Inclusion of purified dietary fiber during gestation improved the reproductive performance of sows

Zhuo, Yong; Feng, Bo; Xuan, Yuedong; Che, Lianqiang; Fang, Zhengfeng; Lin, Yan; Xu, Shengyu; Li, Jian; Feng, Bing; Wu, De

doi:10.1186/s40104-020-00450-5

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology

Table 11 The relative abundances of microbiota at the genera level (%, > 1 in at least one sample) in feces of sows during gestation

From: Inclusion of purified dietary fiber during gestation improved the reproductive performance of sows

Item	Gestation stage				Treatment						SEM	P-value
Item	Day 30	Day 60	Day 90	Day 110	CON	DF1	DF2	DF3	DF4	DF5		Stage	Diets	Stage×Diets	Linear	Quadratic
Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1	15.01^a	14.28^ab	11.24^bc	8.73^c	10.38	12.11	11.78	13.01	13.73	12.86	1.67	< 0.01	0.26	0.21	0.41	0.09
Streptococcus	3.89	5.41	5.45	4.45	6.04^ab	7.05^a	4.45^abc	5.38^abc	3.35^bc	2.52^c	1.11	0.08	< 0.01	0.39	< 0.01	0.07
Methanobrevibacter	1.06^b	2.02^a	2.08^a	1.86^ab	2.43	0.69	1.71	1.99	1.61	2.10	0.72	0.02	0.41	< 0.01	0.49	0.58
Lactobacillus	2.94	3.21	3.59	3.49	3.36	4.20	4.15	2.76	2.35	3.03	0.92	0.67	0.36	0.37	0.47	0.22
Ruminococcaceae_NK4A214_group	5.46^a	4.45^ab	3.67^b	3.54^b	4.28	4.43	4.05	3.95	4.51	4.48	0.56	< 0.01	0.89	0.30	0.65	0.86
Christensenellaceae_R-7_group	1.96	1.81	1.70	1.69	1.77	1.84	1.59	1.96	1.84	1.75	0.23	0.35	0.96	0.20	0.88	0.56
Ruminococcaceae_UCG-002	4.81	3.94	3.28	3.36	3.94	4.05	3.60	3.39	4.07	4.05	0.55	0.06	0.88	0.61	0.67	0.65
Treponema_2	2.18	2.28	3.15	2.56	3.54^a	2.25^b	2.49^b	2.30^b	2.23^b	2.43^b	0.44	0.07	< 0.01	0.045	0.43	0.03
Ruminococcaceae_UCG-005	4.06	3.57	3.41	3.35	3.72	3.80	3.62	3.52	3.36	3.56	0.34	0.14	0.97	0.75	0.73	0.34
Lachnospiraceae_XPB1014_group	2.95	3.03	2.82	3.28	2.03^c	3.05^bc	3.51^ab	4.36^a	2.62^bc	2.56^bc	0.55	0.92	< 0.01	0.10	0.31	< 0.01
Turicibacter	4.06^a	3.68^a	3.13^b	2.26^c	3.22	3.00	3.00	3.09	3.97	3.41	0.41	< 0.01	0.21	0.032	0.48	0.25
Terrisporobacter	3.44^a	2.99^a	2.45^b	2.24^b	2.87^ab	2.52^ab	2.62^ab	2.44^b	3.19^a	3.04^ab	0.30	< 0.01	0.021	0.39	0.26	0.86
Prevotellaceae_UCG-001	1.29	1.69	1.88	1.45	1.06^b	0.97^b	1.29^b	1.89^ab	2.58^a	1.68^ab	0.56	0.11	0.042	0.14	0.24	< 0.01
Eubacterium_coprostanoligenes-group	2.48^a	2.15^ab	1.85^ab	1.55^b	2.24	2.24	2.06	1.87	1.79	1.86	0.32	< 0.01	0.58	0.083	0.32	0.15
Romboutsia	2.00^a	1.62^ab	1.40^bc	1.15^c	1.66	1.37	1.41	1.31	1.71	1.78	0.19	< 0.01	0.047	0.37	0.13	0.64
Oscillospira	1.09^b	1.03^b	1.10^b	1.82^a	0.86	1.52	1.26	1.61	1.07	1.23	0.31	< 0.01	0.071	0.082	0.95	0.24
Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group	1.70^b	2.12^b	2.59^a	1.82^b	2.41	1.98	2.17	1.86	2.03	1.90	0.32	< 0.01	0.25	< 0.01	0.30	0.23
Ruminococcaceae_UCG-014	2.17^a	1.91^ab	1.77^bc	1.49^c	1.96	1.84	1.77	1.53	1.82	2.08	0.15	< 0.01	0.17	0.46	0.12	0.07
Prevotellaceae_NK3B31_group	0.53^b	0.80^b	1.47^a	1.38^a	1.44^a	0.87^b	0.96^ab	1.05^ab	0.88^b	1.09^ab	0.23	< 0.01	0.023	< 0.01	0.91	0.09
Ruminococcus_1	1.00	1.13	1.18	1.45	1.19	1.13	1.12	1.22	1.13	1.35	0.21	0.08	0.97	0.51	0.24	0.73
Phascolarctobacterium	0.64	0.65	0.65	0.85	0.42^b	0.88^ab	1.05^a	0.76^ab	0.62^ab	0.48^b	0.19	0.37	< 0.01	< 0.01	0.10	0.16
Ruminococcaceae_UCG-010	1.21^a	1.14^a	0.94^b	0.82^b	0.98	1.15	0.99	1.02	1.04	0.98	0.09	< 0.01	0.74	0.047	0.61	0.85

Data are expressed as mean ± largest SEM. Sows were regarded as the experimental units, n = 6 for each treatment. ^{a, b, c} denote P < 0.05. CON, basal corn-soybean diet; DF1, wheat bran-rich diet; DF2, DF3, DF4 and DF5 were wheat bran diet supplemented with 1%, 2%, 3% and 4% of FIBER MIX at the expense of wheat bran. Linear contrasts (OPC) analysis was used to test the linear and quadratic effects of dietary fiber levels on microbial parameters of sows

Back to article page

ISSN: 2049-1891

Contact us

Submission enquiries: Access here and click Contact Us
General enquiries: info@biomedcentral.com