Skip to main content

Table 5 Effects of dietary treatments and sex oncarcass quality traits of cattle

From: Effects of different dietary energy and protein levels and sex on growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of F1 Angus × Chinese Xiangxi yellow cattle

Item

 

HE

LE

SEM

E

P

S

E × P

E × S

  

LP

HP

LP

HP

      

HCW, kg

M

235.50

214.75

205.00

210.00

12.284

ns

ns

ns

ns

ns

F

207.25

233.75

223.60

220.83

Dressing percentage, %

M

54.00

54.75

52.00

53.80

0.009

ns

*

ns

ns

ns

F

52.75

55.83

54.60

55.00

CCW, kg

M

231.00

210.50

201.00

205.80

11.80

ns

ns

ns

ns

ns

F

203.00

229.16

219.20

216.33

Carcass composition, %

          

  Meat

M

64.29

67.65

71.08

70.47

0.018

*

ns

ns

ns

ns

F

62.78

67.21

69.05

67.48

  Fat

M

19.51

19.56

14.05

13.99

0.017

*

ns

*

ns

ns

F

22.23

18.11

17.34

19.84

  Bone

M

15.29

11.89

14.15

14.68

0.143

ns

ns

ns

ns

ns

F

13.53

14.38

12.73

12.22

  Meat:fat ratio

M

3.30

3.45

5.04

5.04

0.466

*

ns

*

ns

*

F

2.83

3.71

3.99

3.41

  Meat:bone ratio

M

4.20

5.69

5.01

4.80

0.421

ns

ns

ns

ns

ns

F

4.65

4.67

5.44

5.53

Fat thickness, cm

M

1.10

0.98

0.72

0.71

0.118

ns

ns

ns

ns

*

F

0.76

1.04

1.01

0.86

LM area, cm2

M

65.71

66.59

54.24

60.47

3.660

ns

ns

ns

ns

ns

 

F

59.63

59.04

59.59

58.31

      
  1. Significance: *(P < 0.05), ns not significant (P > 0.05).
  2. M = male, steer, F = female, heifer, E = energy, P = protein, S = sex.
  3. Effects of P × S and E × P × Sinteractions were not significant (P > 0.05).