Skip to main content

Table 3 Effects of different dietary starch sources on the meat quality of finishing pigs

From: Different dietary starch sources alter the carcass traits, meat quality, and the profile of muscle amino acid and fatty acid in finishing pigs

Items

Treatment

P-valuec

TS

CS

PS

ANOVA

Linear

Quadratic

pH45 min

6.13 ± 0.07b

6.28 ± 0.04ab

6.31 ± 0.03a

0.042

0.019

0.042

pH24 h

5.50 ± 0.03

5.53 ± 0.02

5.54 ± 0.04

0.967

0.794

0.967

L* 45 min

43.35 ± 0.71

44.97 ± 0.54

44.00 ± 0.51

0.181

0.474

0.181

a* 45 min

16.68 ± 0.72

17.09 ± 0.52

18.28 ± 0.48

0.206

0.096

0.206

b* 45 min

2.21 ± 0.34

2.47 ± 0.32

2.11 ± 0.28

0.698

0.814

0.698

L* 24 h

55.36 ± 0.60

56.25 ± 0.79

55.55 ± 0.76

0.657

0.854

0.657

a* 24 h

16.46 ± 0.19

16.04 ± 0.32

16.57 ± 0.29

0.361

0.764

0.361

b* 24 h

2.66 ± 0.24

2.72 ± 0.29

3.01 ± 0.29

0.529

0.289

0.529

Marbling scores

2.44 ± 0.13b

2.70 ± 0.16ab

3.04 ± 0.15a

0.028

0.007

0.028

Drip loss, %

3.22 ± 0.16a

2.84 ± 0.13ab

2.73 ± 0.11b

0.043

0.016

0.043

Shear force, N

38.39 ± 1.96a

34.63 ± 2.71ab

31.09 ± 1.02b

0.049

0.016

0.050

  1. Values are mean ± SEM, n = 8
  2. a,bMeans in the same row with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05)
  3. Abbreviations: TS, tapioca starch; CS, corn starch; PS, pea starch; L*, lightness; a*, redness; b*, yellowness
  4. cThe P values indicate the effects of different dietary starch sources with different amylose/amylopectin ratios by one-way ANOVA and polynomial contrasts- linear and quadratic analyses, respectively