Comparative effects of soy protein concentrate, enzyme-treated soybean meal, and fermented soybean meal replacing animal protein supplements in feeds on growth performance and intestinal health of nursery pigs

Table 8 Relative abundance of jejunal mucosa-associated microbiota at the phylum level in nursery pigs fed diets with soy protein concentrate, enzyme-treated soy protein, and fermented soybean meal replacing animal protein supplements^a

Item	Treatment					SEM	P value
Item	CON	SPC^b	ESB^b	FSBL^b	FSBB^b	SEM	CON vs. SPC	CON vs. ESB	CON vs. FSBL	CON vs. FSBB
Proteobacteria	44.52	42.89	43.99	42.05	41.40	2.55	0.435	0.802	0.240	0.140
Firmicutes	30.37	32.39	29.51	32.04	34.12	3.89	0.378	0.706	0.467	0.106
Actinobacteria	14.41	14.74	15.71	15.28	13.93	2.01	0.863	0.502	0.652	0.803
Bacteroidetes	3.89	3.10	3.25	3.57	3.53	0.39	0.398	0.650	0.495	0.471
Others	6.81	6.88	7.53	7.07	7.02	0.49	0.919	0.275	0.691	0.749

^an = 12
^bSPC, ESB, FSBL, and FSBB: basal diet with soy protein concentrate (X-Soy 200, CJ Selecta, Araguari, MG, Brazil), enzyme-treated soybean meal (HP 300, Hamlet Protein Inc., Findlay, OH, USA), fermented soybean meal with Lactobacillus (FerMex 200, Purina Animal Nutrition, Shoreview, SD, USA), and fermented soybean meal with Bacillus (Soytide, CJ Bio, Jung-gu, Seoul, Korea), replacing 1/3, 2/3, 3/3 of animal protein supplements in P1, P2, P3, respectively

ISSN: 2049-1891