Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive statistics for genetic diversity indices in the four breeds studied1

From: Selective footprints and genes relevant to cold adaptation and other phenotypic traits are unscrambled in the genomes of divergently selected chicken breeds

Breed

n

HO (M ± SE)

UHE (M ± SE)

AR (M ± SE)

UFIS [CI 95%]

OMF

30

0.305 ± 0.001

0.305 ± 0.001

1.847 ± 0.002

0.001 [–0.001; 0.003]

RUW

64

0.332 ± 0.001

0.330 ± 0.001

1.927 ± 0.001

–0.004 [–0.006; − 0.002]

USH

40

0.246 ± 0.001

0.263 ± 0.001

1.787 ± 0.002

0.055 [0.053; 0.057]

WCR

22

0.373 ± 0.001

0.379 ± 0.001

1.969 ± 0.001

0.015 [0.012; 0.018]

  1. 1 Breeds: OMF Orloff Mille Fleur, RUW Russian White, USH Ushanka, WCR White Cornish. n number of individuals, HO observed heterozygosity, M Mean value, SE Standard error, UHE unbiased expected heterozygosity, AR rarefied allelic richness, UFIS unbiased inbreeding coefficient [CI 95%, range variation of UFIS coefficient at a confidence interval of 95%]. All pairwise breed differences were significant at P < 0.001