From: A gene expression estimator of intramuscular fat percentage for use in both cattle and sheep
Method | Number of animals1 | WA control subgroup | WA HGP subgroup | P-value2 | Predicted experiment size3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NIRS measured IMF% | 141 | 2.37 ± 1.004 | 1.90 ± 0.83 | 0.001 | 198 |
Ultrasound estimated IMF% | 173 | 2.66 ± 0.724 | 2.93 ± 0.54 | 1.000 | N/A5 |
NIRS measured IMF% | 22 | 2.07 ± 0.774 | 1.79 ± 0.54 | 0.340 | 294 |
IMF% calculated by CIDEA formula | 22 | 2.30 ± 1.196 | 1.60 ± 1.14 | 0.080 | 148 |
IMF% calculated by IMF 5 gene set formula | 22 | 2.66 ± 1.046 | 1.30 ± 0.92 | 0.003 | 26 |
Ranking animals using CIDEA | 22 | 9.50 ± 6.627 | 13.20 ± 6.16 | 0.100 | 156 |
Ranking animals using IMF 5 gene set | 22 | 7.20 ± 5.478 | 15.10 ± 4.99 | 0.0026 | 22 |
Ranking animals using TAG gene set | 22 | 7.00 ± 4.528 | 15.30 ± 5.48 | 0.0017 | 20 |
CIDEA DE | 22 | 13.09 ± 0.447 | 12.83 ± 0.38 | 0.080 | 130 |
IMF 5 gene set DE | 22 | 0.25 ± 0.389 | −0.27 ± 0.31 | 0.0014 | 24 |
TAG gene set DE | 22 | 0.28 ± 0.369 | −0.27 ± 0.33 | 0.00076 | 20 |