Skip to main content

Table 6 The effect of dietary ME level on litter growth (Exp. 1)

From: The effect of the ratio of standardized ileal digestible lysine to metabolizable energy on growth performance, blood metabolites and hormones of lactating sows

Item

Parity

No.

ME level, Mcal/kg

  

P-value

   

3.06

3.16

3.20

3.25

3.30

3.40

Mean13

SEM

Treat

Linear

Quadratic

Initial litter weight, kg

1

36

13.98

13.35

13.10

13.44

13.92

13.37

13.54x

0.35

0.45

--

--

 

2

36

14.34

14.76

14.84

15.34

15.79

15.47

15.12y

0.81

0.86

--

--

 

3+

113

16.43

16.81

16.51

16.75

16.46

16.25

16.53z

0.43

0.95

--

--

 

Overall2

185

15.68

15.94

15.65

15.98

15.96

15.69

15.82

0.38

0.91

--

--

Litter weight at weaning, kg1

1

36

72.57

74.63

72.99

73.64

73.35

73.40

73.35x

1.89

0.83

0.64

0.18

 

2

36

76.69

76.65

76.63

76.58

74.93

74.74

75.94x

2.25

0.68

0.86

0.71

 

3+

113

77.33a

77.94ad

82.66b

80.64c

79.24cd

78.63ad

79.39y

1.43

< 0.01

0.97

< 0.01

 

Overall2

185

76.42a

77.19a

80.06b

78.83b

77.35a

76.95a

77.80

1.14

< 0.01

0.91

0.07

Litter weight gain, kg/d1

1

36

2.08

2.16

2.10

2.12

2.11

2.11

2.11x

0.04

0.82

0.67

0.46

 

2

36

2.17

2.18

2.17

2.17

2.12

2.10

2.15x

0.05

0.66

0.56

0.41

 

3+

113

2.16a

2.18ad

2.35b

2.28c

2.23cd

2.21ad

2.23y

0.03

< 0.01

0.29

< 0.01

 

Overall2

185

2.15a

2.18a

2.28b

2.23b

2.18a

2.17a

2.20

0.02

< 0.01

0.69

< 0.01

  1. 1Initial litter weight, number of piglets suckling and lactation length were used as covariate in the analysis
  2. 2Parity effect was included in the model
  3. 3Parity effect; treatment effect was included in the model
  4. a, b, c, dWithin a row, values with no common superscript differ significantly (P < 0.05)
  5. x, y, zWithin a column, values with no common superscript differ significantly (P < 0.05)