Skip to main content

Table 7 Effect of Bacillus coagulans on serum speicific IgG and intestinal specific IgA against Clostridium perfringens and intestinal AKP activity of broiler chickens challenged with NE (n = 6)

From: Effects of Bacillus coagulans supplementation on the growth performance and gut health of broiler chickens with Clostridium perfringens-induced necrotic enteritis

Items

NEe

sIgAf

IgGg

IAPh

d 28

d 42

d 28

d 42

d 28

d 42

Bacillus coagulans, mg/kg

 0

–

1.07

1.08

1.80

1.12

455.8

633.7

 0

+

1.38

1.35

2.24

1.02

414.4

531.6

 400

–

0.98

0.86

1.68

0.81

491.0

733.9

 400

+

1.00

1.66

2.31

0.95

471.4

652.5

 SEMi

 

0.036

0.103

0.115

0.039

28.94

25.01

Main effect

 400

 

1.22a

1.26

1.99

0.88b

481.2

693.2a

 0

 

0.99b

1.22

2.02

1.07a

435.1

582.6b

 Challenged

 

1.19c

1.51a

2.28a

0.99

442.9

592.0

 Non-challenged

 

1.02d

0.97b

1.74b

0.96

473.4

683.8

P-valuesj

 Bacillus coagulans

 

0.008

0.840

0.910

0.031

0.441

0.047

 Challenged

 

0.045

0.023

0.038

0.801

0.608

0.092

 Challenged ×Bacillus coagulans

 

0.069

0.217

0.683

0.131

0.854

0.839

  1. a,b,c,d Means within the same column with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05)
  2. eNE = Co-challenged with Eimeria spp. and Clostridium perfringens; −, without NE challenge; +, with NE challenge
  3. fsIgA = secretory immunoglobulin A
  4. gAll values represent the means with subtracted background OD490nm. Sera were diluted at 1:50 for the C.perfringens antigen detection, respectively, using ELISAs. Each sample was assayed in duplicate
  5. hIAP = intestinal alkline phosphatase, μmol/mg protein
  6. iSEM, standard error of the mean
  7. jP-values represent the main effect of the diet, the main effect of NE challenge, and the interaction between the dietary treatments and NE challenge