Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 microRNAs and lincRNAs detected by MDSeq as differentially expressed when comparing AL-T0 (fasted) gilts with their AL-T1 (5 h after eating) and AL-T2 (7 h after eating) counterparts

From: Co-expression network analysis predicts a key role of microRNAs in the adaptation of the porcine skeletal muscle to nutrient supply

Contrastlog2FCbP-valueq-valuecLog2CPM AL-T0dLog2CPM AL-T1dLog2CPM AL-T2d
AL-T0/AL-T1a
 miRNA
  ssc-miR-17-5p−4.01903.20E-062.81E-036.26545.7652
  ssc-miR-186-5p−4.14861.66E-062.81E-038.63438.2410
  ssc-miR-362−3.68751.64E-059.48E-036.53275.8885
  ssc-miR-451−3.68252.16E-059.48E-038.17308.1217
  ssc-miR-29a-3p−3.32041.16E-044.07E-029.13358.7859
 lincRNA
  ENSSSCG000000323013.30763.60E-051.32E-021.47225.8072
  ENSSSCG00000031192−3.81781.59E-042.93E-025.88641.7548
AL-T0/AL-T2a
 miRNA
  ssc-miR-1285−4.14284.60E-068.04E-037.97995.5849
  1. aAL-T0: Duroc gilts in a fasting condition (N = 11); AL-T1: Duroc gilts slaughtered after 5 h of food intake (N = 12); AL-T2: Duroc gilts slaughtered after 7 h of food intake (N = 12)
  2. bLog2FC: estimated log2 fold change mean dispersion levels
  3. cq-value: P-value corrected with the Benjamini-Yekutieli procedure
  4. dLog2CPM: estimated log2 counts-per-million (CPM) mean expression levels in AL-T0, AL-T1 and AL-T2 groups