Open Access

Cytokines from the pig conceptus: roles in conceptus development in pigs

  • Rodney D Geisert1Email author,
  • Matthew C Lucy1,
  • Jeffrey J Whyte1,
  • Jason W Ross2 and
  • Daniel J Mathew1
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology20145:51

DOI: 10.1186/2049-1891-5-51

Received: 30 June 2014

Accepted: 28 October 2014

Published: 7 November 2014

Abstract

Establishment of pregnancy in pigs involves maintaining progesterone secretion from the corpora lutea in addition to regulating a sensitive interplay between the maternal immune system and attachment of the rapidly expanding trophoblast for nutrient absorption. The peri-implantation period of rapid trophoblastic elongation followed by attachment to the maternal uterine endometrium is critical for establishing a sufficient placental-uterine interface for subsequent nutrient transport for fetal survival to term, but is also marked by the required conceptus release of factors involved with stimulating uterine secretion of histotroph and modulation of the maternal immune system. Many endometrial genes activated by the conceptus secretory factors stimulate a tightly controlled proinflammatory response within the uterus. A number of the cytokines released by the elongating conceptuses stimulate inducible transcription factors such as nuclear factor kappa B (NFKB) potentially regulating the maternal uterine proinflammatory and immune response. This review will establish the current knowledge for the role of conceptus cytokine production and release in early development and establishment of pregnancy in the pig.

Keywords

Cytokines Embryo development Porcine conceptus Pregnancy Prostaglandins uterus

Introduction

Establishment of pregnancy by the pre-implantation porcine conceptuses (embryo and extraembryonic membranes) requires extending the lifespan and progesterone secretion from the corpora lutea (CL) and appropriately contributing to the intricate interplay between the maternal immune system and attachment of the rapidly expanding trophoblast. Rapid (less than 1 h) elongation of the pig conceptuses across the uterine epithelial surface provides the physiological mechanism for the release of conceptus estrogens (maternal recognition of pregnancy signal) to rapidly redirect endometrial release of luteolytic prostaglandin F away from endocrine movement (towards the uterine vasculature) to an exocrine secretion (into the uterine lumen) to enable CL maintenance. Porcine conceptuses are proteolytic and highly invasive outside the luminal environment of the uterus [1] but in utero the conceptuses are non-invasive (invasiveness controlled by the release of numerous endometrial protease inhibitors) resulting in the superficial epitheliolchorial type of placentation. The peri-implantation period of rapid trophoblastic elongation (Days 11 to 12) and attachment to the maternal uterine surface (Day 13 to 18) is essential for establishing sufficient placental uterine area for subsequent nutrient transport for piglet survival to term. Additionally, conceptus release of factors during this critical phase of pregnancy establishment also involves the stimulation of uterine secretion of histotroph and modulation of the maternal immune system. The semiallogeneic conceptuses ability to modify the maternal uterine environment into an environment favorable for growth and survival occurs through the activation of inducible transcription factors within the conceptus and uterine endometrium. Many genes activated by the conceptuses stimulate a tightly controlled proinflammatory response within the uterus [24]. A number of the cytokines released by the elongating conceptuses stimulate inducible transcription factors, such as nuclear factor kappa B (NFKB), which are thought to contribute to the maternal uterine proinflammatory and immune response [5]. Activation of NFKB is not limited to the immune system but can regulate cell differentiation, proliferation and survival. A number of recent reviews have described the complex nature for the role of growth factors and cytokines during implantation [59]. The following review will establish our current knowledge of the role of conceptus cytokine production and release in early development and establishment of pregnancy in the pig.

Window of implantation

To fully appreciate the intricate interplay between the conceptus and uterus during the peri-implantation period requires a thorough understanding of the cellular localization and shifts in endometrial steroid receptors regulating the release of growth factors involved with conceptus development [4, 8]. Opening of the “window of receptivity” for trophoblastic elongation and attachment to the uterine luminal epithelium is regulated through ovarian estrogen and progesterone release and cell specific expression of steroid receptors within the uterine luminal (LE) and glandular (GE) epithelia and stroma. Although ovarian estrogen from the developing ovulatory follicles during proestrous and estrus is critical for priming the endometrium, progesterone and localization of its receptor play an essential role with cellular communication between the uterine epithelium and stroma in establishing a proper uterine environment for conceptus attachment and early development [1012]. Progesterone’s role in opening the window for implantation during early pregnancy is associated with cell-specific changes in expression of endometrial progesterone receptor (PGR). Epithelial PGR (specifically PGRA) has been demonstrated to be a key regulator of uterine epithelial-stromal crosstalk essential for uterine development and function [13]. While uterine stromal and myometrial cells express PGR throughout pregnancy, a clear spatiotemporal association exists between the down-regulation of PGR in the endometrial LE and GE, and receptivity for conceptus implantation [1116]. Down-regulation of PGR in endometrial epithelia is a conserved event among most mammals [1420] and is associated with the down-regulation of high molecular weight mucin O-linked glycoproteins such as mucin 1 which serve as steric transmembrane inhibitors of trophoblast attachment [2124]. A uterine environment permissive for peri-implantation conceptus development and activation of implantation is established through the loss of PGR from LE and GE cells. Maintenance of PGR in the stromal cell layer stimulates expression and secretion of progestamedins such as fibroblast growth factor 7 (FGF7) and hepatocyte growth factor [4, 10, 25] which in turn activate multiple uterine genes involved with growth, morphogenesis, synthesis of enzymes and enzyme inhibitors, extracellular matrix and cell adhesion prior to trophoblast attachment to the uterine surface [8, 12, 26, 27]. With cell specific loss of PGR from the LE and GE, estrogen receptor (specifically ESR1) is up-regulated in the uterine epithelium [2830]. Establishment of a receptive endometrium for conceptus attachment is thus regulated through progesterone induction of epithelial PGR loss allowing finely synchronized alterations in the LE extracellular matrix exposing attachment factors such as transmembrane integrin heterodimer receptors and release of the matricellular protein, secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1; also referred to as osteopontin) [3, 31] and balanced secretion of numerous growth factors, cytokines, prostaglandins, enzymes and their inhibitors which are enhanced by conceptus estrogen synthesis and release during the peri-implantation period [11, 27, 32]. Conceptus attachment and secretions also increase endometrial folding and LE proliferation (Figure 1) during early implantation in the pig [33]. The increase in endometrial folding and immune cell trafficking to the uterine surface may be induced by conceptus secretion of cytokines like interleukin 1β, interferons, estrogens or a combination of the conceptus release factors.
Figure 1

Endometrial folding during pig conceptus attachment. Following rapid trophoblast elongation on Day 12 of pregnancy, conceptus attachment to the endometrial surface epithelium induces a localized increase in endometrial surface folding on Day 14 of pregnancy (A). Local conceptus release of IL1BE, IFN, estrogens or combination of the factors released by the conceptus to alter the uterine surface architecture (attachment and folding) to increase the surface area needed to support the epithiochorial type of placentation in the pig and alter immune cell trafficking to the uterine surface (B). (Tr = trophectoderm, LE = luminal epithelium, arrows = lymphocytes in the underlying stratum compactum).

Conceptus development

Opening the window of receptivity for conceptus attachment to the uterine endometrium (Day 10 to 14) following down-regulation of the uterine epithelial PGR marks a period of conceptus growth, development and change in morphology stimulated by the release of multiple uterine growth factors and cytokines [24]. During the early peri-implantation period, the endometrium increases the release of epidermal growth factor (EGF) [3437], insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) [3842], FGF7 [43, 44], vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [4547], interleukin 6 (IL6) [4850], transforming growth factor beta (TGFB) [5153], and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) [4850] for which the developing conceptus trophectoderm expresses EGF-receptor (EGFR) [36], IGF1R [54], FGFR2 [55], VEGFR1 and 2 [45, 47], IL6R [50], TGFBR1 and 2 [52], and LIFR [50]. The increased endometrial release of EGF, FGF7, LIF, and IGF-1 are enhanced in the epithelium during the period of conceptus elongation and estrogen release [42, 44, 50, 51, 55]. Receptor activation by many of the uterine secreted factors has been shown to occur through multiple signaling pathways such as phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (P13K)/AKT1 and mitogen-activated protein kinase ERK1/2MAPK [36, 47, 54] which are cell signaling pathways linked to stimulating trophectoderm proliferation, migration and survival. In addition to stimulating proliferation of trophoblast cells, TGFB, LIF and IL6 increase cell viability and attachment in vitro[5052].

Growth of the early developing porcine conceptuses stimulated through the release of uterine growth factors is essential for achieving a critical developmental threshold that triggers rapid trophoblast expansion within the uterine lumen. Timing for the increased release of growth factors is dependent upon the length of progesterone stimulation which facilitates down-regulation of epithelial PGR in the endometrium [2, 3]. Several studies have elegantly demonstrated the impact of the duration of progesterone priming in that exogenous progesterone immediately following ovulation accelerates early conceptus growth in both sheep [56, 57] and cattle [5860]. Administration of progesterone shortly after ovulation advances down-regulation of epithelial PGR by two days during the normal estrous cycle and pregnancy [5660]. The advancement of epithelial PGR down regulation accelerates the release of uterine growth factors for the developing sheep conceptus [61].

Release of the uterine growth factors is clearly involved with growth and differentiation of the porcine conceptuses following hatching from the zona pellucida on Days 6–7 of gestation. Following hatching, peri-implantation development in the pig is unique in that conceptuses develop from a 1–2 mm sphere to a 9–10 mm long ovoid shape between Days 10 to 12 of pregnancy and then rapidly transition to tubular and filamentous forms by elongating at 30–40 mm/h to >100 mm in length (Figure 2) in 1 to 2 h [12, 33, 62]. Rapid conceptus elongation provides the mechanism for delivery of estrogen across the uterine surface to maintain CL function, stimulate secretions from the uterine LE and GE which are closely linked to initiation of trophoblast attachment to the uterine LE and establish individual placental surface area for nutrient absorption from the underlying endometrium for individual conceptuses [3, 23, 63].
Figure 2

Morphological stages of early conceptus development between Days 10 to 12 of pregnancy. Upon reaching a spherical diameter of appropriately 10 mm, conceptuses rapidly transition to ovoid, tubular and filamentous morphologies within 2 to 3 hours.

The specific factor(s) involved with triggering the rapid morphological transformation of the ovoid conceptus to its filamentous shape is currently unknown. Although endometrial release of growth factors is involved with conceptus growth and development, variation in stages of development prior to and during the time of trophoblast elongation (spherical, ovoid, tubular and filamentous conceptuses present within the same litter) indicate that elongation is not necessarily triggered by a uterine-stimulated event but rather a specific stage of conceptus differentiation and development [33, 62, 6468]. Rapid conceptus elongation does not occur through cellular hyperplasia but rather cellular remodeling [62]. The morphological alteration in shape of the trophectoderm and transformation of the underlying endoderm forming filapodia provides a mechanism to physically move cells into the elongation zone [62]. The focal point for the cellular restructuring occurs from the ends of the epiblast forming an extended band of cells (elongation zone) to the elongating tips of the conceptus trophectoderm [3, 62]. The force necessary for the cellular restructuring of the trophoblast during elongation occurs through modifications in microfilaments and junctional complexes [3, 62, 69, 70]. Elongation of the conceptuses may involve interaction of integrins on the endometrial LE apical surface [71].

As previously stated, timing of rapid conceptus elongation is established by the conceptus achieving a specific stage of development which is temporally associated with gastrulation and formation of the extraembryonic mesoderm [65, 7274]. Yelich et al. [72] first indicated that 6 mm spherical conceptuses expressed gene transcripts for brachyury (marker for mesoderm formation) which precedes the initial detection of mesodermal outgrowth in 10 mm ovoid conceptuses. The increase in brachyury expression is associated with an alteration in steroidogenesis in the developing conceptuses [75]. Valdez Magana et al. [68] recently reported that epiblast development and differentiation provides the paracrine signaling between the epiblast and trophectoderm for trophoblast proliferation and mesoderm differentiation. Transcripts for FGF4 are highly detectable in the porcine epiblast but absent/low in the trophectoderm [68, 76]. However in ovoid conceptuses, FGFR2 is expressed in trophectoderm cells where there is abundance of FGF4 ligand which activates MAPK phosphorylation [68]. In addition, bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4) expression in the developing extraembryonic mesoderm outgrowth from the epiblast that occurs between trophectoderm and endoderm stimulates BMPR2 in trophectoderm (absent in epiblast and hypoblast). Valdez Magaña et al. [68] suggested that increased epiblast production of FGF4 and expression of FGFR2 in the adjacent trophectoderm cells trigger the signaling cascade for trophoblast elongation. The novel suggestion that FGF4 is involved in the initial response of the conceptus is supported by information which indicates that FGF4 is not normally released into the extracellular fluid but moves in a gradient only over a short distance of a few cells [77, 78]. Induction of FGF4 in the epiblast stimulating MAPK in the trophectoderm through FGFR2 could coordinate with the extraembryonic mesoderm production of BMP4 to initiate the cascade of events involved with modifying microfilaments and junctional complexes necessary for the elongation process.

Although formation of the extraembryonic mesoderm in the conceptus is clearly a marker for the time of rapid trophoblast elongation and the cellular alternations involved, the conceptus factor triggering elongation of the porcine conceptus is unknown. Although conceptus elongation has not been achieved in vitro, it is clear that the conceptus activates elongation at a specific stage of development. Presence of spherical with filamentous conceptuses within the same litter [12] and the failure to advance elongation in vivo through estrogen administration prior to a stage of development for elongation [62, 67] demonstrate that initiation of trophoblast elongation is regulated by conceptus development. However, alterations in uterine secretion do have a direct impact on the rate of conceptus development to reach the stage for elongation.

A number of studies have evaluated the transcriptome of developing spherical, ovoid, tubular and filamentous pig conceptuses prior to and during elongation [6466, 72, 79, 80]. These studies described a multitude of transcripts involved with steroidogenesis, lipid metabolism, cell morphogenesis, calcium binding, protein binding and nucleotide binding. Specific transcripts involved in steroidogenesis, such as steroidogeneic acute regulatory protein, cytochrome P450 side chain cleavage protein, 17α-hydrolase and aromatase all increase in abundance as the pig conceptuses approach and initiate the elongation process [64, 65, 72]. However, although administration of estrogen can advance uterine gene expression and secretions associated with the increase in conceptus estrogen production at elongation; it does not induce premature elongation of the conceptuses [81]. A number of transcripts involved with embryonic development, attachment and immune cell regulation such as s-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase [79], retinoic acid receptors and retinol binding protein [72], TGFB [64, 72], LIFR [72], interferon-γ (IFNγ), B-cell linker, and chemokine ligand 14 [66] are altered during early conceptus development. The most striking change in the conceptus transcriptome during the transition from ovoid to filamentous morphology is the increase in expression of interleukin 1β (IL1B) [79, 80]. The increase in IL1B during transition to the filamentous form of porcine conceptus development was first described by Tuo et al. [82]. Interleukin 1β is a proinflammatory cytokine which is dependent on the expression of members of the IL-1 system belonging to the IL1B/Toll-like receptor (TLR) superfamily. The IL-1 system consists of two agonists (IL1A and IL1B), two receptors (IL1R1 (functional) and IL1R2 (pseudo-receptor)), converting enzymes, a receptor accessory protein (IL1RAP), and multiple isoforms of receptor antagonists (IL1Rant) [5, 83] which are all present in the porcine endometrium and conceptuses [79, 84, 85].

Conceptus IL-1β

Conceptus IL1B2 mRNA abundance rapidly increases during trophoblast elongation, but decreases over 2000-fold immediately following completion of the elongation process [86]. Based on the timing and pattern of conceptus IL1B release and the presence of the IL-1 system in the conceptuses and endometrium, Ross et al. [86] proposed that conceptus IL1B secretion was the signal to initiate the cascade of events involved with the rapid elongation process.

Recently, analyses of pig genome sequences and expressed sequence tags (EST) indicate that gene duplication resulted in two IL1B genes on Sus scrofa chromosome 3. The classical IL1B1 is expressed in macrophages and endometrial tissue while the embryonic form (IL1B2) is only detected in the early porcine conceptus prior to attachment to the uterine LE [2, 87]. IL1B2 is considered novel because the sequence is not expressed in other mammals [88]. The two predicted protein sequences are 85% identical and are least homologous near the N-terminus as caspase-1 cleaves this portion of the peptide resulting in a functional protein (D.J. Mathew, M.C. Lucy and R.D. Geisert unpublished results). Interestingly, in the embryonic form there is a proline inserted 2 amino acids from the predicted caspase-1 cleavage site. While the two genes are very similar from exon 2 to exon 7, exon 1 and the active promoter regions are different between the two genes. The promoter differences may partially explain variation in mRNA expression between the two forms. Activity and cell specificity of the two forms may also differ as recombinant IL1B2 can activate NFKB in alveolar macrophages and uterine surface epithelium but has reduced activity compared to recombinant IL1B1 (D.J. Mathew, R.D. Geisert and M.C. Lucy unpublished results).

Porcine IL1B2 is secreted only within a brief window associated with the morphological and functional changes that take place in conceptus development and elongation on Days 10 to 12 of pregnancy [86]. It has been postulated that one function of IL1B2 is to act as an inflammatory mediator in the endometrium [89]. Following synthesis and secretion by the conceptus, IL1B2 may trigger a cascade of signaling events that activate the transcription factor, NFKB in the LE of the endometrium. NFKB activation is an important component in opening the implantation window in pigs and other mammals [90]. Genes transcriptionally regulated by NFKB are involved in inflammation, immune function, cell adhesion, and release of cytokines, growth factors, anti-apoptotic factors and immunoreceptors [91]. The activation of inflammatory pathways in the endometrium likely enhances progesterone-induced uterine receptivity for conceptus implantation. It is important, however, that the inflammation cascade triggered by IL1B2 be tightly regulated in order to prevent rejection of the semi-allogeneic conceptus [9]. Conceptus estrogen release during elongation may play a key role in counter-balancing the increased inflammatory response by activating estrogen receptor (ESR1) which can affect the transcriptional activity of NFKB [90]. Thus, conceptus expression of IL1B2 would be consistent with the continued activation of NFKB, whereas the synchronous estrogen secretion by pig conceptuses may pose a suppressive effect to prevent an inflammatory reaction that would be detrimental to conceptus survival [2]. Interleukin-1β increases aromatase expression within human cytotrophoblast [92] and the increased synthesis of IL1B2 by pig conceptuses is temporally associated with elevated conceptus aromatase expression and the acute release of estrogen into the uterine lumen [72, 86]. Thus the increase in expression of both IL1B2 and estrogen by individual conceptuses that are expanding through the uterine lumen would counter-balance stimulation of the pro-inflammatory and immune response within the uterus.

IL1B2 may have other roles in rapid conceptus elongation and the regulation of maternal recognition. IL1B is an inducer of phospholipase A2 [93] and thus up-regulates cell membrane arachidonic acid release, thereby increasing membrane fluidity that is necessary for remodeling of the trophectoderm during elongation [2, 94]. The arachidonic acid could also be converted to prostaglandins which are needed for placental attachment during the establishment of pregnancy. Recent results from studies with ewes suggest that IL1B could play a role in regulating prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2) and the subsequent synthesis of prostaglandins that control conceptus elongation [95]. Pig conceptus IL1B2 secretion, therefore, may be of pivotal importance in the rapid morphological transformation of the pig conceptuses on Day 12 of pregnancy.

IL1B2 activation of NFKB stimulates prostaglandin synthesis through induction of PTGS2. IL1B1 increases endometrial IL1R1 and in conjunction with estrogen, IL1RAP, suggesting that IL1B2 and estrogen regulate endometrial transcriptional activity of NFKB during elongation [85, 86, 96]. IL1B has a stimulatory effect on endometrial prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) secretion and PTGS1 and PTGS2 mRNA expression from Days 10 to 13 of pregnancy [85, 9799]. The presence of PGE2 receptors in the CL and endometrium [98] suggests that conceptus PGE2 secretion could also affect maintenance of the CL and directly stimulate adhesion and attachment of the trophoblast to the uterine epithelium [100]. Conceptus secretion of IL1B2 into the uterine lumen may also enhance endometrial expression of LIF and IL6 [50] possibly through activation of NFKB within the uterine LE and GE. IL1B1 induces human endometrial expression of LIF [101103] and IL6 in placental villous core mesenchymal cells in vitro[104]. Suppression of NFKB activity in the endometrium alters the timing of implantation in the mouse which can be partially rescued by LIF supplementation [105]. LIF and IL1B stimulate expression of fucosyltransferase enzymes which are involved with embryo attachment to the uterine surface epithelium in the mouse [106]. During and following rapid conceptus elongation in the pig, there is increased endometrial secretion of LIF and IL6 [4850]. Both LIFR and IL6R mRNA are detected in porcine conceptus [49, 50] suggesting that endometrial secretion of LIF and IL6 may play an important role in conceptus development and attachment to the uterine surface. Blitek et al. [50] indicated that LIF and IL6 stimulated proliferation and attachment of porcine trophoblast cells in vitro. Conceptus estrogen and IL1B2 secretion serve as major components in the embryo-uterine crosstalk to stimulate endometrial LIF and IL6 to contribute to the pathway for conceptus attachment to the uterine luminal surface.

Several papers have investigated endometrial differential gene expression between cyclic and pregnant pigs which provide numerous endometrial genes and pathways that the conceptus stimulates during the period of conceptus elongation and attachment [107110] which will not be covered in this review. One interesting gene differentially expressed during pregnancy is IL11RA[110]. IL11 and its receptor (IL11RA) is proposed to prevent the invasion of trophoblast cells in the mouse [111] and human [112]. Although gene expression IL-11RA is lower in endometria of pregnant pigs, there was a pregnancy-specific increase in IL11RA on the surface epithelium [110]. As previous indicated porcine conceptuses are proteolytic and highly invasive outside the luminal environment of the uterus [1]. Therefore in addition to endometrial release of protease inhibitors during trophoblast attachment, porcine endometrial expression of IL11RA may serve to help inhibit the proteolytic trophoblast invasion through the surface epithelium during attachment [110].

Switch to endometrial IL-18

Porcine conceptus IL1B2 gene expression and secretion is clearly temporally associated with the rapid conceptus elongation as a dramatic reduction in mRNA abundance is soon followed by a depletion of IL1B2 protein in the uterine lumen following conceptus elongation on Day 12 [86]. The loss of conceptus IL1B2 secretion following elongation suggests that another closely related cytokine may function at the conceptus-uterine interface to continue regulation of the immunological interactions necessary for establishment of pregnancy in the pig. Interleukin 18 (IL18), also referred to as interferon-γ inducing factor [113], is a member of the IL-1 family of pro-inflammatory cytokines believed to play a significant role in implantation. Following the loss of conceptus IL1B2 stimulation, there is a switch to endometrial IL18 production and release during placental attachment in the pig [114]. Porcine endometrial IL18 mRNA expression increases from Days 10 to 15 of the estrous cycle with mRNA expression increasing 10-fold on Day 18 of pregnancy. However, there is a pregnancy-specific increase in uterine luminal content of IL18 between Days 15 and 18 due to an increase in caspase-1 expression induced by the developing conceptuses [114]. Caspase-1 cleaves and activates the proforms of both IL1B and IL18 [115]. Pro-IL18, which has structural similarities to pro-IL1B, is involved with modulation of the immune system through induction of interferon-γ [116]. Conceptus secretion of IFNG increases immediately following trophoblast elongation in the pig [117], suggesting that the conceptuses may induce endometrial IL18 release to assist in development and placental attachment during early pregnancy. Interestingly, unlike IL1B which is stimulated by inflammatory responses in cells, IL18 is stored in healthy cells and its biological activity is dependent upon its release through caspase-1 processing [118]. Although similar to IL1B, IL18 binds to a unique IL18 receptor which consists of two receptor chains, ligand-binding chain IL18RA and a co-receptor IL18RB chain (similar to IL1B accessory protein), which are required for cellular signaling [119]. The conceptus factor that stimulates the increase in caspase-1 in the uterine epithelium is unknown, although IL1B2 could stimulate release IL18 from the uterine epithelial cells through increasing caspase-1 activity [120]. Biological activity of IL18 is regulated through release of an IL18 binding protein (IL18BP) which functions as a negative feedback loop to suppress IFNG production and limit Th1 cell responses.

The increased endometrial expression of caspase-1, and release of IL18 into the uterine lumen may stimulate expression and secretion of IFNG by conceptuses [117] to modulate the maternal immune system through signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) at the interface between trophectoderm and uterine LE [121]. The loss of conceptus IL1B2 stimulation and switch to endometrial IL18 production during placental attachment in the pig would decrease the potential pro-inflammatory stimulation of the conceptuses following trophoblast elongation which maybe important to control cytokine and immune functions following implantation [122]. Increased secretion of IL18 at the uterine/trophoblast interface is associated with increased pregnancy rates in one line of abortion-prone mice [123].

Conceptus interferons (IFN)

During the peri-implantation period of conceptus attachment to the uterine LE following trophoblastic elongation, pig conceptuses secrete of IFNG (Type II IFN) and IFND (Type I IFN) between Days 12 to 20 of gestation [117, 121, 124]. Trophoblastic production and secretion of two IFNs, of which IFNG is the predominate form [125, 126], is unique compared with other mammalian species. Trophoblast secretion of IFNG and IFND would enable activation of a distinct gene set through two different receptors that may provide a uniquely regulated stimulation within the endometrium [127]. With the abrupt decline in conceptus expression of IL1B2 following rapid elongation, there is a tremendous increase in the filamentous conceptus trophoblastic expression of specifically IFNG during initiation of attachment to the uterine LE on Day 13 [66, 117, 121]. Unlike IFNT produced by the conceptus of ruminant species, pig trophoblastic IFNs do not directly function as a maternal recognition signal for CL maintenance [3]. However, pig IFNG and IFND can increase endometrial PGE2 secretion [128] and induce cell-specific endometrial IFN-stimulated genes [127, 129].

Joyce et al. [121] suggested that conceptus estrogens and IFNs regulate endometrial IFN-stimulated genes through a cell-type-specific manner. Conceptus secretion of estrogen increases STAT1 in LE to initiate the signal for pregnancy recognition and CL maintenance as well as inducing changes to the apical surface glycocalyx of LE to allow conceptus attachment. Conceptus IFNG and IFND induced increases of STAT1 are limited to the underlying endometrial stromal cells that express interferon regulatory factor 1, IFNG/STAT1-responsive gene, that is absent in the LE [121]. Pig conceptuses secrete estrogen during the peri-implantation period of pregnancy which increases uterine LE expression of interferon regulatory factor 2 (IRF2), a transcriptional repressor of classical IFN-stimulated genes, which would also restrict IFNG and IFND stimulation to the underlying stroma. Thus expression of classical IFN responsive genes such as MX1, interferon stimulated gene 15 (ISG15), IRF1, STAT1 and STAT2 are localized in the stroma and GE in pigs [121]. The cell specific activation by the pig trophoblastic IFNs may play an essential role in regulating the immunological barrier for attachment of the semi-allogeneic conceptuses [3, 130]. MHC class I molecules such as SLA and β2-microgobulin which are involved with recognition of foreign cells and pathogens are not expressed on the trophoblast and are absent in early pregnancy of the pig [127]. The increase in uterine angiogenesis which occurs during the peri-implantation period between Days 13 to18 of pregnancy [131] could also be stimulated through the trophoblast secretion of IFNs in addition to other conceptus and uterine angiogenic factors such as VEGF.

Conclusion

Proper timing for conceptus growth and development is proposed to be regulated through the initial down-regulation of PR in the uterine LE which stimulates growth factors to promote mesodermal differentiation and expression of FGF4 and BMP4 that initiate conceptus IL1B2 expression and release to stimulate rapid elongation of the conceptuses throughout the uterine lumen (Figure 3). Expansion of the conceptuses throughout the uterine horns provides the mechanism for estrogen to cover the uterine surface for maternal recognition of pregnancy, initiate trophoblast attachment to the LE and regulate the maternal lymphocyte response to conceptus IFNs which stimulate vascular changes and increases angiogenesis for the proper microenvironment for placentation.
Figure 3

Summary of conceptus/uterine interactions from Day 12 to 18 of pregnancy. Exposure of the endometrium to progesterone secretion induces down-regulation of progesterone receptor (PGR) in the endometrial surface (LE) and glandular epithelium (GE). Progesterone modulation of uterine function is maintained by the presence of PR in stromal cells. Down-regulation of PGR in LE opens the window of receptivity of conceptus attachment to the endometrial surface. Progesterone stimulation increases PTGS2 within the LE increasing release of PGF2α into the uterine vasculature inducing CL regression during the estrous cycle. On Day 11 to 12 of pregnancy, conceptus epiblast expression of FGF4 stimulates production of BMP4 by the trophectoderm (Tr) to trigger differentiation of the mesoderm (meso) which may lead to induction of pathways to trigger conceptus trophoblast elongation. Embryonic IL1B2 initiates cellular remodeling during elongation and activates NFKB in the LE through binding to a functional IL1 receptor (IL1RI) and its receptor accessory protein (IL1RAcP). Activation of NFKB induces endometrial genes involved with inducing a pro-inflammatory response. IL1B2 activity in the conceptus and uterus is regulated through the level of receptor antagonist (IL1Rant) expression. Conceptus aromatase expression enhances estrogen secretion, which binds to ESR in the LE and GE increasing endometrial PGE production and altering the movement of PGs into the uterine lumen, thereby preventing luteolysis and maintaining pregnancy. Estrogen induction of STAT2 stimulates endometrial changes needed for placental attachment and may also play a role in modulating NFKB pro-inflammatory responses. Following conceptus elongation, IL1B2 expression ceases but is immediately replaced by expression of IFNγ and IFNδ and increased release of IL-18 into the uterine lumen. The activity of IL-18 is regulated through the concentration of its binding protein (IL-18BP). Activation of IFN-induced genes and conceptus PGE production may help regulate the pro-inflammatory response and regulate lymphocyte differentiation and activation within the uterine stroma and epithelium.

The role of IL18 and IFNG in regulating Th1 lymphocytes and natural killer (NK) cell responses in tissues suggests that pig conceptus secretion of estrogens, IL1B2, prostaglandins, IFNs and endometrial release of IL18 serve to not only induce cell surface adhesion factors for trophoblast attachment, but also play a critical role in balancing the immune cell migration and recognition of receptors to support or reject the developing embryos and their extraembryonic membranes. The IL-1 family of cytokines plays a critical role in the regulation of immune cell differentiation and activity during pregnancy as well as many inflammatory diseases [132]. During pregnancy in the pig, the conceptus recruits uterine natural killer lymphocytes, dendritic cells and other immune cells at the sites of trophoblast attachment which induce major changes in the endometrial vasculature and angiogenesis to support the developing conceptus [133, 134]. Although not demonstrated in the uterus of the pig, the increase in PGE2 from the conceptuses and endometrium may play a role in minimizing pro-inflammatory tissue damage through switching from leukotriene B2 synthesis to lipoxin A4 and release of the anti-inflammatory resolvins and protectins [135]. Clearly pig conceptuses release a number of paracrine factors at the maternal/placental interface to regulate the vascular, angiogenic and immune changes needed to establish pregnancy (Figure 3). The conceptus IL-1 family of cytokines is but one component of a larger group of signaling pathways involved with successful survival of developing embryos. However, pregnancy is not only dependent upon the presence of the various cytokines during implantation but also in the appropriate timing of their release.

It is well established that exposure of pregnant gilts to exogenous estrogen 48 h prior to normal conceptus release at elongation on Day 12 results in fragmentation of the conceptus between Days 15 to 18 of pregnancy [136, 137]. Premature exposure of the endometrium to estrogen advances expression of multiple genes during the period of trophoblast elongation and attachment [138]. Most of the aberrantly expressed endometrial genes are those involved with immune cell regulation and cell adhesion. Early estrogen exposure (Days 9 and 10) of pregnant gilts does not affect endometrial IL18 mRNA expression but disrupts the normal LE release of IL18 into the uterine lumen [114]. Although caspase-1 increases between Days 12 to 18 in estrogen-treated gilts, there is no increase in the luminal content of IL18 as occurs in untreated pregnant gilts. Lack of IL18 release from the LE may directly affect conceptus expression of IFNG. Although STAT1 expression is present in the LE, stromal expression of STAT1 is absent in estrogen-treated gilts [121]. These data indicate a temporally regulated presence of intricate interactions between conceptus estrogen, IL1B2, IFNG and uterine IL18 release in programing downstream transcription factors needed to establish pregnancy in the pig.

Authors’ information

RDG is a Reproductive Physiologist in Division of Animal Science at the University of Missouri, Columbia where his research program over the past 30 years has investigated the interaction between the early developing porcine conceptuses and uterus. MCL is a Reproductive Physiologist in Division of Animal Science at the University of Missouri, Columbia where his research program is focused on dairy cattle reproduction and estrous synchronization. DJM is currently a doctoral graduate student completing his research program on porcine conceptus elongation and establishment of pregnancy in the pig. JWR is a Reproductive Physiologist in the Department of Animal Science at Iowa State University, Ames where he has established a research program on small RNA regulation of reproductive function and the effects of heats stress on pig development. JW is a Reproductive Physiologist in Division of Animal Science at the University of Missouri, Columbia where his research program is involved with the development of transgenic pigs for research in development and disease models.

Abbreviations

BMP4: 

Bone morphogenic protein 4

BMPR2: 

Bone morphogenic protein receptor 2

CL: 

Corpora lutea

EGE: 

Epidermal growth factor

EGFR: 

Epidermal growth factor receptor

ESR: 

Estrogen receptor

EST: 

Expressed sequence tags

FGF: 

Fibroblast growth factor

FGFR2: 

Fibroblast growth factor 2 receptor

GE: 

Glandular epithelium

IGF: 

Insulin-like growth factor

IGF-1R: 

Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor

IFN: 

Interferon

IRF: 

Interferon regulatory factor

IL: 

Interleukin

IL-6R: 

Interleukin 6 receptor

IL-1β2: 

Interleukin 1β conceptus form

IL-1RAP: 

Interleukin 1 receptor accessory protein

IL-1Rant: 

Interleukin 1receptor antagonist

IL-1RT1: 

Interleukin 1 receptor type 1

LIF: 

Leukemia inhibitory factor

LIFR: 

Leukemia inhibitory factor receptor

LE: 

Luminal epithelium

Mx1: 

Interferon-induced GTP-binding protein

NFKB: 

Nuclear factor κB

PR: 

Progesterone receptor

PG: 

Prostaglandin

PTGS2: 

Prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 2

STAT: 

Signal transducer and activator of transcript

TGFβ: 

Transforming growth factor beta

TGFBR: 

Transforming growth factor beta receptor 1

VEGF: 

Vascular endothelial growth factor

VEGFR: 

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Research from the author’s laboratory provide in the review has been supported in part by Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant no. 2007-35203-17836 and Grant no. 2013-67015-21023 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Animal Sciences Research Center, University of Missouri
(2)
Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University

References

  1. Samuel CA, Perry JS: The ultrastructure of pig trophoblast transplanted to an ectopic site in the uterine wall. J Anat. 1972, 113: 139-149.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Geisert R, Fazleabas A, Lucy M, Mathew D: Interaction of the conceptus and endometrium to establish pregnancy in mammals: role of interleukin-1β. Cell Tissue Res. 2012, 349: 825-838. 10.1007/s00441-012-1356-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Bazer FW, Johnson GA: Pig blastocyst-uterine interactions. Differentiation. 2014, 87: 52-65. 10.1016/j.diff.2013.11.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Bazer FW, Song G, Kim J, Dunlap KA, Satterfield MC, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Wu G: Uterine biology in pigs and sheep. J Anim Sci Biotech. 2012, 3: 23-10.1186/2049-1891-3-23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hayden MS, Ghosh S: NF-kB, the first quarter-century: remarkable progress and outstanding questions. Genes Dev. 2014, 26: 203-234.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaouat G, Dubanchet S, Ledée N: Cytokines: Important for implantation?. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007, 24: 491-505. 10.1007/s10815-007-9142-9.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Guzeloglu-Kayisli O, Kayisli UA, Taylor HS: The role of growth factors and cytokines during implantation: endocrine and paracrine interactions. Semin Reprod Med. 2009, 27: 62-79. 10.1055/s-0028-1108011.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Bazer FW, Spencer TE, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Wu G: Comparative aspects of implantation. Reprod. 2009, 138: 195-209. 10.1530/REP-09-0158.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Warning JC, McCracken SA, Morris JM: A balancing act: mechanisms by which the fetus avoids rejection by the maternal immune system. Reprod. 2011, 141: 715-724. 10.1530/REP-10-0360.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Spencer TE, Bazer FW: Biology of progesterone action during pregnancy recognition and maintenance of pregnancy. Front Biosci. 2002, 7: 1879-1898. 10.2741/spencer.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Spencer TE, Bazer FW: Uterine and placental factors regulating conceptus growth in domestic animals. J Anim Sci. 2004, 82 (E-Suppl): E4-E13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Geisert RD, Ross JW, Ashworth MD, White FJ, Johnson GA, DeSilva : Maternal recognition of pregnancy signal or endocrine disruptor: The two faces of oestrogen during establishment of pregnancy in the pig. Soc Reprod Fertil. 2006, 62 (Suppl): 131-145.Google Scholar
  13. Franco HL, Rubel CA, Large MJ, Wetendorf M, Fernandez-Valdivia R, Jeong JW, Spencer TE, Behringer RR, Lydon JP, Demayo FJ: Epithelial progesterone receptor exhibits pleiotropic roles in uterine development and function. FASEB J. 2012, 26: 1218-1227. 10.1096/fj.11-193334.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Tan J, Paria BC, Dey SK, Das SK: Differential uterine expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors correlates with uterine preparation for implantation and decidualization in the mouse. Endocrinology. 1999, 140: 5310-5321.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Geisert RD, Pratt T, Bazer FW, Mayes JS, Watson GH: Immunocytochemical localization and changes in endometrial progestin receptor protein during the porcine oestrous cycle and early pregnancy. Reprod Fert Dev. 1994, 6: 749-760. 10.1071/RD9940749.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Mathew DJ, Sellner EM, Green JC, Okamura CS, Anderson LL, Lucy MC, Geisert RD: Uterine progesterone receptor expression, conceptus development, and ovarian function in pigs treated with RU 486 during early pregnancy. Biol Reprod. 2011, 84: 130-139. 10.1095/biolreprod.110.086843.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Spencer TE, Bazer FW: Temporal and spatial alterations in uterine estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor gene expression during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy in the ewe. Biol Reprod. 1995, 53: 1527-1545. 10.1095/biolreprod53.6.1527.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Hart LS, Carling SJ, Joyce MM, Johnson GA, Vanderwall DK, Ott TL: Temporal and spatial associations of oestrogen receptor alpha and progesterone receptor in the endometrium of cyclic and early pregnant mares. Reproduction. 2005, 130: 241-250. 10.1530/rep.1.00596.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Fazleabas AT, Kim JJ, Srinivasan S, Donnelly KM, Brudney A, Jaffe RC: Implantation in the baboon: endometrial responses. Semin Reprod Endocrinol. 1999, 17: 257-265. 10.1055/s-2007-1016233.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Lessey BA, Yeh I, Castelbaum AJ, Fritz MA, Ilesanmi AO, Korzeniowski P, Sun J, Chwalisz K: Endometrial progesterone receptors and markers of uterine receptivity in the window of implantation. Fertil Steril. 1996, 65: 477-483.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Bowen JA, Bazer FW, Burghardt RC: Spatial and temporal analysis of integrin and Muc-1 expression in porcine uterine epithelium and trophectoderm in vivo. Biol Reprod. 1996, 55: 1098-1106. 10.1095/biolreprod55.5.1098.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Burghardt RC, Bowen JA, Newton GR, Bazer FW: Extracellular matrix and the implantation cascade in pigs. J Reprod Fertil. 1997, 52 (Suppl): 151-164.Google Scholar
  23. Burghardt RC, Johnson GA, Jaeger LA, Ka H, Garlow JE, Spencer TE, Bazer FW: Integrins and extracellular matrix proteins at the maternal-fetal interface in domestic animals. Cells Tissues Organs. 2002, 172: 202-217. 10.1159/000066969.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Singh H, Aplin JD: Adhesion molecules in endometrial epithelium: tissue integrity and embryo implantation. J Anat. 2009, 215: 3-13. 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.01034.x.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Cunha GR, Cooke PS, Kurita T: Role of stromal-epithelial interactions in hormonal responses. Arch Histol Cytol. 2004, 67: 417-434. 10.1679/aohc.67.417.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. van Mourik MS, Macklon NS, Heijnen CJ: Embryonic implantation: cytokines, adhesion molecules, and immune cells in establishing an implantation environment. J Leukoc Biol. 2009, 85: 4-19.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Bazer FW, Wu G, Spencer TE, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Bayless K: Novel pathways for implantation and establishment and maintenance of pregnancy in mammals. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010, 16: 135-152. 10.1093/molehr/gap095.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Geisert RD, Brenner RM, Moffatt JR, Harney JP, Yellin T, Bazer FW: Changes in estrogen receptor protein, mRNA expression and localization in the endometrium of cyclic and pregnant gilts. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1993, 5: 247-260. 10.1071/RD9930247.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Sukjumlong S, Kaeoket K, Dalin A-M, Persson E: Immunohistochemical studies on oestrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and the proliferative marker Ki-67 in the sow uterus at different stages of the oestrous cycle. Reprod Domest Anim. 2003, 3 (8): 5-12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Knapczyk-Stwora K, Durlej M, Bilinska B, Slomczynska M: Immunohistochemical studies on the proliferative marker Ki-67 and estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) in the uterus of neonatal and immature pigs following exposure to flutamide. Acta Histochem. 2011, 113: 534-541. 10.1016/j.acthis.2010.05.008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Burghardt RC, Burghardt JR, Taylor JD, Reeder AT, Nguen BT, Spencer TE, Bayless KJ, Johnson GA: Enhanced focal adhesion assembly reflects increased mechanosensation and mechanotransduction at maternal-conceptus interface and uterine wall during ovine pregnancy. Reproduction. 2009, 137: 567-582. 10.1530/REP-08-0304.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang H, Dey SK: Roadmap to embryo implantation: clues from mouse models. Nat Rev Genet. 2006, 7: 185-199. 10.1038/nrg1808.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Stroband HW, Van der Lende T: Embryonic and uterine development during early pregnancy in pigs. J Reprod Fertil. 1990, 40 (Suppl): 261-277.Google Scholar
  34. Vaughan TJ, James PS, Pascall JC, Brown KD: Expression of the genes for TGFα, EGF and EGF receptor during early pig development. Development. 1992, 116: 663-669.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kim GY, Besner GE, Steffen CL, McCarthy DW, Downing MT, Luquette MH, Abad MS, Brigstock DR: Purification of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor from pig uterine luminal flushings, and its production by endometrial tissues. Biol Reprod. 1995, 52: 561-571. 10.1095/biolreprod52.3.561.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Jeong W, Kim J, Bazer FW, Song G: Epidermal growth factor stimulates proliferation and migration of porcine trophectoderm cells through protooncogenic protein kinase 1 and extracellular-signal-regulated kinases 1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction cascades during early pregnancy. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2013, 381: 302-311. 10.1016/j.mce.2013.08.024.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Kennedy TG, Brown KD, Vaughan TJ: Expression of the genes for the epidermal growth factor receptor and its ligands in porcine oviduct and endometrium. Biol Reprod. 1994, 50: 751-756. 10.1095/biolreprod50.4.751.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Tavakkol A, Simmen FA, Simmen RC: Porcine insulin-like growth factor-I (pIGF-I): complementary deoxyribonucleic acid cloning and uterine expression of messenger ribonucleic acid encoding evolutionarily conserved IGF-I peptides. Mol Endocrinol. 1988, 2: 674-681. 10.1210/mend-2-8-674.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Simmen FA, Simmen RC, Geisert RD, Martinat-Botte F, Bazer FW, Terqui M: Differential expression, during the estrous cycle and pre- and postimplantation conceptus development, of messenger ribonucleic acids encoding components of the pig uterine insulin-like growth factor system. Endocrinology. 1992, 130: 1547-1556.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Green ML, Simmen RCM, Simmen FA: Developmental regulation of steroidogenic enzyme gene expression in the preiimplantation porcine conceptus: a paracrine role for insulin-like growth factor-I. Endocrinology. 1995, 136: 3961-3970.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee CY, Green ML, Simmen RCM, Simmen FA: Proteolysis of insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins (IGFBPs) within the pig uterine lumen associated with peri-implantation conceptus development. J Reprod Fertil. 1998, 112: 369-377. 10.1530/jrf.0.1120369.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Ashworth MD, Ross JW, Allen DT, Stein DR, Spicer LJ, Geisert RD: Endocrine disruption of uterine insulin-like growth factor (IGF) expression in the pregnant gilt. Reprod. 2005, 130: 545-551. 10.1530/rep.1.00821.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Ka H, Spencer TE, Johnson GA, Bazer FW: Keratinocyte growth factor: Expression by endometrial epithelia of the porcine uterus. Biol Reprod. 2000, 62: 1772-1778. 10.1095/biolreprod62.6.1772.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Ka H, Al-Ramadan S, Erikson DW, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Spencer TE, Jaeger LA, Bazer FW: Regulation of expression of fibroblast growth factor 7 in the pig uterus by progesterone and estradiol. Biol Reprod. 2007, 77: 172-180. 10.1095/biolreprod.106.056309.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Kaczmarek MM, Blitek A, Kaminska K, Bodek G, Zygmunt M, Schams D, Ziecik AJ: Assessment of VEGF-receptor system expression in the porcine endometrial stromal cells in response to insulin-like growth factor-I, relaxin, oxytocin and prostaglandin E2. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2008, 291: 33-41. 10.1016/j.mce.2008.04.020.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Kaczmarek MM, Kiewisz J, Schams D, Ziecik AJ: Expression of VEGF-receptor system in conceptus during peri-implantation period and endometrial and luteal expression of soluble VEGFR-1 in the pig. Theriogenology. 2009, 71: 1298-1306. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.12.022.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Jeong W, Kim J, Bazer FW, Song G: Stimulatory effect of vascular endothelial growth factor on proliferation and migration of porcine trophectoderm cells and their regulation by the phosphatidylinositol-3-Kinase-AKT and mitogen-activated protein kinase cell signaling pathways. Biol Reprod. 2014, 90: 1-10. 10.1095/biolreprod.113.115535.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Anegon I, Cuturi MC, Godard A, Moreau M, Terqui M, Martinat-Botte F, Soulillou JP: Presence of leukaemia inhibitory factor and interleukin 6 in porcine uterine secretions prior to conceptus attachment. Cytokine. 1994, 6: 493-499. 10.1016/1043-4666(94)90076-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Modric T, Kowalski AA, Green ML, Simmen RCM, Simmen FA: Pregnancy-dependent expression of leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF), LIF receptor-β and interleukin 6 (IL-6) messenger ribonucleic acids in the porcine female reproductive tract. Placenta. 2000, 21: 345-353. 10.1053/plac.1999.0493.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Blitek A, Morawska E, Ziecik AJ: Regulation of expression and role of leukemia inhibitory factor and interleukin-6 in the uterus of early pregnant pigs. Theriogenology. 2012, 78: 951-964. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.05.016.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Blitek A, Morawska-Pucinska E, Szymanska M, Kiewisz J, Waclawik A: Effect of conceptus on transforming growth factor (TGF) β1 mRNA expression and protein concentration in the porcine endometrium–in vivo and in vitro studies. J Reprod Dev. 2013, 59: 512-519. 10.1262/jrd.2013-002.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Jaeger LA, Spiegel AK, Ing NH, Johnson GA, Bazer FW, Burghardt RC: Functional effects of transforming growth factor beta on adhesive properties of porcine trophectoderm. Endocrinology. 2005, 146: 3933-3942. 10.1210/en.2005-0090.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Massuto DA, Kneese EC, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Hooper RN, Ing NH, Jaeger LA: Transforming growth factor beta (TGFB) signaling is activated during porcine implantation: proposed role for latency-associated peptide interactions with integrins at the conceptus-maternal interface. Reproduction. 2010, 139: 465-478. 10.1530/REP-09-0447.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Jeong W, Song G, Bazer FW, Kim J: Insulin-like growth factor I induces proliferation and migration of porcine trophectoderm cells through multiple cell signaling pathways, including protooncogenic protein kinase 1 and mitogen-activated protein kinase. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2014, 384: 175-184. 10.1016/j.mce.2014.01.023.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Ka H, Jaeger LA, Johnson GA, Spencer TE, Bazer FW: Keratinocyte growth factor is up-regulated by estrogen in the porcine uterine endometrium and functions in trophectoderm cell proliferation and differentiation. Endocrinology. 2001, 142: 2303-2310.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Lawson RA, Cahill LP: Modification of the embryo-maternal relationship in ewes by progesterone treatment early in the oestrous cycle. J Reprod Fertil. 1983, 67: 473-475. 10.1530/jrf.0.0670473.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Satterfield MC, Bazer FW, Spencer TE: Progesterone regulation of preimplantation conceptus growth and galectin 15 (LGALS15) in the ovine uterus. Biol Reprod. 2006, 75: 289-296. 10.1095/biolreprod.106.052944.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Garrett JE, Geisert RD, Zavy MT, Morgan GL: Evidence for maternal regulation of early conceptus growth and development in beef cattle. J Reprod Fertil. 1988, 84: 437-446. 10.1530/jrf.0.0840437.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Mann GE, Fray MD, Lamming GE: Effects of time of progesterone supplementation on embryo development and interferon-tau production in the cow. Vet J. 2006, 171: 500-503. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.12.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Carter F, Forde N, Duffy P, Wade M, Fair T, Crowe MA, Evans AC, Kenny DA, Roche JF, Lonergan P: Effect of increasing progesterone concentration from Day 3 of pregnancy on subsequent embryo survival and development in beef heifers. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2008, 20: 368-375. 10.1071/RD07204.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Satterfield MC, Hayashi K, Song G, Black SG, Bazer FW, Spencer TE: Progesterone regulates FGF10, MET, IGFBP1, and IGFBP3 in the endometrium of the ovine uterus. Biol Reprod. 2008, 79: 1226-1236. 10.1095/biolreprod.108.071787.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Geisert RD, Brookbank JW, Roberts RM, Bazer FW: Establishment of pregnancy in the pig: II. Cellular remodeling of the porcine blastocysts during elongation on day 12 of pregnancy. Biol Reprod. 1982, 27: 941-955. 10.1095/biolreprod27.4.941.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. White FJ, Ross JW, Joyce MM, Geisert RD, Burghardt RC, Johnson GA: Steroid regulation of cell specific secreted phosphoprotein 1 (osteopontin) expression the in the pregnant porcine uterus. Biol Reprod. 2005, 73: 1294-1313. 10.1095/biolreprod.105.045153.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Blomberg LA, Schreier L, Li RW: Characteristics of peri-implantation porcine concepti population and maternal milieu influence the transcriptome profile. Mol Reprod Dev. 2010, 77: 978-989. 10.1002/mrd.21253.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Blomberg LA, Garrett WM, Guillomot M, Miles JR, Sonstegard TS, Van Tassell CP, Zuelke KA: Transcription profiling of the tubular porcine conceptus identifies the differential regulation of growth and developmentally associated genes. Mol Reprod Dev. 2006, 73: 1491-1502. 10.1002/mrd.20503.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Ross JW, Ashworth MD, Stein DR, Couture OP, Tuggle CK, Geisert RD: Identification of differential gene expression during porcine conceptus rapid trophoblastic elongation and attachment to uterine luminal epithelium. Physiol Genomics. 2009, 36: 140-148.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Anderson LL: Growth, protein content and distribution of early pig embryos. Anat Rec. 1978, 190: 143-153. 10.1002/ar.1091900112.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Valdez Magaña G, Rodríguez A, Zhang H, Webb R, Alberio R: Paracrine effects of embryo-derived FGF4 and BMP4 during pig trophoblast elongation. Dev Biol. 2014, 387: 15-27. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.01.008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Albertini DF, Overstrom EW, Ebert KM: Changes in the organization of the actin cytoskeleton during preimplantation development of the pig embryo. Biol Reprod. 1987, 37: 441-451. 10.1095/biolreprod37.2.441.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Mattson BA, Overstrom EW, Albertini DF: Transitions in trophectoderm cellular shape and cytoskeletal organization in the elongating pig blastocyst. Biol Reprod. 1990, 42: 195-205. 10.1095/biolreprod42.1.195.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Erikson DW, Burghardt RC, Bayless KJ, Johnson GA: Secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1, osteopontin) binds to integrin alpha v beta 6 on porcine trophectoderm cells and integrin alpha v beta 3 on uterine luminal epithelial cells, and promotes trophectoderm cell adhesion and migration. Biol Reprod. 2009, 81: 814-25. 10.1095/biolreprod.109.078600.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Yelich JV, Pomp D, Geisert RD: Ontogeny of elongation and gene expression in the early developing porcine conceptus. Biol Reprod. 1997, 57: 1256-1265. 10.1095/biolreprod57.5.1256.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Vejlsted M, Offenberg H, Thorup F, Maddox-Hyttel P: Confinement and clearance of OCT4 in the porcine embryo at stereomicroscopically defined stages around gastrulation. Mol Reprod Dev. 2006, 73: 709-718. 10.1002/mrd.20461.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Vejlsted M, Du Y, Vajta G, Maddox-Hyttel P: Post-hatching development of the porcine and bovine embryo-defining criteria for expected development in vivo and in vitro. Theriogenology. 2006, 65: 153-165. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.021.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Conley AJ, Christenson LK, Ford SP, Christenson RK: Immunocytochemical localization of cytochromes P450 17 alpha-hydroxylase and aromatase in embryonic cell layers of elongating porcine blastocysts. Endocrinology. 1994, 135: 2248-2254.Google Scholar
  76. Fujii T, Sakurai N, Osaki T, Iwagami G, Hirayama H, Minamihashi A, Hashizume T, Sawai K: Changes in the expression patterns of the genes involved in the segregation and function of inner cell mass and trophectoderm lineages during porcine preimplantation development. J Reprod Dev. 2013, 59: 151-158. 10.1262/jrd.2012-122.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Shimokawa K, Kimura-Yoshida C, Nagai N, Mukai K, Matsubara K, Watanabe H, Matsuda Y, Mochida K, Matsuo I: Cell surface heparan sulfate chains regulate local reception of FGF signaling in the mouse embryo. Dev Cell. 2011, 21: 257-272. 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.06.027.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Ornitz DM: FGFs, heparan sulfate and FGFRs: complex interactions essential for development. Bioessays. 2000, 22: 108-112. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(200002)22:2<108::AID-BIES2>3.0.CO;2-M.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Ross JW, Ashworth MD, Hurst AG, Malayer JR, Geisert RD: Analysis and characterization of differential gene expression during rapid trophoblastic elongation in the pig using suppression subtractive hybridization. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2003, 1: 23-10.1186/1477-7827-1-23.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Blomberg LA, Long EL, Sonstegard TS, Van Tassell CP, Dobrinsky JR, Zuelke KA: Serial analysis of gene expression during elongation of the peri-implantation porcine trophectoderm (conceptus). Physiol Genomics. 2005, 20: 188-194. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00157.2004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Morgan GL, Geisert RD, Zavy MT, Fazleabas AT: Development and survival of pig blastocysts after oestrogen administration on day 9 or days 9 and 10 of pregnancy. J Reprod Fertil. 1987, 80: 133-141. 10.1530/jrf.0.0800133.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Tou W, Harney JP, Bazer FW: Developmentally regulated expression of interleukin-1β by peri-implantation conceptuses in swine. J Reprod Immunol. 1996, 31: 185-198. 10.1016/0165-0378(96)00975-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Mantovani A, Muzio M, Ghessi P, Colotta C, Introna M: Regulation of inhibitory pathways of the interleukin-1 system. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998, 840: 338-351. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09573.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Seo H, Kim M, Choi Y, Ka H: Salivary lipocalin is uniquely expressed in the uterine endometrial glands at the time of conceptus implantation and induced by interleukin 1beta in pigs. Biol Reprod. 2011, 84: 279-287. 10.1095/biolreprod.110.086934.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Seo H, Choi Y, Shim J, Choi Y, Ka H: Regulatory mechanism for expression of IL1B receptors in the uterine endometrium and effects of IL1B on prostaglandin synthetic enzymes during the implantation period in pigs. Biol Reprod. 2012, 87: 1-11. 10.1095/biolreprod.112.101691.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Ross JW, Malayer JR, Ritchey JW, Geisert RD: Characterization of the interleukin-1beta system during porcine trophoblastic elongation and early placental attachment. Biol Reprod. 2003, 69: 1251-1259. 10.1095/biolreprod.103.015842.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Mathew DJ, Newsom EM, Geisert RD, Green JA, Tuggle CK, Lucy MC: Characterization of nucleotide and predicted amino acid sequence of a porcine Interleukin-1 beta variant expressed in elongated porcine embryos. J Anim Sci. 2011, 89 (E-suppl): 2.Google Scholar
  88. Groenen MA, Archibald AL, Uenishi H, Tuggle CK, Takeuchi Y, Rothschild MF, Rogel-Gaillard C, Park C, Milan D, Megens HJ, Li S, Larkin DM, Kim H, Frantz LA, Caccamo M, Ahn H, Aken BL, Anselmo A, Anthon C, Auvil L, Badaoui B, Beattie CW, Bendixen C, Berman D, Blecha F, Blomberg J, Bolund L, Bosse M, Botti S, Bujie Z, et al: Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution. Nature. 2012, 491: 393-398. 10.1038/nature11622.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Waclawik A, Kaczynski P, Jabbour HN: Autocrine and paracrine mechanisms of prostaglandin E2 action on trophoblast/conceptus cells through the prostaglandin E2 receptor (PTGER2) during implantation. Endocrinology. 2013, 154: 3864-3876. 10.1210/en.2012-2271.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Ross JW, Ashworth MD, Mathew D, Reagan P, Ritchey JW, Hayashi K, Spencer TE, Lucy M, Geisert RD: Activation of the transcription factor, nuclear factor kappa-B, during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy in the pig. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010, 8: 39-10.1186/1477-7827-8-39.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Ali S, Mann DA: Signal transduction via the NF-κB pathway: targeted treatment modality for infection, inflammation and repair. Cell Biochem Funct. 2004, 22: 67-79. 10.1002/cbf.1082.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Nestler JE: Interleukin-1 stimulates the aromatase activity of human placental cytotrophoblasts. Endocrinology. 1993, 132: 566-570.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Kol S, Kehat I, Adashi EY: Ovarian interleukin-1-induced gene expression: privileged genes threshold theory. Med Hypotheses. 2002, 58: 6-8. 10.1054/mehy.2001.1389.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Geisert RD, Rasby RJ, Minton JE, Wetteman RP: Role of prostaglandins in development of porcine blastocysts. Prostaglandins. 1986, 31: 191-204.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Dorniak P, Bazer FW, Spencer TE: Prostaglandins regulate conceptus elongation and mediate effects of interferon tau on the ovine uterine endometrium. Biol Reprod. 2011, 84: 1119-1127. 10.1095/biolreprod.110.089979.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. White FJ, Kimball EM, Wyman G, Stein DR, Ross JW, Ashworth MD, Geisert RD: Estrogen and interleukin-1beta regulation of trophinin, osteopontin, cyclooxygenase-1, cyclooxygenase-2, and interleukin-1beta system in the porcine uterus. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2009, 66: 203-204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Wilson ME, Fahrenkrug SC, Smith TPL, Rohrer GA, Ford SP: Differential expression of cyclooxygenase-2 around the time of elongation in the pig conceptus. Anim Reprod Sci. 2002, 71: 229-237. 10.1016/S0378-4320(02)00029-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Franczak A, Zmijewska A, Kurowicka B, Wojciechowicz B, Kotwica G: Interleukin 1β-induced synthesis and secretion of prostaglandin E2 in the porcine uterus during various periods of pregnancy and the estrous cycle. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2010, 61: 733-742.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Franczak A, Zmijewska A, Kurowicka B, Wojciechowicz B, Petroff BK, Kotwica G: The effect of tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), interleukin 1β (IL1β) and interleukin 6 (IL6) on endometrial PGF2α synthesis, metabolism and release in early-pregnant pigs. Theriogenology. 2012, 77: 155-165. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.07.029.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Waclawik A, Blitek A, Kaczmarek MM, Kiewisz J, Ziecik AJ: Antiluteolytic mechanisms and the establishment of pregnancy in the pig. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2009, 66: 307-320.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Sawai K, Matsuzaki N, Okada T, Shimoya K, Koyama M, Azuma C, Saji F, Murata Y: Human decidual cell biosynthesis of leukemia inhibitory factor: regulation by decidual cytokines and steroid hormones. Biol Reprod. 1997, 56: 1274-1280. 10.1095/biolreprod56.5.1274.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Perrier D’Hauterive S, Charlet-Renard C, Berndt S, Dubois M, Munaut C, Goffin F, Hagelstein MT, Noël A, Hazout A, Foidart JM, Geenen V: Human chorionic gonadotropin and growth factors at the embryonic-endometrial interface control leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) secretion by human endometrial epithelium. Hum Reprod. 2004, 19: 2633-2643. 10.1093/humrep/deh450.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  103. Gonzalez RR, Leary K, Petrozza JC, Leavis PC: Leptin regulation of the interleukin-1 system in human endometrial cells. Mol Hum Reprod. 2003, 9: 151-158. 10.1093/molehr/gag022.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Kauma SW, Turner TT, Harty JR: Interleukin-1 beta stimulates interleukin-6 production in placental villous core mesenchymal cells. Endocrinology. 1994, 134: 457-460.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Nakamura H, Kimura T, Ogita K, Koyama S, Tsujie T, Tsutsui T, Shimoya K, Koyama M, Kaneda Y, Murata Y: Alteration of the timing of implantation by in vivo gene transfer: delay of implantation by suppression of nuclear factor kappaB activity and partial rescue by leukemia inhibitory factor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004, 321: 886-892. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.07.045.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  106. Jasper MJ, Care AS, Sullivan B, Ingman WV, Aplin JD, Robertson SA: Macrophage-derived LIF and IL1B regulate alpha(1,2)fucosyltransferase 2 (Fut2) expression in mouse uterine epithelial cells during early pregnancy. Biol Reprod. 2011, 84: 179-188. 10.1095/biolreprod.110.085399.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Samborski A, Graf A, Krebs S, Kessler B, Reichenbach M, Reichenbach HD, Ulbrich SE, Bauersachs S: Transcriptome changes in the porcine endometrium during the preattachment phase. Biol Reprod. 2013, 89: 134-10.1095/biolreprod.113.112177.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Franczak A, Wojciechowicz B, Kotwica G: Transcriptomic analysis of the porcine endometrium during early pregnancy and the estrous cycle. Reprod Biol. 2013, 13: 229-237. 10.1016/j.repbio.2013.07.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Kiewisz J, Krawczynski K, Lisowski P, Blitek A, Zwierzchowski L, Ziecik AJ, Kaczmarek MM: Global gene expression profiling of porcine endometria on Days 12 and 16 of the estrous cycle and pregnancy. Theriogenology. 2014, 82: 897-909. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.07.009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Østrup E, Bauersachs S, Blum H, Wolf E, Hyttel P: Differential endometrial gene expression in pregnant and nonpregnant sows. Biol Reprod. 2010, 83: 277-285. 10.1095/biolreprod.109.082321.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  111. Robb L, Li R, Hartley L, Nandurkar HH, Koentgen F, Begley CG: Infertility in female mice lacking the receptor for interleukin 11 is due to a defective uterine response to implantation. Nat Med. 1998, 4: 303-308. 10.1038/nm0398-303.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  112. Paiva P, Salamonsen LA, Manuelpillai U, Dimitriadis E: Interleukin 11 inhibits human trophoblast invasion indicating a likely role in the decidual restraint of trophoblast invasion during placentation. Biol Reprod. 2009, 80: 302-310. 10.1095/biolreprod.108.071415.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  113. Okamura H, Tsutsi H, Komatsu T, Yutsudo M, Hakura A, Tanimoto T, Torigoe K, Okura T, Nukada Y, Hattori K: Cloning of a new cytokine that induces IFN-gamma production by T-cells. Nature. 1995, 15: 379-384.Google Scholar
  114. Ashworth MD, Ross JW, Stein DR, White FJ, Desilva UW, Geisert RD: Endometrial caspase 1 and interleukin-18 expression during the estrous cycle and peri-implantation period of porcine pregnancy and response to early exogenous estrogen administration. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010, 8: 33-10.1186/1477-7827-8-33.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  115. Hentze H, Lin XY, Choi MS, Porter AG: Critical role for cathepsin B in mediating caspase-1 dependant IL18 maturation and caspase-1 independent necrosis triggered by the microbial toxin nigericin. Cell Death Differ. 2003, 10: 956-968. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401264.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  116. Fantuzzi G, Dinarello CA: Interleukin-18 and interleukin-1β: two cytokine substrates for ICE (caspase-1). J Clin Immunol. 1999, 19: 1-11. 10.1023/A:1020506300324.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  117. Cencic A, La Bonnardière C: Trophoblastic interferon-gamma: current knowledge and possible role(s) in early pig pregnancy. Vet Res. 2002, 33: 139-157. 10.1051/vetres:2002003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  118. Arend WP, Palmer G, Gabay C: IL-1, IL-18, and IL-33 families of cytokines. Immunol Rev. 2008, 223: 20-38. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00624.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  119. Lee J-K, Kim S-H, Lewis EC, Azam T, Reznikov LL, Dinarello CA: Differences in signaling pathways by IL1B and IL18. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2004, 101: 8815-8820. 10.1073/pnas.0402800101.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  120. Pomerantz BJ, Reznikov LL, Harken AH, Dinarello CA: Inhibition of caspase 1 reduces human myocardial ischemic dysfunction via inhibition of IL-18 and IL-1beta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98: 2871-2876. 10.1073/pnas.041611398.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  121. Joyce MM, Burghardt RC, Geisert RD, Burghardt JR, Hooper RN, Ross JW, Ashworth MD, Johnson GA: Pig conceptuses secrete estrogen and IFN-γ to differentially regulate uterine STAT 1 in a temporal and cell type-specific manner. Endocrinology. 2007, 198: 4420-4431.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  122. Hadfield KA, McCracken SA, Ashton AW, Nguyen TG, Morris JM: Regulated suppression of NF-κB throughout pregnancy maintains a favourable cytokine environment necessary for pregnancy success. J Reprod Immunol. 2011, 89: 1-9. 10.1016/j.jri.2010.11.008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  123. Ostojic S, Dubanchet S, Chaouat G, Abdelkarim M, Truyens C, Capron F: Demonstration of the presence of IL-16, IL-17 and IL-18 at the murine fetomaternal interface during murine pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2003, 49: 101-112. 10.1034/j.1600-0897.2003.01150.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  124. Joyce MM, Burghardt JR, Burghardt RC, Hooper RN, Jaeger LA, Spencer TE, Bazer FW, Johnson GA: Pig conceptuses increase uterine interferon-regulatory factor 1 (IRF1), but restrict expression to stroma through estrogen-induced IRF2 in luminal epithelium. Biol Reprod. 2007, 77: 292-302. 10.1095/biolreprod.107.060939.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  125. La Bonnardière C, Martinat-Botte F, Terqui M, Lefèvre F, Zouari K, Martal J, Bazer FW: Production of two species of interferon by Large White and Meishan pig conceptuses during the peri-attachment period. J Reprod Fertil. 1991, 91: 469-478. 10.1530/jrf.0.0910469.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  126. Lefèvre F, Martinat-Botté F, Guillomot M, Zouari K, Charley B, La Bonnardière C: Interferon-gamma gene and protein are spontaneously expressed by the porcine trophectoderm early in gestation. Eur J Immunol. 1990, 20: 2485-2490. 10.1002/eji.1830201119.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  127. Joyce MM, Burghardt JR, Burghardt RC, Hooper RN, Bazer FW, Johnson GA: Uterine MHC class I molecules and beta 2-microglobulin are regulated by progesterone and conceptus interferons during pig pregnancy. J Immunol. 2008, 181: 2494-2505. 10.4049/jimmunol.181.4.2494.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  128. Harney JP, Bazer FW: Effect of porcine conceptus secretory proteins on interestrous interval and uterine secretion of prostaglandins. Biol Reprod. 1989, 41: 277-284. 10.1095/biolreprod41.2.277.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  129. Hicks BA, Etter SJ, Carnahan KG, Joyce MM, Assiri AA, Carling SJ, Kodali K, Johnson GA, Hansen TR, Mirando MA, Woods GL, Vanderwall DK, Ott TL: Expression of the uterine Mx protein in cyclic and pregnant cows, gilts, and mares. J Anim Sci. 2003, 81: 1552-1561.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Cencic A, Guillomot M, Koren S, La Bonnardière C: Trophoblastic interferons: do they modulate uterine cellular markers at the time of conceptus attachment in the pig?. Placenta. 2003, 24: 862-869. 10.1016/S0143-4004(03)00135-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  131. Keys JL, King GJ, Kennedy TG: Increased uterine vascular permeability at the time of embryonic attachment in the pig. Biol Reprod. 1986, 34: 405-411. 10.1095/biolreprod34.2.405.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  132. Garlanda C, Dinarello CA, Mantovani A: The interleukin-1 family: back to the future. Immunity. 2013, 39: 1003-1018. 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.11.010.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  133. Edwards AK, Wessels JM, Kerr A, Tayade C: An overview of molecular and cellular mechanisms associated with porcine pregnancy success or failure. Reprod Domest Anim. 2012, 47 (Suppl 4): 394-401.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  134. Wessels JM, Linton NF, Croy BA, Tayade C: A review of molecular contrasts between arresting and viable porcine attachment sites. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2007, 58: 470-480. 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2007.00534.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  135. Serhan CN: Pro-resolving lipid mediators are leads for resolution physiology. Nature. 2014, 510: 92-101. 10.1038/nature13479.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  136. Morgan GL, Geisert RD, Zavy MT, Shawley RV, Fazleabas AT: Development of porcine blastocysts in an uterine environment advanced by exogenous oestrogen. J Reprod Fert. 1987, 80: 125-131. 10.1530/jrf.0.0800125.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  137. Gries LK, Geisert RD, Zavy MT, Garrett JE, Morgan GL: Uterine secretory alterations coincident with embryonic mortality in the gilt after exogenous estrogen administration. J Anim Sci. 1989, 67: 276-284.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Ross JW, Ashworth MD, White FJ, Johnson GA, Ayoubi PJ, DeSilva U, Whitworth KM, Prather RS, Geisert RD: Premature estrogen exposure alters endometrial gene expression to disrupt pregnancy in the pig. Endocrinology. 2007, 148: 4761-4773. 10.1210/en.2007-0599.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Geisert et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement