Skip to main content


Fig. 3 | Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology

Fig. 3

From: Comparisons of improved genomic predictions generated by different imputation methods for genotyping by sequencing data in livestock populations

Fig. 3

Reliabilities (r2) of genomic predictions using original GBS (GBS), GBS with imputation of missing genotypes (Be, IM, FI), imputed corrected genotype by IMPUTE2 (GcIM) and true genotypes of GBS markers (GBSr), at four depths, averaged over 10 replicates. Bars indicate SE. Note: MAF criteria were used to delete markers with low MAF values before imputation

Back to article page