Skip to main content

Effects of methionine supplementation in a reduced protein diet on growth performance, oxidative status, intestinal health, oocyst shedding, and methionine and folate metabolism in broilers under Eimeria challenge

Abstract

Background

This study investigated effects of different methionine (Met) supplementation levels in a reduced protein diet on growth performance, intestinal health, and different physiological parameters in broilers under Eimeria challenge. A total of 600 fourteen-day-old Cobb500 male broilers were challenged with E. maxima, E. tenella, and E. acervulina, and randomly allocated in a 2 × 5 factorial arrangement. Birds received normal protein diets (20% crude protein, NCP) or reduced protein diets (17% crude protein, LCP), containing 2.8, 4.4, 6.0, 7.6, and 9.2 g/kg of Met.

Results

On 6 and 9 days post inoculation (DPI), increasing Met level linearly improved the growth performance (P < 0.05). Total oocyst shedding linearly increased as Met level increased (P < 0.05). Duodenal villus height (VH):crypt depth (CD) in the LCP groups were higher on 6 DPI (P < 0.01) while lower on 9 DPI (P < 0.05) compared to the NCP groups. Jejunal CD and duodenal VH:CD changed quadratically as Met level increased (P < 0.05). On 6 DPI, liver glutathione (GSH) and glutathione disulfide (GSSG) linearly increased as Met level increased (P < 0.05). On 9 DPI, GSSG quadratically increased, whereas GSH:GSSG quadratically decreased as Met levels increased (P < 0.05). The expression of amino acid transporters linearly decreased as Met level increased (P < 0.05). The expression of zonula occludens 2 and claudin-1 linearly increased on 6 DPI whereas decreased on 9 DPI as Met level increased (P < 0.05). The expressions of cytokines were lower in the LCP groups than the NCP groups (P < 0.05). Interaction effects were found for the expression of IL-10 and TNFα on 6 DPI (P < 0.05), where it only changed quadratically in the NCP group as Met level increased. The expression of Met and folate metabolism genes were lower in the LCP groups than the NCP groups on 9 DPI (P < 0.05). The expression of these genes linearly or quadratically decreased as Met level increased (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

These results revealed the regulatory roles of Met in different physiological parameters including oxidative status, intestinal health, and nutrient metabolism in birds fed reduced protein diet and challenged with Eimeria.

Background

Coccidiosis is a widespread and economically significant parasitic disease affecting the poultry industry [1]. It is caused by the protozoan parasite of the genus Eimeria, which inflicts damage to the intestinal lining of the birds during its reproduction cycle [2]. The infection leads to compromised intestinal integrity, hindered nutrient absorption, inflammation, and oxidative stress, ultimately resulting in a substantial decline in growth performance and even mortality [3,4,5, 6]. Anticoccidial drugs have traditionally served as an effective method to combat coccidiosis [2]. However, concerns have been raised due to the development of drug resistance [7] and growing public apprehension regarding antibiotic use in animal production [8]. While vaccinating birds against coccidiosis has demonstrated effectiveness, achieving successful vaccination requires exposing birds to live or attenuated oocysts to develop immunity [9], which can still lead to intestinal lesions that might potentially predispose another intestinal disease necrotic enteritis [10]. With both approaches facing limitations, the exploration of alternative strategies to mitigate the impact of coccidiosis has become necessary.

Since optimal nutrient compositions in diets are crucial for sustaining the well-being of infected birds and the altered physiological state and heightened immune responses induced by coccidiosis may lead to changes in the nutrient requirements which were proposed for the healthy broilers [11, 12]. One promising alternative avenue to combat coccidiosis emerged as the nutritional interventions by increasing the supplementation of nutrients possessing function roles like amino acids into broiler diets, aiming to reduce intestinal damage and promote recovery [13]. Methionine (Met) as one of the essential amino acids is also considered the first limiting amino acid in poultry production [14, 15]. It not only plays a crucial role in maintaining bird growth and protein synthesis, but also holds significant importance in supporting the intestinal health, immune responses, and anti-oxidative functions of the birds [16,17,18,19,20,21]. Besides the established significance in protein synthesis, Met also plays a crucial role in regulating several signaling pathways, including the mTOR and Wnt/β-catenin pathways [22, 23]. These pathways are known for their role in maintaining intestinal structure by regulating the renewal and differentiation of intestinal stem cells [24]. This dual role of Met may contribute significantly to the regenerative capacity of the intestine, especially during coccidiosis infection when the intestinal epithelial cells as well as the tight junctions between them are severely damaged [5, 6]. Moreover, research has shown that Met possesses potent antioxidant capacity, attributed to its close metabolic relationship with glutathione (GSH) and its capability to scavenge free radicals [25,26,27,28,29]. Additionally, the critical role Met plays in the immune responses cannot be ignored, research showed that the Met as well as its metabolites S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) are important for the activation and proliferation of T cells [30, 31], which are essential in combating the Eimeria infections [32]. Sufficient supplementation of Met has also been shown to enhance antibody production in broilers [33,34,35]. Given the multiple functional roles Met possesses, supplementation of Met in diets of broilers under Eimeria challenge might potentially alleviate the impact of the infection and improve the performance of the birds.

However, the potential negative impacts of excessive Met supplementation should not be overlooked. Toxicity caused by excessive Met supplementation has been well documented [36]. While the demands for Met may increase in birds challenged by Eimeria due to its beneficial functional roles, over supplementation of Met could still lead to impaired growth performance. This negative effects could be intensified when the birds are under coccidiosis infection. Moreover, it’s crucial to acknowledge the intimate connection between Met and folate metabolism within the one-carbon cycle. In the process of homocysteine remethylation, elevated Met levels might contribute to the synthesis of additional tetrahydrofolate, ultimately converted into pyrimidine for DNA synthesis and cellular proliferation [37, 38]. This metabolic interplay suggests that an excess of Met might potentially heighten folate and pyrimidine availability to Eimeria, which are essential for their reproduction [39, 40], thus potentially exacerbating the severity of the infection by favoring the reproduction of the parasites.

Reducing the dietary protein levels in animal diets has been proposed by researchers and producers due to its various benefits [41]. One major advantage is the potential to lower production costs by decreasing the usage of high-quality protein ingredients. [13, 42]. Additionally, this approach offers environmental advantages by decreasing nitrogen excretion and ammonia emissions [41,42,43]. However, with the protein content reduced in the diets, it is of more importance to meet the optimal amino acid requirements to maintain the growth performance of the birds especially when the birds are under disease conditions [44, 45].

Hence, an understanding of the optimal Met supplementation levels becomes crucial for coccidia-infected birds fed a reduced protein diet, which ensures not only the economic efficiency and environmental sustainability of poultry production but also the well-being of the birds in the face of coccidiosis challenges. Despite the significance of this issue, there is a scarcity of studies addressing this topic. Therefore, the present study aims to bridge this gap by investigating the effects of different levels of Met supplementation in a reduced protein diet on the growth performance, intestinal health, immune responses, oocyst shedding, and metabolism of Met and folate in broilers challenged with Eimeria. Our hypothesis is that increasing Met levels could enhance the performance of broilers under Eimeria challenge by improving the oxidative status and intestinal health of the birds. However, we postulate that an optimal level of dietary Met may exist, beyond which further supplementation could potentially favor the reproduction of parasites and result in adverse effects.

Materials and methods

All the animal experiment procedures used in this study were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Georgia (A2021 12–012).

Birds, diets, and Eimeria challenge

A total of 600 one-day-old Cobb500 male broiler chicks were fed a same starter diet that met the breeder’s nutrient recommendations [46] from d 0 to 14. On d 14, all birds were orally gavaged with 1 mL of solution containing 25,000 oocysts of E. maxima, 25,000 oocysts of E. tenella, and 125,000 oocysts of E. acervulina. The Eimeria spp. utilized in this study were isolates from North Carolina field strains. The oocysts were sporulated in 2% potassium dichromate at 30 °C. Following sporulation, the oocysts were washed with PBS and quantified using a McMaster chamber (Jorgensen Laboratories, Loveland, CO, USA). Subsequently, the quantified oocysts were combined and resuspended in water to achieve the desired concentration. The birds were then randomly allocated into 10 treatments in a 2 × 5 factorial arrangement with 2 levels of crude protein and 5 levels of Met. Each treatment contained 5 replicates with 12 birds per replicate. The treatment grower diets were corn and soybean meal based and included two protein levels. The normal protein diet (NCP) contained 20% crude protein (CP) with amino acid levels, except Met, meeting the breeder’s recommendations. The reduced protein diet (LCP) contained 17% CP with amino acid levels, except Met, reduced by 15% compared to the NCP diet to achieve the similar amino acid to lysine ratios. In the NCP diet, one group received no crystalline form of DL-Met supplementation, with a Met content of 2.8 g/kg. The subsequent groups contained 1.6 g/kg more Met than the previous group, with the 6.0 g/kg Met group representing the recommended Met level by the breeders and the 9.2 g/kg Met group containing around 50% more Met than the breeder’s recommendation. In the LCP diets, DL-Met supplementation was adjusted to achieve equivalent Met levels as in the NCP diets. The corresponding diets were denoted as Met 2.8, Met 4.4, Met 6.0, Met 7.6 and Met 9.2, respectively. The diet samples were sent for CP and amino acid analysis at a commercial laboratory (The University of Missouri-Columbia Agricultural Experiment Station and Chemical Laboratories, Columbia, MO, USA). The feedstuffs and chemical composition of the diets are shown in Table 1. The birds were raised in battery cages for the entire duration of the experiment with ad libitum access to feed and water. Temperature and lighting programs followed the Cobb500 Broiler Management Guide [47].

Table 1 Ingredient formulation and nutrient and energy composition of experimental dietsa

Growth performance and sample collection

Body weight (BW) was measured on 0, 6, and 9 days post inoculation (DPI) for the calculation of body weight gain (BWG). Feed intake (FI) was measured daily after inoculation. Feed conversion ratio (FCR) was calculated from BWG and FI. Mortality was monitored and recorded daily. On 6 and 9 DPI, one bird per cage was randomly selected and euthanized for sample collections. Samples from liver, jejunal mucosa, and cecal tonsils (CT) were collected and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. The samples were stored at –80 °C for oxidative status and gene expression analyses. Approximately 2 cm in length of the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum samples were collected, rinsed with PBS, and fixed in 10% formalin for intestinal morphology analysis. Excreta were collected daily from 1 to 9 DPI from each cage for the measurement of oocyst shedding.

Intestinal morphology and intestinal permeability

The intestinal samples were removed from the 10% formalin after fixation and subsequently embedded in paraffin blocks. The sample blocks were sliced into 4 μm sections and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The image of the stained tissues was observed and captured under a light microscope with 2 × magnification (BZ-X800, Keyence Inc., Itasca, IL, USA). The villus height (VH) and crypt depth (CD) were measured and VH:CD ratio were calculated as described previously [4]. On 5 DPI, one bird per cage was gavaged with 1 mL of fluorescein isothiocyanate dextran (FITC-d; 2.2 mg/mL, MW 4000; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) to measure intestinal permeability. Two hours after the gavage, the birds were euthanized for blood collection. The blood was centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 15 min (Eppendorf Centrifuge 5430R, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), and 100 μL of serum was used to determine the FITC-d concentration according to the method described previously [48].

Oocyst shedding

The oocyst shedding was measured according to a previously reported method [49]. Briefly, 5 g of the collected excreta samples were weighed and combined with 25 mL of water. The mixture was vigorously vortexed, and 1 mL of the diluted samples was then mixed with 9 mL of saturated salt solution and vortexed thoroughly. The prepared samples were loaded into a McMaster chamber (Jorgensen Laboratories, Loveland, CO, USA) and examined under a microscope (FEC Source, Grand Ronde, OR, USA). The oocysts shedding of E. acervulina, E. maxima, and E. tenella were distinguished by their distinct oocyst sizes and shapes [50]. The oocysts were quantified, and the results were expressed as the log10 of oocysts per gram of excreta (OPG).

Oxidative status analyses

Concentrations of malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione (GSH), glutathione disulfide (GSSG), and activities of glutathione peroxidase (GPX) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) in the liver were determined using commercial assay kits (GSH, GPX, SOD assay kits, Cayman chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; MDA, BioAssay Systems, Hayward, CA, USA). Protein concentrations of the liver samples were measured by bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA) kit (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) to standardize the results obtained as described previously [51].

Reverse transcription and real-time PCR analysis

Liver, jejunal mucosa, and CT samples were homogenized with a MiniBeadBeater-16 (BioSpec Products Inc., Bartlesville, OK, USA), and RNA was extracted using QIAzol Lysis Reagents (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA concentrations were determined by a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). The extracted RNA was diluted to a uniform concentration and reverse-transcribed to cDNA by high-capacity cDNA synthesis kits (Applied Biosystems, Forester City, CA, USA). The cDNA samples were combined with SYBR Green Master Mix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and reverse and forward primers for the real-time PCR analysis performed in a Step One thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Primer sequences for tested genes are listed in Table 2. The 2−ΔΔCt method was used to analyze target gene expression over the housekeeping gene, β-actin [52].

Table 2 List of primer sequences used for real-time PCR

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted by the PROC GLM program of SAS software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The FI of each DPI were analyzed separately by two-way ANOVA in the 2 × 5 factorial arrangement with CP and Met levels being the two main effects. The accumulated FI of each period and the growth performance parameters, intestinal morphology, oxidative status, and gene expression data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA in the same 2 × 5 factorial arrangement. Tukey’s honestly significant difference test was applied to separate means. Linear and quadratic orthogonal polynomial contrasts were utilized to evaluate the effects of Met levels of the tested parameters. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05.

Result

Growth performance

The daily FI began to decline from 4 DPI, reaching its lowest point on 6 DPI. Subsequently, it gradually increased from 6 to 9 DPI (Fig. 1A). Significant interaction effects were observed for the daily FI of 1–3 DPI (P < 0.05) (Table 3). Specifically, the daily FI linearly or quadratically increased as Met levels increased in the NCP groups (P < 0.01), whereas they were not affected by Met levels in the LCP groups (Fig. 1B–D). A significant interaction effect was observed for the daily FI of 4 DPI (P < 0.01). Specifically, as Met level increased, daily FI changed quadratically in the NCP groups (P < 0.05), whereas it linearly decreased in the LCP groups (P < 0.01) (Fig. 1E). On 5 DPI, daily FI linearly decreased as Met levels increased in the LCP groups (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1F). The daily FI of 6 DPI linearly decreased as Met levels increased (P < 0.01) (Fig. 1G) and it was significantly higher in the Met 2.8 groups than the Met 6.0, Met 7.6, and Met 9.2 groups (P < 0.01).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effects of dietary methionine levels and protein contents on the daily feed intake of broilers challenged with Eimeria spp. The error bars represent the SEM values. Bars without a common letter differ significantly. The black lines with arrowhead represented significant linear or quadratic relationship between parameters and dietary methionine levels. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. DFI, Daily feed intake; DPI, Day post inoculation; Met, Methionine; NCP, Normal protein diet; LCP, Reduced protein diet; Met 2.8, Dietary Met level = 2.8 g/kg; Met 4.4, Dietary Met level = 4.4 g/kg; Met 6.0, Dietary Met level = 6.0 g/kg; Met 7.6, Dietary Met level = 7.6 g/kg; Met 9.0, Dietary Met level = 9.0 g/kg

Table 3 Effects of dietary methionine levels and protein contents on post inoculation daily feed intake of broilers under Eimeria challenge

On 6 DPI, BW and BWG linearly increased, and FCR linearly decreased as Met level increased (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2A–C). An interaction effect was observed for the FI of 0–6 DPI (P < 0.05) where it linearly decreased as Met level increased in the LCP groups while not in the NCP groups (Fig. 2D). The FCR of 0–6 DPI was significantly lower in the Met 6.0 groups compared to the Met 2.8 groups (P = 0.019) (Table 4). The FCR of 7–9 DPI quadratically decreased as Met level increased (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2E), and it was significantly lower in the Met 6.0 groups compared to the Met 2.8 groups (P = 0.018). The FCR of 0–9 DPI linearly decreased as Met level increased (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2F). No treatment effects were observed for the mortality on any timepoints.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effects of dietary methionine levels and protein contents on the growth performance of broilers challenged with Eimeria spp. The error bars represent the SEM values. Bars without a common letter differ significantly. The black lines with arrowhead represented significant linear or quadratic relationship between parameters and dietary methionine levels. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. DPI, Day post inoculation; Met, Methionine; NCP, Normal protein diet; LCP, Reduced protein diet; Met 2.8, Dietary Met level = 2.8 g/kg; Met 4.4, Dietary Met level = 4.4 g/kg; Met 6.0, Dietary Met level = 6.0 g/kg; Met 7.6, Dietary Met level = 7.6 g/kg; Met 9.0, Dietary Met level = 9.0 g/kg

Table 4 Effects of dietary methionine levels and protein contents on growth performance of broilers under Eimeria challenge

Intestinal morphology

On 6 DPI, the duodenal CD was lower in the LCP groups compared to the NCP groups (P < 0.01) (Table 5). The duodenal VH:CD ratio was higher in the LCP groups than in the NCP groups (P < 0.01). On 6 DPI, the jejunal CD changed quadratically as it decreased initially and then increased as Met level increased (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3A). On 9 DPI, the duodenal VH:CD ratio was lower in the LCP groups than in the NCP groups (P < 0.05) (Table 6). An interaction effect was observed for the duodenal VH (P < 0.05), where the LCP diet significantly decreased VH only in the Met 6.0 group. (Fig. 3B). The VH:CD ratio changed quadratically as it decreased initially and then increased as Met level increased (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3C). No significant effects on the ileal morphology were observed on 6 and 9 DPI.

Table 5 Effects of dietary methionine levels and protein contents on intestinal morphology of broilers challenged with Eimeria spp. on 6 day post inoculation
Fig. 3
figure 3

Effects of dietary methionine levels and protein contents on intestinal morphology of broilers challenged with Eimeria spp. The error bars represent the SEM values. Bars without a common letter differ significantly. The asterisk (*) denotes significant differences. The black lines with arrowhead represented significant linear or quadratic relationship between parameters and dietary methionine levels. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. DPI, Day post inoculation; CD, Crypt depth; VH, Villus height; Met, Methionine; NCP, Normal protein diet; LCP, Reduced protein diet; Met 2.8, Dietary Met level = 2.8 g/kg; Met 4.4, Dietary Met level = 4.4 g/kg; Met 6.0, Dietary Met level = 6.0 g/kg; Met 7.6, Dietary Met level = 7.6 g/kg; Met 9.0, Dietary Met level = 9.0 g/kg

Table 6 Effects of dietary methionine levels and protein contents on intestinal morphology of broilers challenged with Eimeria spp. on 9 day post inoculation

Gene expression of tight junction proteins

On 6 DPI, the expression of claudin-1 (CLDN1) was higher in the LCP groups than in the NCP groups (P < 0.01) (Table 7). The expression of CLDN1 and zonula occludens (ZO2) linearly increased as Met level increased (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4A and B). On 9 DPI, an interaction effect was observed for the expression of CLDN1( P < 0.05), where it linearly decreased as Met level increased in the NCP groups while not in the LCP groups (Fig. 4C). The expression of ZO2 quadratically decreased as Met level increased (P < 0.05) in the NCP groups (Fig. 4D). No significant CP or Met main effects were observed for the expression of tight junction protein on 9 DPI (Table 8).

Table 7 Effects of dietary methionine levels and protein contents on expression of tight junction proteins and amino acid transporters of broilers challenged with Eimeria spp. on 6 day post inoculation
Fig. 4
figure 4

Effects of dietary methionine levels and protein contents on expression of tight junction proteins of broilers challenged with Eimeria spp. The error bars represent the SEM values. Bars without a common letter differ significantly. The black lines with arrowhead represented significant linear or quadratic relationship between parameters and dietary methionine levels. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. DPI, Day post inoculation; CLDN1, Claudin-1; ZO2, Zonula occludens 2; Met, Methionine; NCP, Normal protein diet; LCP, Reduced protein diet; Met 2.8, Dietary Met level = 2.8 g/kg; Met 4.4, Dietary Met level = 4.4 g/kg; Met 6.0, Dietary Met level = 6.0 g/kg; Met 7.6, Dietary Met level = 7.6 g/kg; Met 9.0, Dietary Met level = 9.0 g/kg

Table 8 Effects of dietary methionine levels and protein contents on expression of tight junction proteins and amino acid transporters of broilers challenged with Eimeria spp. on 9 day post inoculation

Gene expression of amino acid transporters

On 6 DPI, the expression of b(0, +)-type amino acid transporter 1 (SLC7A9) and L-type amino acid transporter 4 (SLC43A2) was lower in the LCP groups than in the NCP groups (P < 0.05) (Table 7). The expression of sodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT1 (SLC6A19) and SLC7A9 linearly decreased as Met level increased (P < 0.05) (Fig. 5A and B). On 9 DPI, the expression of SLC43A2 in the LCP groups and SLC6A19 linearly decreased as Met level increased (P < 0.05) (Fig. 5C and D). No significant effects were observed for the expression of amino acid transporters on 9 DPI (Table 8).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effects of dietary methionine levels and protein contents on expression of amino acid transporters of broilers challenged with Eimeria spp. The error bars represent the SEM values. Bars without a common letter differ significantly. The black lines with arrowhead represented significant linear or quadratic relationship between parameters and dietary methionine levels. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. DPI, day post inoculation; SLC7A9, b(0, +)-type amino acid transporter 1; SLC6A19, Sodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT1; SLC43A2, L-type amino acid transporter 4; Met, Methionine; NCP, Normal protein diet; LCP, Reduced protein diet; Met 2.8, Dietary Met level = 2.8 g/kg; Met 4.4, Dietary Met level = 4.4 g/kg; Met 6.0, Dietary Met level = 6.0 g/kg; Met 7.6, Dietary Met level = 7.6 g/kg; Met 9.0, Dietary Met level = 9.0 g/kg

Gene expression of cytokines

On 6 DPI, the expression of interleukin-1β (IL1β) was higher in the Met 4.4 group than in the Met 2.8 and Met 6.0 groups (P < 0.01) (Table 9). The expression of transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) was higher in the NCP groups than in the LCP groups (P < 0.05). Significant interaction effects were observed for the expression of interleukin-10 (IL10) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) where their expression exhibited a quadratic trend, decreasing initially and then increasing as Met level increased in the NCP groups while not in the LCP groups (Fig. 6A and B). The expression of TGFβ exhibited a quadratic trend (P < 0.05), decreasing initially and then increasing as Met level increased in the NCP groups (Fig. 6C). On 9 DPI, the expression of IL10 was higher in the NCP groups than the LCP groups (P < 0.05) (Table 9). An interaction effect was observed for the expression of TNFα (P < 0.05), where LCP diet decreased its expression only in the Met 6.0 and Met 9.2 groups (Fig. 6D).

Table 9 Effects of dietary methionine levels and protein contents on expression of cytokines of broilers challenged with Eimeria spp.
Fig. 6
figure 6

Effects of dietary methionine levels and protein contents on expression of cytokines of broilers challenged with Eimeria spp. The error bars represent the SEM values. Bars without a common letter differ significantly. The asterisk (*) denotes significant differences. The black lines with arrowhead represented significant linear or quadratic relationship between parameters and dietary methionine levels. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. DPI, Day post inoculation; IL1β, Interleukin-1β; IL10, Interleukin-10; TNFα, Tumor necrosis factor α; TGFβ, Transforming growth factor β; Met, Methionine; NCP, Normal protein diet; LCP, Reduced protein diet; Met 2.8, Dietary Met level = 2.8 g/kg; Met 4.4, Dietary Met level = 4.4 g/kg; Met 6.0, Dietary Met level = 6.0 g/kg; Met 7.6, Dietary Met level = 7.6 g/kg; Met 9.0, Dietary Met level = 9.0 g/kg

Oxidative status

On 6 DPI, liver GSH was higher in the LCP groups than the NCP groups (P < 0.05) (Table 10). Liver GSH linearly increased as Met level increased (P < 0.01) (Fig. 7A). Liver GSSG quadratically increased as Met level increased (P < 0.01) (Fig. 7B). An interaction effect was observed for the GSH:GSSG ratio (P < 0.01), where the ratio quadratically decreased as Met level increased in the NCP groups, whereas the ratio exhibited a quadratic trend, decreasing initially and then increasing as Met level increased in the LCP groups (Fig. 7C). On 9 DPI, liver GSSG were significantly lower in the Met 2.8 groups compared to the other groups (P < 0.01) (Table 10). The GSH:GSSG ratio was significantly lower in the Met 4.4 groups compared to the Met 2.8 groups (P < 0.05). The MDA concentration and SOD activity linearly increased as Met level increased in the LCP groups (P < 0.05) (Fig. 8A and B). An interaction effect was observed for the GSH (P = 0.01), where GSH linearly increased as Met level increased in the NCP groups, whereas GSH exhibited a quadratic trend, increasing initially and then decreasing as Met level increased in the LCP groups (Fig. 8C). Liver GSSG quadratically increased whereas GSH:GSSG ratio quadratically decreased as Met level increased (P < 0.05) (Fig. 8D and E).

Table 10 Effects of dietary methionine levels and protein contents on liver oxidative status of broilers challenged with Eimeria spp.
Fig. 7
figure 7

Effects of dietary methionine levels and protein contents on liver oxidative status of broilers challenged with Eimeria spp. on 6 DPI. The error bars represent the SEM values. Bars without a common letter differ significantly. The black lines with arrowhead represented significant linear or quadratic relationship between parameters and dietary methionine levels. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. DPI, Day post inoculation; GSH, Glutathione; GSSH, Glutathione disulfide; Met, Methionine; NCP, Normal protein diet; LCP, Reduced protein diet; Met 2.8, Dietary Met level = 2.8 g/kg; Met 4.4, Dietary Met level = 4.4 g/kg; Met 6.0, Dietary Met level = 6.0 g/kg; Met 7.6, Dietary Met level = 7.6 g/kg; Met 9.0, Dietary Met level = 9.0 g/kg

Fig. 8
figure 8

Effects of dietary methionine levels and protein contents on liver oxidative status of broilers challenged with Eimeria spp. on 9 DPI. The error bars represent the SEM values. Bars without a common letter differ significantly. The black lines with arrowhead represented significant linear or quadratic relationship between parameters and dietary methionine levels. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. DPI, Day post inoculation; MDA, Malondialdehyde; SOD, Superoxide dismutase; GSH, Glutathione; GSSG, Glutathione disulfide; Met, Methionine; NCP, Normal protein diet; LCP, Reduced protein diet; Met 2.8, Dietary Met level = 2.8 g/kg; Met 4.4, Dietary Met level = 4.4 g/kg; Met 6.0, Dietary Met level = 6.0 g/kg; Met 7.6, Dietary Met level = 7.6 g/kg; Met 9.0, Dietary Met level = 9.0 g/kg

Oocyst shedding

The oocysts of E. acervulina were first detected in the excreta on 3 DPI, and the oocysts of E. maxima and E. tenella first appeared in the excreta on 5 DPI. The OPG of three species peaked at 6 DPI (Fig. 9A). The accumulated OPG from 1 to 9 DPI of E. tenella was significantly lower in the Met 4.4 and Met 6.0 groups than the Met 9.2 groups (Table 11). The accumulated OPG from 1 to 9 DPI of E. acervulina and E. maxima linearly increased as Met level increased (P < 0.05) (Fig. 9B and 9C). The accumulated OPG from 1 to 9 DPI of E. tenella changed quadratically as Met level increased (P < 0.05) (Fig. 9D).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Effects of dietary methionine levels and protein contents on oocyst shedding of broilers challenged with Eimeria spp. The results were expressed as the log10 of oocysts per gram of excreta. The error bars represent the SEM values. The black lines with arrowhead represented significant linear or quadratic relationship between parameters and dietary methionine levels. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. OPG, Oocyst per gram of excreta; DPI, Day post inoculation; Met, Methionine; NCP, Normal protein diet; LCP, Reduced protein diet; Met 2.8, Dietary Met level = 2.8 g/kg; Met 4.4, Dietary Met level = 4.4 g/kg; Met 6.0, Dietary Met level = 6.0 g/kg; Met 7.6, Dietary Met level = 7.6 g/kg; Met 9.0, Dietary Met level = 9.0 g/kg

Table 11 Effects of dietary methionine levels and protein contents on total oocyst shedding from 0 to 9 day post inoculation of broilers under Eimeria challenge

Gene expression of methionine and folate metabolism enzymes

No significant effects were observed for expression of Met and folate metabolism enzymes on 6 DPI (Table 12). On 9 DPI, the expression of methionine adenosyltransferase 1A (MAT1A), methionine synthase (MTR), and cystathionine beta synthase (CBS) were lower in the LCP groups than in the NCP groups (P < 0.05). The expression of MAT1A was significantly higher in the Met 2.8 groups than the other groups (P < 0.01). The expression of adenosylhomocysteinase like 1 (AHCYL1) was higher in the Met 2.8 groups than the Met 6.0 and Met 9.2 groups (P < 0.05). The expression of CBS and AHCYL1 linearly decreased and the expression of MAT1A and MTR quadratically decreased as Met level decreased (P < 0.05) (Fig. 10A–D).

Table 12 Effects of dietary methionine levels and protein contents on expression of methionine metabolism enzymes of broilers challenged with Eimeria spp.
Fig. 10
figure 10

Effects of dietary methionine levels and protein contents on expression of methionine metabolism enzymes of broilers challenged with Eimeria spp. The error bars represent the SEM values. Bars without a common letter differ significantly. The black lines with arrowhead represented significant linear or quadratic relationship between parameters and dietary methionine levels. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. DPI, Day post inoculation; MAT1A, Methionine adenosyltransferase 1A; MTR, Methionine synthase; CBS, Cystathionine beta synthase; AHCYL, Adenosylhomocysteinase like 1; Met, Methionine; NCP, Normal protein diet; LCP, Reduced protein diet; Met 2.8, Dietary Met level = 2.8 g/kg; Met 4.4, Dietary Met level = 4.4 g/kg; Met 6.0, Dietary Met level = 6.0 g/kg; Met 7.6, Dietary Met level = 7.6 g/kg; Met 9.0, Dietary Met level = 9.0 g/kg

On 6 DPI, the expression of thymidylate synthase (TYMS) in the LCP groups linearly increased as Met level increased (P < 0.05) (Fig. 11A). On 9 DPI, the expression of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) and methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase 1 (MTHFD1) were lower in the LCP groups than in the NCP groups (P < 0.01) (Table 13). The expression of TYMS was significantly higher in the Met 2.8 groups than the other groups (P < 0.01). The expression of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) in the LCP groups and TYMS linearly decreased as Met level increased (P < 0.05) Fig. 11B and C.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Effects of dietary methionine levels and protein contents on expression of folate metabolism enzymes of broilers challenged with Eimeria spp. The error bars represent the SEM values. Bars without a common letter differ significantly. The black lines with arrowhead represented significant linear or quadratic relationship between parameters and dietary methionine levels. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. DPI, Day post inoculation; TYMS, Thymidylate synthase; DHFR, Dihydrofolate reductase; MTHFD1, Methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase 1; MTHFR, Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase; Met, Methionine; NCP, Normal protein diet; LCP, Reduced protein diet; Met 2.8, Dietary Met level = 2.8 g/kg; Met 4.4, Dietary Met level = 4.4 g/kg; Met 6.0, Dietary Met level = 6.0 g/kg; Met 7.6, Dietary Met level = 7.6 g/kg; Met 9.0, Dietary Met level = 9.0 g/kg

Table 13 Effects of dietary methionine levels and protein contents on expression of folate metabolism enzymes of broilers challenged with Eimeria spp.

Discussion

The present study investigated the impact of dietary Met levels and protein content on growth performance, intestinal health, oxidative status, and gene expression related to methionine and folate metabolism enzymes in broiler chickens. The multifaceted evaluation of these parameters provided a comprehensive understanding of how Met levels and low dietary protein affect the performance and health of broilers under Eimeria challenge.

The daily FI began to decrease on 4 DPI and reached its lowest point on 6 DPI. This decrease in daily FI in response to Eimeria challenge aligned with the reproductive cycle of the parasites. It has been shown that Eimeria spp. typically undergo the asexual reproduction (schizogony) to produce merozoites from 3 to 5 DPI, the merozoites subsequently re-enter the enterocytes to initiate sexual reproduction (gametogony) around 6 to 7 DPI, resulting in severe damage to the intestinal mucosa [6, 53]. This damage to the intestinal mucosa and integrity may cause pain and discomfort in the birds, potentially leading to anorexia [54]. After 6 DPI, the birds gradually recovered from the infection, and the FI increased accordingly. The same pattern has been reported by previous studies wherein broilers were also subjected to Eimeria challenge, and the daily change in FI was monitored [3, 4, 6, 10].

In the present study, we observed that in the first three DPI, the FI linearly or quadratically increased as Met levels increased from deficiency to levels higher than recommendation in the NCP groups. According to studies conducted by previous researchers who fed broilers with diets containing graded levels of Met, Met deficiency could lead to suppression in FI, which be restored by increasing Met inclusion in diet [21, 55, 56], as observed in this current study in the NCP groups. However, the birds did not respond significantly to the changes of dietary Met levels in the LCP groups, this observation suggested that the birds’ response to dietary Met levels might be dampened by the decreased CP content in the diet. To the authors’ knowledge, this discrepancy in the response of FI to dietary Met levels across different levels of CP diet has not been previously reported. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanism behind this difference. More intriguingly, starting from 4 DPI corresponding with the reproduction of Eimeria spp. and the subsequent drop in FI, birds in the higher Met groups began to exhibit lower FI, especially in the LCP groups. By 6 DPI, when the infection was most acute, FI linearly decreased as Met levels increased. This observation suggested that during the acute infection of coccidiosis, higher dietary Met levels might exert adverse effects on the birds, potentially contributing to the promotion of Eimeria reproduction. While only daily FI was observed in the current study, it would be interesting for future research to monitor daily BW changes to further support this hypothesis. The varying patterns in the birds’ FI response to dietary Met levels on each DPI as Eimeria infection progressed could be attributed to certain physiological changes induced by the infection. Further investigation is necessary to elucidate the exact mechanism behind this change.

Nevertheless, for overall growth performance indices, increased Met levels linearly improved the BWG and FCR from 0 to 6 DPI. As the first limiting amino acid in the poultry diet [14], Met deficiency has been shown to hindered the growth performance of broilers raised under unchallenged conditions [21, 57, 58], this current research provided further evidence underscoring the crucial role of Met in sustaining the growth performance of the birds under Eimeria challenge. However, it is worth noting that although a linear trend between Met levels and performance indices were observed, this improvement in growth performance seemed to plateau when the Met levels reached 6.0 g/kg especially from 7 to 9 DPI where a quadratic trend was observed between FCR and Met levels. This observation suggested that the higher Met supplementation beyond this level might not necessarily lead to improvement in the growth performance for birds under Eimeria challenge. Interestingly, despite previous research showed that reduced CP levels in diets could compromise the performance of the birds [59, 60], this decrease in growth performance caused by lower dietary CP was not observed in the current study. While the previous studies were conducted in unchallenged birds, the anorexia induced by coccidiosis and accompanying physiological changes in the current study might lead to a less prominent compromising effect of reduced CP levels on growth performance. This observation aligns with findings by Teng et al. [38], who also fed broilers with reduced CP diets under Eimeria challenge.

For the influence of Met levels and protein contents on intestinal morphology, we again observed that the protein contents affected the duodenal VH:CD ratios differently on two timepoints. On 6 DPI, the LCP groups had higher VH:CD than the NCP groups, while the opposite pattern was observed on 9 DPI. Similarly results have been reported by previous studies finding that reduced dietary protein resulted in higher duodenal VH:CD ratio in the acute infection phase while not in the recovery phase [38]. In the acute infection phase, a reduction in dietary protein content could plausibly diminish the trypsin secretion, a factor responsible for the excystation of sporozoites from sporocysts [38, 61, 62]. This attenuation may result in an elevated VH:CD ratio which was generally considered as an indicator for better morphology and absorption function [63,64,65]. Conversely, during the recovery phase, the protein deficiency might have impeded the recovery processes, contributing to the lower VH:CD ratio in the LCP groups. A previous swine study has reported that the reduced protein diet negatively impacted the duodenal morphology [66]. Regarding the quadratic trends observed in jejunal CD and duodenal VH:CD ratio with increasing Met levels in the current study, it suggested that both low and high Met levels might confer benefits to the intestinal morphology of broilers under coccidia challenge. Given the close association of Met with folate metabolism and the synthesis of SAM [37, 67], and considering the significance of both compounds for parasite replication [25, 39, 40], lower Met levels could potentially lead to reduced Eimeria reproduction and lessened damage to the intestinal morphology by reducing the metabolism of folate and synthesis of SAM. On the other hand, the higher Met levels could mitigate the damage caused by infection due to the importance of Met in protein synthesis and its antioxidant capacity [14, 15, 68]. Further research needs to confirm the above hypothesis and investigate the mechanism behind the observation.

The increased Met levels exhibited contrasting effects on the gene expression of tight junction proteins at both time points in the current study. On 6 DPI, increased Met levels linearly increased expression of CLDN1 and ZO2 in the jejunum, aligning with findings from prior studies where increased Met supplementation also elevated the tight junction protein expression in broilers [20, 23]. This underscores the importance of Met in preserving intestinal integrity; however, intriguingly, on 9 DPI, the linear increase in Met was associated with a decrease in the expression of these genes in the NCP groups. This provides additional evidence that birds underwent physiological changes during Eimeria infection, leading to the varied responses to dietary factors on different timepoints. As for the gene expression of amino acid transporters, lower Met levels were associated with higher expression of these genes, similar results have also been reported by Fagundes et al. [69] who fed the broilers diets with two different levels of Met. This observation suggested that the birds may have an alternative compensatory mechanism to address Met deficiency, distinct from merely increasing their FI. Increased Met levels quadratically affected the gene expression of cytokines in the NCP groups, a similar quadratic trend was reported in a previous research where the birds were fed diets containing graded levels of Met with normal CP content [21]. However, such trend was not observed in the LCP groups, indicating a potential modulation in the regulatory pathways associated with cytokine gene expression and Met levels in the context of varying dietary protein contents. It is noteworthy that reducing the protein content led to a decrease in the gene expression of cytokines, underscoring the crucial role of protein in affecting certain aspects of immune responses of broilers as highlighted in serval previous review papers discussing the importance of protein or essential amino acids in regulating immune responses [11, 70,71,72].

The current study provided further evidence for the importance of Met in the production of GSH, the important endogenous antioxidants [26, 73, 74], as the GSH and GSSG contents linearly increased as Met level increased. This observation provided some support to the above proposed hypothesis that the higher Met level mitigated the damage of Eimeria infection to the intestinal morphology by alleviating the infection-induced oxidative stress. While the essential role of Met in GSH synthesis has been documented in other studies [20, 75, 76], the results from the current study also suggested that the improvement of GSH or GSSG profiles by increasing Met levels seemed to be less prominent on 9 DPI when multiple previous studies have consistently demonstrated the oxidative stress caused by coccidiosis diminished as the birds recovered from the infection [4, 20, 21, 77]. These findings collectively underscored the essential relationship among Met, GSH production, and the birds’ dynamic response to Eimeria infection over time.

The daily oocyst shedding trend corresponded to the parasite reproduction cycle, and the similar trend has been reported by previous research investigating the oocyst shedding in broilers infected with mixed species of Eimeria [78, 79]. The current study unveiled a linear or quadratic increase in oocyst shedding across all three species in response to elevated Met levels. This outcome substantiated the hypothesis that higher Met levels could promote the reproduction of Eimeria. A previous study has also reported that additional Met supplementation increased oocyst shedding in Eimeria-challenged broilers [38]. While the lesion score was not assessed in the present study, since Met primarily impacts antioxidant capacity and immune regulation, observing marked differences in lesion scores may be less likely. Nevertheless, in the future study, incorporating this assessment should be considered. To explore the potential mechanisms behind this increase in oocyst shedding, we examined whether the increase in Met level upregulated the expression of key enzymes associated with folate and SAM metabolism as previous studies have highlighted their intricate connection and essential roles in DNA synthesis and methylation for parasites [6, 19, 23, 24]. The results showed that the increased Met level only linearly increased the expression of TYMS in the LCP groups on 6 DPI, which is the key enzyme regulating the production of dTMP required for DNA synthesis and repair [80, 81]. More intriguingly, on 9 DPI the increased Met linearly or quadratically decreased the expression of these key enzymes. In other words, the birds increased the expression of these enzymes, possibly to compensate for the deficiency in dietary Met levels. Further studies may need to delve deeper into the analysis of the actual protein levels or activities of these enzymes to better understand how Met level may affect the metabolism of folate and SAM and in turn affect the reproduction of Eimeria. Additionally, the results showed that expression of these enzymes was lower in the LCP groups than the NCP groups, suggesting an existed interplay between protein content and metabolism of other nutrients.

Conclusion

In summary, in broilers challenged with Eimeria spp., although increasing Met levels improved the growth performance of the birds from 0 to 6 DPI, such improvement tended to plateau with the Met level reaching 6.0 g/kg. Interestingly, reducing the dietary CP did not deteriorate the growth performance of the birds. The dietary CP contents and Met levels exerted contrasting effects on intestinal morphology and tight junction protein expression on 6 and 9 DPI, whereas increasing Met consistently decreased the expression of amino acid transporters. Significant quadratic relationships were observed between Met levels and liver GSH concentrations, underscoring the role of Met in the antioxidant system. It was worth noting that the increasing Met levels led to increased oocyst shedding which might be related to the role of Met in folate metabolism. In conclusion, our results indicated that reducing the dietary CP level by 3% with 6.0 g/kg of Met could maintain the performance and intestinal health of broilers under Eimeria challenge. Future study could seek to investigate the mechanism behind the increased oocyst shedding observed in this current study and its influences for subsequent flock performance on the same litter.

Availability of data and materials

All data from this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AHCYL1 :

Adenosylhomocysteinase like 1

BW:

Body weight

BWG:

Body weight gain

CBS :

Cystathionine beta synthase

CD:

Crypt depth

CLDN1 :

Claudin 1

CP:

Crude protein

CT:

Cecal tonsil

DHFR :

Dihydrofolate reductase

DPI:

Day post inoculation

FCR:

Feed conversion ratio

FI:

Feed intake

GPX:

Glutathione peroxidase

GSSG:

Glutathione disulfide

GSH:

Glutathione

IFNγ :

Interferon gamma

IL1β :

Interleukin 1 beta

IL10 :

Interleukin 10

LCP:

Reduced protein diet

MAT1A :

Methionine adenosyltransferase 1A

MDA:

Malondialdehyde

Met:

Methionine

MTHFD1 :

Methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase 1

MTHFR :

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase

MTR :

Methionine synthase

MUC2 :

Mucin 2

NCP:

Normal protein diet

OCLN :

Occludin

OPG:

Oocyst per gram of excreta

SAM:

S-adenosylmethionine

SHMT :

Serine hydroxymethyltransferase

SLC6A19 :

Sodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT1

SLC7A9 :

B(0, +)-type amino acid transporter 1

SLC43A2 :

L-type amino acid transporter 4

SOD:

Superoxide dismutase

TGFβ :

Transforming growth factor beta

TNFα :

Tumor necrotic factor alpha

TYMS :

Thymidylate synthase

VH:

Villus height

ZO2 :

Zonula occludens 2

References

  1. Blake DP, Knox J, Dehaeck B, Huntington B, Rathinam T, Ravipati V, et al. Re-calculating the cost of coccidiosis in chickens. Vet Res. 2020;51:115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-020-00837-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Mesa-Pineda C, Navarro-Ruíz JL, López-Osorio S, Chaparro-Gutiérrez JJ, Gómez-Osorio LM. Chicken coccidiosis: From the parasite lifecycle to control of the disease. Front Vet Sci. 2021;8:787653. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.787653.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Choi J, Goo D, Sharma MK, Ko H, Liu G, Paneru D, et al. Effects of different Eimeria inoculation doses on growth performance, daily feed intake, gut health, gut microbiota, foot pad dermatitis, and Eimeria gene expression in broilers raised in floor pens for 35 days. Animals. 2023;13(13):2237. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13132237.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sharma MK, Liu G, White DL, Tompkins YH, Kim WK. Effects of mixed Eimeria challenge on performance, body composition, intestinal health, and expression of nutrient transporter genes of Hy-Line W-36 pullets (0–6 wks of age). Poult Sci. 2022;101(11):102083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102083.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Teng P-Y, Yadav S, Castro FLdS, Tompkins YH, Fuller AL, Kim WK. Graded Eimeria challenge linearly regulated growth performance, dynamic change of gastrointestinal permeability, apparent ileal digestibility, intestinal morphology, and tight junctions of broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2020;99(9):4203–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.04.031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sharma MK, Liu G, White DL, Kim WK. Graded levels of Eimeria infection linearly reduced the growth performance, altered the intestinal health, and delayed the onset of egg production of Hy-Line W-36 laying hens when infected at the prelay stage. Poult Sci. 2024;103(1):103174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.103174.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Abbas RZ, Iqbal Z, Blake D, Khan MN, Saleemi MK. Anticoccidial drug resistance in fowl coccidia: the state of play revisited. J World’s Poult Sci. 2011;67(2):337–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004393391100033X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chapman HD, Roberts B, Shirley MW, Williams RB. Guidelines for evaluating the efficacy and safety of live anticoccidial vaccines, and obtaining approval for their use in chickens and turkeys. Avian Pathol. 2005;34(4):279–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450500178378.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chapman HD, Cherry TE, Danforth HD, Richards G, Shirley MW, Williams RB. Sustainable coccidiosis control in poultry production: the role of live vaccines. Int J Parasitol. 2002;32(5):617–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(01)00362-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goo D, Choi J, Ko H, Choppa VSR, Liu G, Lillehoj HS, et al. Effects of Eimeria maxima infection doses on growth performance and gut health in dual-infection model of necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens. Front Physiol. 2023;14:1269398. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1269398.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Tourkochristou E, Triantos C, Mouzaki A. The influence of nutritional factors on immunological outcomes. Front Immunol. 2021;12:665968. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.665968.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Adedokun SA, Olojede OC. Optimizing gastrointestinal integrity in poultry: The role of nutrients and feed additives. Front Vet Sci. 2018;5:348. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu G, Ajao AM, Shanmugasundaram R, Taylor J, Ball E, Applegate TJ, et al. The effects of arginine and branched-chain amino acid supplementation to reduced-protein diet on intestinal health, cecal short-chain fatty acid profiles, and immune response in broiler chickens challenged with Eimeria spp. Poult Sci. 2023;102(7):102773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.102773.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu G, Magnuson AD, Sun T, Tolba SA, Starkey C, Whelan R, et al. Supplemental methionine exerted chemical form-dependent effects on antioxidant status, inflammation-related gene expression, and fatty acid profiles of broiler chicks raised at high ambient temperature. J Anim Sci. 2019;97(12):4883–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz348.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Magnuson AD, Liu G, Sun T, Tolba SA, Xi L, Whelan R, et al. Supplemental methionine and stocking density affect antioxidant status, fatty acid profiles, and growth performance of broiler chickens. J Anim Sci. 2020;98(4):skaa092. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa092

  16. Bun SD, Guo YM, Guo FC, Ji FJ, Cao H. Influence of organic zinc supplementation on the antioxidant status and immune responses of broilers challenged with Eimeria tenella. Poult Sci. 2011;90(6):1220–6. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-01308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ding W, Smulan LJ, Hou NS, Taubert S, Watts JL, Walker AK. s-Adenosylmethionine levels govern innate immunity through distinct methylation-dependent pathways. Cell Metab. 2015;22(4):633–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2015.07.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Grimble RF. The effects of sulfur amino acid intake on immune function in humans. J Nutr. 2006;136(6):1660S–S1665. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/136.6.1660S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Castro FLdS, Kim WK. Secondary functions of arginine and sulfur amino acids in poultry health: Review. Animals. 2020;10(11):2106. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Teng P-Y, Liu G, Choi J, Yadav S, Wei F, Kim WK. Effects of levels of methionine supplementations in forms of L- or DL-methionine on the performance, intestinal development, immune response, and antioxidant system in broilers challenged with Eimeria spp. Poult Sci. 2023;102(5):102586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.102586.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu G, Sharma MK, Tompkins YH, Teng PY, Kim WK. Impacts of varying methionine to cysteine supplementation ratios on growth performance, oxidative status, intestinal health, and gene expression of immune response and methionine metabolism in broilers under Eimeria spp. challenge. Poult Sci. 2024;103(2):103300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.103300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kitada M, Xu J, Ogura Y, Monno I, Koya D. Mechanism of activation of mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 by methionine. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:715. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00715.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhong C, Tong DQ, Zhang YR, Wang XQ, Yan HC, Tan HZ, et al. DL-methionine and DL-methionyl-DL-methionine increase intestinal development and activate Wnt/β-catenin signaling activity in domestic pigeons (Columba livia). Poult Sci. 2022;101(3):101644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101644.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sampson LL, Davis AK, Grogg MW, Zheng Y. mTOR disruption causes intestinal epithelial cell defects and intestinal atrophy postinjury in mice. FASEB J. 2016;30(3):1263. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.15-278606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu G, Kim WK. The functional roles of methionine and arginine in intestinal and bone health of poultry: Review. Animals. 2023;13(18):2949. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13182949.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Atmaca G. Antioxidant effects of sulfur-containing amino acids. Yonsei Med J. 2004;45(5):776–88. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2004.45.5.776.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bin P, Huang R, Zhou X. Oxidation resistance of the sulfur amino acids: methionine and cysteine. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:9584932. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9584932.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Brosnan JT, Brosnan ME, Bertolo RFP, Brunton JA. Methionine: A metabolically unique amino acid. Livest Sci. 2007;112(1):2–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Castro FLS, Tompkins YH, Pazdro R, Kim WK. The effects of total sulfur amino acids on the intestinal health status of broilers challenged with Eimeria spp. Poult Sci. 2020;99(10):5027–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.06.055.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Klein Geltink RI, Pearce EL. The importance of methionine metabolism. eLife. 2019;8:e47221. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47221.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Sinclair LV, Howden AJM, Brenes A, Spinelli L, Hukelmann JL, Macintyre AN, et al. Antigen receptor control of methionine metabolism in T cells. eLife. 2019;8:e44210. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Yun CH, Lillehoj HS, Lillehoj EP. Intestinal immune responses to coccidiosis. Dev Comp Immunol. 2000;24(2):303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-305X(99)00080-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mirzaaghatabar F, Saki AA, Zamani P, Aliarabi H, Hemati Matin HR. Effect of different levels of diet methionine and metabolisable energy on broiler performance and immune system. Food Agr Immunol. 2011;22(2):93–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540105.2010.530249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sigolo S, Deldar E, Seidavi A, Bouyeh M, Gallo A, Prandini A. Effects of dietary surpluses of methionine and lysine on growth performance, blood serum parameters, immune responses, and carcass traits of broilers. J Appl Anim Res. 2019;47(1):146–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2019.1583571.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wu B, Cui H, Peng X, Fang J, Cui W, Liu X. Pathology of bursae of Fabricius in methionine-deficient broiler chickens. Nutrients. 2013;5(3):877–86. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu5030877.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Toue S, Kodama R, Amao M, Kawamata Y, Kimura T, Sakai R. Screening of toxicity biomarkers for methionine excess in rats. J Nutr. 2006;136(6 Suppl):1716S–21S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/136.6.1716S.

  37. Krebs HA, Hems R, Tyler B. The regulation of folate and methionine metabolism. Biochem J. 1976;158(2):341–53. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj1580341.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Teng P-Y, Choi J, Yadav S, Tompkins YH, Kim WK. Effects of low-crude protein diets supplemented with arginine, glutamine, threonine, and methionine on regulating nutrient absorption, intestinal health, and growth performance of Eimeria-infected chickens. Poult Sci. 2021;100(11):101427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101427.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Zaĭonts V, Krylov M, Loskot V, Kirillov A. Biosynthesis of folic acid in Eimeria tenella (Coccidia). Parazitologiia. 1978;12(1):3–8.

  40. Noack S, Chapman HD, Selzer PM. Anticoccidial drugs of the livestock industry. Parasitol Res. 2019;118(7):2009–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-019-06343-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Lemme A, Hiller P, Klahsen M, Taube V, Stegemann J, Simon I. Reduction of dietary protein in broiler diets not only reduces n-emissions but is also accompanied by several further benefits. J Appl Poult Res. 2019;28(4):867–80. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfz045.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang Y, Zhou J, Wang G, Cai S, Zeng X, Qiao S. Advances in low-protein diets for swine. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2018;9:60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-018-0276-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Liu SY, Macelline SP, Chrystal PV, Selle PH. Progress towards reduced-crude protein diets for broiler chickens and sustainable chicken-meat production. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2021;12:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-021-00550-w.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. van Harn J, Dijkslag MA, van Krimpen MM. Effect of low protein diets supplemented with free amino acids on growth performance, slaughter yield, litter quality, and footpad lesions of male broilers. Poult Sci. 2019;98(10):4868–77. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez229.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Attia YA, Bovera F, Wang J, Al-Harthi MA, Kim WK. Multiple amino acid supplementations to low-protein diets: Effect on performance, carcass yield, meat quality and nitrogen excretion of finishing broilers under hot climate conditions. Animals. 2020;10(6):973. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10060973.

  46. Cobb500 Broiler Performance & Nutrition Supplement. Cobb-Vantress. 2018. https://www.cobb-vantress.com/assets/5a88f2e793/Broiler-Performance-Nutrition-Supplement.pdf. Accessed 31 Dec 2023.

  47. Cobb Broiler Management Guide. Cobb-Vantress. 2018. https://www.cobb-vantress.com/assets/Cobb-Files/045bdc8f45/Broiler-Guide-2021-min.pdf. Accessed 31 Dec 2023.

  48. Liu J, Teng P-Y, Kim WK, Applegate TJ. Assay considerations for fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran (FITC-d): an indicator of intestinal permeability in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2021;100(7):101202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Choi J, Tompkins YH, Teng P-Y, Gogal RM, Kim WK. Effects of tannic acid supplementation on growth performance, oocyst shedding, and gut health of in broilers infected with Eimeria maxima. Animals. 2022;12(11):1378. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12111378.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Conway DP, McKenzie ME. Poultry coccidiosis: diagnostic and testing procedures. 3rd ed. Ames: Blackwell Pub; 2007.

  51. Castro FLS, Teng PY, Yadav S, Gould RL, Craig S, Pazdro R, et al. The effects of L-Arginine supplementation on growth performance and intestinal health of broiler chickens challenged with Eimeria spp. Poult Sci. 2020;99(11):5844–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. McDougald LR. Intestinal protozoa important to poultry. Poult Sci. 1998;77(8):1156–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.8.1156.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Taylor J, Sakkas P, Kyriazakis I. Starving for nutrients: anorexia during infection with parasites in broilers is affected by diet composition. Poult Sci. 2022;101(1):101535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101535.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Macelline SP, Chrystal PV, McQuade LR, McLnerney BV, Kim Y, Bao Y, et al. Graded methionine dietary inclusions influence growth performance and apparent ileal amino acid digestibility coefficients and disappearance rates in broiler chickens. Anim Nutr. 2022;8:160–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2021.06.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Rehman AU, Arif M, Husnain MM, Alagawany M, Abd El-Hack ME, Taha AE, et al. Growth performance of broilers as influenced by different levels and sources of methionine plus cysteine. Animals. 2019;9(12):56. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9121056.

  57. Song B, Fu M, He F, Zhao H, Wang Y, Nie Q, et al. Methionine deficiency affects liver and kidney health, oxidative stress, and ileum mucosal immunity in broilers. Front Vet Sci. 2021;8:722567. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.722567.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Fang CC, Feng L, Jiang WD, Wu P, Liu Y, Kuang SY, et al. Effects of dietary methionine on growth performance, muscle nutritive deposition, muscle fibre growth and type I collagen synthesis of on-growing grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Br J Nutr. 2021;126(3):321–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114520002998.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Barekatain R, Nattrass G, Tilbrook AJ, Chousalkar K, Gilani S. Reduced protein diet and amino acid concentration alter intestinal barrier function and performance of broiler chickens with or without synthetic glucocorticoid. Poult Sci. 2019;98(9):3662–75. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey563.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Lambert W, Berrocoso JD, Swart B, van Tol M, Bruininx E, Willems E. Reducing dietary crude protein in broiler diets positively affects litter quality without compromising growth performance whereas a reduction in dietary electrolyte balance further improves litter quality but worsens feed efficiency. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2023;297:115571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2023.115571.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Britton W, Hill C, Barber C. A mechanism of interaction between dietary protein levels and coccidiosis in chicks. J Nutr. 1964;82(3):306–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/82.3.306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Chapman H. Studies on the excystation of different species of Eimeria in vitro. Z Parasitenkd. 1978;56:115–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00930742.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Tsirtsikos P, Fegeros K, Kominakis A, Balaskas C, Mountzouris KC. Modulation of intestinal mucin composition and mucosal morphology by dietary phytogenic inclusion level in broilers. Animal. 2012;6(7):1049–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731111002680.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Guo S, Liu L, Lei J, Qu X, He C, Tang S, et al. Modulation of intestinal morphology and microbiota by dietary Macleaya cordata extract supplementation in Xuefeng Black-boned Chicken. Animal. 2021;15(12):100399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100399.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Sen S, Ingale S, Kim Y, Kim J, Kim K, Lohakare J, et al. Effect of supplementation of Bacillus subtilis LS 1–2 to broiler diets on growth performance, nutrient retention, caecal microbiology and small intestinal morphology. Res Vet Sci. 2012;93(1):264–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.05.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Yu D, Zhu W, Hang S. Effects of long-term dietary protein restriction on intestinal morphology, digestive enzymes, gut hormones, and colonic microbiota in pigs. Animals. 2019;9(4):180. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040180.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Stover PJ. Physiology of folate and vitamin B12 in health and disease. Nutr Rev. 2004;62(6 Pt 2):S3–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2004.tb00070.x. (discussion S3).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Kachungwa Lugata J, Ortega ADSV, Szabó C. The role of methionine supplementation on oxidative stress and antioxidant status of poultry-A review. Agriculture. 2022;12(10):1701. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12101701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Fagundes NS, Milfort MC, Williams SM, Da Costa MJ, Fuller AL, Menten JF, et al. Dietary methionine level alters growth, digestibility, and gene expression of amino acid transporters in meat-type chickens. Poult Sci. 2020;99(1):67–75. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez588.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Kim WK, Singh AK, Wang J, Applegate T. Functional role of branched chain amino acids in poultry: a review. Poult Sci. 2022;101(5):101715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101715.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Li P, Yin Y-L, Li D, Woo Kim S, Wu G. Amino acids and immune function. Br J Nutr. 2007;98(2):237–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000711450769936X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Wu G. Functional amino acids in growth, reproduction, and health. Adv Nutr. 2010;1(1):31–7. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.110.1008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Ross D. Glutathione, free radicals and chemotherapeutic agents. Mechanisms of free-radical induced toxicity and glutathione-dependent protection. Pharmacol Ther. 1988;37(2):231. https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-7258(88)90027-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Pizzorno J. Glutathione! Integr Med (Encinitas). 2014;13(1):8–12 (PMID: 26770075).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Séité S, Mourier A, Camougrand N, Salin B, Figueiredo-Silva AC, Fontagné-Dicharry S, et al. Dietary methionine deficiency affects oxidative status, mitochondrial integrity and mitophagy in the liver of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):10151. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28559-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Wu P, Tang L, Jiang W, Hu K, Liu Y, Jiang J, et al. The relationship between dietary methionine and growth, digestion, absorption, and antioxidant status in intestinal and hepatopancreatic tissues of sub-adult grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2017;8:63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-017-0194-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Teng PY, Choi J, Yadav S, Marshall B, Castro FLS, Ferrel J, et al. Evaluation of a dacitic (rhyolitic) tuff breccia use on performance, inflammatory, and antioxidant responses in broilers mildly challenged with Eimeria spp. Poult Sci. 2023;102(7):102697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.102697.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Rijpert-Duvivier ACM, Geurts CPH, Vangroenweghe F, Allais L, van Doorn DCK. Oocyst shedding patterns of Eimeria species and their association with management and performance at ten rose veal starter farms in the Netherlands. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports. 2021;24:100570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vprsr.2021.100570.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Cha JO, Zhao J, Yang MS, Kim WI, Cho HS, Lim CW, et al. Oocyst-shedding patterns of three Eimeria species in chickens and shedding pattern variation depending on the storage period of Eimeria tenella oocysts. J Parasitol. 2018;104(1):18–22. https://doi.org/10.1645/16-132.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Guijarro MV, Nawab A, Dib P, Burkett S, Luo X, Feely M, et al. TYMS promotes genomic instability and tumor progression in Ink4a/Arf null background. Oncogene. 2023;42(23):1926–39. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-023-02694-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Burdelski C, Strauss C, Tsourlakis MC, Kluth M, Hube-Magg C, Melling N, et al. Overexpression of thymidylate synthase (TYMS) is associated with aggressive tumor features and early PSA recurrence in prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;6(10):8377–87. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.3107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Lorraine Fuller for providing the Eimeria spp. and all members of Dr. Woo Kim’s research group for the help with animal care and sample collection. The authors acknowledge the farm staff at the Poultry Science Research Complex at University of Georgia, Athens for their support.

Funding

This study was financially supported in part by a cooperative agreement 6040–32000-080-000D from United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: LG and WKK. Experimental conduction: LG and CVSR. Laboratory analysis: LG, SMK, KH, and CJ. Experimental supervision: WKK. Data analysis and interpretation: LG and WKK. Original draft writing: LG. Draft revision: LG, CVSR, SMK, KH, CJ, and WKK. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Woo Kyun Kim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All the animal experiment procedures used in this study were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Georgia (A2021 12–012).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, G., Choppa, V.S.R., Sharma, M.K. et al. Effects of methionine supplementation in a reduced protein diet on growth performance, oxidative status, intestinal health, oocyst shedding, and methionine and folate metabolism in broilers under Eimeria challenge. J Animal Sci Biotechnol 15, 84 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-024-01041-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-024-01041-4

Keywords