Development of a vivo rabbit ligated intestinal Loop Model for HCMV infection
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 1 November 2015
Accepted: 19 November 2016
Published: 13 December 2016
Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infections can be found throughout the body, especially in epithelial tissue. Animal model was established by inoculation of HCMV (strain AD-169) or coinoculation with Hepatitis E virus (HEV) into the ligated sacculus rotundus and vermiform appendix in living rabbits. The specimens were collected from animals sacrificed 1 and a half hours after infection.
The virus was found to be capable of reproducing in these specimens through RT-PCR and Western-blot. Severe inflammation damage was found in HCMV-infected tissue. The viral protein could be detected in high amounts in the mucosal epithelium and lamina propria by immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescense. Moreover, there are strong positive signals in lymphocytes, macrophages, and lymphoid follicles. Quantitative statistics indicate that lymphocytes among epithlium cells increased significantly in viral infection groups.
The results showed that HCMV or HEV + HCMV can efficiently infect in rabbits by vivo ligated intestine loop inoculation. The present study successfully developed an infective model in vivo rabbit ligated intestinal Loop for HCMV pathogenesis study. This rabbit model can be helpful for understanding modulation of the gut immune system with HCMV infection.
Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is one of important viruses that cause congenital infection in humans worldwide. HCMV is also the leading viral cause of birth defects associated with infections and a major cause of morbidity and mortality in transplant patients.
Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) belongs to the Beta-herpesvirinae subfamily, which also includes cytomegaloviruses from other mammals; humans and monkeys serve as natural hosts. There are currently eight species in the CMV genus, but rabbit CMV is not included. HCMV is found ubiquitously and infects as many as 80% of healthy adults . HCMV likes to infect epithelial tissue and causes hepatitis, pneumonitis, and chronic gastroenteritis. HCMV can vertically transmitte and causes congenital abnormalities in humans all around the world . Cell-mediated immunity, including cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and nature Killer (NK) cells, is essential for limiting and clearing viral infections [3, 4]. UL16 protein encoded by HCMV can suppress the ligands ULBP1, ULBP2 and MICB of NK cell receptors and results in increased viral load during immune evasion .
Cytomegaloviruses are highly species-specific . However, mouse CMV (MCMV) and human CMV (HCMV) have cross-infections among species . The inhibition of cross-species infections are likely due to no interactions between virus and host protein. . The mechanism of HCMV infections has been studied by cell culture and using animal models that CMV infects their own hosts.
In immune competent animals, CMV usually causes asymptomatic latent infection with low levels of viral shedding. However, in immunocompromised individuals such as HIV-infected persons, organ transplant recipients, and developing fetuses, HCMV can cause severe diseases and even become life-threatening with high levels in many organs . In preliminary test of our Lab, previous data demonstrated that HEV could be detected at 10 min post-infection, Therefore, HCMV-HEV co-infection group in the present study could be considered as immunocompromised modles.
CMV pp65 gene encode matrix phosphoprotein targete nucleus immediately after infection. . Clinical diagnosis is based upon the detection of pp65 by CMV antigenemia test. . CMV UL16 gene encoded glycoprotein is synthesized soon after virus penetration and accumulates in both nucleus and cytoplasm . These two early HCMV genes are expressed in the nucleus of infected cells within 1 to 24 h of infection, prior to viral DNA replication. During infection, pp65 is a major target of humoral and cellular (CD4 and CD8 T-cell) immune responses . There was evidence that pp65 modulates antigen presentation . Many other viral gene products encoded during replication have been shown to modulate viral and host cell processes [14–17].
Ligated intestine in vivo animal models have been used for studying mechanisms of intestinal infection and enterotoxin to reveal the mutual effects between pathogens and intestinal mucosal epithelium [18–22]. Intestinal tract is one of the most common sites for HCMV infection . The sacculus rotundus and appendix are peripheral immune organsin intestinal tract, which are ideal sites for study immune activities of HCMV.
In this study, we observed pathological changes of ligated sacculus rotundus and vermiform appendix inoculated with HCMV and strain of rabbit HEV in rabbit. Our results indicate that HCMV or HEV + HCMV can efficiently infect in rabbits by vivo ligated intestine loop inoculation. We successfully developed an infective model in vivo rabbit ligated intestinal Loop for understanding modulation of the gut immune system with HCMV infection, as well as other viruses infection.
All animal experiments involved in this study were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of China Agricultural University (CAU) . (Permit Number: 20150512–212). We followed guidelines of CAU Animal Care and Use Committee for experimental animals during this study.
Experimental design and procedures for inoculation
Nine rabbits were randomly divided into three groups. Each rabbit ligated intestine was inoculated with viruses or PBS in the sacculus rotundus and vermiform appendix. Group 1 was only inoculated with 0.5 mL (50.00 TCID50) HCMV (single infection group, SI). Group 2 was inoculated with 0.5 mL (50.00 TCID50) HCMV and 0.5 mL (2.746 × 107 genome equivalents per mL) HEV (double infection/co-infection group, DI). Group 3 was injected with PBS (control group, CT). Tissue from sacculus rotundus, vermiform appendix and distal appendix were collected 1 and 0.5 h post-infection and stored at −80 °C for further use.
The strain of rabbit HEV was derived from the second passage of a fecal sample from a rabbit infected with rabbit HEV (rhBJ1, accession number KF648530). A 10% suspension of positive feces was prepared and titered with RT-PCR, as described previously . The titer of the suspension was 2.746 × 107 genome equivalents per mL. The viral suspension was stored at −86 °C for later use.
HCMV AD169 strain was obtained from the CDC China. CMV AD169 was propagated in human fibroblasts cell line MRC-5. The virus had been passed many generations in the cells to increase the CPE to 50.0 log TCID 50/mL Virus titer was determined in the MRC-5 cells according to Reed-Muench method. Virus supernates were purified by centrifugation at 1,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C and stored at −80 °C until use.
Eighty-day-old male rabbits were purchased from Xing Long Experimental Animal Center, Beijing, China. Before inoculation, the sera of the rabbits were confirmed to be negative for HEV and HCMV antibodies with reverse transcription-nested PCR (RT-nPCR).
The samples were obtained from rabbits sacrificed 1.5-h post-infection. Inoculated sacculus rotundus, vermiform appendix, and uninoculated distal appendix were collected. These samples were divided into two parts. One part was fixed in paraformaldehyde-glutaraldehyde buffer for histopathology observation. Another part was washed with PBS 3 times to rinse out intestinal contents, and stored in −80 °C for further use.
Other than specifications, the followings are the abbreviations of collected tissues:SISR (single infection sacculus rotundus), DISR (double infection sacculus rotundus), CTSR (control sacculus rotundus); SIVA (single infection vermiform appendix), DIVA (double infection vermiform appendix), CTVA (control vermiform appendix); SIDA (single infection distal appendix), DIDA (double infection distal appendix), CTDA (control distal appendix).
The rabbit anti HCMV pp65 antibody was purchased from Bio-Science Company. The mouse anti rabbit HEV ORF2 antibody was purchase from Beijing Protein Institute. Second fluorescence antibodies were purchased from Bio-Science company.
Samples were washed with PBS trice and grinded in liquid nitrogen. UL16 and pp65 DNA of HCMV detected by PCR. Total DNA was extracted from intestinal samples using a Universal Gen DNA kit(CWBIO, Beijing, China). The primers for Immediate-Early gene pp65 of HCMV were (5′-CACCTGTCACCGCTGCTATATTTGC – 3′, 5′-CACCACGCAGCGGCCCTTGATGTTT -3′). The primers for Early gene UL16 were (5′-CGCGGTACCATGGAGCGTCGCCGAGGTACTGTAC-3′, 5-TGGAACATCGAATGGGTAGTCCTCGGTGCGTAA-3′).
The HEV conservative sequence was tested by nested RT-PCR . Total RNA was isolated in Trizol reagent. The outer primer pairs were 5′-AATTATGCYCAGTAYCGRGTTG-3′ and 5′-CCCTTRTCYTGCTGMGCATTCTC-3′; and The inner primer pairs were 5′-GTWATGCTYTGCATWCATGGCT-3′ and 5′-AGCCGACGAAATCAATTCTGTC-3′.
Tissues were grinded in liquid nitrogen and lysed in RIPA buffer with cocktail of protease inhibitor. The lysates were loaded into 12% SDS-PAGE gel under reducing condition. Proteins were electrotransferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The membranes were blocked, probed separately with affinity-purified pp65 Ab or anti-ORF2-specific Ab for 1 h, followed by incubation with HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse or donkey anti-rabbit antibody. All blocking, incubation, and washing were performed in 5% non-fat milk and 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS. Proteins were visualized by the enhanced chemiluminescence detection (Pierce) method according to the instructions of the manufacturer. For reprobing, the blots were first incubated in stripping buffer (Fisher) for 15 min at room temperature and then washed fully to remove residual reducing agent.
The sacculus rotundus and vermiform appendix were collected and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde– polyoxymethylene solution for 48 h. The fixed tissues were routinely processed, embedded in paraffin, sectioned (4 μm thickness), Each paraffin block was cut and spreaded 5 slices, separately stained with hematoxylin and eosin(HE) for light microscopic observation, immunohistochemistry and confocal immunofluorescence.
Immunohistochemistry and confocal immunofluorescence
Immunohistochemical staining was performed according to the instructions of the Histostain™-Plus Kit (ZSGB-BIO, Beijing, China). Briefly, paraffin wax sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated. Sections were pretreated with 3% H2O2 for 10 min, and then the sections were blocked with blocking buffer containing 3% normal goat serum (NGS) for 30 min. Monoclonal mouse anti-HEV ORF2 antibody (1:300 dilution) or rabbit anti-HCMV pp65 antibody was used as the primary antibody and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. followed by treatment with streptavidin-peroxidase for 30 min at 37 °C. Color was developed with 3,3′- Diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB; ZSGB-BIO, Beijing, China) for 5 min. Gill’s hematoxylin was then applied for counter stain. The primary antibody was replaced with phosphate-buffered saline in the negative control. The slides were then observed under an Olympus microscope (Japan).
For confocal immunofluorescence, after incubation of the 1st antibody, the slices were then incubated with FITC-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG and Cy3-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG in blocking buffer. After each step, slides were washed at least three times with 0.1% Tween 20 in PBS. Coverslips were mounted on slides with ProLong antifade kit (Molecular Probes) and examined using a Leica LSM 510 confocal fluorescence microscopy. The images were processed using the Image Examiner software (Leica).
Quantitative statistics method for comparing lymphocytes and goblet cells in epithelial tissue
Under 40 times the objective, observed tissue slice, calculate the intraepithelial lymphocytes(IELs) and intraepithelial goblet cells(IGCs) among 100 mucosal epithelium cells of the villus tip and the two sides of dome. There were 8 microscopic views to be calculated for each tissue. The GraphPad Prism software was used for statistical analysis. The parameters were analyzed as means and standard deviation. Differences were considered to be statistically significant with P < 0.05 indicated as one asterisk and P < 0.01 as double asterisks.
RT-PCR detection of HCMV and HEV RNA in the ligated SR and VA of living rabbits
HCMV encoded protein pp65 expressed in co-infection group
Ligated sacculus rotundus
In the DI group, histological lesions are more severe than SI group. Epithelium in the villus tip of SR are distinctly degenerated and exfoliated with distinct edema of the lamina propria. Capillaries were distinctly enlarged and congested. Multifocal hemorrhages were noted. There were intranuclear inclusion bodies formed in epithelial cell and lymphocyte infected with the virus, In one SR mucosal lamina propria, several symplasms were found (Fig. 3c). Moreover, lymphocytes in the lymphoid follicle dome of Payer’s patches in submucosa were distinctly evacuated. Lymphocytes in the dome increased largely, making the boundary between epithelium and lymphoid tissue unclear. Lymphocytes migrated in dome; lymphocytes in germinal center of follicle were evacuated significantly and even showed necrosis (Fig. 3d). Capillaries in the submucosa were distinctly enlarged and congested.
Ligated vermiform appendix
Epithelium of the appendix is thinner than that of SR. In the CT group, the structure of epithelium is intact with normal lamina propria and enteraden (Fig. 3e). In the SI group, epithelium in the villus tip of the VA was slightly degenerate, exfoliated, and hyperplastic. There was slightly edema of the lamina propria, with a large number of lymphocytes. The number of lymphocytes among the epithelium is significantly increased. Lymphocytes in Payer’s patches of the submucosa evacuated inordinately, lymphocytes in the dome epithelium increased largely, but the boundary between epithelial and lymphoid tissue is clear. Lymphocytes in the germinal center of lymphoid follicle evacuated slightly (Fig. 3f).
In DI group, similer, but more severe histology lesions were observed in this group. Epithelium in the villus tip of SR are distinctly degenerate, exfoliated, and hyperplastic. There was distinct edema of the lamina propria. Capillaries were distinctly enlarged and congested. There were multifocal Interspersed hemorrhage (Fig. 3g). Intraepithelial lymphocytes of the dome increased largely in number to make the boundary between epithelium and lymphoid tissue unclear (Fig. 3h).
Immunohistochemistry detection of HCMV pp65 and HEV ORF2 antigens in ligated SR and VA
HCMVpp65 antigen distribution and location in ligated SR
HEV ORF2 antigen distribution and location in ligated SR
CT group (Fig. 4e) was HEV ORF2 negative. HEV ORF2 antigenic positive signal was only observed in the DI group, but not in the SI group. There were distinctly positive signals in the mucosal epithelium, glandular epithelium, and cytoplasm of the dome epithelium. Lymphocytes and macrophages in dome and follicle germinal center showed an inordinately positive signal (Fig. 4f).
HCMVpp65 antigen distribution and location in ligated VA
The observation of HCMV pp65 antigen distribution in ligated VA was consistence with SR. There were distinctly positive signals in the mucosal, glandular, and dome epithelium, especially in the nucleus and cytoplasm of the lamina propria in both SI (Fig. 4g).and DI groups, but the signals are much stronger in the DI group (Fig. 4h).
HEV ORF2 antigen distribution and location in ligated VA
The observation of HEV ORF2 antigen distribution and location in ligated VA is consistence as there was in SR. HEV ORF2 antigenic positive signal was only observed in the DI group, but not in the SI group. There are distinctly positive signals in the mucosal epithelium, glandular epithelium, and cytoplasm of the dome epithelium (Fig. 4i). In CT group no positive signals could be found (Fig. 4j).
Immunofluorescence of HCMV pp65 and HEV ORF2 under confocal microscope
Colocalization of HCMV pp65 and HEV ORF2 of ligated SR
Colocalization of HCMV pp65 and HEV ORF2 in ligated VA
The results were similar to the SR. In the SI group, Only Cy3 red color staining of HCMV pp65 protein was seen in the lamina propria, glandular epithelium, dome epithelium, and lymphoid tissue in deep mucosa (Fig. 5h, i). In the DI group, not only Cy3 signal but also FITC green color staining, representing HEV ORF2, could be seen (Fig. 5j, k). In the CT group, no HCMV or HEV ORF2 fluorescence signals could be observed (Fig. 5l).
Quantitative statistics for comparing IELs and IGCs in mucosal epithelium
Statistic data of IELs in the mucosal epithelium of the villus tip increased post-infection
IELs in the mucosal epithelium of the two sides of dome increased post-infection
Statistic data of IGCs percentage in the mucosal epithelium of villus tip post-infection
There was a difference between CTSR and SISR, but there were no differences between any other groups.
Statistic data of IGCs percentage in the mucosal epithelium of two sides of dome post-infection
For the injected sacculus rotundus, differences in CTSR vs. SISR and CTSR vs. DISR were significant, while there was no difference between SISR and DISR.
For the injected vermiform appendix, the lowest goblet cell percentage was SIVA, which showed significant difference with CTVA and DIVA.
HCMV infecting immunocompromised individuals can cause increased morbidity and mortality. The importance of congenital CMV infection as a significant public health issue is well recognized and the development of a successful vaccine is a priority. But there is still lack of animal models for the pathogenesis study of human virus because of high species sensitivity. Here, we successfully developed a vivo rabbit ligated intestinal Loop model for understanding modulation of the gut immune system with HCMV infection, as well as other viruses infection.
CMV pp65 antigenemia test utilizes an indirect immunofluorescence technique for identifying the pp65 protein of cytomegalovirus in peripheral blood leukocytes, which has proven efficacy in the detection and monitoring of immune response of CMV infection in immunocompromised patients. The advantage of this assay is the rapidity in providing results a few hours following infection. During HCMV infection, pp65 is a major antigen for cellular immune responses. CMV pp65 is also a tegument protein and involved in manipulation of the host’s immune system. HEV has three open reading frames (ORFs) of which ORF2 encodes the capsid protein. The ORF2 protein contains RNA binding activity, specifically binding the 5′ end of the HEV genome. ORF2 is synthesized as a large glycoprotein precursor that is cleaved into the mature viral capsid protein, which harbors immunoreactive epitopes; therefore, it has largely been used in diagnostics and vaccine development. In present study, we also used indirect immunofluorescence staining with tissue paraffin sections rather than peripheral blood leukocytes. The immunofluorescence signal distribution of the injected tissue paraffin sections showed the protein localization in the cells, which was more intuitive than counting the positive number of suspension cells. We used both anti-pp65 and anti-ORF2 antibodies to perform duo-tone staining. The cy3 red color represents pp65 expression, FITC green color represents ORF2 expression, and DAPI blue represents the nucleus. There is yellow color when the red and green colors merged, and white when red, green, and blue colors merged.
As a lower matrix phosphoprotein and also the main content of virion body, CMV pp65 protein is a frequent target for humoral as well as exceptionally strong CMV-specific CD8+ T cell response during lytic infection . It has been common to use pp65 as an indicator for diagnosis of HCMV infection in immunocompromised individuals . The significant findings of HCMV pp65 RNA and protein expression in the sacculus rotundus in this study indicate that HCMV can stimulate both immune and cellular response in the rabbit intestinal tract. which could explain why we detected pp65 protein in the DI. This could be because HCMV on its own does not activate immune response in healthy individuals.
The intestinal tract is the most common site of HCMV infection . The sacculus rotundus is a peripheral immune organ containing lymphoid tissue that functions similarly to human gastro-intestinal lymphoid tissue (GALT), which is in charge of alimentary tract mucosal immunity and anti-infection [25, 26]. The dome epithelium is the tunnel for turnover of inflammatory cells, and also the barrier to block pessimum antigens . The appendix is a dead-end pouch found extending alongside the margin of the ascending colon near the cecum which is in charge of sampling antigens from the contents of the intestine and determining which antigens are pathogens that require an immune response. It is important to understand the immune response here during virus infection . There are four layers of sacculus rotundus and appendix: mucosa (includes epithelium, lamina propria, and muscularis mucosa), submucosa, muscular, and serosa. Highly developed lymphoid tissue in the submucosa is formed by the dome, lymphoid follicle, interfollicular area, and cap area [29, 30]. The dome epithelium is composed of cuboidal absorptive epithelial cells covering follicles which are interrupted by delicate membraneous cells. Peyer’s patches (PP) are aggregated lymphoid nodules alongside intestine mucosa which are smooth without villus and enteraden and always bulged like a dome. PP are covered by follicular associated epithelium (FAE) or dome epithelium (DE). In Peyer’s patches, antigen is transported and presented in the DE rather than in afferent lymphatic vessels in peripheral lymph nodes. Antigen from the lumen can be processed and transferred to the domes of PP through the DE [31, 32].
In this study, living ligation of bowel loops was firstly developed and applied for infection of rabbit gut associated lymphoid tissue in the sacculus rotundus and appendix by inoculating with HCMV solely or co-infecting with HCMV and HEV . PCR, western-blot, histopathology, enzyme immunohistochemistry and laser confocal immunofluorescence double labeling method were used to investigate the pathological changes of rabbit sacculus rotundus and appendix mucosal tissue caused by HCMY solely or HCMV and HEV synergistically infection, and the location of HCMV antigen. The results proved that HCMV DNA replication were detectable since 1.5 h post-injection by means of both genetic and protein technology. Meanwhile, the HCMV antigen was also detected in the lymphoid tissue of rabbit sacculus rotundus and appendix, via immunoenzyme labeling and immunofluorescence labeling.
Histopathological observation found that HCMV infected mucosa of SR and VA had damage, epithelium degeneration, congestion in lamina propria capillaries, lymphocytes evacuated, and/or necrosis. The morphology changes are more severe in HCMV + HEV co-infected tissue. It was characteristics by degenerated and exfoliated mucosal epithelium, hyperemia, edema and hemorrhage of lamina propria, which led to the exudation and drain or diffuse necrosis of lymphocytes in the deep layer, even syncytial giant cells formation in the mucosa lamina propria. These were all signs of inflammation, which indicated HCMV infection and propagation. Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence results revealed pp65 positive signals alongside the epithelium and Peyer’s patches of the sacculus rotundus and appendix, which suggested HCMV successfully infect these areas. There were also positive signals in the lamina propria, especially in the DI group, which indicated HCMV penetrated and reproduced in the rabbit intestinal tract; this was consistent with the RT-PCR signal detected in uninjected tissue.
Intestinal epithelium contains 15%–30% lymphocytes, which traversed from the lamina propria into the epithelium through the basilar membrane called IEL (intraepithelial lymphocyte) . They are both thymus-dependent and thymus-independent. Their main functions are inhibition of intestinal mucosal hypersensitivity, recognition of foreign pathogens, and secretion of cytokine for anti-bacterial, anti-viral, and anti-canceration locally. In present study, the statistical data indicated that IELs increased largely in the mucosal epithelium and dome epithelium post-infection. The differences among the CT group, the SI group and the DI group were significant (P < 0.05). The increase was always accompanied by lymphocytes evacuated in deep lymphoid tissue, especially in the DI group, from histopathology observation. This indicated that lymphocytes may activate properly and migrate from deep inside tissue to the lumen during anti-viral process. The increase is also associated with activation of host immunity and this specific anti-viral immunity may be achieved through stimulation of local mucosal cellular immunity. The change of IGCs percentage was irregular. In the mucosal epithelium, IGCs secrete mucin as part of innate immunity so that IGCs percentage does not increase. In the unique dome epithelium, IGCs incorporated with M cells are specialized to sample local antigens. The significant increase of DA and SR tissue in different treatments suggested frequent antigen-presentation activities.
The results above indicated that the rabbit sacculus rotundus and appendix were appropriate for HCMV infection and multiplication, and HCMV had a strong infectivity to these tissues as well. These results preliminarily proved that HCMV could reproduce and express its viral structural proteins in mucosal epithelial cell and lamina propria cells of the vivo rabbit ligated sacculus rotundus and vermiform appendix inoculated with HCMV. In the present study, the ligated intestine in vivo initiative proved HCMV could express its viral protein and cause serious inflammation damage in infected tissue of SI group and/or DI groups. Furthermore, this study revealed that the possibility of a rabbit model for HCMV intestinal infection is emerging, which provides a novel path for studying pathogenesis and prevention of HCMV infection.
We successfully established an in vivo rabbit intestinal loop model for human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection as demonstrated by pathological finding, the presence of viral DNA replication and viral protein expression with PCR, western blotting, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence assays. This study also showed that co-inoculation of HCMV and hepatitis E virus (HEV) to the animal model can promoted the pathogenicity of HCMV infection.
Thanks the funding of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31272515, 31472165, 31330076).
The design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript were supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31272515, 31472165, 31330076).
Availability of data and material
JT, XS and RS designed the study. JT wrote article. JT, RS, QW, JA, JW, XT, JS, GH, JY and WH performed the laboratory experiments. JT, QW and RS analyzed and interpreted the data. All authors have read, commented upon, and approved the final article.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All animal experiments involved in this study were approved by the Laboratory Animal Welfare and Animal Experimental Ethical Committee of China Agricultural University. (20150512–212). We followed guidelines of the Committee for experimental animals during this study.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Fülöp T, Larbi A, Pawelec G. Human T cell aging and the impact of persistent viral infections. Front Immunol. 2013;4:1–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Damato E, Winnen C. Cytomegalovirus infection: perinatal implications. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006;31(1):86–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vivier E, Raulet DH, Moretta A, Caligiuri MA, Zitvogel L, Lanier LL, et al. Innate or adaptive immunity? The example of natural killer cells. Science. 2011;331:44–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kulinski M, Tarakanova V. Reply to “testing for herpesvirus infection is essential in children with chromosomal-instability syndromes. J Virol. 2013;87:3618.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Welte A, Sinzger C, Lutz Z, Singh-Jasuja H, Sampaio KL, et al. Selective intracellular retention of virally induced NKG2D ligands by the human cytomegalovirus UL16 glycoprotein. Eur J Immunol. 2003;33(1):194–203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reddehase J, Podlech J, Grzimek N. Mouse models of cytomegalovirus latency: overview. J Clin Virol. 2002;25:S23–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tang Q, Maul G. Mouse Cytomegalovirus crosses the species barrier with help from a few human cytomegalovirus proteins. J Virol. 2006;80(15):7510–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ryan KJ, Ray CG. Sherris Medical Microbiology, vol. 556. 5th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2010. p. 566–9.Google Scholar
- Gallina A, Percivalle E, Simoncini L, Revello MG, Gerna G, et al. Human cytomegalovirus pp65 lower matrix phosphoproteinharbours two transplantable nuclear localization signals. J Gen Virol. 1996;77((6):1151–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ho SK, Lo CY, Cheng IK, Chan TM. Rapid Cytomegalovirus pp 65 antigenemia assay by direct erythrocyte lysis and immunofluorescence staining. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36(3):638–40.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Browne EP, Wing B, Coleman D, Shenk T. Altered cellular mRNA levels in humancytomegalovirus- infected fibroblasts: viralblock to the accumulation of antiviral mRNAs. J Virol. 2001;75:12319–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Saffert RT, Penkert RR, Kalejta RF. Cellular and viral control over the initial events of human cytomegalovirus experimental latency in CD34+ cells. J Virol. 2010;84:5594–604.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Miller-Kittrell M, Sparer TE. Feeling manipulated: cytomegalovirus immune manipulation. Virol J. 2009;6:4. doi:10.1186/1743-422X-6-4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hewitt EW, Gupta SS, Lehner PJ. The human cytomegalovirus gene product US6 inhibits ATP binding by TAP. Embo J. 2001;20:387–96.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gustav R, Geironson L, Bressendorff I, Paulsson K. Viral proteins interfering with antigen presentation target the major histocompatibility complex class I peptide-loading complex. J Virol. 2008;82:8246–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hewitt EW. The MHC, class I antigen presentation pathway: strategies for viral immune evasion. Immunology. 2003;110:163–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hesse J, Ameres S, Besold K, Krauter S, Moosmann A, Plachter B, et al. Suppression of CD8+ T-cell recognition in the immediate-early phase of human cytomegalovirus infection. J Gen Virol. 2013;94:376–86Google Scholar
- Yamamoto K, Ohishi I, Sakaguchi G. Fluid accumulation in mouse ligated intestine inoculated with Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979;37(2):181–6.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nikitas G, Deschamps C, Disson O, Niault T, Cossart P, Lecuit M. Transcytosis of Listeria monocytogenes across the intestinal barrier upon specific targeting of goblet cell accessible E-cadherin. J Exp Med. 2011;208(11):2263–77.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Boutrup TS, Schauser K, Agerholm JS, Jensen TK. Application of a pig ligated intestinal loop model for early Lawsonia intracellularis infection. Acta Vet Scand. 2011;52:17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu B, Yin X, Yu H, Feng Y, Ying X, Gong J, et al. Alteration of the microbiota and virulence gene expression in E. coli O157:H7 in pig ligated intestine with and without AE lesions. Plos One. 2015. doi:10.1371/0130272.
- Caserta JA, Robertson SL, Saputo J, Shrestha A, Mcclane BA, Uzal FA. Development and application of a mouse intestinal loopmodel to study the in vivo action of clostridium perfringens enterotoxin. Infect Immun. 2011;79(8):3020–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dimitroulia E, Spanakis N, Konstantinidou AE, Legakis NJ, Tsakris A. Frequent detection of cytomegalovirus in the intestine of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006;12(9):879–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muir S, Murray J, AFarquharson M, Wheatley D, McPhaden A. Detection of Cytomegalovirus in upper-gastrointestinal biopsies from heart transplantrecipients: comparison of light microscopy, immunocytochemistry, in situ hybridisation, andnested PCR. J ClinPathol. 1998;51:807–11.Google Scholar
- Mao J, Zhao Y, She R, Cao B, Xiao P, Wu Q, et al. Detection and localization of rabbit hepatitis E virus and antigen in systemic tissues from experimentally intraperitoneally infected rabbits. Plos One. 2014;9(3):e88607.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hannant D. Mucosal immunology.: overview and potential in the veterinary species. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2002;87(3–4):265–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bockman E, Cooper P. Pinocytosis by epithelium associated with lymphoid follicles in the bursa of Fabricirs, appendix and peyer’s patches. An electron microscoapic study. Am J Nat. 1973;136:455–78.Google Scholar
- Baker DG. Natural pathogens of laboratory mice, rats, and rabbits and their effects on research. Clin Microbiol Reviews. 1998;11(2):231–66.Google Scholar
- So J. Effects of glucomannan on the sacculus rotundus and peripheral blood lymphocytes in New Zealand rabbits during aflatoxicosis. Sci World J. 2001;2012(2):223–9.Google Scholar
- Favre A, Paoli D. The lymphoid station in the small intestine microscopic and histoenzymatic research on saculus rotundus in the lepus cuniculus. Arch Ital Anat. 1985;90(3):159–76.Google Scholar
- Bye WA, Allan CH, Trier JS. Structure, distribution and origin of M cell in Peyer’s patches of mouse ileum. Gastroenterology. 1984;86(1):789–801.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Owen RL, Allen CL, Stevens DP. Phagocytosis of Giardiamuris by macrophages in Peyer’s patch epithelium in mice. Infect Immune. 1981;33(2):591–601.Google Scholar
- Kagnoff MF. Mucosal immunology: New frontiers. Immunol Today. 1996;17(2):57–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar