Open Access

Conceptus elongation in ruminants: roles of progesterone, prostaglandin, interferon tau and cortisol

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology20145:53

https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-1891-5-53

Received: 23 June 2014

Accepted: 28 October 2014

Published: 16 November 2014

Abstract

The majority of pregnancy loss in ruminants occurs during the first three weeks after conception, particularly during the period of conceptus elongation that occurs prior to pregnancy recognition and implantation. This review integrates established and new information on the biological role of ovarian progesterone (P4), prostaglandins (PGs), interferon tau (IFNT) and cortisol in endometrial function and conceptus elongation. Progesterone is secreted by the ovarian corpus luteum (CL) and is the unequivocal hormone of pregnancy. Prostaglandins (PGs) and cortisol are produced by both the epithelial cells of the endometrium and the trophectoderm of the elongating conceptus. In contrast, IFNT is produced solely by the conceptus trophectoderm and is the maternal recognition of pregnancy signal that inhibits production of luteolytic pulses of PGF by the endometrium to maintain the CL and thus production of P4. Available results in sheep support the idea that the individual, interactive, and coordinated actions of P4, PGs, IFNT and cortisol regulate conceptus elongation and implantation by controlling expression of genes in the endometrium and/or trophectoderm. An increased knowledge of conceptus-endometrial interactions during early pregnancy in ruminants is necessary to understand and elucidate the causes of infertility and recurrent early pregnancy loss and provide new strategies to improve fertility and thus reproductive efficiency.

Keywords

Conceptus Cortisol Endometrium Interferon Prostaglandin Ruminant

Introduction

This review integrates established and new information on the biological role of ovarian progesterone (P4), prostaglandins (PGs), interferon tau (IFNT) and cortisol in endometrial function and conceptus elongation during the peri-implantation period of pregnancy in ruminants. Our knowledge of the complex biological and genetic mechanisms governing conceptus elongation and implantation remains limited in domestic ruminants [1], but is essential to ameliorate early pregnancy losses and increase fertility of ruminants.

Establishment of pregnancy in domestic ruminants (i.e., sheep, cattle, goats) begins at the conceptus stage and includes pregnancy recognition signaling, implantation, and placentation [25]. The morula-stage embryo enters the uterus on days 4 to 6 post-mating and then forms a blastocyst that contains an inner cell mass and a blastocoele or central cavity surrounded by a monolayer of trophectoderm. After hatching from the zona pellucida (days 8 to 10), the blastocyst slowly grows into a tubular or ovoid form and is then termed a conceptus (embryo-fetus and associated extraembryonic membranes) [5, 6]. In sheep, the ovoid conceptus of about 1 mm in length on day 11 begins to elongate on day 12 and forms a filamentous conceptus of 15 to 19 cm or more in length by day 15 that occupies the entire length of the uterine horn ipsilateral to the corpus luteum (CL) with extraembryonic membranes extending into the contralateral uterine horn. In cattle, the hatched blastocyst forms an ovoid conceptus between days 12 to 14 and is only about 2 mm in length on day 13. By day 14, the conceptus is about 6 mm, and the elongating bovine conceptus reaches a length of about 60 mm (6 cm) by day 16 and is 20 cm or more by day 19. Thus, the bovine blastocyst/conceptus doubles in length every day between days 9 and 16 with a significant increase (~30-fold) in length between days 12 and 15 [7, 8]. In both sheep and cattle, conceptus elongation involves exponential increases in length and weight of the trophectoderm [9] and onset of extraembryonic membrane differentiation, including gastrulation of the embryo and formation of the yolk sac and allantois that are vital for embryonic survival and formation of a functional placenta [5, 6]. Trophoblast elongation observed in ruminants appears to not involve geometrical changes in cell shape but rather occurs from cell proliferation [10]. Successively, the elongated conceptus begins the process of central implantation and placentation around day 16 in sheep and day 19 in cattle [11].

Blastocyst growth into an elongated conceptus does not occur in vitro, as it requires secretions supplied by the endometrium of the uterus [1214]. The uterine luminal fluid (ULF) contains substances, collectively termed histotroph, that govern elongation of the conceptus via effects on trophectoderm proliferation and migration as well as attachment and adhesion to the endometrial luminal epithelium (LE) [4, 15, 16]. Histotroph is derived primarily from transport and (or) synthesis and secretion of substances by the endometrial LE and glandular epithelia (GE), and it is a complex and rather undefined mixture of proteins, lipids, amino acids, sugars (glucose, fructose), ions and exosomes/microvesicles [1721]. The recurrent early pregnancy loss observed in uterine gland knockout (UGKO) ewes established the importance of uterine epithelial-derived histotroph for support of conceptus elongation and implantation [14]. Available evidence supports the idea that ovarian P4 induces expression of a number of genes, specifically in the endometrial epithelia, that are then further stimulated by factors from the conceptus (e.g., IFNT, PGs, cortisol) as well as the endometrium itself (e.g., PGs and cortisol) [22]. The genes and functions regulated by these hormones and factors in the endometrial epithelia elicit specific changes in the intrauterine histotrophic milieu necessary for conceptus elongation [4, 15, 16, 22, 23].

Progesterone regulation of endometrial function and conceptus elongation

Progesterone stimulates and maintains endometrial functions necessary for conceptus growth, implantation, placentation, and development to term. In cattle, concentrations of P4 during early pregnancy clearly affect embryonic survival [13, 24]. In both lactating dairy cows and heifers, there is a strong positive association between the post-ovulatory rise in P4 and embryonic development. Increasing concentrations of P4 after ovulation enhanced conceptus elongation in beef heifers [25, 26], dairy cows [27], and sheep [28], while lower P4 concentrations in the early luteal phase retarded embryonic development in sheep and cattle [24, 29, 30]. Supplementation of cattle with P4 during early pregnancy has equivocal effects to increase embryonic survival [31] and is unlikely to rescue development of embryos with inherent genetic defects or in high-producing dairy cows [27, 32, 33].

Progesterone predominantly exerts an indirect effect on the conceptus via the endometrium to regulate blastocyst growth and conceptus elongation [28, 30, 3436]. Similar to humans [37, 38], the endometria of both cyclic and pregnant sheep and cattle express genes implicated in uterine receptivity, which can be defined as a physiological state of the uterus when conceptus growth and implantation for establishment of pregnancy is possible. The absence of a sufficiently developed conceptus to signal pregnancy recognition results in those genes being turned ‘off’ as luteolysis ensues and the animal returns to estrus for another opportunity to mate. The outcome of the P4-induced changes in the cyclic and pregnant uterus is to modify the intrauterine milieu, such as an increase in select amino acids, glucose, cytokines and growth factors in histotroph, for support of blastocyst growth into an ovoid conceptus and elongation to form a filamentous conceptus [4, 15, 22, 23].

Sheep

Actions of ovarian P4 on the uterus are essential for conceptus survival and growth in sheep [28]. Between days 10 and 12 after onset of estrus or mating in cyclic and pregnant ewes, P4 induces the expression of many conceptus elongation- and implantation-related genes (Figure 1 and Table 1). The initiation of expression of those genes requires P4 action and is temporally associated with the loss of progesterone receptors (PGR) between days 10 and 12 in the endometrial LE and between days 12 and 14 to 16 in the GE after onset of estrus; however, PGR remain present in the stroma and myometrium in the ovine uterus throughout pregnancy [39]. In the endometrial LE and superficial GE (sGE), P4 induces genes that encode secreted attachment and migration factors (galectin-15 [LGALS15] and insulin-like growth factor binding protein one [IGFBP1]), intracellular enzymes (prostaglandin G/H synthase and cyclooxygenase 2 [PTGS2] and hydroxysteroid (11-beta) dehydrogenase 1 [HSD11B1]), secreted proteases (cathepsin L1 [CTSL1]), secreted protease inhibitors (cystatin C [CST] 3 and 6), a secreted candidate cell proliferation factor (gastrin releasing peptide [GRP]), glucose transporters (SLC2A1, SLC2A5, SLC5A1), and a cationic amino acid (arginine, lysine and ornithine) transporter (SLC7A2) [3, 4, 15]. In the endometrial GE, P4 induces genes that encode for a secreted cell proliferation factor (GRP), a glucose transporter (SLC5A11), secreted adhesion protein (secreted phosphoprotein one or SPP1), a candidate regulator of calcium/phosphate homeostasis (stanniocalcin one or STC1), and a potential immunomodulatory factor (SERPINA14, also known as uterine milk proteins or uterine serpins) [3, 4, 15]. Several of those P4-induced genes in the epithelia are further stimulated by the actions of PGs, IFNT and/or cortisol, resulting in changes in components of the uterine luminal fluid histroph that regulate conceptus elongation via effects on trophectoderm proliferation and migration (Figures 1 and 2).
Figure 1

Schematic illustrating the effects of ovarian hormones and factors from the endometrium and conceptus trophectoderm on expression of elongation- and implantation-related genes in the endometrial epithelia of the ovine uterus during early pregnancy. Progesterone action for 8–10 days down-regulate expression of the progesterone receptor (PGR). The loss of PGR is correlated with the induction of many genes in the endometrial LE and sGE, including PTGS2 and HSD11B1 involved in prostaglandin (PG) and cortisol production, respectively, in both cyclic and pregnant ewes. If the ewe is pregnant, the trophectoderm synthesizes and secretes PGs, interferon tau (IFNT), and cortisol that act on the endometrium in a cell-specific manner to up-regulate the expression of many P4-induced genes that govern endometrial functions and/or elongation of the conceptus. Legend: GE, glandular epithelia; IFNT, interferon tau; LE, luminal epithelium; PG, prostaglandins; PGR, progesterone receptor; sGE, superficial glandular epithelia.

Table 1

Effects of ovarian progesterone (P4) and intrauterine infusion of interferon tau (IFNT), prostaglandins (PGs) or cortisol on elongation- and implantation-related genes expressed in the endometrial epithelia of the ovine uterus 1

Gene symbol

P4

IFNT

PGs2

Cortisol

Transport of glucose

SLC2A1

+

+

+

SLC2A5

n.d.

n.e.

+

+

SLC2A12

n.d.

+

n.e. or +

+

SLC5A1

+

n.e. or +

+

SLC5A11

+

n.e. or +

n.e.

Transport of amino acids

SLC1A5

n.d.

n.d.

+

+

SLC7A2

+

n.e.

n.e.

Cell proliferation, migration and (or) attachment

GRP

+

+

+

IGFBP1

+

++

n.e.

LGALS15

++

++

++

SPP1

+

n.d.

++

Proteases and their inhibitors

CTSL1

++

n.e. or +

+

CST3

+

n.e. or +

n.e.

CST6

 

+

n.e.

+

Enzymes

HSD11B1

+

++

+

PTGS2

n.e. (+ activity)

n.e. (+ activity)

n.e. (+ activity)

1Effect of hormone or factor denoted as induction (↑), stimulation (+ or ++), no effect (n.e.), decrease (-) or not determined (n.d.). 2Summary data for infusion of PGE2, PGF2α, or PGI2 [40].

Figure 2

Schematic illustrating working hypothesis of the biological role of interferon tau (IFNT) and prostaglandins (PGs) in uterine function and conceptus elongation during early pregnancy in sheep. See text for detailed description. Legend: ABCC4, ATP-binding cassette, sub-family C (CFTR/MRP), member 4; CREB, cAMP responsive element binding protein; IFNAR, interferon (alpha, beta and omega) receptor; DP, prostaglandin D receptor (PTGDR); EP, prostaglandin E receptor (PTGER); FP, prostaglandin F receptor (PTGFR); IP, prostaglandin I receptor (PTGIR); PLA2, phospholipase A2; PPARD, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta; PPARG, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; PTGS2, prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (prostaglandin G/H synthase and cyclooxygenase); PG Synthases, prostaglandin synthases (AKR1C3, PTGDS, PTGES, PTGFS, PTGIS, TBXAS); SLCO2A1, solute carrier organic anion transporter family, member 2A1 (prostaglandin transporter); TBXA2R, thromboxane A2 receptor.

Cattle

Comparisons of the endometrial transcriptome in cyclic and pregnant heifers (days 5, 7, 12 and 13) found no difference prior to pregnancy recognition (days 15 or 16) [41, 42]. Indeed, the major changes required to drive conceptus elongation and establish uterine receptivity to implantation occur between days 7 and 13 in response to ovarian P4, irrespective of whether an appropriately developed embryo/conceptus is present or not [23, 30, 41, 4346]. Similar to sheep, PGR protein is lost from the LE by day 13 and in the GE by day 16, and PGR loss is associated with the down- and up-regulation of genes expressed in the endometrial epithelia [47]. Using a global gene profiling approach, studies have identified the temporal changes that occur in endometrial gene expression in both cyclic [30] and pregnant [43] heifers following an elevation or diminution of post-ovulatory P4 during metestrus that promotes or delays conceptus elongation, respectively [30, 34, 48]. As summarized in a recent review [23], the expression of several genes is lost in the LE and GE, including PGR and a protease (alanyl (membrane) aminopeptidase [ANPEP]), and in the GE, a lipase (lipoprotein lipase [LPL]), protease (matrix metallopeptidase 2 [MMP2]) and immunomodulatory protein with antimicrobial activity (lactotransferrin [LTF]), between days 7 and 13 after onset of estrus or mating in cyclic and pregnant heifers. As expected, many conceptus elongation- and implantation-related genes appear in the endometrial epithelia between days 7 and 13 in cyclic and pregnant heifers. Genes up-regulated in the LE encode a mitogen (connective tissue growth factor [CTGF]) and in the GE encode a transport protein (retinol binding protein 4 [RBP4]), a glucose transporter (SLC5A1), and a protein involved in transport and cell proliferation (fatty acid binding protein 3 [FABP3]). Further, some genes are up regulated in both the LE and GE that encode secreted attachment and migration factors (lectin, galactoside-binding, soluble, 9 [LGALS9] and insulin-like growth factor binding protein one [IGFBP1]) as well as an intracellular enzyme (PTGS2). Those gene expression changes in the endometrium elicit changes in the ULF histotroph that are hypothesized to support conceptus elongation [23, 49, 50]. It is quite clear that substantial differences in gene expression occur between the receptive endometrium of sheep and cattle, as one of the most abundant genes (LGALS15) induced by P4 and stimulated by IFNT in the endometrium of sheep is not expressed in cattle [51]. However, PTGS2 and IGFBP1 are common uterine receptivity markers and regulators of conceptus elongation in both sheep and cattle [46, 52]. Of note, in vitro produced bovine embryos will elongate when transferred into a receptive ovine uterus [53].

Interferon tau regulation of endometrial function and conceptus elongation

Maternal recognition of pregnancy is the physiological process whereby the conceptus signals its presence to the maternal system and prolongs the lifespan of the ovarian CL [54]. In ruminants, IFNT is the pregnancy recognition signal secreted by the elongating conceptus that acts on the endometrium to inhibit development of the luteolytic mechanism [15, 16, 55, 56]. Interferon tau is secreted predominantly by the elongating conceptus before implantation [57, 58]. The antiluteolytic effects of IFNT inhibit transcription of the estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) gene in sheep and oxytocin receptor (OXTR) gene in both sheep and cattle specifically in the endometrial LE. The absence of OXTR in the endometrium prevents the release of luteolytic pulses of PGF2α, thereby ensuring maintenance of the CL and continued production of P4 [3, 59]. Although IFNT inhibits OXTR expression, it does not inhibit expression of PTGS2, which is important for the generation of PGs that are critical regulators of conceptus elongation during early pregnancy [60]. In addition to antiluteolytic effects, IFNT acts in a paracrine manner on the endometrium to induce or enhance expression of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) that are hypothesized to regulate uterine receptivity and conceptus elongation and implantation [4, 40, 61, 62].

Classical type I IFN-stimulated genes in the endometrium

A number of transcriptional profiling experiments conducted with human cells, ovine endometrium, bovine endometrium, and bovine peripheral blood lymphocytes have elucidated classical ISG induced by IFNT during pregnancy [3, 4, 41, 42, 63]. In cattle, comparisons of days 15 to 18 pregnant and non-pregnant or cyclic endometria revealed conceptus effects on endometrial gene expression, particularly the induction or up-regulation of classical ISGs [23, 4143, 64, 65]. In sheep, ISG15 (ISG15 ubiquitin-like modifier) is expressed in LE of the ovine uterus on days 10 or 11 of the estrous cycle and pregnancy, but is not detected in the LE by days 12 to 13 of pregnancy [66]. In response to IFNT from the elongating conceptus, ISG15 is induced in the stratum compactum stroma and GE by days 13 to 14, and expression extends to the stratum spongiosum stroma, deep glands, and myometrium as well as resident immune cells of the ovine uterus by days 15 to 16 of pregnancy [66, 67]. As IFNT production by the conceptus trophectoderm declines, expression of ISG in the stroma and GE also declines, but some remain abundant in endometrial stroma and GE on days 18 to 20 of pregnancy. Similar temporal and spatial alterations in ISG15 expression occur in the bovine uterus during early pregnancy [68, 69].

In vivo studies revealed that the majority of classical ISG (B2M, GBP2, IFI27, IFIT1, ISG15, IRF9, MIC, OAS, RSAD2, STAT1, and STAT2) are not induced or up-regulated by IFNT in endometrial LE or sGE of the ovine uterus during early pregnancy [66, 7073]. This finding was initially surprising, because all endometrial cell types express IFNAR1 (interferon [alpha, beta and omega] receptor 1) and IFNAR2 subunits of the common Type I IFN receptor [74]. Further, bovine endometrial, ovine endometrial, and human 2fTGH fibroblast cells were used to determine that IFNT activates the canonical janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription-interferon regulatory factor (JAK-STAT-IRF) signaling pathway used by other Type I IFNs [75]. About the same time, it was discovered that IRF2, a potent transcriptional repressor of ISGs [76], is expressed specifically in the endometrial LE and sGE and represses transcriptional activity of genes containing IFN-stimulated response element (ISRE)-containing promoters [70, 77]. In fact, all components of the ISGF3 transcription factor complex (STAT1, STAT2, IRF9) and other classical ISGs (B2M, GBP2, IFI27, IFIT1, ISG15, MIC, OAS) contain one or more ISRE in their promoters. Thus, IRF2 in LE appears to restrict IFNT induction of most classical ISG to stroma and GE of the ovine uterus. The silencing of MIC and B2M genes in endometrial LE or sGE during pregnancy may be a critical mechanism preventing immune rejection of the semi-allogeneic conceptus [71]. As IRF2 is not expressed in other uterine cell types, classical ISGs are substantially increased in the endometrial stroma, GE and immune cells by IFNT from the conceptus during early pregnancy. Of particular note, several reports indicate induction or increases in ISGs in peripheral blood lymphocytes and the CL during pregnancy of sheep and cattle or in ewes receiving intrauterine injections of IFNT [61, 63]. Recent evidence indicates that IFNT exits the uterus to exert systemic effects that alter maternal physiology, including function of the CL [61, 7880].

One challenge has been to determine which of the large number of classical ISGs induced in the endometrium by IFNT have a biological role in conceptus-endometrial interactions, as traditionally the main function of Type I IFN is to inhibit viral infection and has primarily been associated with cellular antiviral responses [81]. One classical ISG with reported biological effects on trophectoderm growth and adhesion in ruminants is CXCL10 [chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 10; alias IP-10], a member of the C-X-C chemokine family that regulates multiple aspects of inflammatory and immune responses primarily through chemotactic activity toward subsets of leukocytes [82, 83]. ISG15 conjugates to intracellular proteins through a ubiquitin-like mechanism [40], and deletion of Isg15 in mice results in 50% pregnancy loss manifest during early placentation [84]. In addition, MX proteins are thought to regulate secretion through an unconventional secretory pathway [85]. The enzymes which comprise the 2′,5′-oligoadenylate synthetase (OAS) family regulate ribonuclease L antiviral responses and may play additional roles in control of cellular growth and differentiation [72].

Non-classical IFNT-stimulated genes in the endometrium

Although IFNT is the only known IFN to act as the pregnancy recognition signal, IFNs appear to have a biological role in uterine receptivity, decidualization, and placental growth and development in primates, ruminants, pigs, and rodents [40, 62]. Transcriptional profiling of human U3A (STAT1 null) cells and ovine endometrium, as well as candidate gene analyses were used to discover novel ‘non-classical’ ISG in the endometrial LE during pregnancy such as CST3, CTSL, HSD11B1, IGFBP1, LGALS15 and WNT7A (wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 7A) [28, 8690]. Subsequently, a series of transcriptomic and candidate gene studies found that IFNT stimulates expression of a number of elongation- and implantation-related genes that are initially induced by P4 (CST3, CST6, CTSL, GRP, HSD11B1, IGFBP1, LGALS15, SLC2A1, SLC2A5, SLC5A11, SLC7A2) specifically in the endometrial LE, sGE, and (or) GE [3, 4, 62, 90] (Figure 1). None of these genes are classical Type I ISG, and are referred to as ‘non-classical or novel’ ISG. Indeed, IFNT stimulation of these non-classical ISG requires induction by P4 and loss of PGR in the epithelia. Importantly, all of the non-classical ISG encode factors that have actions on the trophectoderm (proliferation, migration, attachment and (or) adhesion, nutrient transport) important for conceptus elongation (Table 1). For example, knockdown of an arginine transporter (SLC7A1) in the conceptus trophectoderm and inhibition of PTGS2 or HSD11B1 activity in utero compromised conceptus elongation in sheep [60, 91, 92]. The effects of IFNT in the bovine endometrium are not as well understood in terms of non-classical ISGs, but recent studies have started to unravel those effects in cattle [41, 42, 93].

Given that the critical signaling components of the JAK-STAT signaling system (STAT1, STAT2, IRF9) are not expressed in endometrial LE or sGE [70], IFNT must utilize a noncanonical, STAT1-independent signaling pathway to regulate expression of genes in endometrial LE and sGE of the ovine uterus. The noncanonical pathway mediating IFNT stimulation of genes in the endometrial LE and sGE has not been entirely elucidated, but other Type I IFN utilize mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) cascades [94]. Available evidence suggests that IFNT activates distinct epithelial and stromal cell-specific JAK, epidermal growth factor receptor, MAPK (ERK1/2), PI3K-AKT, and (or) Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling modules to regulate expression of PGE2 receptors in the endometrium of the ovine uterus or in ovine uterine LE cells in vitro[95, 96]. As discussed subsequently, recent evidence indicates that PTGS2-derived PGs and HSD11B1-derived cortisol are part of the noncanonical pathway of IFNT action on the endometrium in sheep [60, 97].

Prostaglandin regulation of endometrial function and conceptus elongation

Results of recent studies in sheep support the concept that PGs regulate expression of elongation- and implantation-related genes in the endometrial epithelia of ruminants during early pregnancy and are involved in conceptus elongation [46, 60, 98] (Figures 1 and 2). The conceptus and endometria synthesize a variety of PGs during early pregnancy in both sheep and cattle [99104]. The endometrium produces and uterine lumen contains substantially more PGs during early pregnancy than during the estrous cycle [105107]. The dominant cyclooxygenase expressed in both the endometrium and trophectoderm of the elongating conceptus is PTGS2 [104106]. Although the antiluteolytic effects of IFNT are to inhibit expression of the OXTR in the endometrial LE and sGE of early pregnant ewes, it does not impede up-regulation of PTGS2, a rate-limiting enzyme in PG synthesis [102, 107]. In sheep, PTGS2 activity in the endometrium is stimulated by IFNT, and PTGS2-derived PG were found to mediate, in part, the effects of P4 and IFNT on the endometrium of the ovine uterus. In those studies, the abundance of HSD11B1 and IGFBP1 mRNA in the endometrium was considerably reduced by intrauterine infusion of meloxicam, a selective PTGS2 inhibitor. As illustrated in Figure 1, PTGS2 expression appears between days 10 and 12 post-estrus and mating in the endometrial LE and sGE and is induced by ovarian P4 [98, 102]. In the bovine uterus, PTGS2 is also not down-regulated in endometria of early pregnant cattle, but rather is up-regulated by IFNT [108, 109]. Thus, IFNT acts as a molecular switch that stimulates PGE2 production in the bovine endometrium [110]. Indeed, Type I IFNs were found to stimulate phospholipase A2 (PLA2) and synthesis of PGE2 and PGF in several different cell types over 25 years ago [111, 112].

Prostaglandins are essential for conceptus elongation, as intrauterine infusions of meloxicam prevented conceptus elongation in early pregnant sheep [60, 98]. The elongating conceptuses of both sheep and cattle synthesize and secrete more PG than the underlying endometrium [99, 100, 113]. Thus, PG levels are much greater in the uterine lumen of pregnant as compared with cyclic or nonpregnant cattle [106]. In sheep, Charpigny and coworkers [103] found that PTGS2 was abundant in day 8 to 17 blastocysts/conceptuses, whereas PTGS1 was undetectable. PTGS2 protein increased in the conceptus trophectoderm between days 8 and 14 and was maximal between days 14 and 16. In fact, there was a 30-fold increase in PTGS2 content per protein extract between days 10 and 14, corresponding to a 50,000-fold increase in the whole conceptus, and PTGS2 protein in the conceptus then declined substantially after Day 16 to become undetectable by day 25 of pregnancy. Other studies found that Day 14 sheep conceptuses in vitro release mainly cyclooxygenase metabolites including PGF2α, 6-keto-PGF1α (i.e., a stable metabolite of PGI2), and PGE2[103], and day 16 conceptuses produce substantially more of those PGs than day 14 conceptuses [101]. Given that membrane and nuclear receptors for PGs are present in all cell types of the ovine endometrium and conceptus during early pregnancy [60, 114], PTGS2-derived PGs from the conceptus likely have paracrine, autocrine, and perhaps intracrine effects on endometrial function and conceptus development during early pregnancy (Figure 2). Indeed, expression of PTGS2 in biopsies of day 7 bovine blastocysts is a predictor of the successful development of that blastocyst to term and delivery of a live calf [114]. Further, pregnancy rates were substantially reduced in heifers that received meloxicam, a partially selective inhibitor of PTGS2, on day 15 after insemination [115]. Thus, PGs are critical regulators of conceptus elongation and implantation in ruminants, as they are for blastocyst implantation and decidualization during pregnancy in mice, rats, hamsters, mink and likely humans [116118].

Recently, Dorniak and coworkers [52] infused PGE2, PGF, PGI2, or IFNT, at the levels produced by the day 14 conceptus, into the uterus of cyclic ewes. In that study, expression of GRP, IGFBP1, and LGALS15 were increased by PGE2, PGI2, and IFNT, but only IFNT increased CST6 (Table 1). Differential effects of PG were also observed for CTSL1 and its inhibitor CST3. For glucose transporters, IFNT and all PG increased SLC2A1, but only PG increased SLC2A5 expression, whereas SLC2A12 and SLC5A1 were increased by IFNT, PGE2, and PGF. Infusions of all PGs and IFNT increased the amino acid transporter SLC1A5, but only IFNT increased SLC7A2. In the uterine lumen, only IFNT increased glucose levels, and only PGE2 and PGF increased total amino acids [52]. Thus, available results support the idea that PG and IFNT from the conceptus coordinately regulate endometrial functions important for growth and development of the conceptus during the peri-implantation period of pregnancy [22] (Figures 1 and 2).

Prostaglandins also have intracrine effects within cells. Both PGI2 and PGJ2 can activate nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activating receptors (PPARs) [119]. PGI2 is a ligand for PPARD, and PGD2 spontaneously forms 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-PGJ2 within cells that is a ligand for PPARG [120123]. PPARs dimerize with retinoid X receptors (RXRs) and regulate transcription of target genes. Although PGs are lipid-derived, their efflux out and influx into cells depends on specific PG transporters (PGT) termed solute carrier organic anion transporter family, member 20A1 (SLC20A1) and ATP-binding cassette, sub-family C (CFTR/MRP), member 4 (ABCC4 or MRP4). PGJ2 and PGI2 are not as efficiently transported as other PGs (PGE2, PGF, TBXA2). Expression of prostacyclin (PGI2) synthase (PTGIS), PGI2 receptors (PTGIR), PPARs and RXRs in uteri and conceptuses of sheep during early pregnancy has been well documented [124]. In the endometrium, PTGIS mRNA and protein were expressed mainly in the endometrial LE/sGE as early as day 9 of pregnancy, but levels declined from days 12 to 17. Expression of PTGIR, PPARs (PPARA, PPARD, PPARG) and RXRs (RXRA, RXRB, RXRG) was detected in the endometrium, and PPARD and PPARG were particularly abundant in the endometrial LE and sGE. In the conceptus trophectoderm, PTGIS expression increased and then peaked at day 17. PTGIR and PPARA mRNAs peaked before day 12 and then declined and were nearly undetectable by Day 17, whereas PPARD and PPARG mRNAs increased from Days 12 to 17 in the conceptus. These results suggest that PPARG may also regulate conceptus trophectoderm development and differentiation due to intrinsic actions of PGJ2, which is spontaneously formed within cells from PGD2.

Unexpectedly, genetic studies in mice found that Pparg is essential for placental development, as null mutation of Pparg in mice resulted in placentae with poor differentiation and vascular anomalies, leading to embryonic death by gestational day 10 [123]. In mink, treatment of trophoblast cells with PGJ2 attenuated cell proliferation, increased PPARG expression, elicited the appearance of enlarged and multinuclear cells, and increased the expression of adipophilin or ADRP (adipose differentiation-related protein), a protein involved in lipid homeostasis, and SPP1 [125]. PPARs alter the transport, cellular uptake, storage, and use of lipids and their derivatives [119]. In extravillous cytotrophoblasts of human placentae, PPARG stimulates synthesis of chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) and increases free fatty acid (FFA) uptake. PPARG-regulated genes include fatty acid binding proteins (FABP) and fatty acid transport proteins [FATP or SLC27As] required for lipid uptake and triacylglycerol synthesis, which is undoubtedly important in rapidly growing and elongating conceptuses producing large amounts of PGs.

Mice deficient in Ppard also exhibit placental defects and reduced or inhibited trophoblast giant cell differentiation [126, 127]. PPARD is activated by PGI2, and treatment of rat trophoblast cells with a specific PPARD agonist triggered early differentiation of giant cells that expressed CSH1 (chorionic somatomammotropin hormone one or placental lactogen) and reduced expression of inhibitor of differentiation two (ID2), which is an inhibitor of several basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors, such as HAND1, that promote giant cell differentiation. Further, PPARD increases expression of ADRP, and PPARD potentiates cell polarization and migration in the skin [128], which are all cellular activities implicated in conceptus elongation. Thus, PTGS2-derived PGs and PPARG may impact conceptus elongation via effects on trophectoderm growth and survival as well as expression of elongation- and implantation-related genes in the endometrial epithelia.

Cortisol regulation of endometrial function and conceptus elongation

Initially identified as a candidate P4-regulated gene in the endometrium that potentially governed conceptus elongation [36, 52], HSD11B1 was found to be expressed specifically in the endometrial LE and sGE and is induced by P4 and stimulated by IFNT and PGs in the endometrium of the ovine uterus [98] (Table 1). Expression of HSD11B1 is also up-regulated in the endometrium of cattle between days 7 and 13 of pregnancy [43]. One of two isoforms of hydroxysteroid (11-beta) dehydrogenases that regulate intracellular levels of bioactive glucocorticoids within key target tissues [129], HSD11B1 is a low affinity NADP(H)-dependent bidirectional dehydrogenase/reductase for glucocorticoids, and the direction of HSD11B1 activity is determined by the relative abundance of NADP+ and NADPH co-factors. The endometrium of the ovine uterus as well as conceptus generates active cortisol from inactive cortisone [97]. Cortisol regulates gene expression via the nuclear receptor subfamily 3, group C, member 1 (NR3C1 or glucocorticoid receptor [GR]), a transcriptional regulator that modulates expression of primary target genes that either directly affect cellular physiology or alter the expression of other secondary target genes, which then confer hormonal responses [130, 131].

Recent findings support the idea that PGs mediate, in part, P4 induction and IFNT stimulation of HSD11B1 expression in the ovine endometrium [60, 97]. Similarly, PG regulate activity of HSD11B1 in bovine endometria [132], and PGF stimulates the activity of HSD11B1 in human fetal membranes [133, 134]. Whereas PG stimulate HSD11B1 activity, glucocorticoids enhance PG synthesis by up-regulating expression and activity of PLA2 and PTGS2 in the ovine placenta, thereby establishing a positive feed-forward loop implicated in the timing of parturition [135]. This tissue-specific stimulatory role of glucocorticoids on PG synthesis contradicts the classical concept that glucocorticoids exert anti-inflammatory effects on immune cells [136].

Available results support the idea that cortisol from the endometrium as well as conceptus regulates endometrial functions important for conceptus elongation during early pregnancy in sheep. The day 14 conceptus expresses both HSD11B1 and HSD11B2 as well as NR3C1[60, 98]. Indeed, the elongating sheep conceptus generates cortisol from cortisone via HSD11B1, and elevated levels of cortisol are found in the uterine lumen of early pregnant sheep [97]. Thus, cortisol may have paracrine and intracrine effects on the endometrium and conceptus trophectoderm during early pregnancy (Figure 1). As summarized in Table 1, intrauterine infusions of cortisol at early pregnancy levels into the uterus of cyclic ewes from day 10 to 14 post-estrus increased the expression of several elongation- and implantation-related genes expressed in the endometrial epithelia of the ovine uterus and increased endometrial PTGS2 and HSD11B1 expression and/or activity [92]. Similar to IFNT actions, PTGS2-derived PGs mediated some effects of cortisol. In order to determine if HSD11B1-derived cortisol is important for conceptus elongation, PF915275, a selective HSD11B1 inhibitor, was infused into the uterine lumen of bred ewes from days 8 to 14 post-mating [92]. Inhibition of HSD11B1 activity in utero prevented conceptus elongation. Thus, HSD11B1-derived cortisol is an essential regulator of conceptus elongation via effects on trophectoderm growth and survival as well as expression of elongation- and implantation-related genes in the endometrial epithelia.

The effect of knocking out NR3C1 in the elongating conceptus has not been reported in ruminants. Indeed, NR3C1 targets hundreds of genes, including those involved in lipid metabolism and triglyceride homeostasis, in other organs and cell types [130, 137]. In humans, the proposed positive roles of HSD11B1-generated cortisol at the conceptus-maternal interface include stimulation of hormone secretion by the trophoblast, promotion of trophoblast growth/invasion, and stimulation of placental transport of glucose, lactate and amino acids. Indeed, glucocorticoids can have positive as well as negative effects during pregnancy [138]. Administration of synthetic glucocorticoids to women during pregnancy can alter normal development of the fetus and compromise pregnancy success by inhibiting cytokine-PG signaling, restricting trophoblast invasion, and inducing apoptosis in placenta. Similarly, administration of synthetic glucocorticoids to pregnant ewes reduced placental growth and development, numbers of trophoblast giant binucleate cells in the placenta, and circulating levels of placental lactogen [139]. On the other hand, natural glucocorticoids are hypothesized to have positive effects during early pregnancy [138]. Interestingly, administration of glucocorticoids increased pregnancy rates in women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies and pregnancy outcomes in women with a history of recurrent miscarriage [140, 141].

Conclusions

The individual, additive and synergistic actions of P4, IFNT, PGs and cortisol regulate expression of elongation- and implantation-related genes in the endometrial epithelia in ruminants. The outcome of the carefully orchestrated changes in gene expression is secretion or transport of substances (e.g., glucose, amino acids, proteins) from the endometrium into the uterine lumen that govern conceptus survival and elongation via effects on trophectoderm proliferation, migration, attachment, and adhesion. Moreover, conceptus elongation is also likely governed by intracrine factors and pathways such as PGs and PPARs. A systems biology approach is necessary to fully understand conceptus elongation and the multifactorial phenomenon of early pregnancy loss. Such information is critical to provide a basis for new strategies to improve the fertility and reproductive efficiency in ruminant livestock.

Ethical approval

This is a review paper; however, all results reported based on research by the authors was approved by the Washington State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Support for the work described in this review paper was supported, in part, by AFRI competitive grants 2009–01722 and 2012-67015-30173 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Animal Science and Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University

References

  1. Ulbrich SE, Groebner AE, Bauersachs S: Transcriptional profiling to address molecular determinants of endometrial receptivity–lessons from studies in livestock species. Methods. 2013, 59: 108-115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Spencer TE, Johnson GA, Bazer FW, Burghardt RC: Implantation mechanisms: insights from the sheep. Reproduction. 2004, 128: 657-668.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Spencer TE, Johnson GA, Bazer FW, Burghardt RC: Fetal-maternal interactions during the establishment of pregnancy in ruminants. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2007, 64: 379-396.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Spencer TE, Sandra O, Wolf E: Genes involved in conceptus-endometrial interactions in ruminants: insights from reductionism and thoughts on holistic approaches. Reproduction. 2008, 135: 165-179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Guillomot M: Cellular interactions during implantation in domestic ruminants. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1995, 49: 39-51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hue I, Degrelle SA, Turenne N: Conceptus elongation in cattle: genes, models and questions. Anim Reprod Sci. 2012, 134: 19-28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Berg DK, van Leeuwen J, Beaumont S, Berg M, Pfeffer PL: Embryo loss in cattle between Days 7 and 16 of pregnancy. Theriogenology. 2010, 73: 250-260.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Betteridge KJ, Eaglesome MD, Randall GC, Mitchell D: Collection, description and transfer of embryos from cattle 10–16 days after oestrus. J Reprod Fertil. 1980, 59: 205-216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wales RG, Cuneo CL: Morphology and chemical analysis of the sheep conceptus from the 13th to the 19th day of pregnancy. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1989, 1: 31-39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Wang J, Guillomot M, Hue I: Cellular organization of the trophoblastic epithelium in elongating conceptuses of ruminants. C R Biol. 2009, 332: 986-997.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Guillomot M, Flechon JE, Wintenberger-Torres S: Conceptus attachment in the ewe: an ultrastructural study. Placenta. 1981, 2: 169-182.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Betteridge KJ, Flechon JE: The anatomy and physiology of pre-attachment bovine embryos. Theriogenology. 1988, 29: 155-187.Google Scholar
  13. Lonergan P: Influence of progesterone on oocyte quality and embryo development in cows. Theriogenology. 2011, 76: 1594-1601.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gray CA, Taylor KM, Ramsey WS, Hill JR, Bazer FW, Bartol FF, Spencer TE: Endometrial glands are required for preimplantation conceptus elongation and survival. Biol Reprod. 2001, 64: 1608-1613.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bazer FW, Wu G, Spencer TE, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Bayless K: Novel pathways for implantation and establishment and maintenance of pregnancy in mammals. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010, 16: 135-152.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Spencer TE, Johnson GA, Bazer FW, Burghardt RC, Palmarini M: Pregnancy recognition and conceptus implantation in domestic ruminants: roles of progesterone, interferons and endogenous retroviruses. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2007, 19: 65-78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bazer FW: Uterine protein secretions: relationship to development of the conceptus. J Anim Sci. 1975, 41: 1376-1382.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gray CA, Bartol FF, Tarleton BJ, Wiley AA, Johnson GA, Bazer FW, Spencer TE: Developmental biology of uterine glands. Biol Reprod. 2001, 65: 1311-1323.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bazer FW, Song G, Kim J, Erikson DW, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Gao H, Carey Satterfield M, Spencer TE, Wu G: Mechanistic mammalian target of rapamycin (MTOR) cell signaling: effects of select nutrients and secreted phosphoprotein 1 on development of mammalian conceptuses. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012, 354: 22-33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Koch JM, Ramadoss J, Magness RR: Proteomic profile of uterine luminal fluid from early pregnant ewes. J Proteome Res. 2010, 9: 3878-3885.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Burns G, Brooks K, Wildung M, Navakanitworakul R, Christenson LK, Spencer TE: Extracellular vesicles in luminal fluid of the ovine uterus. PLoS One. 2014, 9: e90913.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Dorniak P, Bazer FW, Spencer TE: Physiology and endocrinology symposium: biological role of interferon tau in endometrial function and conceptus elongation. J Anim Sci. 2013, 91: 1627-1638.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Forde N, Lonergan P: Transcriptomic analysis of the bovine endometrium: what is required to establish uterine receptivity to implantation in cattle?. J Reprod Dev. 2012, 58: 189-195.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mann GE, Lamming GE: Relationship between maternal endocrine environment, early embryo development and inhibition of the luteolytic mechanism in cows. Reproduction. 2001, 121: 175-180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Garrett JE, Geisert RD, Zavy MT, Gries LK, Wettemann RP, Buchanan DS: Effect of exogenous progesterone on prostaglandin F2 alpha release and the interestrous interval in the bovine. Prostaglandins. 1988, 36: 85-96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Carter F, Forde N, Duffy P, Wade M, Fair T, Crowe MA, Evans AC, Kenny DA, Roche JF, Lonergan P: Effect of increasing progesterone concentration from Day 3 of pregnancy on subsequent embryo survival and development in beef heifers. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2008, 20: 368-375.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mann GE, Fray MD, Lamming GE: Effects of time of progesterone supplementation on embryo development and interferon-tau production in the cow. Vet J. 2006, 171: 500-503.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Satterfield MC, Bazer FW, Spencer TE: Progesterone regulation of preimplantation conceptus growth and galectin 15 (LGALS15) in the ovine uterus. Biol Reprod. 2006, 75: 289-296.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Nephew KP, McClure KE, Ott TL, Dubois DH, Bazer FW, Pope WF: Relationship between variation in conceptus development and differences in estrous cycle duration in ewes. Biol Reprod. 1991, 44: 536-539.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Forde N, Beltman ME, Duffy GB, Duffy P, Mehta JP, O’Gaora P, Roche JF, Lonergan P, Crowe MA: Changes in the endometrial transcriptome during the bovine estrous cycle: effect of low circulating progesterone and consequences for conceptus elongation. Biol Reprod. 2011, 84: 266-278.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Beltman ME, Lonergan P, Diskin MG, Roche JF, Crowe MA: Effect of progesterone supplementation in the first week post conception on embryo survival in beef heifers. Theriogenology. 2009, 71: 1173-1179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Wiltbank MC, Souza AH, Carvalho PD, Bender RW, Nascimento AB: Improving fertility to timed artificial insemination by manipulation of circulating progesterone concentrations in lactating dairy cattle. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2011, 24: 238-243.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lonergan P, Woods A, Fair T, Carter F, Rizos D, Ward F, Quinn K, Evans A: Effect of embryo source and recipient progesterone environment on embryo development in cattle. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2007, 19: 861-868.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Clemente M, de La Fuente J, Fair T, Al Naib A, Gutierrez-Adan A, Roche JF, Rizos D, Lonergan P: Progesterone and conceptus elongation in cattle: a direct effect on the embryo or an indirect effect via the endometrium?. Reproduction. 2009, 138: 507-517.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Larson JE, Krisher RL, Lamb GC: Effects of supplemental progesterone on the development, metabolism and blastocyst cell number of bovine embryos produced in vitro. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2011, 23: 311-318.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Satterfield MC, Song G, Kochan KJ, Riggs PK, Simmons RM, Elsik CG, Adelson DL, Bazer FW, Zhou H, Spencer TE: Discovery of candidate genes and pathways in the endometrium regulating ovine blastocyst growth and conceptus elongation. Physiol Genomics. 2009, 39: 85-99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kao LC, Tulac S, Lobo S, Imani B, Yang JP, Germeyer A, Osteen K, Taylor RN, Lessey BA, Giudice LC: Global gene profiling in human endometrium during the window of implantation. Endocrinology. 2002, 143: 2119-2138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Giudice LC, Ferenczy A: The Endometrial Cycle. Reproductive Endocrinology, Surgery and Technology. Edited by: Adashi EY, Rock J, Rosenwaks Z. 1996, Philadelphia: Lippencott-Raven, 271-300.Google Scholar
  39. Spencer TE, Bazer FW: Biology of progesterone action during pregnancy recognition and maintenance of pregnancy. Front Biosci. 2002, 7: d1879-1898.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hansen TR, Austin KJ, Perry DJ, Pru JK, Teixeira MG, Johnson GA: Mechanism of action of interferon-tau in the uterus during early pregnancy. J Reprod Fertil. 1999, 54: 329-339.Google Scholar
  41. Forde N, Carter F, Spencer TE, Bazer FW, Sandra O, Mansouri-Attia N, Okumu LA, McGettigan PA, Mehta JP, McBride R, O’Gaora P, Roche JF, Lonergan P: Conceptus-induced changes in the endometrial transcriptome: how soon does the cow know she is pregnant?. Biol Reprod. 2011, 85: 144-156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Bauersachs S, Ulbrich SE, Reichenbach HD, Reichenbach M, Buttner M, Meyer HH, Spencer TE, Minten M, Sax G, Winter G, Wolf E: Comparison of the effects of early pregnancy with human interferon, alpha 2 (IFNA2), on gene expression in bovine endometrium. Biol Reprod. 2012, 86: 46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Forde N, Carter F, Fair T, Crowe MA, Evans AC, Spencer TE, Bazer FW, McBride R, Boland MP, O’Gaora P, Lonergan P, Roche JF: Progesterone-regulated changes in endometrial gene expression contribute to advanced conceptus development in cattle. Biol Reprod. 2009, 81: 784-794.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Forde N, Spencer TE, Bazer FW, Song G, Roche JF, Lonergan P: Effect of pregnancy and progesterone concentration on expression of genes encoding for transporters or secreted proteins in the bovine endometrium. Physiol Genomics. 2010, 41: 53-62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Forde N, Mehta JP, Minten M, Crowe MA, Roche JF, Spencer TE, Lonergan P: Effects of low progesterone on the endometrial transcriptome in cattle. Biol Reprod. 2012, 87: 124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Simmons RM, Erikson DW, Kim J, Burghardt RC, Bazer FW, Johnson GA, Spencer TE: Insulin-like growth factor binding protein one in the ruminant uterus: potential endometrial marker and regulator of conceptus elongation. Endocrinology. 2009, 150: 4295-4305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Okumu LA, Forde N, Fahey AG, Fitzpatrick E, Roche JF, Crowe MA, Lonergan P: The effect of elevated progesterone and pregnancy status on mRNA expression and localisation of progesterone and oestrogen receptors in the bovine uterus. Reproduction. 2010, 140: 143-153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Beltman ME, Roche JF, Lonergan P, Forde N, Crowe MA: Evaluation of models to induce low progesterone during the early luteal phase in cattle. Theriogenology. 2009, 72: 986-992.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Forde N, Mehta JP, McGettigan PA, Mamo S, Bazer FW, Spencer TE, Lonergan P: Alterations in expression of endometrial genes coding for proteins secreted into the uterine lumen during conceptus elongation in cattle. BMC Genomics. 2013, 14: 321.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Forde N, McGettigan PA, Mehta JP, O’Hara L, Mamo S, Bazer FW, Spencer TE, Lonergan P: Proteomic analysis of uterine fluid during the pre-implantation period of pregnancy in cattle. Reproduction. 2014, 147: 575-587.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Lewis SK, Farmer JL, Burghardt RC, Newton GR, Johnson GA, Adelson DL, Bazer FW, Spencer TE: Galectin 15 (LGALS15): a gene uniquely expressed in the uteri of sheep and goats that functions in trophoblast attachment. Biol Reprod. 2007, 77: 1027-1036.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Dorniak P, Bazer FW, Wu G, Spencer TE: Conceptus-derived prostaglandins regulate endometrial function in sheep. Biol Reprod. 2012, 87 (9): 1-7.Google Scholar
  53. Black SG, Arnaud F, Burghardt RC, Satterfield MC, Fleming JA, Long CR, Hanna C, Murphy L, Biek R, Palmarini M, Spencer TE: Viral particles of endogenous betaretroviruses are released in the sheep uterus and infect the conceptus trophectoderm in a transspecies embryo transfer model. J Virol. 2010, 84: 9078-9085.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Bazer FW, Thatcher WW, Hansen PJ, Mirando MA, Ott TL, Plante C: Physiological mechanisms of pregnancy recognition in ruminants. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1991, 43: 39-47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Spencer TE, Bazer FW: Conceptus signals for establishment and maintenance of pregnancy. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2004, 2: 49.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Spencer TE, Ott TL, Bazer FW: tau-Interferon: pregnancy recognition signal in ruminants. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1996, 213: 215-229.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Robinson RS, Fray MD, Wathes DC, Lamming GE, Mann GE: In vivo expression of interferon tau mRNA by the embryonic trophoblast and uterine concentrations of interferon tau protein during early pregnancy in the cow. Mol Reprod Dev. 2006, 73: 470-474.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Roberts RM, Ezashi T, Rosenfeld CS, Ealy AD, Kubisch HM: Evolution of the interferon tau genes and their promoters, and maternal-trophoblast interactions in control of their expression. Reprod Suppl. 2003, 61: 239-251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Thatcher WW, Hansen PJ, Gross TS, Helmer SD, Plante C, Bazer FW: Antiluteolytic effects of bovine trophoblast protein-1. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1989, 37: 91-99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Dorniak P, Bazer FW, Spencer TE: Prostaglandins regulate conceptus elongation and mediate effects of interferon tau on the ovine uterine endometrium. Biol Reprod. 2011, 84: 1119-1127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Hansen TR, Henkes LK, Ashley RL, Bott RC, Antoniazzi AQ, Han H: Endocrine actions of interferon-tau in ruminants. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2010, 67: 325-340.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Bazer FW, Spencer TE, Johnson GA: Interferons and uterine receptivity. Seminars Reproductive Medicine. 2009, 27: 90-102.Google Scholar
  63. Ott TL, Gifford CA: Effects of early conceptus signals on circulating immune cells: lessons from domestic ruminants. Am J Reproductive Immunol. 2010, 64: 245-254.Google Scholar
  64. Bauersachs S, Ulbrich SE, Gross K, Schmidt SE, Meyer HH, Wenigerkind H, Vermehren M, Sinowatz F, Blum H, Wolf E: Embryo-induced transcriptome changes in bovine endometrium reveal species-specific and common molecular markers of uterine receptivity. Reproduction. 2006, 132: 319-331.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Cerri RL, Thompson IM, Kim IH, Ealy AD, Hansen PJ, Staples CR, Li JL, Santos JE, Thatcher WW: Effects of lactation and pregnancy on gene expression of endometrium of Holstein cows at day 17 of the estrous cycle or pregnancy. J Dairy Sci. 2012, 95: 5657-5675.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Johnson GA, Spencer TE, Hansen TR, Austin KJ, Burghardt RC, Bazer FW: Expression of the interferon tau inducible ubiquitin cross-reactive protein in the ovine uterus. Biol Reprod. 1999, 61: 312-318.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Johnson GA, Spencer TE, Burghardt RC, Joyce MM, Bazer FW: Interferon-tau and progesterone regulate ubiquitin cross-reactive protein expression in the ovine uterus. Biol Reprod. 2000, 62: 622-627.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Johnson GA, Austin KJ, Collins AM, Murdoch WJ, Hansen TR: Endometrial ISG17 mRNA and a related mRNA are induced by interferon-tau and localized to glandular epithelial and stromal cells from pregnant cows. Endocrine. 1999, 10: 243-252.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Austin KJ, Carr AL, Pru JK, Hearne CE, George EL, Belden EL, Hansen TR: Localization of ISG15 and conjugated proteins in bovine endometrium using immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy. Endocrinology. 2004, 145: 967-975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Choi Y, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Berghman LR, Joyce MM, Taylor KM, Stewart MD, Bazer FW, Spencer TE: Interferon regulatory factor-two restricts expression of interferon- stimulated genes to the endometrial stroma and glandular epithelium of the ovine uterus. Biol Reprod. 2001, 65: 1038-1049.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Choi Y, Johnson GA, Spencer TE, Bazer FW: Pregnancy and interferon tau regulate MHC class I and beta-2-microglobulin expression in the ovine uterus. Biol Reprod. 2003, 68: 1703-1710.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Johnson GA, Stewart MD, Gray CA, Choi Y, Burghardt RC, Yu-Lee LY, Bazer FW, Spencer TE: Effects of the estrous cycle, pregnancy, and interferon tau on 2′,5′- oligoadenylate synthetase expression in the ovine uterus. Biol Reprod. 2001, 64: 1392-1399.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Song G, Bazer FW, Spencer TE: Pregnancy and interferon tau regulate RSAD2 and IFIH1 expression in the ovine uterus. Reproduction. 2007, 133: 285-295.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Rosenfeld CS, Han CS, Alexenko AP, Spencer TE, Roberts RM: Expression of interferon receptor subunits, IFNAR1 and IFNAR2, in the ovine uterus. Biol Reprod. 2002, 67: 847-853.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Stark GR, Kerr IM, Williams BR, Silverman RH, Schreiber RD: How cells respond to interferons. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998, 67: 227-264.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Taniguchi T, Ogasawara K, Takaoka A, Tanaka N: IRF family of transcription factors as regulators of host defense. Annu Rev Immunol. 2001, 19: 623-655.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Spencer TE, Ott TL, Bazer FW: Expression of interferon regulatory factors one and two in the ovine endometrium: effects of pregnancy and ovine interferon tau. Biol Reprod. 1998, 58: 1154-1162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Bott RC, Ashley RL, Henkes LE, Antoniazzi AQ, Bruemmer JE, Niswender GD, Bazer FW, Spencer TE, Smirnova NP, Anthony RV, Hansen TR: Uterine vein infusion of interferon tau (IFNT) extends luteal life span in ewes. Biol Reprod. 2010, 82: 725-735.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Romero JJ, Antoniazzi AQ, Smirnova NP, Webb BT, Yu F, Davis JS, Hansen TR: Pregnancy-associated genes contribute to antiluteolytic mechanisms in ovine corpus luteum. Physiol Genomics. 2013, 45: 1095-1108.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Antoniazzi AQ, Webb BT, Romero JJ, Ashley RL, Smirnova NP, Henkes LE, Bott RC, Oliveira JF, Niswender GD, Bazer FW, Hansen TR: Endocrine delivery of interferon tau protects the corpus luteum from prostaglandin F2 alpha-induced luteolysis in ewes. Biol Reprod. 2013, 88: 144.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Pestka S: The interferons: 50 years after their discovery, there is much more to learn. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282: 20047-20051.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Nagaoka K, Sakai A, Nojima H, Suda Y, Yokomizo Y, Imakawa K, Sakai S, Christenson RK: A chemokine, interferon (IFN)-gamma-inducible protein 10 kDa, is stimulated by IFN-tau and recruits immune cells in the ovine endometrium. Biol Reprod. 2003, 68: 1413-1421.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Nagaoka K, Nojima H, Watanabe F, Chang KT, Christenson RK, Sakai S, Imakawa K: Regulation of blastocyst migration, apposition, and initial adhesion by a chemokine, interferon gamma-inducible protein 10 kDa (IP-10), during early gestation. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 29048-29056.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Ashley RL, Henkes LE, Bouma GJ, Pru JK, Hansen TR: Deletion of the Isg15 gene results in up-regulation of decidual cell survival genes and down-regulation of adhesion genes: implication for regulation by IL-1beta. Endocrinology. 2010, 151: 4527-4536.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Toyokawa K, Leite F, Ott TL: Cellular localization and function of the antiviral protein, ovine Mx1 (oMx1): II. The oMx1 protein is a regulator of secretion in an ovine glandular epithelial cell line. Am J Reproductive Immunol. 2007, 57: 23-33.Google Scholar
  86. Song G, Spencer TE, Bazer FW: Cathepsins in the ovine uterus: regulation by pregnancy, progesterone, and interferon tau. Endocrinology. 2005, 146: 4825-4833.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Kim S, Choi Y, Bazer FW, Spencer TE: Identification of genes in the ovine endometrium regulated by interferon tau independent of signal transducer and activator of transcription 1. Endocrinology. 2003, 144: 5203-5214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Gray CA, Abbey CA, Beremand PD, Choi Y, Farmer JL, Adelson DL, Thomas TL, Bazer FW, Spencer TE: Identification of endometrial genes regulated by early pregnancy, progesterone, and interferon tau in the ovine uterus. Biol Reprod. 2006, 74: 383-394.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Song G, Spencer TE, Bazer FW: Progesterone and Interferon Tau Regulate Cystatin C (CST3) in the Endometrium. Endocrinology. 2006, 147: 3478-3483.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Bazer FW, Spencer TE, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Wu G: Comparative aspects of implantation. Reproduction. 2009, 138: 195-209.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Wang X, Frank JW, Little DR, Dunlap KA, Carey Satterfield M, Burghardt RC, Hansen TR, Wu G, Bazer FW: Functional role of arginine during the peri-implantation period of pregnancy. I. Consequences of loss of function of arginine transporter SLC7A1 mRNA in ovine conceptus trophectoderm. FASEB J. 2014, 28: 2852-2863.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Dorniak P, Welsh TH, Bazer FW, Spencer TE: Cortisol and interferon tau regulation of endometrial function and conceptus development in female sheep. Endocrinology. 2013, 154: 931-941.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Forde N, Duffy GB, McGettigan PA, Browne JA, Mehta JP, Kelly AK, Mansouri-Attia N, Sandra O, Loftus BJ, Crowe MA, Fair T, Roche JF, Lonergan P, Evans AC: Evidence for an early endometrial response to pregnancy in cattle: both dependent upon and independent of interferon tau. Physiol Genomics. 2012, 44: 799-810.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Platanias LC: Mechanisms of type-I- and type-II-interferon-mediated signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005, 5: 375-386.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Banu SK, Lee J, Stephen SD, Nithy TK, Arosh JA: Interferon tau regulates PGF2alpha release from the ovine endometrial epithelial cells via activation of novel JAK/EGFR/ERK/EGR-1 pathways. Mol Endocrinol. 2010, 24: 2315-2330.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Lee J, Banu SK, Nithy TK, Stanley JA, Arosh JA: Early pregnancy induced expression of prostaglandin E2 receptors EP2 and EP4 in the ovine endometrium and regulated by interferon tau through multiple cell signaling pathways. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012, 348: 211-223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Dorniak P, Welsh TH, Bazer FW, Spencer TE: Endometrial HSD11B1 and cortisol regeneration in the ovine uterus: effects of pregnancy, interferon tau, and prostaglandins. Biol Reprod. 2012, 86: 124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Simmons RM, Satterfield MC, Welsh TH, Bazer FW, Spencer TE: HSD11B1, HSD11B2, PTGS2, and NR3C1 expression in the peri-implantation ovine uterus: effects of pregnancy, progesterone, and interferon tau. Biol Reprod. 2010, 82: 35-43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Lewis GS, Thatcher WW, Bazer FW, Curl JS: Metabolism of arachidonic acid in vitro by bovine blastocysts and endometrium. Biol Reprod. 1982, 27: 431-439.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Lewis GS, Waterman RA: Effects of endometrium on metabolism of arachidonic acid by bovine blastocysts in vitro. Prostaglandins. 1983, 25: 881-889.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Lewis GS, Waterman RA: Metabolism of arachidonic acid in vitro by ovine conceptuses recovered during early pregnancy. Prostaglandins. 1985, 30: 263-283.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Charpigny G, Reinaud P, Tamby JP, Creminon C, Martal J, Maclouf J, Guillomot M: Expression of cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 in ovine endometrium during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy. Endocrinology. 1997, 138: 2163-2171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Charpigny G, Reinaud P, Tamby JP, Creminon C, Guillomot M: Cyclooxygenase-2 unlike cyclooxygenase-1 is highly expressed in ovine embryos during the implantation period. Biol Reprod. 1997, 57: 1032-1040.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Ellinwood WE, Nett TM, Niswender GD: Maintenance of the corpus luteum of early pregnancy in the ewe. II. Prostaglandin secretion by the endometrium in vitro and in vivo. Biol Reprod. 1979, 21: 845-856.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Marcus GJ: Prostaglandin formation by the sheep embryo and endometrium as an indication of maternal recognition of pregnancy. Biol Reprod. 1981, 25: 56-64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Ulbrich SE, Schulke K, Groebner AE, Reichenbach HD, Angioni C, Geisslinger G, Meyer HH: Quantitative characterization of prostaglandins in the uterus of early pregnant cattle. Reproduction. 2009, 138: 371-382.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Kim S, Choi Y, Spencer TE, Bazer FW: Effects of the estrous cycle, pregnancy and interferon tau on expression of cyclooxygenase two (COX-2) in ovine endometrium. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2003, 1: 58.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Arosh JA, Banu SK, Kimmins S, Chapdelaine P, Maclaren LA, Fortier MA: Effect of interferon-tau on prostaglandin biosynthesis, transport, and signaling at the time of maternal recognition of pregnancy in cattle: evidence of polycrine actions of prostaglandin E2. Endocrinology. 2004, 145: 5280-5293.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Emond V, MacLaren LA, Kimmins S, Arosh JA, Fortier MA, Lambert RD: Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in the endometrial epithelium of the cow is up-regulated during early pregnancy and in response to intrauterine infusions of interferon-tau. Biol Reprod. 2004, 70: 54-64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Krishnaswamy N, Chapdelaine P, Tremblay JP, Fortier MA: Development and characterization of a simian virus 40 immortalized bovine endometrial stromal cell line. Endocrinology. 2009, 150: 485-491.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Fuse A, Mahmud I, Kuwata T: Mechanism of stimulation by human interferon of prostaglandin synthesis in human cell lines. Cancer Res. 1982, 42: 3209-3214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Fitzpatrick FA, Stringfellow DA: Virus and interferon effects on cellular prostaglandin biosynthesis. J Immunol. 1980, 125: 431-437.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Lewis GS: Prostaglandin secretion by the blastocyst. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1989, 37: 261-267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. El-Sayed A, Hoelker M, Rings F, Salilew D, Jennen D, Tholen E, Sirard M-A, Schellander K, Tesfaye D: Large-scale transcriptional analysis of bovine embryo biopsies in relation to pregnancy success after transfer to recipients. Physiol Genomics. 2006, 28: 84-96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Erdem H, Guzeloglu A: Effect of meloxicam treatment during early pregnancy in Holstein heifers. Reprod Domest Anim. 2010, 45: 625-628.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Dey SK, Lim H, Das SK, Reese J, Paria BC, Daikoku T, Wang H: Molecular cues to implantation. Endocr Rev. 2004, 25: 341-373.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Kennedy TG, Gillio-Meina C, Phang SH: Prostaglandins and the initiation of blastocyst implantation and decidualization. Reproduction. 2007, 134: 635-643.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Wang H, Dey SK: Roadmap to embryo implantation: clues from mouse models. Nat Rev Genet. 2006, 7: 185-199.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Desvergne B, Wahli W: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: nuclear control of metabolism. Endocr Rev. 1999, 20: 649-688.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Forman BM, Tontonoz P, Chen J, Brun RP, Spiegelman BM, Evans RM: 15-Deoxy-delta 12, 14-prostaglandin J2 is a ligand for the adipocyte determination factor PPAR gamma. Cell. 1995, 83: 803-812.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Kliewer SA, Lenhard JM, Willson TM, Patel I, Morris DC, Lehmann JM: A prostaglandin J2 metabolite binds peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and promotes adipocyte differentiation. Cell. 1995, 83: 813-819.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. Lim H, Gupta RA, Ma WG, Paria BC, Moller DE, Morrow JD, DuBois RN, Trzaskos JM, Dey SK: Cyclo-oxygenase-2-derived prostacyclin mediates embryo implantation in the mouse via PPARdelta. Genes Dev. 1999, 13: 1561-1574.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Lim H, Dey SK: PPAR delta functions as a prostacyclin receptor in blastocyst implantation. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2000, 11: 137-142.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Cammas L, Reinaud P, Bordas N, Dubois O, Germain G, Charpigny G: Developmental regulation of prostacyclin synthase and prostacyclin receptors in the ovine uterus and conceptus during the peri-implantation period. Reproduction. 2006, 131: 917-927.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Desmarais JA, Lopes FL, Zhang H, Das SK, Murphy BD: The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma regulates trophoblast cell differentiation in mink (Mustela vison). Biol Reprod. 2007, 77: 829-839.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Barak Y, Liao D, He W, Ong ES, Nelson MC, Olefsky JM, Boland R, Evans RM: Effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta on placentation, adiposity, and colorectal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002, 99: 303-308.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Nadra K, Anghel SI, Joye E, Tan NS, Basu-Modak S, Trono D, Wahli W, Desvergne B: Differentiation of trophoblast giant cells and their metabolic functions are dependent on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta/delta. Mol Cell Biol. 2006, 26: 3266-3281.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Tan NS, Icre G, Montagner A, Bordier-ten-Heggeler B, Wahli W, Michalik L: The nuclear hormone receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta/delta potentiates cell chemotactism, polarization, and migration. Mol Cell Biol. 2007, 27: 7161-7175.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. Michael AE, Thurston LM, Rae MT: Glucocorticoid metabolism and reproduction: a tale of two enzymes. Reproduction. 2003, 126: 425-441.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Wang JC, Derynck MK, Nonaka DF, Khodabakhsh DB, Haqq C, Yamamoto KR: Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) scanning identifies primary glucocorticoid receptor target genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101: 15603-15608.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Yamamoto KR: Steroid receptor regulated transcription of specific genes and gene networks. Annu Rev Genet. 1985, 19: 209-252.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. Lee HY, Acosta TJ, Skarzynski DJ, Okuda K: Prostaglandin F2alpha stimulates 11Beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 1 enzyme bioactivity and protein expression in bovine endometrial stromal cells. Biol Reprod. 2009, 80: 657-664.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Alfaidy N, Xiong ZG, Myatt L, Lye SJ, MacDonald JF, Challis JR: Prostaglandin F2alpha potentiates cortisol production by stimulating 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 1: a novel feedback loop that may contribute to human labor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001, 86: 5585-5592.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. Alfaidy N, Li W, MacIntosh T, Yang K, Challis J: Late gestation increase in 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 1 expression in human fetal membranes: a novel intrauterine source of cortisol. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003, 88: 5033-5038.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Challis JRG, Matthews SG, Gibb W, Lye SJ: Endocrine and paracrine regulation of birth at term and preterm. Endocr Rev. 2000, 21: 514-550.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Goppelt-Struebe M: Molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of prostaglandin biosynthesis by glucocorticoids. Biochem Pharmacol. 1997, 53: 1389-1395.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Yu CY, Mayba O, Lee JV, Tran J, Harris C, Speed TP, Wang JC: Genome-wide analysis of glucocorticoid receptor binding regions in adipocytes reveal gene network involved in triglyceride homeostasis. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e15188.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Michael AE, Papageorghiou AT: Potential significance of physiological and pharmacological glucocorticoids in early pregnancy. Hum Reprod Update. 2008, 14: 497-517.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Braun T, Li S, Moss TJ, Newnham JP, Challis JR, Gluckman PD, Sloboda DM: Maternal betamethasone administration reduces binucleate cell number and placental lactogen in sheep. J Endocrinol. 2007, 194: 337-347.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Boomsma CM, Keay SD, Macklon NS: Peri-implantation glucocorticoid administration for assisted reproductive technology cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007, 1: CD005996.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. Quenby S, Kalumbi C, Bates M, Farquharson R, Vince G: Prednisolone reduces preconceptual endometrial natural killer cells in women with recurrent miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2005, 84: 980-984.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Brooks et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement