Skip to main content

Table 4 Effect of variety and drying method on the nutritive value of corns for growing pigs

From: Effect of variety and drying method on the nutritive value of corn for growing pigs

Item

Variety

Sun dried

Artificially dried °C

SEM

P-value1

Variety

Drying method2

Air temperature

 

LS1

LS2

LS3

LS4

 

80

100

120

   

Linear

Quadratic

DE of DM, MJ/kg

16.14a

15.86b

15.86b

15.82b

15.82

16.03

15.92

15.91

0.06

0.01

0.06

0.23

0.45

ME of DM, MJ/kg

15.87a

15.51b

15.61b

15.51b

15.57

15.76

15.63

15.61

0.06

0.01

0.06

0.19

0.40

Digestibility coefficients, %

           

Organic matter

91.56a

90.10b

90.21b

90.03b

90.24

90.77

90.48

90.41

0.27

0.01

0.31

0.45

0.73

Dry matter

90.03a

88.54b

88.70b

88.62b

88.66

89.43

88.96

88.85

0.30

0.01

0.23

0.20

0.41

Energy

89.58a

88.11b

88.00b

88.24b

88.02

89.04

88.47

88.41

0.34

0.02

0.13

0.21

0.40

NDF

57.01

48.20

45.78

45.24

52.28

50.20

46.33

47.43

3.35

0.09

0.27

0.62

0.78

ADF

51.32

41.94

34.65

34.58

48.54

40.92

36.27

36.76

4.47

0.06

0.06

0.57

0.79

Crude protein

80.81

78.56

76.76

78.56

78.99

79.37

77.17

79.16

1.18

0.15

0.75

0.91

0.38

Ether extract

61.13

65.25

64.07

63.71

59.18

66.46

66.83

67.68

1.39

0.31

0.01

0.53

0.82

  1. 1Interaction between variety and drying method was not significant (P > 0.10).
  2. 2Contrast for Artificial dried vs. sun dried.
  3. a-bMeans followed by the same letter within each row are not significantly different from each other (P > 0.05).