Co-expression network analysis predicts a key role of microRNAs in the adaptation of the porcine skeletal muscle to nutrient supply

Table 2 microRNAs and lincRNAs detected by MDSeq as differentially expressed when comparing AL-T0 (fasted) gilts with their AL-T1 (5 h after eating) and AL-T2 (7 h after eating) counterparts

Contrast	log₂FC^b	P-value	q-value^c	Log₂CPM AL-T0^d	Log₂CPM AL-T1^d	Log₂CPM AL-T2^d
AL-T0/AL-T1^a
miRNA
ssc-miR-17-5p	−4.0190	3.20E-06	2.81E-03	6.2654	5.7652	–
ssc-miR-186-5p	−4.1486	1.66E-06	2.81E-03	8.6343	8.2410	–
ssc-miR-362	−3.6875	1.64E-05	9.48E-03	6.5327	5.8885	–
ssc-miR-451	−3.6825	2.16E-05	9.48E-03	8.1730	8.1217	–
ssc-miR-29a-3p	−3.3204	1.16E-04	4.07E-02	9.1335	8.7859	–
lincRNA
ENSSSCG00000032301	3.3076	3.60E-05	1.32E-02	1.4722	5.8072	–
ENSSSCG00000031192	−3.8178	1.59E-04	2.93E-02	5.8864	1.7548	–
AL-T0/AL-T2^a
miRNA
ssc-miR-1285	−4.1428	4.60E-06	8.04E-03	7.9799	–	5.5849

^aAL-T0: Duroc gilts in a fasting condition (N = 11); AL-T1: Duroc gilts slaughtered after 5 h of food intake (N = 12); AL-T2: Duroc gilts slaughtered after 7 h of food intake (N = 12)
^bLog₂FC: estimated log₂ fold change mean dispersion levels
^cq-value: P-value corrected with the Benjamini-Yekutieli procedure
^dLog₂CPM: estimated log₂ counts-per-million (CPM) mean expression levels in AL-T0, AL-T1 and AL-T2 groups

ISSN: 2049-1891