Skip to main content
Download PDF

Vitamin A regulates intramuscular adipose tissue and muscle development: promoting high-quality beef production

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology volume 12, Article number: 34 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

During growth in cattle, the development of intramuscular adipose tissue and muscle is dependent upon cell hyperplasia (increased number of adipocytes) and hypertrophy (increased size of adipocytes). Based on the results of previous studies, other adipose tissue depots (e.g., perirenal and subcutaneous) develop from the fetal stage primarily as brown adipose tissue. The hyperplastic stage of intramuscular adipose is considered to develop from late pregnancy, but there is no evidence indicating that intramuscular adipose tissue develops initially as brown adipose tissue. Hyperplastic growth of intramuscular adipose continues well into postweaning and is dependent on the timing of the transition to grain-based diets; thereafter, the late-stage development of intramuscular adipose tissue is dominated by hypertrophy. For muscle development, hyperplasia of myoblasts lasts from early (following development of somites in the embryo) to middle pregnancy, after which growth of muscle is the result of hypertrophy of myofibers. Vitamin A is a fat-soluble compound that is required for the normal immunologic function, vision, cellular proliferation, and differentiation. Here we review the roles of vitamin A in intramuscular adipose tissue and muscle development in cattle. Vitamin A regulates both hyperplasia and hypertrophy in in vitro experiments. Vitamin A supplementation at the early stage and restriction at fattening stage generate opposite effects in the beef cattle. Appropriate vitamin A supplementation and restriction strategy increase intramuscular adipose tissue development (i.e., marbling or intramuscular fat) in some in vivo trials. Besides, hyperplasia and hypertrophy of myoblasts/myotubes were affected by vitamin A treatment in in vitro trials. Additionally, some studies reported an interaction between the alcohol dehydrogenase-1C (ADH1C) genotype and vitamin A feed restriction for the development of marbling and/or intramuscular adipose tissue, which was dependent on the timing and level of vitamin A restriction. Therefore, the feed strategy of vitamin A has the visible impact on the marbling and muscle development in the cattle, which will be helpful to promote the quality of the beef.

Introduction

In recent years, with the improvement of national economies, more consumers are willing to pay for high-quality beef with satisfaction, and beef cattle producers also benefit from high-quality beef production. In beef production, beef quality and beef quantity are two of the most critical factors in the beef grading system in many countries such as the USA, South Korea, and Japan [1,2,3]. Vitamin A is a fat-soluble vitamin, which is an essential substance to maintain a healthy vision and primary physiological function of cattle [4, 5]. Vitamin A was first found to be negatively correlated with marbling score in carcasses of Japanese Black steers [6]. This was supported by numerous studies on adipocyte development with vitamin A restriction strategy in beef cattle during fattening period [7,8,9], as well as research in in vitro models [10,11,12]. In addition, the in vitro trial in human and mouse cell model indicated that vitamin A upregulated the preadipocyte genes, but downregulated the adipogenesis level in the [13]. Also, recent study in Angus beef cattle reported that vitamin A supplementation at only birth stage enhanced the final marbling development [14]. These studies suggested that vitamin A feeding strategy might have different effect on marbling development at different stage of the beef cattle. At the same time, the relationship between vitamin A supplementation and muscle development was also investigated in in vivo and in vitro studies [15, 16]. These studies have demonstrated that vitamin A has a profound impact on adipocyte and muscle development in beef cattle.

Vitamin A digestion, metabolism, and physiological function

Vitamin A is a fat-soluble compound required in the diet of many animals, including ruminants [5]. Vitamin A can be absorbed by ruminants from plant sources (as carotenoids, or provitamin A) and feed additives (as retinol or retinyl ester, or preformed vitamin A) [17]. In ruminants, after vitamin A compounds enter the small intestine, mixed micelles containing digested lipid components are transported to intestinal mucosal cells [18]. In the enterocytes (mucosal cells), carotenoids and preformed vitamin A are converted to retinol or retinyl ester under the action of multiple enzymes, including β-carotene 15,15′-monooxygenase, lecithin:retinol acyltransferase and acyl-CoA:retinol acyltransferase [19,20,21]. Retinyl esters are transported to various tissues, including the liver primarily by the lymph circulation system, but also in the vascular system in the form of chylomicrons [22]. In the hepatocytes, retinyl esters contained in chylomicron remnants are taken up and hydrolyzed to retinol for further physiological functions in other target cells [17]. When transported to the target cell, retinol can be reversibly oxidized into retinal by retinol dehydrogenase (RDH) and alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) [23, 24]. Retinal can be converted to retinoic acid by the oxidation of retinaldehyde by aldehyde dehydrogenases (RALDH or ALDH) [23, 25].

Numerous physiological functions of vitamin A are achieved through retinal and retinoic acid. Retinoic acid regulates gene expression through factors bound to the retinoic acid-responsive element, retinoic acid receptor (RAR), retinoid X receptor (RXR) [24]. All-trans and 9-cis retinoic acids are the primary isoforms that regulate gene expression [26]. In addition, the cellular retinoic acid-binding proteins (CRABP1 and 2), which can bind retinoic acid efficiently and involve in transporting retinoic acid into the nucleus [27]. Previous paper reviewed that CRABP1 could balance the concentration of the retinoic acid by regulating the catabolism of retinoic acid and mediated the non-transcriptional function of retinoic acid by the CRABP1-retnoic acid complex [28]. CRABP2 might inhibit the cell proliferation by passing retinoic acid to RAR, which also involved in the regulation of the preadipocyte differentiation [28,29,30]. The excess retinol is stored in stellate cells of the liver after being re-esterified to retinyl esters [26]. The liver provides the primary storage site for vitamin A, and more than 95% of vitamin A exists in the liver in the form of retinyl esters [31]; the stellate cells are responsible for approximately 80% of the total retinyl ester storage [22].

Multiple physiological functions of vitamin A have been determined. Vitamin A participates in the formation of rhodopsin (visual purple) for night vision and is required for normal epithelial cell function [18]. Vitamin A and carotenoids have antioxidant activity via scavenging of peroxyl radicals and singlet oxygen [32, 33]. Other studies reported that retinoids are associated with cell proliferation, differentiation, and gene expression via cytosolic retinol-binding protein and cytosolic retinoic acid-binding proteins [34, 35].

Fetal and postnatal development of adipose tissue and muscle in bovine calves

Fetal and postnatal development of brown and white adipose tissue

Brown adipose tissue (BAT) and white adipose tissue (WAT) develop in the second or early third trimester of pregnancy in cattle [36]. Perirenal adipose tissue differentiates initially as BAT, but subcutaneous adipose tissue also expresses uncoupling protein-1 (UCP1, a halmark of BAT) and contains a mixture of brown and white adipocytes [37]. WAT stores energy [33] and BAT primarily is responsible for neonatal heat production [38, 39], and both WAT and BAT are sensitive to maternal nutrition and endocrine environment [36, 40, 41]. An increase in adipose tissue mass involves both hyperplasia (increase in cell number, i.e., adipocyte progenitor cell proliferation) and hypertrophy (increase in cell s ize, i.e., lipogenesis and triglyceride accumulation) [42,43,44].

There are four primary types of adipose tissue in livestock species: visceral, subcutaneous, intermuscular, and intramuscular adipose tissue (also called marbling) [45]. Visceral adipose tissue (which in this discussion includes perirenal adipose tissue) develops first, followed by subcutaneous, intermuscular, and intramuscular adipose in growing cattle. As indicated above, subcutaneous adipose tissue (and perhaps seam adipose tissue) of newborn calves contain a mixture of brown and white adipocytes, which probably different from the initial fetus period performs as BAT. However, fetal muscle does not express UCP1 [37], so development of fetal muscle is unlikely the intramuscular adipose tissue which develops as BAT in the initial fetus period. Progenitor cells for intramuscular adipose tissue are present in bovine muscle, but lipid synthesis and triglyceride accumulation occur postweaning, and not until the calves are transitioned to a high-energy, corn-based diet [46, 47]. Subcutaneous and intramuscular adipose tissue (and probably all adipose tissue depots) retain the capacity to proliferate in mature cattle [48], so bovine adipose tissue mass increases initially by hyperplasia and then mainly by hypertrophy.

Muscle development during fetal and postnatal stage

In mammals, skeletal muscle represents more than 50% of body mass, and muscle mass is determine by the number and size of the muscle fibers [49]. Skeletal muscle growth is initiated early in embryonic development, at which time myoblasts derived from somites undergo extensive hyperplasia until approximately mid-gestation, followed by increasing myotube and size prenatally [50]. From late gestation onward, muscles increase in mass by hypertrophy as new myofibrils are added to existing muscle fibers [51, 52]. Specifically, the primary embryonic muscle fiber develops from 30 days of gestation and lasted for 3 months, and major myofibers mature into slow type I muscle fibers [53]. Secondary muscle fibers are generated at the termination of primary muscle fiber development and lasts to mid-gestation. These secondary muscle fibers differentiate mostly into fast type II muscle fibers and a few developed into type I fibers, whose fiber type can be converted to other fiber types according to postnatal conditions [54]. The total number of muscle fibers is fixed around the mid-gestation (around 180 days of post-conception in cattle) [54, 55]. Tertiary muscle fiber development starts from 110 days of gestation and maintains an undifferentiated state at birth, based on the fast and slow myosin heavy chain (MyHC) isoform expression of fibers in the bovine muscle [49, 54, 55]. It was reported that cattle had type I, IIa, and IIX types of mature MyHC isoforms 3 weeks after birth [49, 54, 55].

Vitamin A and intramuscular adipose tissue hyperplasia and hypertrophy

Marbling (also referred to intramuscular fat) is agglomerated white streaks and flecks across the muscle surface [56], which profoundly affects the juiciness, tenderness, and flavor of the beef [57, 58]. The accumulation of marbling is dependent on an increase in intramuscular adipocyte development, which frequently is associated with an increase in monounsaturated fatty acids [59].

Vitamin A supplementation and intramuscular adipose tissue development in cattle

The relationship between vitamin A and marbling score was firstly observed in Japanese Black cattle; vitamin A restriction during the fattening period increased marbling development [6]. Subsequently, other studies addressing the effects of vitamin A status and marbling score were conducted in other breed types of cattle, such as Angus crossbred steers, Simmental steers, feedlot heifers [7, 8], and Korean native steers [9] (Table 1). Some studies indicated an increase in marbling with vitamin A restriction, but other studies reported no significant effects with vitamin A restriction. There was a fact ignored for many years that pro-vitamin A (carotenoids) in feedstuffs might contain a large amount of vitamin A equivalents which could limit the effect of vitamin A restriction. The extensive assessment of vitamin A content in the feedstuff need to be conducted for a better vitamin A restriction in the beef cattle [65]. It appears that a very low level or no vitamin A supplementation (compared to National Research Council (NRC) requirements for beef cattle), including low or no supplementation before vitamin A treatments, were necessary during the vitamin A restriction period to elevate marbling scores and/or intramuscular fat (IMF) during the fattening period [9, 60, 65,66,67].

Table 1 Studies reporting vitamin A restriction and marbling or intramuscular fat (IMF) in cattle
Full size table

A review of the nutrigenomic regulation of adipose tissue hypothesized that marbling development was initiated during the prenatal stage (late pregnancy) and postnatal stage (until about 250 days), which was associated with preadipocyte hyperplasia [68]. Oral administration of vitamin A (78,000 IU/d) during late-stage pregnancy increased birth weight of calves and increased the mRNA expression related to muscle [myogenic factor 5 (Myf5), myogenic factor 6 (Myf6), myoblast determination protein 1 (MyoD)] and preadipocyte (Krüppel like factor 2 (KLF2)] development [69]. Vitamin A injection at birth and one-month age in Angus calves resulted in elevated intramuscular adipose tissue deposition in the carcass trait result when averagely slaughtered at day 438 [14, 70]. Our previous study also reported that oral vitamin A supplementation also enhanced the growth performance of the neonatal Korean native calves, as well as promoted the preadipocyte [zinc finger protein 423 (Zfp423), preadipocyte factor 1 (Pref-1)] and muscle (MyoD, Myf6, myogenin) development in the genetic level [71]. Besides, vitamin A intake in the early growth stage in rats led to greater adiposity in rats [70]. These results implied that vitamin A supplementation in the late pregnancy and neonatal calves enhances the preadipocyte development, which further indirectly promotes the intramuscular adipose tissue deposition in the late stage of cattle. Therefore, these studies indicate that during early developmental stage, vitamin A supplementation promotes the adipogenic progenitor cells by preadipocyte hyperplasia process. However, in the fattening stage, vitamin A supplementation stimulates the lipid oxidation, thus restriction of vitamin A increases the lipid accumulation by the adipocyte hypertrophy.

Vitamin A, preadipocyte hyperplasia, and adipocyte hypertrophy

There have been several investigations of the effects of vitamin A on adipogenesis and subsequent development of intramuscular adipose tissue, which are summarized in Fig. 1. During the adipogenic differentiation period (adipocyte hypertrophy), the effects of retinoic acid are regulated by the RAR and RXR families in the promoter region of target genes [72, 73]. In particular, all-trans-retinoic acid supplementation inhibited the expression of adipogenic marker genes, such as fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha (C/EBPα) during the early differentiation stage [74]. The retinoic acid inhibits lipid accumulation by stimulating PPARα/β/δ in mature adipocytes which relates to lipid oxidation and catabolism [68]. As well as activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway [Wnt family member 1 (Wnt-1), Wnt family member 4 (Wnt-4), Wnt family member 10 (Wnt10b), and β-catenin] in 3T3-L1 cells, which may associate with the adipogenesis suppression induced by retinoic acid [11]. Supplementation of 9-cis retinoic acid inhibits adipogenesis by decreasing the PPARγ and RXR levels in 3 T3-L1 cells [74] and induced liver FABP gene expression above the induction caused by oleic acid in the subconfluent rat hepatoma cells [75]. In addition, all-trans retinoic acid supplementation activated RAR and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta/delta (PPARβ/δ) in mature adipocytes [76], stimulated transforming growth factor β-effector protein (mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 3, Smad3), blocked the phosphorylation of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta (C/EBPβ), thereby decreasing the adipogenesis [77, 78]. Vitamin A reduced cellular triacylglycerol content and upregulated the fatty acid oxidation rate by increasing the expression of UCP gene family [10, 79]. Also, demethylation in the promotor of Zfp423 was disrupted by retinoic acid [80]. Interestingly, a recent study demonstrated that retinoic acid supplementation regulates adipogenesis and cell proliferation through both positive and negative functions, which depended on retinoic acid dosage during the differentiation period [81]; fatty acid oxidation only occurred at specific concentrations.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Retinoic acid supplementation plays various roles that vary from preadipocyte development to the adipocyte deposition. The full names of genes are preadipocyte factor-1 (Pref-1), Krüppel-like factor 2 (KLF2), zinc finger protein 423 (Zfp423), Wnt family member 10b (Wnt-10b), fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha/beta (C/EBPα/β), sterol regulatory element binding protein 1c (SREBF1c), extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), retinoic acid binding protein (RABP), retinoic acid receptor gamma (RARγ)

Full size image

More attention has been paid to the influence of retinoic acid on preadipocyte hyperplasia in recent years. Previous studies demonstrated that Pref-1, Sox-9, Wnt-10b, Zfp423, and KLF2 were expressed at high levels in preadipocytes but not in mature adipocytes [82,83,84]. Retinoic acid inhibited adipocyte differentiation by activation of the cellular retinoic acid-binding protein 2/retinoic acid receptor (CRABP-II/RAR) pathway, but decreased the expression of Pref-1, Sox-9, and KLF2 in mature adipocytes, which typically are highly expressed only in preadipocytes [13]. Also, the activation of the ERK/MAPK pathway was required during the adipogenic commitment process by retinoic acid treatment in embryonic stem cells [85]. These results were summarized in Fig. 1, which shows that retinoic acid plays a crucial role in the development of the preadipocyte hyperplasia by activating related genes and stimulating the progenitor proliferation by the signaling pathway. When come to the adipogenic differentiation period, retinoic acid shows the inhibition of lipid accumulation and down-regulated the related genes expression. Paradoxically, low levels of vitamin A supplementation also promotes adipogenesis.

Vitamin A, myoblast hyperplasia, and myotube differentiation

Taylor and Jones [86] demonstrated that myoblasts and adipocytes can be derived from the same mesodermal stem cell precursors, which is dependent on upregulation of Wnt signalling [87]. Mesodermal stem cell precursors are activated by paired box (Pax) 3 and 7 during somitogenesis [88]. The muscle lineage is determined by the muscle-specific transcription MyoD and Myf5 at an early stage of embryonic development [89]. Followed by proliferation, a pool of myoblasts is formed following the expression of Myf5 and MyoD genes in the initial stage of muscle differentiation [90]. Following terminal differentiation, multinucleated myotubes are established by the expression of muscle-specific genes such as Myf6, myogenin, and myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) genes [91]. Subsequently, myotubes form myofibers following extensive myobril synthesis [92, 93].

Metabolites of retinoic acid can promote myogenic differentiation [88, 94]. In zebrafish, the retinoic acid activates muscle differentiation in vivo through fibroblast growth factor 8 (Fgf8) gene signaling, a muscle differentiation activator; suppression of retinoic acid signaling inhibits muscle differentiation and myoD expression [95]. The ovine primary myoblasts, retinoic acid dramatically decreased cell proliferation by a reduction of cyclin D1 protein, but retinoic acid increased myogenin gene expression and MyHC protein levels, and upregulated the glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) mRNA and protein expression [96]. Retinoic acid treatment of human embryonic stem cells expanded the premyogenic progenitor population, promoting the Pax3-positive myoblast population and elevating the expression of MyoD, myogenin, and mesenchyme homeobox 1 (Meox1) [97]. In addition, a high dose level of retinoic acid supplementation in the C2C12 cell line still stimulated the myogenic differentiation, but the MyHC protein level was obviously decreased [98].

All-trans-retinoic acid promoted myogenin expression but had no effect on the cell cycle arrest in the rhabdomyosarcoma cell line [99, 100]. Maternal vitamin A deficiency in rats did not affect fetal weight but decreased survival rate as well as downregulated the protein level of Myf5, myogenin, and MyHC expression compared to rats receiving moderate vitamin A supplementation [101]. In addition, previous study in Black Angus steer calves reported that vitamin A injection to the neonatal calves upregulated the expression of myogenic genes (Pax3, Pax7, Myf5, MyoD and myogenin) [15]. Besides, our previous study also showed that oral vitamin A supplementation to the Korean native calves enhanced the expression of MyoD, Myf6 and myogenin in the longissimus dorsi muscle as well as the growth performance [71].

In Fig. 2, we conclude that retinoic acid plays an essential role myogenic commitment from the progenitor cells, the deficiency of retinoic acid may decrease the later myogenesis in the genetic levels. In terminal myogenesis, low levels of vitamin A promotes the formation of the myotubes as well as the related gene expression, however high levels of supplementation may have the side effect on maturation of myotubes by influencing the MyHC protein level.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Retinoic acid supplementation plays various roles that vary from myoblasts development to myogenesis stage. The full names of genes are paired box gene 3 (Pax3), mesenchyme homeobox 1 (Meox1), fibroblast growth factor 8 (Fgf8), major histocompatibility complex (MHC), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma/delta (PPARγ/δ), lipoprotein lipase (LPL), glucose transporter type 4 (Glut 4), myogenic factor 5 (Myf5), myoblast determination protein (MyoD), Wnt family member 5a (Wnt5a), Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMK2)

Full size image

Vitamin A and metabolites in cattle

Besides, with the deepening research of marbling in cattle, various potential biochemical parameters have been found related to the marbling score under vitamin A treatment. Adachi et al. [102] reported that with in the case of vitamin A restriction, the high serum concentration of glucose, urea nitrogen, albumin/globulin ratio and magnesium showed in the high marbling group than that in control group. Another monitor research in cattle by our lab revealed that, vitamin A restriction led the increase of the level of calcium, total cholesterol, albumin, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine and non-esterified fatty acids in serum [9, 103]. These discovered metabolic indicators may contribute to the marbling production in cattle as well as the metabolic imbalances during the vitamin A restriction. Recently, the other latest research in our lab indicated that vitamin A supplementation in the early growth period of calf increased the levels of cholesterol and myo-inositol both in serum and longissimus dorsi muscle to maintain the preadipocyte status [104].

Vitamin A, marbling, and the ADH1C genotype in cattle

As stated above, retinol is oxidized into retinaldehyde by RDH and ADH, and retinaldehyde is further oxidized into retinoic acid by RALDH and ALDH [17]. Serum retinaldehyde concentration was dramatically lower in the RALDH1−/−/ADH1−/− mouse than in wild-type mice [105]. An ADH1C SNP was reported in Angus steers, including TT, TC, and CC genotypes. The TT genotype was more common than the CC genotype, with the TC genotype intermediate [106, 107]. The result suggested that the lower performance of the C allele might reduce the transcription of the ADH1C gene by elimating a potential binding site of C/EBPα [108]. Under vitamin A restriction, the TT genotype of ADH1C resulted in a higher level of intramuscular fat than the CC and CT genotypes [106]. A subsequent study in Angus steers reported that 75% of NRC recommended vitamin A supplementation caused greater intramuscular fat for Angus crossbred steers with the ADH1C TT genotype of ADH1C gene than steers with the CT or CC genotype [106]. However, vitamin A restriction at 25% or 50% of NRC recommendations had no effect on final levels of intramuscular fat [107].

All-trans-retinoic acid increases the expression of PPARγ/δ, LPL, SMAD3, and MyHCIIX in cultured bovine satellite cells at relatively high doses, and increases MyHCI and MyHCIIA expression at low levels via the PPARδ pathway [16]. High marbling scores in Korean native cattle (Hanwoo) are associated with a greater percentage of type I muscle fibers and fewer type IIB muscle fibers [109], which may be related to the level of retinoic acid supplementation during production. In a study in Korean native steers, steers with the ADH1C TC genotype had higher marbling score than the TT genotype under vitamin A restriction (930 IU/kg of DM); the ADH1C CC genotype was not detected in this group of Korean native cattle [110].

Table 2 summarizes the results from the only four published reports of the interaction between ADH1C phenotype and vitamin A supplementation. Three studies [106, 107, 110] observed an increase in marbling with vitamin A restriction, but the ADH1C genotype that was affected by vitamin A restriction (TT or TC) differed among these studies. One large study from Canada [111] demonstrated no effect of vitamin A restriction (to 50% recommended levels); nor did observe a vitamin A × ADH1C (TT, TC, and CC genotypes) interaction for marbling. Breed types, basal diets, and countries in which the experiments were conducted may have led to the differing results. Moreover, these inconsistencies probably caused by the different effects of retinoic acid in preadipocyte hyperplasia and hypertrophy among these different vitamin A treated levels and different experimental periods. In spite of the inconsistent results among studies, subsequent experiments are warranted to study the interesting interaction between ADH1C genotypes and dietary vitamin A levels.

Table 2 Studies reporting vitamin A restriction and the ADH1C genotype in cattle
Full size table

Limitations and conclusion

According to the previous studies, vitamin A feeding strategy played a crucial role on the development of marbling or intramuscular fat in cattle. Several in vivo studies documented that vitamin A restriction of cattle during the fattening period increased intramuscular fat in carcasses (by adipocyte hypertrophy), but the broad applicability of vitamin A restriction in beef cattle production is equivocal and warrants further investigation. Current study suggested that vitamin A restriction did not affect backfat depth or lean mass. Furthermore, the effect of vitamin A on preadipocyte hyperplasia was reported in limited studies in beef cattle, however, the inside mechanism by in vivo or in vitro trials remains to be determined. In addition, existing data suggests that vitamin A contributes to myogenic commitment from progenitor cells and myogenesis in a narrow level of vitamin A supplementation. Although some studies in mouse and fish demonstrated that vitamin A would increase muscle development, few experiments have shown that vitamin A is efficacious for promoting muscle growth in cattle. These findings suggest that vitamin A supplementation during the early stage enhances the preadipocyte hyperplasia, but the restriction of vitamin A during the fattening period increases the lipid accumulation by adipocyte hypertrophy. A limited number of studies demonstrated that ADH1C genotype (TT and TC, depending on breed type) contributes to marbling production under vitamin A restriction, and again results are equivocal. Larger studies comparing the effects of vitamin A restriction between different breed types (e.g., Korean native cattle and Holstein or Angus cattle) should be encouraged.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ADH1C:

Alcohol dehydrogenase-1C

RDH:

Retinol dehydrogenase

ADH:

Alcohol dehydrogenase

RALDH:

Retinaldehyde

ALDH:

Aldehyde dehydrogenases

RAR:

Retinoic acid receptor

RARγ:

Retinoic acid receptor gamma

RXR:

Retinoid X receptor

CRABP:

Cellular retinoic acid-binding proteins (1 and 2)

BAT:

Brown adipose tissue

UCP1:

Uncoupling protein-1

WAT:

White adipose tissue

MyHC:

Myosin heavy chain

NRC:

National Research Council

IMF:

Intramuscular fat

Myf5/6:

Myogenic factor 5/6

MyoD:

Myoblast determination protein 1

KLF2:

Krüppel-like factor 2

Zfp423:

Zinc finger protein 423

Pref-1:

Preadipocyte factor-1

FABP4:

Fatty acid binding protein 4

PPARα/β/γ/δ:

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha/beta/gamma/delta

C/EBPα/β:

CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha/beta

Wnt-1/4/10b:

Wnt family member 1/4/10b

Smad3:

Mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 3

SREBF1c:

Sterol regulatory element binding protein 1c

ERK 1/2:

Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2

MAPK:

Mitogen-activated protein kinase

RABP:

Retinoic acid binding protein

Pax3/7:

Paired box gene 3/7

Meox1:

Mesenchyme homeobox 1

Fgf8:

Fibroblast growth factor 8

MHC:

Major histocompatibility complex

LPL:

Lipoprotein lipase

GLUT4:

Glucose transporter type 4

MEF2:

Myocyte enhancer factor 2

References

  1. Jo C, Cho SH, Chang J, Nam KC. Keys to production and processing of Hanwoo beef: a perspective of tradition and science. Animal Frontiers. 2012;2:32–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gotoh T, Takahashi H, Nishimura T, Kuchida K, Mannen H. Meat produced by Japanese black cattle and Wagyu. Animal Frontiers. 2014;4:46–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. USDA. United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef. Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA, 2017. https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/CarcassBeefStandard.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2021.

  4. Han S, Kondo N, Fujiura T, Ogawa Y, Takao Y, Tanigawa S, et al. Machine vision based prediction of serum vitamin A level in Japanese black cattle by pupillary light reflex analysis. In: IEEE/SICE international symposium on system integration (SII), vol. 2011: IEEE; 2011. p. 178–81.

  5. NRC. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle. 8th ed. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2016.

  6. Oka A, Maruo Y, Miki T, Yamasaki T, Saito T. Influence of vitamin A on the quality of beef from the Tajima strain of Japanese black cattle. Meat Sci. 1998;48:159–67.

  7. Gorocica-Buenfil MA, Fluharty FL, Bohn T, Schwartz SJ, Loerch SC. Effect of low vitamin A diets with high-moisture or dry corn on marbling and adipose tissue fatty acid composition of beef steers. J Anim Sci. 2007;85:3355–66.

  8. Bryant TC, Wagner JJ, Tatum JD, Galyean ML, Anthony RV, Engle TE. Effect of dietary supplemental vitamin A concentration on performance, carcass merit, serum metabolites, and lipogenic enzyme activity in yearling beef steers. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:1463–78.

  9. Peng D-Q, Lee J-S, Kim W-S, Kim Y-S, Bae M-H, Jo Y-H, et al. Effect of vitamin A restriction on carcass traits and blood metabolites in Korean native steers. Anim Prod Sci. 2019;59:2138–46.

  10. Mercader J, Madsen L, Felipe F, Palou A, Kristiansen K, Bonet L. All-trans retinoic acid increases oxidative metabolism in mature adipocytes. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2007;20:1061–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim DM, Choi HR, Park A, Shin SM, Bae KH, Lee SC, et al. Retinoic acid inhibits adipogenesis via activation of Wnt signaling pathway in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;434:455–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith SB, Kawachi H, Choi CB, Choi CW, Wu G, Sawyer JE. Cellular regulation of bovine intramuscular adipose tissue development and composition. J Anim Sci. 2009;87:E72–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berry DC, DeSantis D, Soltanian H, Croniger CM, Noy N. Retinoic acid upregulates preadipocyte genes to block adipogenesis and suppress diet-induced obesity. Diabetes. 2012;61:1112–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Harris CL, Wang B, Deavila JM, Busboom JR, Maquivar M, Parish SM, et al. Vitamin A administration at birth promotes calf growth and intramuscular fat development in Angus beef cattle. J Anim Science Biotechnol. 2018;9:55.

  15. Wang B, Nie W, Fu X, de Avila JM, Ma Y, Zhu MJ, et al. Neonatal vitamin A injection promotes cattle muscle growth and increases oxidative muscle fibers. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2018;9:82.

  16. Kim J, Wellmann KB, Smith ZK, Johnson BJ. All-trans retinoic acid increases the expression of oxidative myosin heavy chain through the PPARδ pathway in bovine muscle cells derived from satellite cells. J Anim Sci. 2018;96:2763–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen W, Chen G. The roles of vitamin A in the regulation of carbohydrate, lipid, and protein metabolism. J Clin Med. 2014;3:453–79.

  18. Church DC, Pond WG. Basic animal nutrition and feeding. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Borel P, Drai J, Faure H, Fayol V, Galabert C, Laromiguiere M, et al. Recent knowledge about intestinal absorption and cleavage of carotenoids. Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2005;63(2):165–77.

  20. Goodman DS, Huang HS. Biosynthesis of vitamin A with rat intestinal enzymes. Science. 1965;149:879–80.

  21. Rigtrup KM, Ong DE. A retinyl ester hydrolase activity intrinsic to the brush border membrane of rat small intestine. Biochemistry. 1992;31:2920–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Harrison EH. Mechanisms of digestion and absorption of dietary vitamin A. Annu Rev Nutr. 2005;25:87–103.

  23. Napoli JL. Physiological insights into all-trans-retinoic acid biosynthesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1821:152–67.

  24. Chen G. Roles of vitamin A metabolism in the development of hepatic insulin resistance. ISRN Hepatol. 2013;2013:534972.

  25. Wolf G. Tissue-specific increases in endogenous all-trans retinoic acid: possible contributing factor in ethanol toxicity. Nutr Rev. 2010;68:689–92.

  26. Blomhoff R, Blomhoff HK. Overview of retinoid metabolism and function. J Neurobiol. 2006;66:606–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Frey SK, Vogel S. Vitamin A metabolism and adipose tissue biology. Nutrients. 2011;3:27–39.

  28. Napoli JL. Functions of intracellular retinoid binding-proteins. Subcell Biochem. 2016;81:21–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Napoli JL. Cellular retinoid binding-proteins, CRBP, CRABP, FABP5: effects on retinoid metabolism, function and related diseases. Pharmacol Ther. 2017;173:19–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Berry DC, Soltanian H, Noy N. Repression of cellular retinoic acid-binding protein II during adipocyte differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:15324–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Blomhoff R, Rasmussen M, Nilsson A, Norum KR, Berg T, Blaner WS, et al. Hepatic retinol metabolism. Distribution of retinoids, enzymes, and binding proteins in isolated rat liver cells. J Biol Chem. 1985;260:13560–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Palace VP, Khaper N, Qin Q, Singal PK. Antioxidant potentials of vitamin A and carotenoids and their relevance to heart disease. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999;26:746–61.

  33. Tesoriere L, Ciaccio M, Bongiorno A, Riccio A, Pintaudi AM, Livrea MA. Antioxidant activity of all-trans-retinol in homogeneous solution and in phosphatidylcholine liposomes. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1993;307:217–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ross AC, Gardner EM. The function of vitamin A in cellular growth and differentiation, and its roles during pregnancy and lactation. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1994;352:187–200.

  35. Lewis AJ, Southern LL. Swine nutrition. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Smith S, Carstens G. Ontogeny and metabolism of brown adipose tissue in livestock species. In: Burrin DG,  Mersmann HJ, editors. Biology of Metabolism in Growing Animals. 2005;3:303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1877-1823(09)70019-0.

  37. Landis MD, Carstens GE, McPhail EG, Randel RD, Green KK, Slay L, et al. Ontogenic development of brown adipose tissue in Angus and Brahman fetal calves. J Anim Sci. 2002;80:591–601.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Large V, Peroni O, Letexier D, Ray H, Beylot M. Metabolism of lipids in human white adipocyte. Diabetes Metab. 2004;30:294–309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Himms-Hagen J. Brown adipose tissue thermogenesis: interdisciplinary studies. FASEB J. 1990;4:2890–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Symonds ME, Pope M, Sharkey D, Budge H. Adipose tissue and fetal programming. Diabetologia. 2012;55:1597–606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Martin GS, Carstens GE, King MD, Eli AG, Mersmann HJ, Smith SB. Metabolism and morphology of brown adipose tissue from Brahman and Angus newborn calves. J Anim Sci. 1999;77:388–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jo J, Gavrilova O, Pack S, Jou W, Mullen S, Sumner AE, et al. Hypertrophy and/or hyperplasia: dynamics of adipose tissue growth. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009;5:e1000324.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hocquette J, Gondret F, Baéza E, Médale F, Jurie C, Pethick D. Intramuscular fat content in meat-producing animals: development, genetic and nutritional control, and identification of putative markers. Animal. 2010;4:303–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Du M, Tong J, Zhao J, Underwood KR, Zhu M, Ford SP, et al. Fetal programming of skeletal muscle development in ruminant animals. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:E51–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Allen C. Biology of Fat in Meat Animals. University of Wisconsin-Madison. 1976.

  46. Hausman G, Dodson M, Ajuwon K, Azain M, Barnes K, Guan L, et al. Board-invited review: the biology and regulation of preadipocytes and adipocytes in meat animals. J Anim Sci. 2009;87:1218–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Brooks M, Choi C, Lunt D, Miller R, Choi C, Smith S. CASE STUDY: carcass and meat characteristics and M. longissimus thoracis histology of beef from calf-fed and yearling-fed Angus steers. Prof Anim Sci. 2011;27:385–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. May SG, Savell JW, Lunt DK, Wilson JJ, Laurenz JC, Smith SB. Evidence for preadipocyte proliferation during culture of subcutaneous and intramuscular adipose tissues from Angus and Wagyu crossbred steers. J Anim Sci. 1994;72:3110–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bonnet M, Cassar-Malek I, Chilliard Y, Picard B. Ontogenesis of muscle and adipose tissues and their interactions in ruminants and other species. Animal. 2010;4:1093–109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Brameld JM, Fahey AJ, Langley-Evans SC, Buttery PJ. Nutritional and hormonal control of muscle growth and fat deposition. Archiv Fur Tierzucht. 2003;46:143–56.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Greenwood PL, Slepetis RM, Bell AW. Influences on fetal and placental weights during mid to late gestation in prolific ewes well nourished throughout pregnancy. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2000;12:149–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Greenwood PL, Slepetis RM, Bell AW, Hermanson JW. Intrauterine growth retardation is associated with reduced cell cycle activity, but not myofibre number, in ovine fetal muscle. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1999;11:281–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Picard B, Robelin J, Pons F, Geay Y. Comparison of the foetal development of fibre types in four bovine muscles. J Muscle Res Cell Motility. 1994;15:473–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Picard B, Lefaucheur L, Berri C, Duclos MJ. Muscle fibre ontogenesis in farm animal species. Reprod Nutr Dev. 2002;42:415–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Picard B, Jurie C, Duris M, Renand G. Consequences of selection for higher growth rate on muscle fibre development in cattle. Livest Sci. 2006;102:107–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Pethick D, Harper G, Oddy VH. Growth, development and nutritional manipulation of marbling in cattle: a review. Aust J Exp Agric. 2004;44:705–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Shiranita K, Hayashi K, Otsubo A, Miyajima T, Takiyama R. Grading meat quality by image processing. Pattern Recogn. 2000;33:97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wood JD, Enser M, Fisher AV, Nute GR, Sheard PR, Richardson RI, et al. Fat deposition, fatty acid composition and meat quality: a review. Meat Sci. 2008;78:343–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Smith SB, Lunt DK. Marbling: management of cattle to maximize the deposition of intramuscular adipose tissue. In: Plains Nutrition Council Spring Conference, vol. 26; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Gibb D, Van Herk F, Mir P, Loerch S, McAllister T. Removal of supplemental vitamin A from barley-based diets improves marbling in feedlot heifers. Can J Anim Sci. 2011;91:669–74.

  61. Gorocica-Buenfil MA, Fluharty FL, Reynolds CK, Loerch SC. Effect of dietary vitamin A restriction on marbling and conjugated linoleic acid content in Holstein steers. J Anim Sci. 2007;85:2243–55.

  62. Gorocica-Buenfil MA, Fluharty FL, Reynolds CK, Loerch SC. Effect of dietary vitamin A concentration and roasted soybean inclusion on marbling, adipose cellularity, and fatty acid composition of beef. J Anim Sci. 2007;85:2230–42.

  63. Pickworth C, Loerch S, Fluharty F. Effects of timing and duration of dietary vitamin A reduction on carcass quality of finishing beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 2012;90:2677–91.

  64. Kruk Z, Bottema C, Davis J, Siebert B, Harper G, Di J, et al. Effects of vitamin A on growth performance and carcass quality in steers. Livest Sci. 2008;119:12–21.

  65. Pickworth CL, Loerch SC, Kopec RE, Schwartz SJ, Fluharty FL. Concentration of pro-vitamin A carotenoids in common beef cattle feedstuffs. J Anim Sci. 2012;90:1553–61.

  66. Knutson E, Sun X, Fontoura A, Gaspers J, Liu J, Carlin K, et al. Effect of a low vitamin A diet on marbling and carcass characteristics of Angus cross and Simmental steers. In: Proceedings, Western Section, American Society of Animal Science; 2017. p. 96–100.

  67. Oka A. Effects of vitamin A on beef quality and body weight of Japanese black steers. J Anim Genet. 1996;24:31–6.

  68. Wang B, Yang Q, Harris CL, Nelson ML, Busboom JR, Zhu M-J, et al. Nutrigenomic regulation of adipose tissue development—role of retinoic acid: a review. Meat Sci. 2016;120:100–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Jo YH, Peng DQ, Kim WS, Kim SJ, Kim NY, Kim SH, et al. The effects of vitamin A supplementation during late-stage pregnancy on longissimus dorsi muscle tissue development, birth traits, and growth performance in postnatal Korean native calves. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2020;33:742–52.

  70. Granados N, Amengual J, Ribot J, Musinovic H, Ceresi E, von Lintig J, et al. Vitamin A supplementation in early life affects later response to an obesogenic diet in rats. Int J Obes. 2013;37:1169–76.

  71. Peng DQ, Jo YH, Kim SJ, Kim NY, Nejad JG, Lee HG. Oral vitamin A supplementation during neonatal stage enhances growth, pre-adipocyte and muscle development in Korean native calves. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2020;268:114609.

  72. Chambon P. A decade of molecular biology of retinoic acid receptors. FASEB J. 1996;10:940–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Lefebvre P, Martin PJ, Flajollet S, Dedieu S, Billaut X, Lefebvre B. Transcriptional activities of retinoic acid receptors. Vitam Horm. 2005;70:199–264.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Sagara C, Takahashi K, Kagechika H, Takahashi N. Molecular mechanism of 9-cis-retinoic acid inhibition of adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;433:102–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Poirier H, Braissant O, Niot I, Wahli W, Besnard P. 9-cis-retinoic acid enhances fatty acid-induced expression of the liver fatty acid-binding protein gene. FEBS Lett. 1997;412:480–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Berry DC, Noy N. All-trans-retinoic acid represses obesity and insulin resistance by activating both peroxisome proliferation-activated receptor β/δ and retinoic acid receptor. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:3286–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Ayala-Sumuano JT, Velez-DelValle C, Marsch-Moreno M, Beltran-Langarica A, Hernandez-Mosqueira C, Kuri-Harcuch W. Retinoic acid inhibits Adipogenesis modulating C/EBPbeta phosphorylation and down regulating Srebf1a expression. J Cell Biochem. 2016;117:629–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Marchildon F, St-Louis C, Akter R, Roodman V, Wiper-Bergeron NL. Transcription factor Smad3 is required for the inhibition of adipogenesis by retinoic acid. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:13274–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Bonet ML, Ribot J, Felipe F, Palou A. Vitamin A and the regulation of fat reserves. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2003;60:1311–21.

  80. Wang B, Fu X, Zhu M-J, Du M. Retinoic acid inhibits white adipogenesis by disrupting GADD45A-mediated Zfp423 DNA demethylation. J Mol Cell Biol. 2017;9:338–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Kim DH, Lee JW, Lee K. Supplementation of all-trans-retinoic acid below cytotoxic levels promotes Adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 cells. Lipids. 2019;54:99–107.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Zubiría M, Alzamendi A, Moreno G, Portales A, Castrogiovanni D, Spinedi E, et al. Relationship between the balance of hypertrophic/hyperplastic adipose tissue expansion and the metabolic profile in a high glucocorticoids model. Nutrients. 2016;8:410.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Sarjeant K, Stephens JM. Adipogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012;4:a008417.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Huang Y, Das AK, Yang QY, Zhu MJ, Du M. Zfp423 promotes adipogenic differentiation of bovine stromal vascular cells. PLoS One. 2012;7:e47496.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Bost F, Caron L, Marchetti I, Dani C, Le Marchand-Brustel Y, Binetruy B. Retinoic acid activation of the ERK pathway is required for embryonic stem cell commitment into the adipocyte lineage. Biochem J. 2002;361:621–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Taylor SM, Jones PA. Multiple new phenotypes induced in 10T12 and 3T3 cells treated with 5-azacytidine. Cell. 1979;17:771–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Cossu G, Borello U. Wnt signaling and the activation of myogenesis in mammals. EMBO J. 1999;18:6867–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Jin W, Peng J, Jiang S. The epigenetic regulation of embryonic myogenesis and adult muscle regeneration by histone methylation modification. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2016;6:209–19.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Imae M, Fu Z, Yoshida A, Noguchi T, Kato H. Nutritional and hormonal factors control the gene expression of FoxOs, the mammalian homologues of DAF-16. J Mol Endocrinol. 2003;30:253–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Buckingham M. Skeletal muscle formation in vertebrates. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2001;11:440–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Johnston IA. Environment and plasticity of myogenesis in teleost fish. J Exp Biol. 2006;209:2249–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Pas MFW, Everts ME, Haagsman HP. Muscle development of livestock animals : physiology, genetics, and meat quality. Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK. Cambridge, MA: CABI Pub; 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  93. Keren A, Tamir Y, Bengal E. The p38 MAPK signaling pathway: a major regulator of skeletal muscle development. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2006;252:224–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Le May M, Mach H, Lacroix N, Hou C, Chen J, Li Q. Contribution of retinoid X receptor signaling to the specification of skeletal muscle lineage. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:26806–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Hamade A, Deries M, Begemann G, Bally-Cuif L, Genet C, Sabatier F, et al. Retinoic acid activates myogenesis in vivo through Fgf8 signalling. Dev Biol. 2006;289:127–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Li Q, Zhang T, Zhang R, Qin X, Zhao J. All-trans retinoic acid regulates sheep primary myoblasts proliferation and differentiation in vitro. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2019;106394.

  97. Ryan T, Liu J, Chu A, Wang L, Blais A, Skerjanc IS. Retinoic acid enhances skeletal myogenesis in human embryonic stem cells by expanding the premyogenic progenitor population. Stem Cell Rev. 2012;8:482–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Liu B, Li N, Jiang Y, Liu C, Ma L, Cong W, et al. Effects of excessive retinoic acid on C2C12 myogenesis. J Hard Tissue Biol. 2016;25:97–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Al-Tahan A, Sarkis O, Harajly M, Baghdadi OK, Zibara K, Boulos F, et al. Retinoic acid fails to induce cell cycle arrest with myogenic differentiation in rhabdomyosarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012;58:877–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Arnold HH, Gerharz CD, Gabbert HE, Salminen A. Retinoic acid induces myogenin synthesis and myogenic differentiation in the rat rhabdomyosarcoma cell line BA-Han-1C. J Cell Biol. 1992;118:877–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Downie D, Antipatis C, Delday MI, Maltin CA, Sneddon AA. Moderate maternal vitamin A deficiency alters myogenic regulatory protein expression and perinatal organ growth in the rat. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005;288:R73–9.

  102. Adachi K, Kawano H, Tsuno K, Nomura Y, Yamamoto N, Arikawa A, et al. Relationship between serum biochemical values and marbling scores in Japanese black steers. J Vet Med Sci. 1999;61:961–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Wang T, Lee KH, Jung US, Jin YC, Lee SB, Lee JS, et al. Responses of blood metabolites and proteins to different vitamin A levels in Korean native steers. Pak Vet J. 2014;34.

  104. Peng DQ, Kim SJ, Lee HG. Metabolomics analyses to characterize metabolic alterations in Korean native calves by oral vitamin A supplementation. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–8.

  105. Molotkov A, Duester G. Genetic evidence that retinaldehyde dehydrogenase Raldh1 (Aldh1a1) functions downstream of alcohol dehydrogenase Adh1 in metabolism of retinol to retinoic acid. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:36085–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Ward AK, McKinnon JJ, Hendrick S, Buchanan FC. The impact of vitamin A restriction and ADH1C genotype on marbling in feedlot steers. J Anim Sci. 2012;90:2476–83.

  107. Krone KG, Ward AK, Madder KM, Hendrick S, McKinnon JJ, Buchanan FC. Interaction of vitamin A supplementation level with ADH1C genotype on intramuscular fat in beef steers. Animal. 2016;10:403–9.

  108. Chekmenev DS, Haid C, Kel AE. P-match: transcription factor binding site search by combining patterns and weight matrices. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W432–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Hwang YH, Kim GD, Jeong JY, Hur SJ, Joo ST. The relationship between muscle fiber characteristics and meat quality traits of highly marbled Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) steers. Meat Sci. 2010;86:456–61.

  110. Peng DQ, Jung US, Lee JS, Kim WS, Jo YH, Kim MJ, et al. Effect of alcohol dehydrogenase 1C (ADH1C) genotype on vitamin A restriction and marbling in Korean native steers. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 2017;30:1099.

  111. Madder KM, McKinnon JJ, Torres GW, Krone KG, Duncombe JL, Luby CD, et al. Feedlot performance and immune function analysis of implanted and non-implanted steers selected for alcohol dehydrogenase 1 C (ADH1C) genotype and fed a low vitamin A diet. Animal. 2019;13:292–300.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by a Cooperation Research Project (2020R1A2B5B02001843) funded by the National Research Foundation of Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sanghuh College of Life Sciences, Konkuk University, Seoul, 05029, South Korea

    Dong Qiao Peng & Hong Gu Lee

  2. Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA

    Stephen B. Smith

Authors
  1. Dong Qiao Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephen B. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hong Gu Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HGL and DQP designed this review. DQP wrote the manuscript. HGL and DQP revised the manuscript. SBS revised the manuscript for content and English grammar and usage. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Gu Lee.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peng, D.Q., Smith, S.B. & Lee, H.G. Vitamin A regulates intramuscular adipose tissue and muscle development: promoting high-quality beef production. J Animal Sci Biotechnol 12, 34 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-021-00558-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-021-00558-2

Keywords

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology

ISSN: 2049-1891