Skip to main content
Download PDF

Differential expression, molecular cloning, and characterization of porcine beta defensin 114

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology volume 10, Article number: 60 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

β-defensins have attracted considerable research interest because of their roles in protecting hosts from various pathogens. This study was conducted to investigate the expression profiles of the porcine β-defensin 114 (PBD114) in different breeds and in response to infections. Moreover, the function of PBD114 protein was partially investigated.

Methods

Six Tibetan pigs (TP) and six DLY (Duroc×Landrace×Yorkshire) pigs were slaughtered to explore the expression profiles of PBD114 in different breeds and tissues. For infection models, sixteen DLY pigs were divided into two groups and challenged either with sterile saline or E. coli K88. The recombinant protein PBD114 (rPBD114) was obtained by using a heterologous expression system in E. coli.

Results

PBD114 gene was highly expressed in tissues such as the intestine, liver, spleen, and thymus. Interestingly, the expression level of PBD114 gene was higher in the TP pigs than in the DLY pigs (P < 0.05), and was significantly elevated upon E. coli K88 challenge (P < 0.05). The nucleotide sequences of PBD114 from Tibetan and DLY pigs was identical, and both showed a 210-bp open reading frame encoding a 69-amino acid mature peptide. To explaore the function of PBD114 protein, PBD114 gene was successfully expressed in E. coli Origami B (DE3) and the molecular weight of the rPBD114 was estimated by SDS-PAGE to be 25 kDa. The rPBD114 was purified and mass spectrometry verified the protein as PBD114. Importantly, rPBD114 showed antimicrobial activities against E. coli DH5α and E. coli K88, and the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were 64 and 128 μg/mL, respectively. Hemolytic and cytotoxicity assays showed that rPBD114 did not affect cell viability under physiological concentrations.

Conclusions

PBD114 is an infection response gene that is differentially-expressed between different porcine breeds and tissues. The antimicrobial activity of PBD114 protein, against pathogens such as the E. coli K88, suggested that it may serve as a candidate for the substitution of conventionally used antibiotics.

Introduction

The availability of antibiotics for treating bacterial infections has significantly improved the health of animals and humans. In addition, sub-therapeutic levels of antibiotics have been added to pig feed as growth promoters in many countries [1]. However, liberal antibiotic use combined with the ability of microorganisms to develop antibiotic resistance has led to multi-drug resistant, which has fuelled a potential global public health crisis [2]. To reduce the emergence of antimicrobial resistance, approaches to reduce the utilization of antibiotics in animal production are needed.

Innate immunity is the first line of host defense against invading pathogens such as bacteria, virus, and fungus. Previous studies have indicated that one of the primary innate immune responses are the secretion of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) [3, 4]. To date, thousands of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have already been identified in vertebrates, invertebrates, plants and fungi (http://aps.unmc.edu/AP/main.php). AMPs are classified based on structural and sequence homology, with host defence peptides (HDPs) comprising one of the major subclasses of the family of AMPs [5]. HDPs are a family of low molecular weight peptides secreted by organisms, and can protect hosts from a broad range of pathogens including bacteria, virus and fungus [3,4,5]. Upon microbial invasion, mature active HDPs are released quickly by proteolytic processing from precursor peptides either in cytoplasmic granules of most mammalian neutrophils and macrophages or in epithelial cells of the respiratory, gastroenteric, and urogenital tracts [6, 7]. HDPs disrupt the bacterial membrane by forming non-specifc electrostatic interactions with the membrane lipid components [8]. So bacteria are less able to develop resistance to HDPs than to traditional antibiotics. Therefore, the administration of HDPs is a potentially novel therapeutic strategy for inflammatory and infectious diseases of the gastrointestinal tract [7, 9], and may present a promising alternative to the traditional antibiotic feed additives used in the livestock industry.

The first identified porcine beta defensin was porcine beta defensin 1 (PBD1), which can be detected throughout the respiratory and digestive tracts [6]. Further studies found that PBD1 displayed strong antimicrobial activity against Bordetella pertussis, Staphylococcus aureus and multi-resistant E. coli [10,11,12]. In addition, previously reported that porcine beta defensin (PBD2) was expressed in the intestine, and mature PBD2 synthetic peptide exhibited high antimicrobial activity against a broad range of pathogenic bacteria, but only limited hemolytic activity against porcine red blood cells [1, 12]. A recent study reported that there were at least 29 different β-defensins expressed in porcine tissues. The average nucleotide sequence identity from the 27 pairs of orthologous β-defensins between humans and pigs was 84.38%, and this probably indicated that β-defensins have multiple biological functions [13]. Although the porcine beta defensins may function as an important regulator of host defense against exogenous pathogens, the expression profile and biological functions of PBD114 are still unclear. The present study was conducted to explore the expression profiles of the PBD114 in different breeds and in response to infections. Moreover, the function of PBD114 protein has also been investigated.

Materials and methods

Strains and vectors

E. coli DH5α and E. coli Origami B (DE3) strains were purchased from TIANGEN (Beijing, China). E. coli K88 was kindly provided by Professor Lianqiang Che, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University. Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium) ATCC14028, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) CICC10384, Streptococcus, Pichia pastoris X33 and Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) were kindly provided by Professor Qigui Yan, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University. The plasmids pMD19-T Simple and pET32a (+) were purchased from Takara (Dalian, China) and Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany) respectively.

Animals

Six 60 days old TP (6.63 ± 0.85 kg) and six 60 days old DLY (21.72 ± 0.36 kg) pigs were purchased from the animal husbandry science research institute, Ganzi Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture in Sichuan Province. All pigs were immediately euthanized to collect liver, spleen, kidney, lung, thymus, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum and colon, then collected tissues were immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen for quantitative real-time PCR.

Sixteen 7 days old DLY pigs (3.14 ± 0.07 kg) were purchased from the Sichuan Giastar Group. All pigs were randomly divided into two groups: CON and K88. Pigs of K88 group and CON group were given a gavage of 80 mL 1 × 109 CFU/mL E. coli K88 and the same volume normal saline respectively. Diarrhoea scores were recorded every 4 h for a total 24 h after challenge. Artificial milk (Table 1) was fed every 3 h during the study period. After the experiment, all pigs were euthanized to collect duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum and colon, and then immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen for quantitative real-time PCR.

Table 1 Composition and nutrient content of artificial milk (87.5% DM basis)
Full size table

Cell culture

Intestinal porcine epithelial cells (IPEC-J2) were cultured in 75 cm2 cell culture flask in DMEM-F12 with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. 1 × 105 cells/well were seeded in 12-well plates and grown to ~ 80% confluence at 37 °C in a CO2 incubator (5% v/v), then cultured for 12 h in culture medium without FBS and penicillin-streptomycin. Cells were challenged with 1 × 105/6/7 CFU/well E. coli K88 for 1.5 h, control cells were not challenged. Total cellular RNA was collected using RNAiso Plus (Takara, Dalian, China).

Total RNA isolation and PCR

Total RNA was isolated from pigs using RNAiso Plus (Takara, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quantity and quality of the isolated RNA were determined by absorbance at 260 and 280 nm [14]. And then cDNA was synthesized using a Reverse Transcriptase kit (Takara, Dalian, China). Subsequently, PBD114 cDNA was amplified by PCR using the following specific primers which were designed online: forward primer F (5'-CCGGAATTCACCTTGGTGGATCCTGAACG-3') and reverse primer R (5'-TTGCGGCCGCAGATAAATCTTCTTCAAACGC-3') supplemented with EcoR I/Not I restriction sites. The PCR reaction was performed according the manufacturers’ instructions of 2 × PCR Solution Premix Taq™ (Takara, Japan). The amplified PCR products were collected and purified by a DNA Fragment Purification Kit (Takara, Dalian, China). Then the amplified products of PBD114 by PCR were directly cloned into the pMD19-T Simple Vector, positive clones were identified by colony PCR and sequenced by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). Sequence alignment of PBD114 from TP and DLY were performed by DNAMAN 8.0, and phylogenetic tree of beta defensin 114 among human, Sus scrofa, Bos indicus and Pan troglodytes was analyzed with DNAMAN 8.0. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed on the ABI PRISM 7500 Fast Sequence Detection System for ninety-six well plates (Applied Biosystems) using the SYBR green 2× RT-PCR mix (Takara, Dalian, China). The primers of β-actin, TNFα and PBD114 are shown in Table 2, and the gene β-actin was used as a housekeeping gene. The relative gene expressions compared with the housekeeping gene β-actin were calculated by 2-CT [15].

Table 2 Primers sequences used for quantitative RT-PCR
Full size table

Preparation of rPBD114

Gene PBD114 (without signal peptide) was synthesized by TsingKe (Beijng, China) and inserted into expression vector pET32a(+) to construct recombinant expression vector pET32a(+)-PBD114. The construction of the engineered strain E. coli Origami B (DE3)-pET32a(+)-PBD114, induction of recombinant engineered strain and SDS-PAGE were performed according previous study [16], the engineered strain E. coli Origami B (DE3)-pET32a(+) was used as negative control. Identification was carried out through mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/TOF) by Beijing Genomics Institute. Purification of recombinant PBD114 protein (rPBD114) referred to our previous study [16]. Briefly, the supernatant with crude rPBD114 was applied to Ni2+-IDA column (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) and purified according specification. Ten resin volumes of Binding Buffer (50 mmol/L NaH2PO4, 300 mmol/L NaCl, pH 8.0) were added to wash way the impure protein, and then five resin volumes of Elution Buffer (50 mmol/L NaH2PO4, 300 mmol/L NaCl, 150 mmol/L imidazole, pH 8.0) were added to eluted the rPBD114 from the column. The protein concentration was determined by the BCA assay (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). The purifed rPBD114 was electrophoresed on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel. The rest was stored at − 80 °C to analyze biological activities.

Structure homology-modelling and physical and chemical parameters of PBD114

The automated protein structure homology-modelling of PBD114 was performed by SWISS-MODEL online (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/) to predict the structure of PBD114. The computation of various physical and chemical parameters for PBD114 carried out by ExPASy online (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/) to predict theoretical pI, net charged residues and aliphatic index of PBD114.

Minimal inhibitory concentration

The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for antimicrobial activity analysis of purified rPBD114 was measured by the microtiter broth dilution method [17]. E. coli DH5α, pathogenic E. coli K88+, S. typhimurium, S. aureus, B. subtilis were grown to 0.4 OD600 at 37 °C in LB, Streptococcus was grown to 0.4 OD600 at 37 °C in THY (Todd-Hewitt+yeast extract), Pichia pastoris X33 was grown to 0.4 OD600 at 37 °C in YPD. The target cell culture was diluted to 1 × 105 CFU/mL with same media respectively. A total of 100 μL of rPBD114 and 100 μL of cell suspension were added into each well. The activity of rPBD114 was tested over a concentration range of 256, 128, 64, 32, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1, 0.5 and 0.25 μg/mL, and all assays were tested in triplicated. Bacterial plates were incubated at 37 °C for 16 h, fungal plate was incubated at 30 °C for 24 h, and the absorption of cell culture was recorded at 600 nm. MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of peptide at which there was no change in optical density.

Hemolytic activity assay

The hemolytic activity of rPBD114 was measured spectrophotometrically using a hemoglobin release assay [18]. Fresh pig blood was collected to prepare erythrocytes by centrifugation at 1500 r/min for 10 min at room temperature. The erythrocytes were gently washed three times with PBS (pH 7.2) and resuspended to 4% (v/v) with PBS (pH 7.2). 4% erythrocytes were incubated with different concentrations (0.5~256 μg/mL, double gradient) of rPBD114 for 1 h at 37 °C, and then centrifuged at 1000 r/min for 5 min. Three mL supernatant were then added to a 2-cm quartz cuvette, and the absorbance was measured at 414 nm with UV-1100 spectrophotometer (ShangHai, China). No hemolysis and 100% hemolysis were determined in PBS and Triton X-100, respectively.

Cytotoxicity assay

The cytotoxicity of rBPD114 was measured according to previously a study [19]. Briefly, IPEC-J2 cells were cultured in DMEM-F12 with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin for 48 h and then resuspended to 105 cells/mL in FBS free DMEM-F12 media. A volume of 100 μL of cells was aliquoted into sterile flat-bottomed 96-well plates (Corning, USA). Final concentration of 0, 4, 16, 64 and 256 μg/mL rPBD114 were added to the cells and incubated at 37 °C/5% CO2 for 24 h. Cell viability was evaluated with the CCK-8 assay (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analysis

All of the statistical analyses were performed using Graphpad Prism 7.0. Differences in PBD114 expression among breeds were investigated using Student’s t-test (and nonparametric tests). Treatment differences of PBD114 expression of IPEC-J2 and cytotoxicity were statistically analyzed by One-way ANOVA, Tukey’s test was applied post hoc. Data were expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean. Values in the same row with different superscripts are significant (P < 0.05), while values with same superscripts are not significant different (P > 0.05).

Results

Expression profiles of PBD114 gene in different pig breeds and tissues

To evaluate expression profiles of PBD114, mRNA expressions in various tissues among TP (Fig. 1a) and DLY (Fig. 1b) were measured. PBD114 widely expressed in duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, colon, liver, spleen, kidney, lung and thymus, while the tissue with the highest expression abundance was jejunum in TP and duodenum of DLY. The different expression levels of PBD114 between TP pigs and DLY pigs were display in Fig. 1c. The results showed that the expression levels of PBD114 of TP pigs in jejunum, colon and lung were higher than DLY pigs (P < 0.05). However, the abundance of PBD114 of TP pigs in kidney were lower than DLY pigs (P < 0.05).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The mRNA level of PBD114 in Tibetan and DLY pigs. a, the mRNA level of PBD114 in tissues of Tibetan pigs; b, the mRNA level of PBD114 in tissues of DLY pigs; c, comparison of the mRNA level of PBD114 among breeds. Values are means ± SE, n = 6. a, b Mean in a same column with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05)

Full size image

Expression profiles of PBD114 gene upon E. coli K88 challenge

The effects of E. coli K88 on the expression of PBD114 were displayed in Fig. 2. Diarrhea scores of K88 group were higher than CON group over 24 h except at 20 h (P < 0.05), and the results indicated that E. coli K88 challenged model was successful. In vivo, the expressions of PBD114 in duodenum, jejunum and ileum were significantly induced by E. coli K88 (P < 0.05). In vitro, the expressions of TNFα in IPEC-J2 were markedly increased by 1 × 105 and 1 × 106 CFU/mL E. coli K88, and 1 × 105 CFU/mL E. coli K88 also obviously induced the expression of PBD114 (P < 0.05).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Escherichia coli K88 induced the expression of PBD114 in 6 days old pigs and IPEC-J2. a, diarrhea scores of 7 days old piglets challenged by E. coli K88 or not; b, effects of E. coli K88 challenge on the mRNA level of PBD114 in intestinal tissues; Effects of E. coli K88 challenge on the mRNA level of TNFα (c) and PBD114 (d) in IPEC-J2. Values are means ± SE, n = 8. a, b, c Mean in a same column with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05)

Full size image

Cloning and sequence analysis of the PBD114 gene

In order to compare the homology of PBD114 between TP pigs and DLY pigs, the 210-bp open reading frame of PBD114 from TP pigs and DLY pigs were successfully amplified (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Then PBD114 amplicons from TP and DLY pigs were cloned and sequenced, and the results of sequence alignment indicated that DNA sequence identity of PBD114 between TP and DLY pigs was identical with NM_001129973.1 (Fig. 3a). Amino acid sequence identity and phylogenetic tree of beta defensin 114 among Homo sapiens, Sus scrofa, Bos indicus and Pan troglodytes was compared. Phylogenetic tree analysis results indicated that beta defensin 114 of Sus scrofa was close to Homo sapiens (Fig. 3b). Moreover, with 45.83% amino acid sequence identity of beta defensin 114 from human and Sus scrofa (Fig. 3c).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Sequence alignment of PBD114 and phylogenetic analysis of beta defensin 114. a, DNA sequences cloned from TP and DLY pigs were aligned by DNAMAN 8.0; b, amino acid sequences of beta defensin 114 in sus scorfa, Homo sapiens, Pan troglodytes and Bos indicus were aligned by DNAMAN 8.0; c, phylogenetic analysis of beta defensin 114 in sus scorfa, Homo sapiens, Pan troglodytes and Bos indicus were performed by DNAMAN 8.0

Full size image

Expression and purification of rPBD114

The recombinant strain E. coli Origami B (DE3)-pET32a(+)-PBD114 and E. coli Origami B (DE3)-pET32a(+) were constructed, and positive colonies were identified by colony PCR (data were not showed). And then the identified positive colony was cultured and induced by 1 mmol/L isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactoside (IPTG) at 28 °C for 9 h. Then SDS-PAGE analysis showed that the target protein with the Trx tag conformed to the theoretical molecular weight (Fig. 4), of 25.18 kDa. The pellets were disrupted with sonication and dissolved in lysis buffer. The crude soluble recombinant protein was purified by Ni2+-IDA affinity chromatography. SDS-PAGE was performed and the purity of rPBD114 was analyzed with Image Lab (Bio-Rad). The result showed that the purity of rPBD114 was 95% and the expression level of rPBD114 was 5.0 mg/L. The target band was collected and amino acid sequence of rPBD114 was identified by mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/TOF) (Fig. 5a). Through searching uniprot-Sus-scrofa (68,152 sequences, 25,615,784 residues), rPBD114 sequence had a 100% math with NP_001123445 (Fig. 5b), more MS information was shown in Additional file 2 data.

Fig. 4
figure 4

SDS-PAGE of recombinant PBD114 protein. M, 150 kDa protein marker; 1, E. coli Origami B (DE3)-pET32a(+) did not induce for 9 h at 28 °C; 2, E. coli Origami B (DE3)-pET32a(+) induced by 1 mmol/L IPTG for 9 h at 28 °C; 3, E. coli Origami B (DE3)-pET32a(+)-PBD114 did not induce for 9 h at 28 °C; 4, E. coli Origami B (DE3)-pET32a(+)-PBD114 induced for 9 h at 28 °C

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Mass spectrometry identification of rPBD114. a, peak figure of amino acid fragments; b, through searching uniprot-Sus-scrofa (68152 sequences, 25615784 residues), rPBD114 sequence had a 100% math with NP_001123445 (show in red)

Full size image

Protein structure, physical and chemical parameters of PBD114

Protein structure prediction was performed online to explore the biological function of PBD114. SWISS-MODEL analysis found that the structure of PBD114 was similar to human beta defensin 2 with 35.14% sequence identity (Additional file 1: Figure S2). The predicted structure of PBD114 indicated that PBD114 was consisted of an alpha helix fragment and a β-pleated sheet fragment (Additional file 1: Figure S2), the detail predicted results were provided in Additional file 1: Figure S3. Physical and chemical parameters of PBD114 was analyzed by ProtParam online, theoretical pI, net charged residues and aliphatic index of PBD114 was 7.46, + 1 and 66.38 respectively, and more information was shown in Additional file 3 data.

Antibacterial activities

The antimicrobial activity of rPBD114 was explored by determining its MIC against E. coli DH5α, pathogenic E. coli K88+, S. typhimurium, S. aureus, B. subtilis and Pichia pastoris X33 (Table 3). The results showed that rPBD114 exhibited strong antimicrobial activity against E. coli DH5α and pathogenic E. coli K88+, The MIC value of E. coli DH5α and pathogenic E. coli K88+ were 64 and 128 μg/mL respectively. However, much higher concentration rPBD114 (more than 256 μg/mL) were needed to against S. typhimurium, S. aureus, B. subtilis and Pichia pastoris X33. The tolerance of these four organisms to rPBD114 indicate that Pichia pastoris X33 would be more tolerant to expression of rPBD114.

Table 3 MIC of rPBD114
Full size table

Hemolytic activity and cytotoxicity assays

Erythrocytes were collected from fresh porcine blood and incubated with different concentrations of rPBD114 for 1 h. Less than 3.9% hemolysis was found at all concentrations (0–256 μg/mL). The results showed that rPBD114 had slight hemolytic in vitro (Fig. 6a). IPEC-J2 was also used to examine cytotoxicity of rPBD114, cell viability was measured by CCK-8 after treating with different concentrations of rPBD114. There was little cytotoxicity (Fig. 6b) when the concentration of rPBD114 was less than 256 μg/mL. However, the cytotoxicity was significant when the concentration of rPBD114 was 256 μg/mL (P < 0.05). These results suggested that the safe concentration of rPBD114 should be lower than 256 μg/mL.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Hemolytic and cytotoxicity of recombinant PBD114 protein. a, hemolytic of rPBD114, porcine erythrocyte was hatched with different concentration of rPBD114 for 1 h at 37 °C and measured OD414; b, cytotoxicity of rPBD114, IPEC-J2 was co-culture with different concentration of rPBD114 for 24 h and measured by CCK8. Values are means ± SE, n = 6. a, b Mean in a same column with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05)

Full size image

Discussion

The innate and adaptive immunity are two essential elements of host defense. Innate immunity is highly conserved from fruit flies to human and is the first line of defense against invading pathogens. One mechanism of the innate immunity is the secretion of broad-spectrum antimicrobial substances, such as cathelicidins and small cationic polypeptides named defensins [20]. Previous studies reported that porcine β-defensin 1 and β-defensin 2 existed broad-spectrum antimicrobial activities and immune modulating function [20]. Human beta defensin 114 exhibited strong antimicrobial activity against E. coli, C. albicans and S. aureus, and anti-inflammatory function [21]. Choi et al. [13] found PBD114 by a BLAST analysis in 2012. However, the expression profile of PBD114 in various tissues of pigs and biological function of PBD114 have not been studied. Therefore, the present study was conducted to explore the expression profiles of the PBD114 in different breeds and in response to infections. Moreover, the function of PBD114 protein has also been investigated.

Our results showed that PBD114 widely expressed in duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, colon, liver, spleen, lung, kidney and thymus, in both TP and DLY pigs. Similar expression patterns also have been demonstrated by previous study on porcine beta defensins [13]. The extensive expression of PBD114 suggested that this endogenous peptide antibiotic may contribute to both mucosal and systemic host defenses in pigs. Chinese TP is a special Chinese indigenous pig breed, which are distributed in high-altitude areas of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau which has cold climate. They are raised in pollution-free, purely natural alpine and cold mountainous areas all year round. And their immunity and disease resistance are stronger than Duroc pigs [22, 23]. The higher level mRNA of PBD114 was detected in intestine of TP and DLY pigs, furthermore, the results of comparison among breeds showed that the abundance of PBD114 mRNA of TP pigs in jejunum, colon and lung were higher than DLY pigs. As well, defensins are a family of endogenous cationic antimicrobial peptides that play an important role in the innate immune system of mammals and provide protection against bacterial infections in the intestine [24, 25], Hence, the high expression of PBD114 in TP pigs may have implications for the contribution of PBD114 on high disease resistance of TP, and which was the same as PBD1, 2 and 3 [22, 26].

Due to the impact of thousands of years of artificial selection for survival of these breeds of different signatures of selection in TP and domestic pigs [23], we chose to investigate whether there were some variants in the PBD114 gene. So the DNA sequence of PBD114 was cloned from TP and DLY pigs respectively. Agarose gel electrophoresis of cloning PCR showed that the size of PBD114 from TP and DLY pigs was same to theoretical value (210 bp). Further DNA sequence alignment of PBD114 between TP and DLY pigs indicated that the identity was 100%, and exactly consistent with NM_001129973.1 in NCBI. The sequence of gene PBD114 did not mutated during thousands evolutionary history, and this hinted that PBD114 was very important to survive and breed of pigs. Moreover, previous study reported that human defensin 114 exhibited a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity with Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans [27]. Amino acid sequence alignment of beta defensin 114 between pig and human showed that the identity was 45.83%, and phylogenetic analysis was performed with amino acid of Sus scrofa, Homo sapiens, Pan troglodytes and Bos indicus, and showed that PBD114 was closely related to DEFB114. These results suggested that PBD114 may possess antimicrobial activity like DEFB114.

To explore whether PBD114 take part in resistance to pathogens, we carried out experiments in vitro and in vivo. The results showed that E. coli K88 significantly induced the expression of PBD114 in vitro and in vivo. On the one hand, the results indicated that PBD114 was an inducible defensin. According previous studies, PBD114 was not only induced by E. coli K88, but also could be promoted by nutrients and probiotics [27, 28]. On the other hand, PBD114 may play an important role in killing E. coli K88 or immune modulating function to alleviate the damage of E. coli K88. Because previous study reported that DEFB114 (a human homologous protein of PBD114) not only exhibited antimicrobial activity but also could inhibit RAW264.7 release TNFα after stimulation with LPS [26]. In addition, PBD2 protected intestinal health via modulating of TJ proteins in intestine and inhibiting the production of inflammatory mediators [29].

To explore the antimicrobial activity of PBD114, PBD114 was expressed in an Escherichia coli expression system. Because Escherichia coli expression system technology was mature and simple, still the first choice as host for AMPs production [16, 30]. In addition, PBD114 possessed three disulfide bonds, so we selected pET32a(+) and E. coli Origami B (DE3) to construct recombinant expression bacteria. pET32a(+) vector possessed thioredoxin tag which can increase the activity and amount of target protein present in the soluble fraction. E. coli Origami B (DE3) with glutathione reductase (gor) and/or thioredoxin reductase (trxB) mutations enhance the formation of disulfide bonds in the E. coli cytoplasm [31]. We successfully constructed recombinant bacteria, E. coli Origami B (DE3)-pET32a (+)-PBD114 and expressed the rPBD114 protein. rPBD114 was identified by mass spectrometry and the sequence coverage 100% was identical to NP_001123445. Physical and chemical parameters showed that rPBD114 possessed positive net charge (+ 1), aliphatic index (66.38) and grand average of hydropathicity (− 0.530), and suggested that PBD114 protein has the biochemical properties of antimicrobial peptides [32]. As we all know, protein structure determines protein function. To learn more about the function of PBD114 protein, we predicted the protein structure of PBD114 protein on SWISS-MODEL and the results showed that the structure of PBD114 protein was similar with human defensin 2. Human beta defensin 2 is produced by a number of epithelial cells and exhibits potent antimicrobial activity against Gram-negative bacteria and Candida, but not Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus [33]. Similarly, MIC of rPBD114 protein was carried out and rPBD114 protein exhibited antimicrobial activity against E. coli but not Gram-positive bacteria and fungus. However, a great number of studies have shown that defensins have a wide range of antimicrobial activities [34,35,36,37]. The antimicrobial activity of rPBD114 protein in our study suggested that Pichia pastoris X33 would be more tolerant to expression of rPBD114. The methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris can grow to extremely high cell densities, enabling efficient protein production and secretion [38, 39]. The most attractive feature of this system is that the recombinant protein could be exactly folded, fully decorated and easily purified [40]. However, the yeast may have been more resistant to the defensins if it were not properly processed. Therefore, further study in Pichia pastoris was needed. In addition, hemolytic and cytotoxicity of rPBD114 protein indicated that rPBD114 was safe to mammals. These results suggested that rPBD114 may serve as a candidate for the replacement of conventionally used antibiotics. However, further researches are needed to investigate such as the structural and functional analysis, immunogenicity, and biologic function of rPBD114 protein in vitro and in vivo.

Conclusions

PBD114 is an infection response gene that is differentially-expressed between different porcine breeds and tissues. The antimicrobial activity of PBD114 protein, against pathogens such as the E. coli K88, few hemolytic activity and cytotoxicity suggested that it may serve as a candidate for the substitution for conventionally used antibiotics.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AMPs:

Antimicrobial peptides

DEFB114:

Human beta defensin 114

DLY:

Duroc×Landrance×Yorkshire

IPTG:

Isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactoside

LB:

Lysogeny broth

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharide

MALDI-TOF/TOF:

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry

MIC:

Minimal inhibitory concentration

PBD114:

Porcine beta defensin 114

rPBD114:

Recombinant porcine beta defensin 114

SDS-PAGE:

Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

THY:

Todd-Hewitt+yeast extract

TJ:

Tight junction

TP:

Tibetan pig

YPD:

Yeast Extract Peptone Dextrose Medium

References

  1. Veldhuizen EJ, Rijnders M, Claassen EA, van Dijk A, Haagsman HP. Porcine beta-defensin 2 displays broad antimicrobial activity against pathogenic intestinal bacteria. Mol Immunol. 2008;45:386–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhu YG, Johnson TA, Su JQ, Qiao M, Guo GX, Stedtfeld RD, et al. Diverse and abundant antibiotic resistance genes in Chinese swine farms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;201222743.

  3. Auvynet C, Rosenstein Y. Multifunctional host defense peptides: antimicrobial peptides, the small yet big players in innate and adaptive immunity. FEBS J. 2009;276:6497–508.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang D, Liu ZH, Tewary P, Chen Q, de la Rosa G, Oppenheim JJ. Defensin participation in innate and adaptive immunity. Curr Pharm Des. 2007;13:3131–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Selsted ME, Ouellette AJ. Mammalian defensins in the antimicrobial immune response. Nature Immunol. 2005;6:551.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang G, Wu H, Shi J, Ganz T, Ross CR, Blecha F. Molecular cloning and tissue expression of porcine beta-defensin-1. FEBS Lett. 1998;424:37–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Salzman NH, Hung K, Haribhai D, Chu H, Karlsson-Sjöberg J, Amir E, et al. Enteric defensins are essential regulators of intestinal microbial ecology. Nature Immunol. 2009;11:76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang Y, Teng D, Mao R, Wang X, Xi D, Hu X, et al. High expression of a plectasin-derived peptide NZ2114 in Pichia pastoris and its pharmacodynamics, postantibiotic and synergy against Staphylococcus aureus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98:681–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen ML. Changing patterns of infectious disease. Nature. 2000;406:762–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Elahi S, Buchanan RM, Attah-Poku S, Townsend HG, Babiuk LA, Gerdts V. The host defense peptide beta-defensin 1 confers protection against Bordetella pertussis in newborn piglets. Infect Immun. 2006;74:2338–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Li CL, Xu TT, Chen RB, Huang XX, Zhao YC, Bao YY, et al. Cloning, expression and characterization of antimicrobial porcine beta defensin 1 in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif. 2013;88:47–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Veldhuizen EJA, Dijk AV, Tersteeg MHG, Kalkhove SIC, Meulen JVD, Niewold TA, et al. Expression of β-defensins pBD-1 and pBD-2 along the small intestinal tract of the pig: lack of upregulation in vivo upon Salmonella typhimurium infection. Mol Immunol. 2007;44:276–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Choi MK, Le MT, Nguyen DT, Choi H, Kim W, Kim JH, et al. Genome-level identification, gene expression, and comparative analysis of porcine ß-defensin genes. BMC Genet. 2012;13:98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kusminski CM, Park J, Scherer PE. MitoNEET-mediated effects on browning of white adipose tissue. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3962.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Su G, Tang F, Chen D, Yu B, Huang Z, Luo Y, et al. Expression, purification and characterization of a novel antimicrobial peptide: Gloverin A2 from Bombyx mori. Int J Pept Res Ther. 2018:1–7.

  17. Zhang J, Yang YL, Teng D, Tian ZG, Wang SR, Wang JH. Expression of plectasin in Pichia pastoris and its characterization as a new antimicrobial peptide against Staphyloccocus and Streptococcus. Protein Expres Purif. 2011;78:189–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Feng X, Liu C, Guo J, Song X, Li J, Xu W, et al. Recombinant expression, purification, and antimicrobial activity of a novel hybrid antimicrobial peptide LFT33. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;95:1191–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Deng X, Cao M, Zhang J, Hu K, Yin Z, Zhou Z, et al. Hyaluronic acid-chitosan nanoparticles for co-delivery of MiR-34a and doxorubicin in therapy against triple negative breast cancer. Biomaterials. 2014;35:4333–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Qi S, Chen J, Guo R, Yu B, Chen D. β-Defensins gene expression in tissues of the crossbred and Tibetan pigs. Livest Sci. 2009;123:161–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yu H, Dong J, Gu Y, Liu H, Xin A, Shi H, et al. The novel human β-defensin 114 regulates lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-mediated inflammation and protects sperm from motility loss. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:12270–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao Y, Yu B, Mao XB, Han GQ, Mao Q, Huang ZQ, et al. Molecular cloning and expression analysis of IFN-β promoter stimulator 1 in Tibetan pigs. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39(6):7011–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Li M, Tian S, Jin L, Zhou G, Li Y, Zhang Y, et al. Genomic analyses identify distinct patterns of selection in domesticated pigs and Tibetan wild boars. Nat Genet. 2013;45:1431.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Veldhuizen EJA, Koomen I, Ultee T, van Dijk A, Haagsman HP. Salmonella serovar specific upregulation of porcine defensins 1 and 2 in a jejunal epithelial cell line. Vet Microbiol. 2009;136:69–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ganz T. Defensins and other antimicrobial peptides: a historical perspective and an update. Comb Chem High T Scr. 2005;8:209–17.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen J, Qi S, Guo R, Yu B, Chen D. Different messenger RNA expression for the antimicrobial peptides beta-defensins between Meishan and crossbred pigs. Mol Biol Rep. 2010;37:1633.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ren M, Zhang SH, Zeng XF, Liu H, Qiao SY. Branched-chain amino acids are beneficial to maintain growth performance and intestinal immune-related function in weaned piglets fed protein restricted diet. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2015;28:1742–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu H, Hou C, Wang G, Jia H, Yu H, Zeng X, et al. Lactobacillus reuteri I5007 modulates intestinal host defense peptide expression in the model of IPEC-J2 cells and neonatal piglets. Nutrients. 2017;9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Han F, Zhang H, Xia X, Xiong H, Song D, Zong X, et al. Porcine beta-defensin 2 attenuates inflammation and mucosal lesions in dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis. J Immunol. 2015;194:1882–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Parachin NS, Mulder KC, Viana AAB, Dias SC, Franco OL. Expression systems for heterologous production of antimicrobial peptides. Peptides. 2012;38:446–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Prinz WA, Åslund F, Holmgren A, Beckwith J. The role of the Thioredoxin and Glutaredoxin pathways in reducing protein disulfide bonds in the Escherichia coli cytoplasm. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:15661–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Yeaman MR, Yount NY. Mechanisms of antimicrobial peptide action and resistance. Pharmacol Rev. 2003;55:27–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Schröder JM, Harder J. Human beta-defensin-2. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1999;31:645–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kahlon AK, Tripathi S, Sharma A. Chapter 8 - recent developments and future prospects of natural and synthetic Antitubercular peptide drugs. In: Amandeep KK, Shubhandra T, Ashok S, editors. Applied microbiology and bioengineering: Academic Press; 2019. p. 121–59.

  35. Yang M, Zhang C, Zhang MZ, Zhang S. Beta-defensin derived cationic antimicrobial peptides with potent killing activity against gram negative and gram positive bacteria. BMC Microbiol. 2018;18:54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sun E, Belanger CR, Haney EF, Hancock REW. Host defense (antimicrobial) peptides. In: Koutsopoulos S, editor. Peptide applications in biomedicine, biotechnology and bioengineering: Woodhead Publishing; 2018. p. 253–85.

  37. Chen RB, Zhang K, Zhang H, Gao CY, Li CL. Analysis of the antimicrobial mechanism of porcine beta defensin 2 against E. coli by electron microscopy and differentially expressed genes. Sci Rep. 2018;8:14711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Corrales-Garcia LL, Possani LD, Corzo G. Expression systems of human β-defensins: vectors, purification and biological activities. Amino Acids. 2011;40:5–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. De Schutter K, Lin Y C, Tiels P, Van Hecke A, Glinka S, Weber-Lehmann J, et al. Genome sequence of the recombinant protein production host pichia pastoris. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27(6):561–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Damaso MCT, Almeida MS, Kurtenbach E, Martins OB, Pereira N, Andrade CMMC, et al. Optimized expression of a thermostable xylanase from Thermomyces lanuginosus in Pichia pastoris. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:6064–607.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Honglin Yan, Weikang Wang, Qian Lin and Yaqiang Dai for assistance in collecting samples of TP pigs, and thank Huifen Wang and Quyuan Wang for purchasing consumables and reagents.

Funding

This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Program of Sichuan Province (2018NZDZX0005), and the Youth Innovation Teams of Animal Feed Biotechnology of Sichuan Province (2016TD0028).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Animal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, People’s Republic of China

    Guoqi Su, Kunhong Xie, Daiwen Chen, Bing Yu, Zhiqing Huang, Yuheng Luo, Xiangbing Mao, Ping Zheng, Jie Yu, Junqiu Luo & Jun He

  2. Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of China Ministry of Education, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 625014, People’s Republic of China

    Guoqi Su, Kunhong Xie, Daiwen Chen, Bing Yu, Zhiqing Huang, Yuheng Luo, Xiangbing Mao, Ping Zheng, Jie Yu, Junqiu Luo & Jun He

Authors
  1. Guoqi Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kunhong Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daiwen Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bing Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhiqing Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yuheng Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xiangbing Mao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ping Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jie Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Junqiu Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jun He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JH, JL, JY, PZ, XM, YL, ZH, BY and DC participated in the design of the study. QS, KX and QL collected the experiments data. GS analyzed the data and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun He.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The experimental procedures followed the actual law of animal protection that were approved by the Animal Care Advisory Committee of Sichuan Agricultural University (No. 20160709) and were performed in accordance with the National Research Council’s Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Consent for publication

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

PBD114 cloning PCR and predictive spatial structure of rPBD114. (DOCX 840 kb)

Additional file 2: 

Detail information of MS. (XLSX 9 kb)

Additional file 3: 

Detail information of physicochemical. (DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, G., Xie, K., Chen, D. et al. Differential expression, molecular cloning, and characterization of porcine beta defensin 114. J Animal Sci Biotechnol 10, 60 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-019-0367-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-019-0367-0

Keywords

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology

ISSN: 2049-1891