus on the long-term implications for health and disease risk in humans. However, FP is one of the rare areas of research where sheep has also been used quite extensively as a model for humans [510] due to the similarities in the foetal developmental trajectory and physiological maturity at birth. Pig is another farm animal commonly used as a model for humans studies regarding FP [11], but the pig is born less physiologically mature than humans and ruminant offspring. Less frequently, non-human primates [12] have been used.

We developed the Copenhagen sheep model [9, 10] to be able to study the long-term impacts of foetal over- and undernutrition in late gestation, and further to study how postnatal manifestations of FP are affected by the diet received in early postnatal life. In the studies based on this model, twin-pregnant ewes were exposed to adequate nutrition (NORM; 100% of Danish daily energy and protein requirements), undernutrition (LOW; 50% of NORM for energy and protein requirements) or overnutrition (HIGH; 150% of energy and 110% of protein requirements) during the last 6 wk of pregnancy (term ~147 d). When the twin lambs were born, they received colostrum within 3 h of birth, and suckled their dams at will for the first 3 days after parturition. Thereafter, the dam was removed and the lambs artificially reared until 6 mo of age (after puberty) on two different diets: one lamb from each twin pair received a moderate, conventional diet (CONV, consisting of good quality hay sufficient to achieve moderate growth rates of 225 g/d with a milk replacer until 8 wk of age), whereas the other lamb received an energy dense, high-starch-high-fat diet (HCHF, consisting of rolled maize and a dairy cream-milk replacer mix (1:1) fed ad libitum up to a maximum daily intake of 1 kg and 2.5 kg, respectively) (Fig. 1). From 6 mo of age until adulthood at 2–2.5 yr of age, all sheep were fed the same moderate grass/hay based diet. To minimize the potential paternal impacts in regards to foetal programming of maternal nutrition, rams used for mating the ewes prior to an exposure to prenatal nutritional treatments were of the same breed and similar ages and body weights and they were reared under similar management conditions. With this experimental design, it was possible to evaluate whether long-term adverse outcomes of foetal malnutrition and excessive fat deposition in early postnatal life can be reversed by nutritional intervention later in life. Details of the type of feeds used and the nutritional composition of the experimental diets are shown in Table 1.
Fig. 1

The experimental design of the Copenhagen sheep model showing different nutritional and dietary interventions during late gestation and early postnatal life in sheep (obtained from Khanal et al., 2014 [10]). Late gestational nutrition groups: HIGH, fulfilling 150% of Danish requirements for energy and 110% of requirements for protein; LOW, fulfilling only 50% of requirements for energy and protein; NORM; fulfilling 100% requirements for energy and protein. Early postnatal (from 3 d after birth until 6 mo of age) nutrition groups: one lamb from each twin pair was allocated to a HCHF diet (high-starch-high fat consisting of a milk replacer-dairy cream mix supplemented with rolled maize), and the other was fed a CONV (conventional/moderate, hay-based diet; growth rate of appr. 225 g/d) diet

Table 1

Different types of experimental feeds and their chemical composition and energy content

Feeds

DM, %

Ash, % of DM

aNDF, % of DM

ADF, % of DM

ADL, % of DM

CP, % of DM

Cfat, % of DM

DE, MJ/ kg DM

Sheep diet during late gestation

 Hay

91.4

5.6

47.7

27

3.1

20.8

4.8

13.7

 Barley

89.0

2.3

14

6

1.1

12.5

3.1

17.1

 Concentrate

87.7

7.7

25.8

18

2.8

15.3

3.8

12.8

Lamb diet during early postnatal life until puberty

 Hay

93.1

6.8

50.4

32.3

3.5

19.1

3.7

13.5

 Maize

89.5

0.6

4.1

<5

0.9

8.5

1.9

16.3

 Milk powder

95.6

7.1

-

-

-

22.5

23.6

19.2

 Cream

42.9

0.8

-

-

-

4.3

38.0

30.5

These are the types of feeds used in diets for experimental animals in the Copenhagen sheep model; the table was obtained from Khanal et al., 2014 [10] with modifications. DM, dry matter; aNDF, amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; ADL, acid detergent lignin; CP, crude protein; Cfat, crude fat; DE, digestible energy

It should be noted that we characterized the long-term consequences of pre- and postnatal nutrition mismatch scenarios in a ruminant animal species without disrupting rumen fermentation or compromising animal health. Nutritional manipulations in our experiments were done during the late gestation period (third trimester), which is the period of extensive quantitative foetal growth [13] where many endocrine organs and tissues are matured, including adipose tissues [14]. Although nutritional insults during all stages of gestation can influence body functions of the offspring later in life [5, 15, 16], late gestation is the time window, where FP is most likely to occur in precocial farm animal species given birth to multiple offspring, such as sheep, due to the dramatic rise in nutrient requirements for the foetuses in late gestation [13, 17]. Although our studies were designed from a human health perspective, the results obtained allow us to evaluate how programming outcomes may affect both animal growth and metabolic and endocrine functions of importance for animal productivity, including the timing of manifestations. Such knowledge can help to refine nutritional strategies applied in livestock production [18].

Impacts of maternal malnutrition on postnatal growth and organ and tissue development and function in growing animals

Growth characteristics

Historically, birth weight has been used as a marker to identify individuals at risk of having undergone adverse FP [19]. Birth weight is in itself a poor indicator of nutritional programming, since it provides little information about body composition, adiposity and potentially altered body functions. Moreover, nutritional insults interfering with foetal growth during the earlier stages of gestation may not be reflected in changes in birth weight if catch-up growth occurs during later stages of gestation [6, 20]. However, it has been shown in several studies that undernutrition in late gestation can result in animals being born small for gestational age. In sheep, birth weights have been reduced in different experiments by 10–18% under controlled conditions, when dams were fed only 50–70% of their daily energy requirements during late gestation (see e.g. [9, 21]), and in goats kid birth weight was reduced by ~10% when dams were exposed to poor grazing conditions during the last 4 wk pre-partum [22]. Lower birth weight has in different studies been associated with reduced survival rate [23], poorer growth rate during the suckling period and 24% lower weaning weight at 14 wk of age in sheep [21]. These findings may partly be explained by poorer mammary development of dams malnourished in late gestation [24], leading to a reduction in colostrum and early lactation milk production [9, 25, 26]. However, in other studies in sheep where the dietary intake of offspring was controlled after birth (artificial rearing), the postnatal growth appeared to be entirely determined by the postnatal and not the prenatal level of nutrition [9, 10, 27, 28]. However, postnatal growth does appear to terminate earlier in individuals with a history of late gestation undernutrition, resulting in smaller adult body size [27]. In cattle, low birth weight (28.6 vs. 38.3 kg) or slow growth till weaning led to lowered body (56 or 46 kg less, respectively) and carcass weights (32 or 40 kg less, respectively) at slaughter at 30 mo of age [29]. Thus, proper attention should be given to ewe nutrition in the late gestational period to ensure not only optimal foetal growth, but also a desired level of colostrum and milk production. It may therefore be beneficial to consider supplementary milk feeding after birth in suckling individuals which were exposed to prenatal undernourishment to improve their postnatal immunization and growth performance.

Skeletal muscle development and function

Proper growth of skeletal muscle and lean carcass mass in slaughter animals are important production traits for the livestock industry. Muscle fibre formation commences during the embryonic stage and, in animal species born precocial, the formation of secondary muscle fibers is concluded during mid-gestation [30]. Thus, in sheep, and other animals born precocial, conclusion of myotube formation and establishment of the final number of muscle fibres occurs prior to the onset of the third trimester [14, 31]. In other farm animal species, myogenesis may occur over a larger part of gestation, for example in pigs, where muscle fibre hyperplasia is not concluded until 95 d of the 114-d gestation period [32]. It must be anticipated, therefore, that foetal myofibre formation in such species may be affected by adverse nutritional insults during a greater part of the gestation. In ruminant animals, foetal undernutrition during the first part of gestation, when myogenesis takes place, has been shown to reduce the formation and number of secondary muscle fibres [15, 31]. In lambs exposed to undernutrition from 28 to 78 d of gestation, the reduced number of total secondary myofibers was reconizable at 8 mo of age [15], and in another study it was shown that undernutrition from 30 to 70 d of gestation altered muscle characteristics (fewer fast fibres and more slow fibres in the longissimus and vastus lateralis muscles) in new-born lambs [33]. In cows, improving the nutritional status of pregnant cows (improved pasture conditions) during mid to mid-late gestation (120–150 through 180–210 d of gestation; term ~280 d) improved carcass characteristics (tenderness) and also increased live and hot carcass weight in steers [34].

In contrast, exposure to malnutrition after myofibre formation has been completed does not appear to have major implications for muscle development and function postnatally. Thus, nutrient restriction (to 50% of daily requirements) between 85 and 115 d of gestation decreased muscle weight in lambs without affecting muscle fibre number [33]. Similarly, in adult sheep, we have not been able to demonstrate any changes in muscle mass or expression of markers for metabolic function in muscle of adult offspring that could be related to a history of late gestational foetal undernutrition (50% reduction in maternal energy and protein supply relative to recommendations) [35]. In conclusion, whether gestational malnutrition will have implications for myogenesis thus appears to depend on the timing of the nutritional insults relative to the conclusion of myotube formation in utero. The nutritional programming of skeletal muscle development prior to the conclusion of myofibre development appears to be permanent, whereas malnutrition in late gestation in precocial animal species does not have long-term consequences for skeletal muscle development.

Adipose tissue deposition

In precocial animal species such as sheep, the major part of foetal adipogenesis and adipose tissue differentiation takes place during the last part of gestation [3638]. Thus, if foetal nutrition should have implications for adipose tissue development, it would most likely be during the late gestation period. This has received much less attention in relation to FP in farm animals than muscle development, presumably due to the greater economic importance of the latter.

From studies using our Copenhagen sheep model, we have earlier reported that both prenatal overnutrition (150% of energy and 110% of protein requirements) and undernutrition (50% of energy and protein requirements) during late pregnancy led to changes in fat deposition patterns in adolescent offspring (~6 mo of age) resulting in a greater preference for deposition in the abdominal (mesenteric or perirenal) rather than subcutaneous region when the lambs were fed a high-fat diet in early postnatal life [9, 10]. This could be ascribed to a reduced ability to increase fat deposition in subcutaneous adipose tissue during fatness development (Fig. 2). Moreover, in the 6 months old lambs with a history of late gestation undernourishment, an increased occurrence of collagen and non-collagen extracellular matrix, together with greater numbers of a subpopulation of very small adipocytes (<40 μm diameter) was observed in the subcutaneous fat (Fig. 3) [39]. Our recent data also indicate that altered fat distribution patterns due to late-gestation under- as well as overnutrition, followed by exposure to a high-fat diet in early postnatal life are associated with markedly increased perirenal adipocyte hypertrophy (Khanal et al., unpublished data; Fig. 4).
Fig. 2

Impacts of late gestational over- and undernutrition on fat deposition patterns in adolescent (6 months old) offspring (left panel: subcutaneous to mesenteric fat ratio; right panel: subcutaneous to perirenal fat ratio) (obtained from Khanal et al. [10]). For HIGH, NORM and LOW, see legends for Fig. 1

Fig. 3

Morphology of Van Gieson-stained subcutaneous adipose tissue from 6 months old adolescent lambs and 2 years old adult sheep (obtained from Nielsen et al. [39]). Panel A: examples of pictures from the 4 groups of lambs, used to grade cell size (and with negligible collagen infiltration) showing a larger population of very small cells in the LOW/CONV group (bottom left) relative to the other groups, and extensive hypertrophy in adipocytes from HCHF lambs (pictures to the right). Panel B: morphological characteristics observed in slides from adult LOW sheep, which was not restricted to a specific early postnatal diet (pictures at the top) with extensive collagen infiltration (grade 4), which was never observed to the same extent among NORM sheep (max grade assigned = 2). For HIGH, NORM, LOW, CONV, HCHF see legends for Fig. 1

Fig. 4

Impacts of late gestational nutrition on hyperplasia and hypertrophy of different adipose tissue depots in adolescent (6 months old) offspring (obtained from Khanal et al., unpublished data). SF, subcutaneous fat (encircled as green); MF, mesenteric fat (encircled as yellow); PRF, perirenal fat (encircled as red). For HIGH, NORM and LOW, see legends for Fig. 1. Each hexagonal structure represents an individual adipocyte

A limited expandability of subcutaneous adipose tissue may give rise to increased intramuscular fat deposition during fattening. This would be consistent with findings in pigs, where low birth weight pigs (1.05 vs. 1.89 kg) had increased lipid deposition (25%) in semitendinosus muscle when subcutaneous fat deposition increased, and lean meat content and fibre numbers (19%) were lowered compared to high-birth weight animals [40]. In contrast, other findings in sheep have shown that maternal overnutrition (~50% above maintenance energy requirements) during late pregnancy increased relative subcutaneous fat deposition and leptin expression in subcutaneous and perirenal fat in 1 mo old lambs [7]. The reasons for these apparently conflicting results are not known, but the postnatal diet could have had an influence.

Impacts of maternal malnutrition on metabolic and endocrine function in growing animals

Malnutrition during gestation has been linked to substantial changes in metabolic and endocrine functions postnatally, and in the following sections implications of prenatal nutritional for glucose-insulin homeostasis, hepatic function and other endocrine functions will be addressed.

Glucose-insulin homeostasis

The glucose-insulin regulatory axis has long been known to be an important target of foetal programing in humans. In our Copenhagen sheep model we have shown that this is also the case in sheep, and that both under- and overnutrition in late gestation can change the function of this axis permanently. The digestive system and intermediary metabolism of the ruminants differ from the non-ruminant animals, as ruminants ferment most of the dietary carbohydrates to short-chain volatile fatty acids using microbial activity in the rumen leaving only little glucose available for intestinal absorption [41]. However, like in other animal species, hormonal regulatory mechanisms for the maintenance of stable blood glucose level appear to be quite similar in both ruminant and monogastric animals [42, 43]. In our studies, we have performed in vivo metabolic and endocrine tolerance tests to elucidate glucose-insulin-axis function in sheep.

Late gestation undernutrition (50% of energy and protein requirements) decreased peripheral insulin sensitivity in young lambs, but their ability to clear intravenously administered glucose was maintained due to a compensatory upregulation of insulin secretion [44, 45]. However, upon exposure to a high-fat diet in early postnatal life, the ability to clear glucose was reduced, since the high-fat diet interfered with the compensatory upregulation of glucose secretion from the pancreas [45]. The high-fat diet also gave rise to very high plasma levels of triglyceride (~2.0 vs. 0.5 mmol/L) in the lambs, and development of pancreatic fibrosis [45], which to our knowledge has not been reported in ruminant animals previously.

Late gestation overnutrition also affects glucose-insulin regulation, but in a different way. In our studies, lambs exposed to overnutrition in late gestation had increased postnatal gluconeogenic ability in response to intravenous propionate injection [46] and had higher levels of plasma glucose during 44-h fasting when exposed to an early postnatal high-fat diet [10], which was not observed in lambs that had been exposed to undernutrition in late gestation. The underlying mechanims are not known.

Hepatic function

The liver is an important organ for integration of metabolic pathways, and studies in sheep have shown that prenatal over- and undernutrition may have long-term and differential impacts on hepatic lipid accumulation, glucose and lactate release, and cholesterol synthesis. Nutrient restriction (50% of requirements) during early pregnancy led to increased hepatic lipid accumulation in obese 1 years old sheep offspring [47], and in 4 months old lambs born to dams that were obese around the periconceptional period, expression of genes encoding for factors involved in hepatic fatty acid oxidation was increased [48]. The implications for hepatic function in the offspring later in life were, however, not studied. We ourselves observed increased plasma cholesterol levels in prenatally undernourished 6 months old sheep offspring provided a high-starch-high-fat diet during early postnatal life [46], which may be due to upregulated hepatic cholesterol metabolism. As with glucose metabolism, the impacts of an early postnatal high-starch-high-fat diet in our studies were additive to those of prenatal undernutrition with regard to lipid metabolism and hepatic function. This is because the predisposition of higher plasma cholesterol levels due to late gestation undernutrition (4.3 vs. 1.6 mmol/L) was manifested particularly upon additional exposure to a postnatal high-starch-high-fat diet in adolescent lambs [46]. Our studies have thus shown clear indications that late gestation undernutrition impacts on postnatal cholesterol metabolism in sheep offspring but further investigation into the underlying mechanism and its potential long-term implications for farm animals is warranted in future.

Other endocrine functions

Not only glucose-insulin axis function, but also a number of other endocrine systems are subject to programming in foetal life, such as the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis [49], the growth hormone (GH)-insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) axis [50], leptin regulation [51] and the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid hormone (TH) axis [52]. We have, however, found that the impacts of prenatal nutrition on basal plasma levels and the adaptive responses to fasting in these endocrine systems became manifested in adulthood only, and were not evident in lambs at 6 mo of age [53]; this will be addressed in the following section.

Long-term consequences of early life nutrition in adult animals

In animal production systems, animals are kept until adulthood for special production purposes, such as reproduction and lactation [54]. Much less information is available regarding the implications of FP in adulthood in farm animals, probably due to the fact that it is costly to run such studies for several years. Prevailing evidence suggests that many of the implications of FP become increasingly manifested as the animal approaches adulthood. As already mentioned, low birth weight in lambs can be compensated for early postnatal catch-up growth so that normal slaughter weights can be achieved. However, adult body composition can be altered as demonstrated by increased adult adiposity and body weight [55], and there is also, as previously mentioned, evidence suggesting that linear growth can be terminated earlier, resulting in smaller adult body size [27]. In our sheep studies, we did, however, not observe changes in neither body size nor proportions or weights of major organs or muscle or adipose tissue mass in adult offspring that had been exposed to over- or undernutrition in their late foetal life [56], except for increased adrenal weights [9]. Irrespective of that, abnormal subcutaneous morphology (more extensive fibrosis and the occurrence of a subpopulation of very small adipocytes) was also clearly evident in prenatally nutrient-restricted adult offspring regardless of postnatal diet [39]. These morphological changes were similar to the previously mentioned morphological changes observed in non-obese 6 months old lambs. We were to our knowledge the first to report that prenatal undernutrition has long-term implications for composition of fatty acids in skeletal muscle, liver and adipose tissues [35, 39, 57]. Thus, sheep with a history of prenatal undernutrition reduced the myristic acid content and increased the C16:0 to C18:0 fatty acid ratio in perirenal fat, an effect which was not observed in lambs [39]. The underlying reasons for such a FP of fatty acid composition in tissue lipids are unknown, and this could not be ascribed to differences in the postnatal diet. Tissue levels of myristic acid appear to be rate-limiting for a process termed protein myristoylation, and myristoylation impacts function of appr. 0.5–3% of the human proteome [58], and the consequences of such changes thus merit to be addressed in future studies. Prenatal undernutrition was also associated with increased triglyceride, ceramide and free fatty acid contents in livers of adult sheep, which was not observed in lambs [57].

Although studies focusing on early life nutritional impacts in adult offspring are relatively scarce, it seems reasonable to conclude that (subcutaneous) adipose tissue morphology and expandability (increased extracellular matrix, abundance of very small adipocytes) as well as hepatic and adipose lipid composition appear to be a permanent target of FP induced by late gestational undernutrition.

Glucose-insulin axis function

The functionality of a whole range of endocrine systems is altered in animals subjected to maternal malnutrition, but long-lasting impacts appear to be less pronounced following prenatal overnutrition as compared to undernutrition. Undernutrition during late, but not early, gestation in sheep led to impaired insulin sensitivity of peripheral tissues (reduced glucose tolerance) in adult offspring alongside increased adipose tissue mass [59]. This is consistent with our previous studies, where we found that a depression of insulin sensitivity [45], reduced pancreatic insulin secretory capacity as well as plasticity of down-regulation of insulin secretion [60] persisted into adulthood in sheep with a history of late gestation undernutrition.

In contrast, the adverse impacts of an early postnatal high-fat diet on glucose-insulin axis function, which were clearly observed in lambs (poorer glucose tolerance, reduced insulin secretion and clearance ability), completely disappeared in adult sheep when they were shifted from a high-starch-high-fat to a normal diet and normalization body fat contents [45].

In ruminants as in monogastrics, insulin is the hormone responsible for stimulating transport of glucose into insulin-sensitive tissues, where skeletal muscle and adipose tissues are the most important, but not into insulin-insensitive tissues including tissues important for reproduction (mammary gland and the conceptus). Thus, poor insulin sensitivity and reduced plasticity of pancreatic insulin secretion in sheep exposed to undernutrition in late foetal life, can undoubtedly influence how different tissues are adjusted or prioritized for the glucose utilization during reproductive cycle, pregnancy, etc. [61] and hence the (re) production potential of animals.

Thyroid-hormone axis function

Studies on prenatal nutritional impacts on TH axis function in farm animals are very scarce, although these hormones affect the adaptation and maintenance of a wide range of body functions under different environmental conditions [62] and also play an important role in ending seasonal reproduction in ewes [63]. In one study, adult hyperthyroidism was observed in adult sheep exposed to late gestation undernutrition and this was associated with increased thyroid expression of genes regulating TH synthesis and deiodination. It also increased the number of TH receptors and deiodinase mRNA expression in different target tissues such as liver, cardiac muscle and longissimus dorsi muscle but decreased the number of TH receptors and deiodinase mRNA expression in adipose tissues [64]. This suggests that long-term TH axis function is a target of FP in response to foetal undernutrition during late gestation, but its potential influences on animal production traits remain to be established.

Other endocrine functions

In our Copenhagen sheep model, alterations in HPA axis function and leptin response were induced by late gestational undernutrition and became manifested in adulthood regardless of the dietary exposures early in postnatal life. Prenatally undernourished male lambs and adult female animals had, as already mentioned, increased adrenal weights [9], and we observed that the adult sheep also had elevated plasma cortisol levels and responded to fasting with a reduction in the cortisol levels [53], in contrast to an expected increase plasma cortisol levels during fasting. This may indicate hyperactivity of the HPA axis, and confirms the previous finding in which increased HPA axis response was observed in adult sheep offspring exposed to a short duration of undernutrition during late foetal life [5]. The GH-IGF-1 axis and adaptations to leptin also appear to be targets of FP. In our prenatally undernourished sheep total plasma IGF-1 concentrations were unexpectedly increased during fasting (presumably due to extended half-life in the blood), whereas plasma leptin concentrations were higher during fasting from much lower levels than in non-programmed sheep [45].

Thus, all the hypothalamic-pituitary axes hitherto studied (TH, GH-IGF-1, HPA) have been shown to be targets of FP. However, the phenotypic manifestation of this programming may not become manifested until the animals approach adulthood, and the consquences for productive functions in adulthood are not well-known. The hypothalamus is a main target for leptin, a hormone produced in white adipose tissues, and hypothalamic binding of leptin can induce changes in all hypothalamic-pituitary endocrine axes in addition to its role in down-regulation of feed intake [65] Considering that FP also induces abnormalities of adipose tissue morphology (fibrosis and very small adipocytes), this has led us to hypothesize that FP may target the entire leptin-hypothalamic-pituitary axis.

It is not known, to what extent overnutrition in late foetal life can predispose for similar long-term impacts on this axis, but it can, as previously reviewed, predispose for increased fat deposition, and the development of leptin resistance, with associated defects in a number of endocrine systems affecting hypothalamic appetite regulators and metabolic function [66].

Reproductive function

Considering that the nutritional history in foetal life has implications for all aspects of later HPA axes previously studied, it is not surprising that reproductive development during foetal and neonatal life is also affected [67, 68] with consequences for subsequent reproductive function in adulthood. There are, however, relatively few studies on these issues, and it is still not clear to what extent the changes in reproductive function are a consequence of FP targeting reproductive organs directly or there may be indirect effects of altered functions of other endocrine systems and changes in energy metabolism.

It has been shown that both over- (ad libitum feeding) and undernutrition (60% of dietary requirements) during a period of 8 wk prior to oocyte collection in ewes led to reduced oocyte competence and fertilization and poor early embryonic development [69]. Additionally, uundernutrition during the early stages of pregnancy, before and during the period of folliculogenesis, delayed foetal ovarian follicular development in sheep [70]. These findings may explain impaired reproductive funtion in sheep offspring observed in other studies. For example, prenatal undernutrition (50% of energy requirements) during the first 95 d of gestation reduced the ovulation rate in female adult sheep [71]. Furthermore, maternal undernutrition during mid- to late gestation led to a reduction in the number of large corpora lutea in female sheep offspring [72]. Nutrition of ewes during late pregnancy or lactation can also influence subsequent lifetime reproductive performance of the female offspring through impact on the ability to sustain pregnancy, i.e. avoidance of embryo or foetal loss [73].

Although it appears evident that maternal undernutrition, both in the preconceptional period and during gestation, can have adverse effects on the overall reproductive function of the offspring, much remains to be understood about the impacts of prenatal overnutrition and gestational stage-specific influences on the development of reproductive function. Studies are also required to ascertain whether lactation performance may be affected by sub-optimal nutrition during foetal life.

Epigenetic changes due to maternal nutrition during gestation

Epigenetic regulation of gene expression, i.e. DNA methylation, histone modification etc., could be a potential mechanism linking foetal malnutrition to subsequent phenotypic changes in postnatal life (see reviews [74, 75]). Periconceptional undernutrition in sheep has been shown to induce epigenetic changes, namely histone acetylation and promoter methylation, of foetal hypothalamic genes including glucocorticoid receptors and proopiomelanocortin genes [76], which ultimately affects food intake and energy expenditure after birth. Additionally, periconceptional undernutrition has been associated with epigenetic changes in the adrenal IGF2/H19 genes coexisting with adrenal overgrowth in offspring [77], which may predispose for postnatal susceptibility to stress. Periconceptional restriction of maternal vitamin B and methionine supply led to altered methylation at CpG islands in the foetal sheep liver and with increased adult body weight and fatness of the offspring [78]. The detailed molecular biological mechanisms underlying epigenetic modifications in response to foetal life malnutrition are still poorly understood. Future studies are needed to identify the impacts of prenatal malnutrition at different gestational stages on tissue-specific epigenetic changes and long-term implications of such epigenetic modifications induced in foetal for animal production and performance.

Can dietary intervention later in life reverse the adverse programming outcomes of early life nutrition?

An important issue in animal production is to what extent undesirable effects of early life malnutrition can be minimized or completely reversed by dietary or other interventions later in life. Unfortunately, studies investigating the possibility of reversing undesirable FP outcomes with dietary interventions later in life are scarce and not encouraging. We have shown in sheep that it was possible to effectively reverse the adverse outcomes (in terms of increased body fat, higher plasma lipid profiles, poor glucose-insulin homeostasis etc.) induced by an unhealthy fatness-inducing diet fed in early postnatal life if the diet was changed later in life to a normal (for sheep) grass-based diet. Late gestation undernutrition, however, induced permanent programming outcomes [9, 45], particularly on lipid and urea metabolism as described previously, and these implications were more strongly manifested in adult sheep than lambs, irrespective of changes in the postnatal diet.

Extremely few studies have focussed on the long-term impacts of late gestation overnutrition in farm animal species, but it appears from our studies that the possibility of recovery from undesirable nutritional programming outcomes is more likely in individuals exposed to late gestational over rather than undernutrition. The alterations observed in body fat composition and glucose-insulin homeostasis in young lambs with a history of foetal overnutrition did not persist into adulthood [56].

Conclusion and future perspectives

Foetal or developmental programming can have life-long impacts on the health and disease status of farm animals (Table 2), thus affecting the economy of livestock production (Fig. 5). Indeed, it has earlier been reported that foetal programming can be treated as a management tool to improve the livestock productivity in commercial farming but long-term programing impacts specific to different gestational stages and their interactions with postnatal nutritional environment are known [79]. Here, we highlight that foetal programming may be induced during any time point from prior to conception until birth, but the exact manifestation of the foetal programming later in life will depend on the timing of the insult relative to the critical time windows during which embryo formation, placental growth and foetal organogenesis take place. Serious maternal malnutrition during the earlier parts of gestation can influence the development of reproductive functions and muscle fibre numbers and characteristics, but this is probably not very likely to occur under normal production conditions.
Table 2

Major impacts of foetal programming due to abnormal nutrition applied at different stages of gestation and under various experimental conditions in sheep

Experimental conditions (gestational age and nutritional environment)

Primary changes in postnatal life

Reference

Growth characteristics

 Late gestational (105 d to term) overnutrition (150% energy and 110% protein) or undernutrition (50% energy and protein) + Early postnatal high-fat diet (0 d to 6 mo)

Reduced birth weight due to prenatal undernutrition, but no impacts due to prenatal overnutrition; Increased abdominal and perirenal fat deposition relative to subcutaneous fat by prenatal under- and overnutrition

[10]

 Late gestational (105 d to term) undernutrition (50% energy and protein) + Early postnatal high-fat diet (0 d to 6 mo)

Reduced birth weight; Increased TG, ceramide and free fatty acids in liver, increased extracellular matrix content and very small adipocytes proportion in subcutaneous fat, hyperthyroidism and increased adrenal weights in prenatally undernourished adult sheep (2 yr)

[9, 39, 57, 64]

 Late gestational (100 d to term) undernutrition (70% of energy requirements)

Reduced birthweight (18%) and weaning weight, but no weight differences in adulthood (26 wk)

[21]

 Late gestational (115 d to term) overnutrition (133% energy)

Increased relative subcutaneous deposition in 1 months old lamb

[7]

 Late gestational (109 d to term) undernutrition (50% of energy and protein)

Lowered colostrum yield

[24]

 Late gestational (105 d to term) undernutrition (50% of energy and protein)

Lowered birth weight, colostrum and milk yield (lactation performance)

[25]

 Mid-gestational (85 d to 115 d) undernutrition (50% of energy requirements)

Decreased muscle weights in newborn lambs

[33]

 Early to mid-gestational (28 d to 78 d) undernutrition (50% of requirements)

Increased intramuscular fat content in skeletal muscle in 8 mo old offspring

[15]

 Early to mid-gestational (30 d to 70 d) undernutrition (50% of energy requirements)

Fewer fast and more slow muscle fibres in newborn lambs

[33]

 Early to mid-gestational (30 d to 80 d) undernutrition (50% of energy requirements) + Postnatal obesogenic environment (restricted physical activity) from weaning (10 wk) to 1 yr

Increased hepatic TG accumulation in prenatally undernourished, obese adult sheep (1 yr.)

[47]

Metabolic and endocrine function

 Late gestational (105 d to term) over- (150% energy and 110% protein) or undernutrition (50% energy and protein) + Early postnatal high-fat diet (0 d to 6 mo)

Reduced glucose clearance and increased glucogeneogensis in matched prenatally overnourished high-fat fed lambs; Increased cholesterol levels in mismatched prenatally undernourished high-fat diet fed lambs and adult sheep

[10, 46, 56]

 Late gestational (from 105 d to term) undernutrition + Early postnatal high-fat diet (0 d to 6 mo)

Reduced insulin sensitivity and increased insulin secretory responses to glucose in prenatally undernourished lambs; Poor glucose tolerance in mismatched prenatally undernourished high-fat fed lambs (mismatch group); Poor insulin clearance in prenatally undernourished high-fat fed adult sheep

[45]

 Late gestational undernutrition (from 105 d to term)

Reduced insulin secretory ability with increased compensatory insulin sensitivity in 19 wk. old lambs

[44]

 Late gestation undernutrition (from 110 d to term)

Poor glucose tolerance in adult sheep (1 yr)

[59]

 Late gestational overnutrition (from 115 d to term)

Increased leptin expression in subcutaneous and perirenal fat from 1 months old lamb

[7]

Reproductive function

 Early gestational (0 d to 95 d) undernutrition (50% energy)

Reduced ovulation rate in prenatally undernourished adult female sheep (20 mo)

[71]

 Early to mid (0 d to 30 d) or mid to late (31 d to 100 d) gestational undernutrition (50% requirements)

Increased number of small follicles in the ovary (early to mid-gestation undernutrition); reduced large corpora lutea (mid to late gestation undernutrition) in 10 mo old female lambs.

[72]

Fig. 5:

Impacts on early life nutrition on animal physiology and metabolism.

On the other hand, in animals born precocial, such as sheep, around three quarters of the growth of the foetus [80], and of the mammary gland of the dam [24], occurs during the last 2 mo of gestation. For that reason, adverse FP is much more likely to occur in animal production systems, and with more severe consequences, during late- rather than early- to mid-gestation [8, 81, 82], if adequate attention is not paid to the nutrition of the pregnant dam [83] particularly during multiple pregnancy. Indeed, this may be the case in many parts of the world, where the late gestation period coincides with poor grazing conditions, e.g. during the dry season in tropical countries [84, 85] or the winter in the Nordic and alpine regions [86]. Late gestation malnutrition can have a wide range of both short-term (birth weight, weaning and slaughter weight, and glucose-insulin regulation) and long-term (metabolic and endocrine function, including but not limited to the glucose-pancreatic-hepatic and adipose-hypothalamic-pituitary axis functions, adipose development, fatty acid composition, and reproduction) consequences.

In ruminant production systems, young animals used for meat production are slaughtered within months of birth to obtain the best slaughter result in terms of economic return and meat quality [87]. It can be anticipated that impacts of adverse nutritional programming in utero are of minor quantitative significance at this age, unless the animal has been severely affected during foetal life. However, the timing of abnormal nutrition exposures in utero and the early postnatal nutrition can have implications for lean-to-fat ratios in slaughter animals, since morphogenesis of muscle in precocial species takes place, and may be programmed during the earlier parts of gestation, whilst development of adipose tissue development occurs later in gestation and into early postnatal life [88].

It has earlier been acknowledged that foetal programming in response to severe or prolonged improper nutrition is likely to affect various production traits in commercial sheep farming [79]. Here, we suggest that the best way to manage prenatally programmed animals, particularly undernourished animals (birth weight deviation by 15–20% of the normal range), is to destine them for slaughtering, and not allow them to enter into production processes taking place in adulthood, since the major adverse implications of FP become manifested later in life [45, 89]. Furthermore, there is a risk that undesirable traits may be transferred to future generations due to epigenetic inheritance, and it is therefore advisable to apply proper strategies to avoid the entry of adversely programmed animals into reproduction [90, 91].

Our recent findings suggest that a moderate diet and lower body fat content later in life can prevent or reverse a large part of the impacts induced by fatness development in early postnatal life [56]. FP due to late gestation undernutrition, however, has irreversible life-time impacts on offspring, which are exacerbated upon transient fatness development in early postnatal life. Further studies are needed to confirm the findings from our studies that late gestational overnutrition has fewer long-term detrimental consequences for animal production than foetal undernutrition.

There are unfortunately no biomarkers other than birth weight, which can be used to reliably identify animals (at an early age) that have undergone FP. Although more studies are needed to assess the long-term quantitative impacts and economic consequences of FP, and to find biomarkers and potential means for reversal of such programming outcomes, commercial animal production should now acknowledge this phenomenon and devise management strategies to ensure its prevention and spread to future generations.

Abbreviations

CONV: 

Conventional diet

FP: 

Foetal programming

GH: 

Growth hormone

HCHF: 

High-starch-high-fat diet

HIGH: 

Overnutrition

HPA: 

Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal

IGF-1: 

Insulin-like growth factor 1

LOW: 

Undernutrition

NORM: 

Normal (adequate) nutrition

TG: 

Triglycerides

TH: 

Thyroid hormones

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all the members and laboratory technicians involved in the studies based on the Copenhagen sheep model at the Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen Denmark. The authors also extend their sincere gratitude to Dr. Mark Birtwistle for proofreading the manuscript and providing valuable suggestions.

Funding

The research activities involving the Copenhagen sheep model were supported by the Danish Council for Strategic Research through the research programme of the Centre for Foetal Programming (CFP), Denmark.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

PK wrote the manuscript under the guidance of MON and both authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen
(2)
Current address: Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Transgenic Animal and Lipid Storage, Norwegian Transgenic Centre (NTS), University of Oslo

References

  1. Lucas A. Programming by early nutrition in man. CIBA Found Symp. 1991;156:38–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lucas A. Programming by early nutrition: an experimental approach. J Nutr. 1998;128:401S–6S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hales CN, Barker DJ. Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus: the thrifty phenotype hypothesis. Diabetologia. 1992;35:595–601.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Spencer HG. Predictive adaptive responses and human evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005;20:527–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloomfield FH, Oliver MH, Giannoulias CD, Gluckman PD, Harding JE, Challis JRG. Brief undernutrition in late-gestation sheep programs the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in adult offspring. Endocrinology. 2003;144:2933–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gopalakrishnan GS, Gardner DS, Rhind SM, Rae MT, Kyle CE, Brooks AN, et al. Programming of adult cardiovascular function after early maternal undernutrition in sheep. Am J Physiol-Endoc M. 2004;287:R12–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Mühlhäusler BS, Duffield JA, McMillen IC. Increased maternal nutrition increases leptin expression in perirenal and subcutaneous adipose tissue in the postnatal lamb. Endocrinology. 2007;148:6157–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ford S, Hess B, Schwope M, Nijland M, Gilbert J, Vonnahme K, et al. Maternal undernutrition during early to mid-gestation in the ewe results in altered growth, adiposity, and glucose tolerance in male offspring. J Anim Sci. 2007;85:1285–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Nielsen MO, Kongsted AH, Thygesen MP, Strathe AB, Caddy S, Quistorff B, et al. Late gestation undernutrition can predispose for visceral adiposity by altering fat distribution patterns and increasing the preference for a high-fat diet in early postnatal life. Brit J Nutr. 2013;109:2098–110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Khanal P, Husted SV, Axel AMD, Johnsen L, Pedersen KL, Mortensen MS, et al. Late gestation over- and undernutrition predispose for visceral adiposity in response to a post-natal obesogenic diet, but with differential impacts on glucose–insulin adaptations during fasting in lambs. Acta Physiol. 2014;210:110–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Nissen PM, Nebel C, Oksbjerg N, Bertram HC. Metabolomics reveals relationship between plasma inositols and birth weight: possible markers for fetal programming of type 2 diabetes. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;article ID: 378268, doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/378268.
  12. Rutherford JN. Toward a nonhuman primate model of fetal programming: phenotypic plasticity of the common marmoset fetoplacental complex. Placenta. 2012;33:e35–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Rattray PV, Garrett WN, East NE, Hinman N. Growth, development and composition of the ovine conceptus and mammary gland during pregnancy. J Anim Sci. 1974;38:613–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Symonds ME, Stephenson T, Gardner DS, Budge H. Long-term effects of nutritional programming of the embryo and fetus: mechanisms and critical windows. Reprod Fert Develop. 2007;19:53–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhu MJ, Ford SP, Means WJ, Hess BW, Nathanielsz PW, Du M. Maternal nutrient restriction affects properties of skeletal muscle in offspring. J Physiol. 2006;575:241–50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Todd SE, Oliver MH, Jaquiery AL, Bloomfield FH, Harding JE. Periconceptional undernutrition of ewes impairs glucose tolerance in their adult offspring. Pediatr Res. 2009;65:409–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bell AW. Regulation of organic nutrient metabolism during transition from late pregnancy to early lactation. J Anim Sci. 1995;73:2804–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Reynolds LP, Borowicz PP, Caton JS, Vonnahme KA, Luther JS, Hammer CJ, et al. Developmental programming: the concept, large animal models, and the key role of uteroplacental vascular development. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:E61–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Barker DJP. Fetal programming of coronary heart disease. Trends Endocrin Met. 2002;13:364–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Chadio SE, Kotsampasi B, Papadomichelakis G, Deligeorgis S, Kalogiannis D, Menegatos I, et al. Impact of maternal undernutrition on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis responsiveness in sheep at different ages postnatal. J Endocrinol. 2007;192:495–503.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Borwick SC, Rae MT, Brooks J, McNeilly AS, Race PA, Rhind SM. Undernutrition of ewe lambs in utero and in early post-natal life does not affect hypothalamic–pituitary function in adulthood. Anim Reprod Sci. 2003;77:61–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Bajhau HS, Kennedy JP. Influence of pre- and postpartum nutrition on growth of goat kids. Small Rumin Res. 1990;3:227–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Dalton D, Knight T, Johnson D. Lamb survival in sheep breeds on New Zealand hill country. N Z J Agric Res. 1980;23:167–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Nørgaard JV, Nielsen MO, Theil PK, Sørensen MT, Safayi S, Sejrsen K. Development of mammary glands of fat sheep submitted to restricted feeding during late pregnancy. Small Rumin Res. 2008;76:155–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Tygesen MP, Nielsen MO, Norgaard P, Ranvig H, Harrison AP, Tauson AH. Late gestational nutrient restriction: effects on ewes' metabolic and homeorhetic adaptation, consequences for lamb birth weight and lactation performance. Arch Anim Nutr. 2008;62:44–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. McGovern FM, Campion FP, Sweeney T, Fair S, Lott S, Boland TM. Altering ewe nutrition in late gestation: II. The impact on fetal development and offspring performance. J Anim Sci. 2015;93:4873–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Schinckel P, Short B. Influence of nutritional level during pre-natal and early post-natal life on adult fleece and body characters. Crop Pasture Sci. 1961;12:176–202.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Cleal JK, Poore KR, Boullin JP, Khan O, Chau R, Hambidge O, et al. 2007. Mismatched pre- and postnatal nutrition leads to cardiovascular dysfunction and altered renal function in adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007;104:9529–33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Greenwood P, Cafe L, Hearnshaw H, Hennessy D, Thompson J, Morris S. Long-term consequences of birth weight and growth to weaning on carcass, yield and beef quality characteristics of Piedmontese-and Wagyu-sired cattle. Anim Prod Sci. 2006;46:257–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Yan X, Zhu MJ, Dodson MV, Du M. Developmental programming of fetal skeletal muscle and adipose tissue development. J Genomics. 2013;1:29–38.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Du M, Tong J, Zhao J, Underwood KR, Zhu M, Ford SP, et al. Fetal programming of skeletal muscle development in ruminant animals. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:E51–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Wigmore PM, Stickland NC. Muscle development in large and small pig fetuses. J Anat. 1983;137:235–45.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Fahey AJ, Brameld JM, Parr T, Buttery PJ. The effect of maternal undernutrition before muscle differentiation on the muscle fiber development of the newborn lamb. J Anim Sci. 2005;83:2564–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Underwood KR, Tong JF, Price PL, Roberts AJ, Grings EE, Hess BW, et al. Nutrition during mid to late gestation affects growth, adipose tissue deposition, and tenderness in cross-bred beef steers. Meat Sci. 2010;86:588–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hou L, Kongsted AH, Ghoreishi SM, Takhtsabzy TK, Friedrichsen M, Hellgren LI, et al. Pre- and early-postnatal nutrition modify gene and protein expressions of muscle energy metabolism markers and phospholipid fatty acid composition in a muscle type specific manner in sheep. PLoS One. 2013;8:e65452.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Symonds ME, Lomax MA. Maternal and environmental influences on thermoregulation in the neonate. Proc Nutr Soc. 1992;51:165–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Symonds ME, Stephenson T. Maternal nutrition and endocrine programming of fetal adipose tissue development. Biochem Soc Trans. 1999;27:97–104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Symonds ME, Sebert SP, Hyatt MA, Budge H. Nutritional programming of the metabolic syndrome. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2009;5:604–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Nielsen MO, Hou L, Johnsen L, Khanal P, Bechshøft CL, Kongsted AH, et al. Do very small adipocytes in subcutaneous adipose tissue (a proposed risk factor for insulin insensitivity) have a fetal origin? Clin Nutr Exp. 2016;8:9–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Gondret F, Lefaucheur L, Louveau I, Lebret B. The long-term influences of birth weight on muscle characteristics and eating meat quality in pigs individually reared and fed during fattening. Archiv Tierzucht Dummerstorf. 2005;48:68–73.Google Scholar
  41. Annison EF, White RR. Glucose utilization in sheep. Biochem J. 1961;80:162–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Brockman RP, Laarveld B. Hormonal regulation of metabolism in ruminants; a review. Livest Prod Sci. 1986;14:313–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Sasaki SI. Mechanism of insulin action on glucose metabolism in ruminants. Anim Sci J. 2002;73:423–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Husted SM, Nielsen MO, Tygesen MP, Kiani A, Blache D, Ingvartsen KL. Programming of intermediate metabolism in young lambs affected by late gestational maternal undernourishment. Am J Physiol-Endoc M. 2007;293:E548–57.Google Scholar
  45. Kongsted AH, Tygesen MP, Husted SV, Oliver MH, Tolver A, Christensen VG, et al. Programming of glucose-insulin homoeostasis: long-term consequences of pre-natal versus early post-natal nutrition insults. Evidence from a sheep model. Acta Physiol. 2014;210:84–98.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Khanal P, Axel A, Kongsted A, Husted S, Johnsen L, Pandey D, et al. Late gestation under-and overnutrition have differential impacts when combined with a post-natal obesogenic diet on glucose–lactate–insulin adaptations during metabolic challenges in adolescent sheep. Acta Physiol. 2015;213:519–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Hyatt MA, Gardner DS, Sebert S, Wilson V, Davidson N, Nigmatullina Y. Suboptimal maternal nutrition, during early fetal liver development, promotes lipid accumulation in the liver of obese offspring. Reproduction. 2011;141:119–26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Nicholas LM, Rattanatray L, Morrison JL, Kleemann DO, Walker SK, Zhang S, et al. Maternal obesity or weight loss around conception impacts hepatic fatty acid metabolism in the offspring. Obesity. 2014;22:1685–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Phillips DI, Bennett FI, Wilks R, Thame M, Boyne M, Osmond C. Maternal body composition, offspring blood pressure and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Paediatr Perinat Ep. 2005;19:294–302.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Langford K, Blum W, Nicolaides K, Jones J, McGregor A, Miell J. The pathophysiology of the insulin-like growth factor axis in fetal growth failure: a basis for programming by undernutrition? Eur J Clin Investig. 1994;24:851–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. McMillen I, Edwards L, Duffield J, Mühlhäusler B. Regulation of leptin synthesis and secretion before birth: implications for the early programming of adult obesity. Reproduction. 2006;131:415–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Wilcoxon JS, Redei EE. 2004. Prenatal programming of adult thyroid function by alcohol and thyroid hormones. Am J Physiol-Endoc M. 2004;287:E318–E26.Google Scholar
  53. Kongsted AH, Husted SV, Thygesen MP, Christensen VG, Blache D, Tolver A, et al. Pre- and postnatal nutrition in sheep affects beta-cell secretion and hypothalamic control. J Endocrinol. 2013;219:159–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Festa-Bianchet M, King WJ. Age—related reproductive effort in bighorn sheep ewes. Ecoscience. 2007;14:318–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Louey S, Cock ML, Harding R. Long term consequences of low birthweight on postnatal growth, adiposity and brain weight at maturity in sheep. J Reprod Dev. 2005;51:59–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Khanal P, Johnsen L, Axel AM, Hansen PW, Kongsted AH, Lyckegaard NB, et al. Long-term impacts of foetal malnutrition followed by early postnatal obesity on fat distribution pattern and metabolic adaptability in adult sheep. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0156700.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Hou L, Hellgren LI, Kongsted AH, Vaag A, Nielsen MO. Pre-natal undernutrition and post-natal overnutrition are associated with permanent changes in hepatic metabolism markers and fatty acid composition in sheep. Acta Physiol. 2014;210:317–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Legrand P, Rioux V. The complex and important cellular and metabolic functions of saturated fatty acids. Lipids. 2010;45:941–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Gardner DS, Tingey K, Van Bon BWM, Ozanne SE, Wilson V, Dandrea J, et al. Programming of glucose-insulin metabolism in adult sheep after maternal undernutrition. Am J Physiol-Endoc M. 2005;289:R947–R54.Google Scholar
  60. Husted SM, Nielsen MO, Blache D, Ingvartsen KL. Glucose homeostasis and metabolic adaptation in the pregnant and lactating sheep are affected by the level of nutrition previously provided during her late fetal life. Domest Anim Endocrin. 2008;34:419–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Bell AW, Bauman DE. Adaptations of glucose metabolism during pregnancy and lactation. J Mammary Gland Biol. 1997;2:265–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Todini L 2007. Thyroid hormones in small ruminants: effects of endogenous, environmental and nutritional factors. Animal. 2007;1:997-1008.Google Scholar
  63. Webster JR, Moenter SM, Woodfill CJI, Karsch FJ. Role of the thyroid gland in seasonal reproduction. II. Thyroxine allows a season-specific suppression of gonadotropin secretion in sheep. Endocrinology. 1991;129:176–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Johnsen L, Kongsted AH, Nielsen MO. Prenatal undernutrition and postnatal overnutrition alter thyroid hormone axis function in sheep. J Endocrinol. 2013;216:389–402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Ahima RS, Flier JS. Leptin. Annu Rev Physiol. 2000;62:413–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Mühlhäusler BS. Programming of the appetite-regulating neural network: a link between maternal overnutrition and the programming of obesity? J Neuroendocrinol. 2007;19:67–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Dupont C, Cordier AG, Junien C, Mandon-Pépin B, Levy R, Chavatte-Palmer P. 2012. Maternal environment and the reproductive function of the offspring. Theriogenology. 2012;78:1405–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Rhind SM. Effects of maternal nutrition on fetal and neonatal reproductive development and function. Anim Reprod Sci. 2004;82:169–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Grazul-Bilska A, Borowczyk E, Arndt W, Evoniuk J, O’neil M, Bilski J, et al. Effects of overnutrition and undernutrition on in vitro fertilization (IVF) and early embryonic development in sheep. Sheep Beef Day. 2006;47:56–66.Google Scholar
  70. Rae MT, Palassio S, Kyle CE, Brooks AN, Lea RG, Miller DW, et al. Effect of maternal undernutrition during pregnancy on early ovarian development and subsequent follicular development in sheep fetuses. Reproduction. 2001;122:915–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Rae MT, Kyle CE, Miller DW, Hammond AJ, Brooks AN, Rhind SM. The effects of undernutrition, in utero, on reproductive function in adult male and female sheep. Anim Reprod Sci. 2002;72:63–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Kotsampasi B, Chadio S, Papadomichelakis G, Deligeorgis S, Kalogiannis D, Menegatos I, et al. Effects of maternal undernutrition on the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis function in female sheep offspring. Reprod Domest Anim. 2009;44:677–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Gunn RG, Sim DA, Hunter EA. Effects of nutrition in utero and in early life on the subsequent lifetime reproductive performance of Scottish blackface ewes in two management systems. Anim Sci. 1995;60:223–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Sookoian S, Gianotti TF, Burgueño AL, Pirola CJ. Fetal metabolic programming and epigenetic modifications: a systems biology approach. Pediatr Res. 2013;73:531–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Burdge GC, Hanson MA, Slater-Jefferies JL, Lillycrop KA. Epigenetic regulation of transcription: a mechanism for inducing variations in phenotype (fetal programming) by differences in nutrition during early life? Br J Nutr. 2007;97:1036–46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Stevens A, Begum G, Cook A, Connor K, Rumball C, Oliver M, et al. Epigenetic changes in the hypothalamic proopiomelanocortin and glucocorticoid receptor genes in the ovine fetus after periconceptional undernutrition. Endocrinology. 2010;151:3652–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Zhang S, Rattanatray L, MacLaughlin SM, Cropley JE, Suter CM, Molloy L, et al. Periconceptional undernutrition in normal and overweight ewes leads to increased adrenal growth and epigenetic changes in adrenal IGF2/H19 gene in offspring. FASEB J. 2010;24:2772–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Sinclair KD, Allegrucci C, Singh R, Gardner DS, Sebastian S, Bispham J, et al. DNA methylation, insulin resistance, and blood pressure in offspring determined by maternal periconceptional B vitamin and methionine status. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007;104:19351–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  79. Kenyon PR, Blair HT. Foetal programming in sheep – effects on production. Small Ruminant Res. 2014;118:16–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Robinson JJ, McDonald I, Fraser C, Crofts RMJ. Studies on reproduction in prolific ewes. J Agric Sci. 1977;88:539–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Greenwood PL, Thompson AN, Ford SP. Postnatal consequences of the maternal environment and of growth during prenatal life for productivity of ruminants. In: Greenwood PL, Bell AW, Vercoe PE, Viljoen GJ, editors. In managing the prenatal environment to enhance livestock productivity. Netherlands.: Springer Science; 2010. p. 3–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Smith NA, McAuliffe FM, Quinn K, Lonergan P, Evans ACO. The negative effects of a short period of maternal undernutrition at conception on the glucose–insulin system of offspring in sheep. Anim Reprod Sci. 2010;121:94–100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Greenwood P, Thompson A. Consequences of maternal nutrition during pregnancy and of foetal growth for productivity of sheep. Rec Adv Anim Nutr. 2007;16:185–96.Google Scholar
  84. Degen AA, Benjamin RW, Hoorweg JC. Bedouin households and sheep production in the Negev Desert, Israel. Nomadic Peoples. 2000;4:125–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. McWilliam EL, Barry TN, Lopez-Villalobos N, Cameron PN, Kemp PD. The effect of different levels of poplar (Populus) supplementation on the reproductive performance of ewes grazing low quality drought pasture during mating. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2004;115:1–18.Google Scholar
  86. Dýrmundsson ÓR. Sustainability of sheep and goat production in north European countries—from the Arctic to the alps. Small Ruminant Res. 2006;62:151–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Cifuni GF, Napolitano F, Pacelli C, Riviezzi AM, Girolami A. Effect of age at slaughter on carcass traits, fatty acid composition and lipid oxidation of Apulian lambs. Small Ruminant Res. 1993;35:65–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Bonnet M, Cassar-Malek I, Chilliard Y, Picard B. Ontogenesis of muscle and adipose tissues and their interactions in ruminants and other species. Animal. 2010;4:1093–109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Godfrey KM, Barker DJ. Fetal nutrition and adult disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71:1344s–52s.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Bertram C, Khan O, Ohri S, Phillips DI, Matthews SG, Hanson MA. Transgenerational effects of prenatal nutrient restriction on cardiovascular and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function. J Physiol. 2008;586:2217–29.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  91. Daxinger L, Whitelaw E. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: more questions than answers. Genome Res. 2010;20:1623–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017